Pricing of Information Distribution Based on Comparability and Market Inefficiency | ||
| تحقیقات مالی | ||
| Article 7, Volume 20, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 531-553 PDF (468.8 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/frj.2018.263423.1006711 | ||
| Author | ||
| Mohsen Rashidi Baqhi | ||
| Assistant Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Objective: Flow of information is a key parameter in an economic activity and acts as a crucial factor in the emergence, stability and efficiency of capital markets. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of the comparability and ineffectiveness of the market on the value of information and changes in the distribution of accounting information. Methods: For this purpose, the data of the firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange for the period of 2006 to 2016 were extracted and the regression model of the pooled data was used to test the research hypothesis. Results: The results of the research show that information asymmetry, comparability and market inefficiency have a significant effect on the expected returns (cost of capital) of investors. On the other hand, the interactive effects of comparability and imperfect market on the relationship between information asymmetry and cost of capital have been confirmed. Finally, the results of the research show that information asymmetry is a function of comparability and that the capital cost resulting from information asymmetry fluctuate and varies at different levels of comparability. Conclusion: Information asymmetry and market inefficiency can increase the firm's cost of capital, as less informed traders recognize that they are in a bad state of information and therefore maintain fewer assets within the market. The comparability along with creating high-quality information reduces the overall ambiguity and thus reduces the benefits that particular investors receive from private information about the company. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Information Asymmetry; Comparability; Imperfect market | ||
| References | ||
|
References Akins, B., Ng, J. & Verdi, R. (2012). Investor competition over information and the pricing of information asymmetry. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 35–58.
Armstrong, C., Core, J., Taylor, D. & Verrecchia, R. (2011). When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital? Journal of Accounting Research, 49 (1), 1-40.
Biddle, G., Hilary, G., Verdi, R.S. (2010). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 58-74.
Brown, S. & Hillegiest, S.A. (2007). How Disclosure Quality Affects the Levelof Information Asymmetry. Review of Accounting Studies, 12(2-3), 443–477.
Chang, E., Lin, T., Ma, X. (2014). Governance through trading and corporate investment decisions. Working paper, University of Hong Kong.
Chen, C., Xiumin, M., Roychowdhury, S., Xin, W., & Matthew, B. (2016). Clarity Begins at Home: Internal Information Asymmetry and External Communication Quality. Forthcoming the Accounting Review, 93(1), 71-101.
Choi, J.-H., Choi, S., Myers, L. & Ziebart, D. (2014). Financial Statement Comparability and the Ability of Current Stock Returns to Reflect the Information in Future Earnings. available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 2337571.
Cohen, D. (2008). Does Information Risk Really Matter? An Analysis of the Determinants and Economic Consequences of Financial Reporting Quality. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 69-90.
Dastgir, M., Bazaz zadeh, H. (2003). Effect of mandatory disclosure on cost of equity capital. Financial Research Journal, 5(2), 83-103. (in Persian)
Davallou, M., Azizi, N. (2017). The Investigation of Information Risk Pricing; Evidence from Adjusted Probability of Informed Trading Measure. Financial Research Journal, 19(3), 415-438. (in Persian)
De Franco, G., Kothari, S., Verdi, R. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49 (4), 895–931.
Diamond, D. & Verrecchia, D. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46 (4), 1325-1359.
Dou, Y., Hope, O., Thomas, W., Zou, Y. (2015). Block holder exit threats and financial reporting quality. Working paper, University of Toronto.
Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 59 (4), 1553-1583.
Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S., & O’Hara, M. (2002). Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2185–2221.
Fishman, M., & Hagerty, K. (1992). Insider trading and the efficiency of stock prices. RAND Journal of Economics, 23, 106-122.
Fu, R., Kraft, A. and Zhang, H. (2012). Financial reporting frequency, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(2-3), 132-149.
Ghorbani, A., Soroshyar, A. (2017). The Effect of Earnings Comparability and Cash Flows and Accruals Components on Information Asymmetry. Accounting Empirical Research of Financial, 4(3), 143-160. (in Persian)
Gomes, A., Gorton, G. and Madureira, L. (2006). SEC Regulation Fair Disclosure, Information, and the Cost of Capital. Working Paper. Washington University, University of Pennsylvania; Case Western Reserve University.
Imhof, M.J., Seavey, S.E., & Smith, D.B. (2017). Comparability and Cost of Equity Capital. Accounting Horizons, 31(2), 125-138.
Jamshidi, N., ghalibaf asl, H. (2018). Studying the Effect of Investors’ Personality on their Business Behavior and Investment Performance: Evidences of Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Research Journal, 20(1), 75-90. (in Persian)
Kordestani, G., Tayefeh, S. (2013). Earnings Attributes and Cost of Equity. Financial Research Journal, 15(1), 75-94. (in Persian)
Kyle, A. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trade. Econometrica 53, 1315–1335.
Lambert, R. & Verrecchia, R. (2010). Cost of Capital in Imperfect Competition Settings. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
Lambert, R., C. Leuz, & Verrecchia, R. (2012). Information asymmetry, information precision, and the cost of capital. Review of Finance, 16 (1), 1-29.
Lauri, A. (2003). Asymmetric Information: Theory and Applications. Tu-91. 167 Seminar in Strategy and International Business.
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91-124.
Levitt, A. (1998). The Importance of High Quality Accounting Standards. Accounting Horizons, 12, 79-82.
Lin, T.J., Chen, Y.P., Tsai, H.F. (2017). The relationship among information asymmetry, dividend policy and ownership structure. Finance Research Letters, 20, 1-12.
Lundholm, R. & Myers, L. (2002). Bringing the future forward: The effect ofdisclosure on the returns earnings relation. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 809-839.
Mehrara, M., Soheyli Ahmadi, H. (2018). Arrival Dynamics of Informed and Uninformed Traders into Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Research Journal, 20(3), 265-288. (in Persian) Mehrvarz, F., Marfou, M. (2016). The Relationship between Financial Statements Comparability with Stock Price in Formativeness about Future Earnings. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 13(49), 83-110. (in Persian)
Merton, R. (1987). A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information. Journal of Finance, 43, 483-510.
Sohn, B. C. (2016). The effect of accounting comparability on the accrual-based and real earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 513–539.
Stiglitz L. (2003). Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 123-142.
Stiglitz L. (2004). Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1), 71-100.
Van Buskirk, A. (2012). Disclosure frequency and information asymmetry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 38, 411–440.
Verdi, R. (2005). Information Environment and the Cost of Capital, Working paper, MIT.
Verrecchia, R. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting andEconomics, 32, 97-180. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,344 PDF Download: 1,189 |
||