پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,973,761 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,645,967 |
بررسی جایگاه افغانستان جدید در مجموعه‌های امنیتی منطقه‌ای از آسیای مرکزی تا آسیای جنوبی | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 11، شماره 2، مهر 1397، صفحه 399-416 اصل مقاله (668.68 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2019.216523.449668 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید احمد فاطمی‌نژاد* 1؛ علیرضا محمدزاده2 | ||
| 1استادیار روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این نوشتار بررسی جایگاه افغانستان در مجموعه‌های امنیتی منطقه‌ای است. با تغییر روابط دوقطبی جنگ سرد، مناطق و جایگاه کشورها در آن‌ها نقش مهمی در تحلیل‌های امنیتی پیدا کردند؛ اما پژوهشگران مختلف دربارۀ جایگاه کشورها در مناطق امنیتی دیدگاه‌های متفاوتی دارند. افغانستان از کشورهایی است که در مورد آن رویکردهای مختلفی وجود دارد و آن را در مجموعه‌های امنیتی گوناگونی قرار می‌دهند. پرسش اصلی نوشتار حاضر این است که افغانستان در کدام مجموعۀ امنیتی منطقه‌ای قرار می‌گیرد. در پاسخ، این فرضیه مطرح می‌شود که افغانستان با توجه به نزدیکی جغرافیایی، وابستگی‌های امنیتی، گسترش روابط اقتصادی و وجود الگوهای دوستی و دشمنی با کشورهای جنوب آسیا در مجموعۀ امنیتی منطقۀ آسیای جنوبی قرار می‌گیرد. برای بررسی این فرضیه از نظریۀ مجموعۀ امنیتی منطقه‌ای استفاده می‌شود. روش آزمون فرضیه، دوبعدی است و از روش‌های مقایسه‌ای و برهان خلف استفاده می‌شود. با استفاده از این روش، ابتدا نشان داده می‌شود که با وجود شباهت‌های فراوان افغانستان با کشورهای خاورمیانه و آسیای مرکزی، عوامل متعددی سبب می‌شود که افغانستان خارج از مجموعه‌های امنیتی آسیای مرکزی و خاورمیانه قرار گیرد. سپس با توجه به شاخص‌های شکل‌گیری مجموعه‌های امنیتی، روابط افغانستان با منطقۀ آسیای جنوبی و به‌ویژه دو قدرت تأثیرگذار در این منطقه یعنی هند و پاکستان بررسی می‌شود. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که با تشدید رقابت هند و پاکستان در افغانستان، حضور این کشور در مجموعۀ امنیتی آسیای جنوبی به واقعیت نزدیک‌تر است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| افغانستان؛ الگوهای دوستی و دشمنی؛ مجموعۀ امنیتی منطقه‌ای؛ نزدیکی جغرافیایی؛ وابستگی‌های امنیتی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Studying the Status of the New Afghanistan among Regional Security Complexes: from Central Asia to South Asia | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed Ahmad Fatemi Nejad1؛ Alireza Mohammadzadeh2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of International Relations, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad | ||
| 2M.A. in International Relations, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The article aims to study the place of Afghanistan among regional security complexes including South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East. During the Cold War period, Afghanistan was located at the center of US-USSR competitions. Lastly, the dyadic tension led to invasion of the country by the USSR Red Army and its occupation. Thanks to presence of former Soviet Union in Afghanistan, an ‘overlay’ came into existence influencing the security processes of the state. So, the end of the war in the Afghanistan was a pivotal accident in the late of bipolar era. The end of the cold war coincided with rising incidents and concepts such as multi-dimensional security, security regionalism, and new regionalism. In other words, regions and the status of different countries among them were playing an important role in security analysis. Regarding the process, Afghanistan’s status was subjected to change in security analysis. Afghanistan had lost its geostrategic importance after the cold war, but it was regained after the 11/9 terrorist operations. The operations obliged the United States to fight against terrorism and try for democratization of Islamic world under the frameworks like ‘the Great Middle East’ and ‘the Greater Middle East’ – all of them set Afghanistan on the Middle Eastern security complex. Transiting responsibilities to Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and reducing American troops in Afghanistan, historical-cultural relations between Afghanistan and Central Asia was highlighted and pushed the Country to Central Asian security complex. Meanwhile, Indo-Pak conflict and its externalities for Afghanistan security tie the late state in South Asian security complex. So, the main question here is which security complex does include Afghanistan. Answering the question, there are three approaches as follow: a) The first approach sets a link between Afghanistan and the Middle Eastern security complex. b) The second attitude ties Afghanistan in Central Asian security complex. c) The third view argues that Afghanistan is an ‘insulator state’ which puts on borders of regional security complexes including Middle Eastern, central and south Asian ones. But our hypothesis is that given the geographical proximity, security dependencies, economic interdependence, and patterns of amity and enmity, Afghanistan is located within South Asian security complex. Studying the hypothesis, regional security complex theory and bi-dimensional method including comparison and proof by contradiction has been used. Using this method, first, it is demonstrated that several factors take Afghanistan away from the Middle Eastern security and Central Asian one, notwithstanding the vast similarity among them. Then, regarding indices of security complexes, Afghanistan’s relations with South Asia especially India and Pakistan are examined. It seems that regional security complex theory could be helpful here. Security complex theory was first sketched out by Barry Buzan. Security complexes address the level of region located between national units and international system. So, the theory focuses on the regions as objects of security analysis, and offers an analytical framework for dealing with them. The aim of this theory is to highlight the relative autonomy of regional security relations. In this regard, seven factors including geographical neighborhood, models of amity and enmity, existence of two influential actors, relative independence, security interdependence, cultural-civilizational relationships, and economic relations has been examined in many regions from the Middle East to south and east of Asia. Under the above-mentioned theory, it is possible to test our hypothesis in below sections: a) Geographical neighborhood: Afghanistan and South Asian countries, especially India and Pakistan, have similarities in geographical policy. These similarities including: vicinity to China and East Asia, direct or indirect accessibility to Indian Ocean, being subject to historically common external threat especially by United Kingdom, and so forth. b) Models of amity and enmity: in this section, problems such as borders disputes, ethnical concerns, historical relations and other similar issues are in mind. In this regard, Pashto-ethnicity concerns has casted a shadow on Afghanistan-Pakistan bilateral relations. c) Existence of two influential regional actors: formation of regional security complex depends on the presence of at least two players. In this case, everyone accepts that India and Pakistan are two key actors in South Asia. Both of them are playing very important roles in the economic and political process at their surrounding environment. d) Relative independence: next factor influencing the security complex is relative independence in security relations of one region regarding another ones. It seems that security processes of South Asian security complex are independent of other security complexes. e) Security interdependence: the fate of a security-complex members relate together negatively or positively. According this, the security of Afghanistan depends on South Asian security by whether common agreement or joint threats. For example, both Afghanistan and other countries of South Asia are subject to threats caused by nuclear proliferation or terrorism. Alongside, all of them are members of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) which could facilitate their relations. f) Cultural-civilizational relationships: Afghanistan and South Asian countries are the successors of the historical governments which have joint traditions. These traditions, today, constitute a basis for vast linkage between the nations. For example, Pakistan TVs shows Pashto films and many Afghans and Pakistanis welcome Bollywood films. g) Economic relations: Afghanistan and South Asian countries, especially India and Pakistan are among the economic partners of each other experiencing a wide bilateral trade. For example, Afghanistan is the second great market of Pakistani commodities. Lastly, findings show that different factors including above-mentioned ones as well as spilling Indian-Pakistani conflict over Afghanistan place the late country on the South Asian security complex. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Afghanistan, Geographical Proximity, Patterns of Amity and Enmity, Regional Security Complex, Security Dependencies | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
A) English
1. Buzan, B. and Ole Waever (2003), Regions and Powers:The Structure of International Security, Cambridge University Press.
2. Gibbs, D. N. (2000), “Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion in Retrospect”, International Politics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 233-246.
3. Golunov, S. (2006), “Drug Trafficking as a Challenge for Russia’s Security and Border Policies, Budapest”, Open Society Institute, Available at: http://www.policy.hu/golunov/policypaper_Golunov.pdf, (Accessed on: 12/11/2017). 4. Guney, A. and F. Gokcan (2010), “The “Greater Middle East” as a “Modern” Geopolitical Imagination in American Foreign Policy”, Geopolitics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 22-38. 5. Hameed, S. (2012), Prospect for Indian-Pakistan Cooperation in Afghanistan, New York: Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS). 6. Henderson, N. (2015), “2015 Terrorism and Political Violence Risk Map - a Guide: Aon’s Guide to Terrorism and Political Violence Risk”, Available at: https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/uk/special-reports/aon-risk-solutions-2015-terrorism-and-political-violence-risk-map-29529.aspx, (Accessed on: 11/8/2018). 7. Kassenova, N. (2014), “Relations between Afghanistan and Central Asian States after 2014 (Incentives, Constraints and Prospects)”, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Available at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/ default/files/files/misc/SIPRI14wcaNK.pdf, (Accessed on: 10/8/2017). 8. Katzman, K. (2015), “Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy”, Congressional Research Service, Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL30588.pdf, (Accessed on: 6/11/2018). 9. Keshavarzian, A. (2007), “The Muslim World is not Flat”, Middle East Research and Information Project, Inc. (MERIP), Available at: https://www.merip.org/mer/mer242/muslim-world-not-flat, (Accessed on: 10/8/2016). 10. King, M. and B. Sturtewagen (2010), Making the Most of Afghanistan’s River Basins: Opportunities for Regional Cooperation, the East West Institute. 11. Laruelle, M., S. Peyrouse and V. Axyonova (2013), “The Afghanistan-Central Asia Relationship: What Role for the EU?”, EUCAM, Working Paper No. 13, Available at: http://fride.org/descarga/EUCAM_WP13_Afghanistan.pdf, (Accessed on: 11/9/2017). 12. Mitton, J. (2014), “India-Pakistan Rivalry and Failure in Afghanistan”, International Journal, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 353–376.
13. Muzaffary, F. R. (2008), “Regional Security and NATO”, Policy Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 35-52. 14. Özalp, N. O. (2011), “Where is the Middle East? the Definition and Classification Problem of the Middle East as a Regional Subsystem in International Relations”, TJP Turkish Journal of Politics,Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 5-21. 15. Pant, B., S. Pradhan and S. Gartaula (2014), “Regional Cooperation and Integration in South Asia: Nepal Perspective”, 15th Annual GDN Conference, Accra-Ghana, Available at: https://docplayer.net/46935813-Regional-cooperation-and-integration-in-south-asia-nepal-perspective-1.html, (Accessed on: 6/11/2018). 16. Paramonov, V. and A. Strokov (2006), “Russia and Central Asia: Current and Future Economic Relations”, Conflict Studies Research Centre Central Asian Series, Vol. 6, No. 31, pp. 1-13. 17. Parto, S. and Others (2012), “Afghanistan and Regional Trade: More, or Less, Imports from Central Asia?”, University of Central Asia: Institute of Policy and Adminstration, Working Paper No. 3, pp. 1-38. 18. POMEPS Studies (2014), “Visions of Gulf Security”,Available at: https://pomeps.org/2014/03/25/visions-of-gulf-security/, (Accessed on: 2/6/2017). 19. Price, G. (2013), “India’s Policy towards Afghanistan”, Available at: www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/.../0813pp_indiaafghanistan.pdf, (Accessed on: 20/8/2016). 20. Wagner, Ch. )2014(, “Security Cooperation in South Asia: Overview, Reasons, Prospects”, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, pp. 1-22, Available at: https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/ research_papers/2014_RP06_wgn.pdf, (Accessed on: 6/11/2018). B) Persian
1. Aghajari, Mohammad Javad and Simin Sadat Rostamifar (2012), “SAARC and its Impact on Regionalism”, International Relations, Vol. 5, No. 20, pp. 9-39.
2. Ahmadipoor, Zahra and Others (2010), “A Geopolitical Analysis on Oppurtunities and Challenges of West Asian Integration”, Geography and Regional Programming, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 77-108.
3. Azizi, Hamidreza (2018), “Analyzing Iran’s Security Ties with Central Asia Based on the Regional Security Complexes Theory”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 157-175.
4. Buzan, Barry (1999), People, States, and Fear, Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies.
5. Buzan, Barry (2012), “Logic of Regional Security in the Post-Cold-War World”, in: B. Hettne, A. Inotai and O. Sunkel, The New Regionalism and the Future of Security and Development, Translated by A. Tayeb, Tehran: Publication of Foreign Ministry, pp. 47-84.
6. Buzan, Barry and Ole Waever (2009), Regions and Powers: Structure of Interntional Security, Translated by R. Ghahramanpour, Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies.
7. Buzan, Barry and Others (2007), Security: a New Framework for Analysis, Translated by A. Tayeb, Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies.
8. Dadandish, Parvin and Vali Koozegar Kaleji (2010), “A Critical Study on Regional Security Complex Theory Using Security Invironment of South Caucasus”, Rahbord, Vol. 19, No. 56, pp. 73-107.
9. Farajollahi, Ghasem (2010), “Geopolitics of Persian Gulf, Iran, US: Threats and Opportunities of I.R. Iran”, Islam, Politics, and International Structure, pp. 3-22.
10. Hekmatnia, Hasan (2004), “Afghanistan: Asian Heartland”, Peyke Noor, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 84-96.
11. Hettne, Bjorn, A. Inotai and O. Sunkel (2012), The New Regionalism and the Future of Security and Development, Translated by A. Tayeb, Tehran: Publication of Foreign Ministry.
12. Jom’e-i, Rohollah (2009), Greater Middle East, Tehran: Irna.
13. Moosazadeh, Reza and Mahdi Ebrahiminejad (2008), International Monetry and Financial Organizations, Tehran: Samt.
14. Moradi, Manuchehr and Parvin Moazami Goodarzi (2009), “Enlargement NATO in Central Asia and Caucasus: Dimentions and Results”, in: 15th Conference on Central Asia and Caucasus, Tehran: Publication of Foreign Ministry, pp. 125-143.
15. Mousavi, Seyed Mohammad and Others (2012), “The Impact of Energy Pipe Lines on Geopolitic of Central Asia and Caucasus”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 18, No. 80, pp. 147-169.
16. Rahim Safavi, Seyed Yahya and Abdolmahdi Sheikhani (2010), “Long-Term and Short-Term Objectives of United States from Military Invation to Afghnistan”, Human Geografi, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 1-24.
17. Sajjadpoor, Seyed Mohammad Kazem and Mohammad Taghi Jahanbakhsh (2013), “Russian Security Policy toward New Afghanistan”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 19, No. 84, pp. 31-62.
18. Shafiee, Nawzar (2017), “Consolidation of USA and India in Great Game Power in Central Asia”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 101-116.
19. Tamanna, Faramarz (2008), US Foreign Policy toward Afghanistan, Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies.
20. Tamanna, Faramarz (2014), Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy under Regional Cooperation, Kabol: Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry Center for Strategic Studies.
21. Williams, Paul D. (2013), Security Studies: an Introduction, Translated by A. Tayeb, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,688 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,184 |
||