پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,766 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,217,913 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,964,453 |
سنجش مطلوبیت کیفیت محیطی در مناطق روستایی (مورد مطالعه: روستاهای استان لرستان) | ||
| پژوهشهای روستائی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 11، شماره 1، خرداد 1399، صفحه 106-123 اصل مقاله (4.2 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2019.264052.1279 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رضا نعمتی1؛ مهدی پورطاهری* 2؛ عبدالرضا رکن الدین افتخاری3 | ||
| 1دکتری، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش سنجش مطلوبیت کیفیت محیطی در مناطق روستایی و همچنین بررسی مهم‌ترین مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار در کیفیت محیطی از دیدگاه جامعه نمونه در روستاهای استان لرستان است. ابتدا برای مشخص نمودن روستاهای موردمطالعه مهم‌ترین شاخص‌ها و مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار در کیفیت محیطی در مناطق روستایی استان لرستان مورد شناسایی قرار گرفت. با استفاده از شاخص مرکزیت، روستاهای موردمطالعه در 5 طبقه تقسیم‌بندی شدند، سپس تعداد روستاهای هر طبقه مشخص و درمجموع تعداد 30 روستا به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب گردید. با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 450 خانوار به‌عنوان حجم نمونه تحقیق انتخاب و به‌وسیله آن‌ها پرسشنامه تکمیل گردید. نتایج حاصل از یافته‌های توصیفی و آزمون T تک نمونه‌ای نشان می‌دهد که وضعیت کیفیت محیطی به لحاظ مؤلفه‌های اقتصادی، کالبدی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی در سطح نامطلوبی قرار دارد. همچنین نتایج تحلیل حاصل از رادار مطلوبیت نشان می‌دهد که از 30 روستای موردمطالعه، 18 روستا به لحاظ همه مؤلفه‌های کیفیت محیطی وضعیتی کاملاً نامطلوب و 12 روستا نیز از مطلوبیت نسبتاً ضعیفی برخوردار هستند و هیچ‌کدام از روستاهای موردمطالعه وضعیتی متوسط و کاملاً مطلوبی ندارند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کیفیت محیطی؛ رادار مطلوبیت؛ مناطق روستایی؛ استان لرستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Assessment of the Desirability Levels of Environmental Health in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Lorestan Province Villages | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Reza Nemati1؛ Mehdi Pourtaheri2؛ Abdolreza R. Eftekhari3 | ||
| 1PhD, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran,Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran,Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| An analysis of international organizations reflects the centrality of health as a key indicator of sustainable development. Today, environmental quality of health has become one of the most important issues in rural settlements. In other words, in the literature on development and its related approaches, the issue of environmental health and efforts to promote this indicator is of paramount importance at the level of rural communities. The method is a library-based quantitative study and data were collected based on documentary analysis and field survey. Based on this, the components and health records of environmental quality were identified as the basis for developing the questionnaire as the main tool for research in field studies. Based on the five priority classes of Prescott Allen's utility survey in the economic dimension of 28 villages, some villages are in a potentially poor situation (poor utility). In the social dimension of the total number of studied villages, 20 were undesirable villages, six villages were in the unfavorable condition (weak utility) and four also had a moderate utility. Regarding the physical utility, 23 villages were in a state of complete disadvantage, six villages were in a poor potential situation (poor utility) and 1 village had a moderate utility. However, in terms of environmental sustainability, 22 villages were in a state of complete disadvantage and eight villages in a state of poor potential status (poor utility). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Environmental health, Utility radar, Rural Areas, Lorestan province | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Banzhaf, E., de la Barrera, F., Kindler, A., Reyes-Paecke, S., Schlink, U., & Welz, J. (2014). A conceptual framework for integrated analysis of environmental quality and quality of life. Ecological Indicators, 45(0), 664-668. Berardi, U. (2013). Clarifying the new interpretation of the cocept of sustainable building, Sustainable City and Society 8(2013) 72-78. Chervinskia, A. (2014): Ecological evaluation of economic evaluation of environmental quality, Procedia Economics and Finance, No 8, pp 150-156. Clarke, P., Nieuwenhuijsenb, E.R. (2009). Environments for healthy ageing: A critical review, Maturitas 64 (2009) 14–19. Department of Public Health and Strategi., (2005). Planning Building Healthy Communities in Dumfries and Galloway Strategy and Action Plan 2008 – 2013. Fadaei, A.M., Zahedi, M.R. (2007). Comparison of health status status in a pilot village of Chaharmahal Bakhtiari province's basic development needs (BDN) plan, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences.Volume8, Number1,pp 13-19. Ferry, S. (2001). Environmental Law: Examples and Explanations. 2nd Ed. New York: Aspen Law & Business. Garosi, S., Shamsealdini, M (2015). The effect of residential environment quality on the health of residents in Kerman city, Sociological Quarterly of the city, fourth year, No. 12, pp. 74-51. Griffiths, A., Haigh,N., Rassias, J. (2007) A framework for understanding Government Systems and Climate Change : the Case of Austrilia, Europen Manengement Journal ,Vol 25,No,6. Islik, B ,Tulbentci, T. (2008). Housing island condition using Aiker-gypsum-stabilized earth: A case study from northern Cyprus, Building and Environment 43(2008) 1426-1432. Lawrence, P., (2000). Planning theories and environmental impact assessment, Environment impact assessment Review. Rahnamai, M., Shah Hosseni, P. (2005). City planning process of Iran, first print, samt publication, Teheran. Resources of the World Health Organization. (2001). Health and the environment in sustainable development. Translated by Ali Asghar Farshad and colleagues, Tehran: Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education. Sadri, GH. (2002). Assessing the environmental health situation of Hamedan villages in line with Salem village project, the third national conference on environmental health. PP 433-451. Sajadi, H., Sadr Sadat, j. (2003). Social health indexes, newsletter of political economic information, No. 207-208, P.244-253. Sarbu, I & Sebarchievici, C. (2013): Aspects of indoor environmental quality assessment in buildings, journal of Energy and Buildings, No 60, pp 410–419. Shaykhi, D., Rezvani, M., Mahdavi, M. (2010). Assessment and analysis of health level in rural areas based on the approach of Salem village: a case study of Khandab city, Markazi province,Journal of rural and development19,pp109-138. Sirven, N. Debrand, T. (2008). Social participation and healthy Village: An international comparison using SHARE data, Social Science & Medicine 67 (2008) 2017–2026. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). “Urban environmental quality and human well-being toward a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: a literature study” Landscape and Urban Planning 65, pp. 5-18 Yeatts, D.E, Pei, X, Cready, C,M, Shen, Y, Luo, H, & Tan, J. (2013). Village characteristics and health of rural Chinese older adults: Examining the CHARLS Pilot Study of a rich and poor province, Social Science & Medicine 98 (2013) 71-78. Yuliastuti, N. & Saraswati, N. (2014). Environmental Quality in Urban Settlement: The Role of Local Community Association in East Semarang Sub-District, journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, No 135, pp 31 – 35. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 588 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 457 |
||