|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||103,391,979|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||81,395,262|
بررسی روند پراکنده رویی و تغییرات فضایی شهر بابل
|پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی|
|مقاله 7، دوره 52، شماره 3، مهر 1399، صفحه 889-902 اصل مقاله (1.2 M)|
|نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2019.260197.1007724|
|موسی کمانرودی کجوری 1؛ احمد زنگانه1؛ تاج الدین کرمی1؛ صادق قلی نیا2|
|1استادیار گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران|
|2کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران|
|پراکندهرویی از اشکال گسترش استکه در نیمقرن اخیر وارد ادبیات مدیریت و برنامهریزی شهری کشورهای در حال توسعه، از جمله ایران،شده است. برخی شهرهای ایران این نوع گسترش را در مرحله رشد شتابان تجربه کردهاند. این شهرها با مشکلات فراوان، مانند توسعه بدون برنامهریزی، افزایش سکونتگاههای غیررسمی، نوسان شدید قیمت زمین و مسکن، افزایش هزینه زیرساختها و خدمات شهری، به زیر ساخت و ساز رفتن اراضی کشاورزی، مصرف بیشتر انرژی، و آلودگیهای محیط زیستی مواجه شدهاند. سئوال اصلی این پژوهش این است که آیا شهر بابل در فرایند گسترش از سال 1335 تا 1395 با پراکندهرویی و تغییرات فضایی ناشی از آن مواجه شده است؟ بنابراین، هدف از این پژوهش شناخت الگوی گسترش شهر بابل از سال 1335 تا 1395 و تغییرات فضایی آن است. در این پژوهش، با استفاده از دادههای آماری و «مدل هلدرن» به تحلیل پراکندهرویی شهر بابل و سایر تغییرات فضایی آن پرداخته شده است. برای تحلیل داده و اطلاعات این پژوهش، از آمار توصیفی استفاده شده است. بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش، مساحت شهر بابل از سال 1335 تا 1395 بهصورت مستمر افزایش یافته است. براساس نتایج مدل هلدرن، 74 درصد افزایش وسعت این شهر در این دوره از رشد جمعیت و 26 درصد آن از پراکندرویی ناشی شده است. این روند موجب کاهش تراکم ناخالص جمعیت و افزایش سرانه ناخالص زمین شهری و در نتیجه گسترش افقی و بیرویه این شهر شده است. پراکندهرویی این شهر موجب شکلگیری شهرکهای مسکونی، سکونتگاههای غیررسمی، و ادغام روستاهای پیرامون در آن شده است.|
|پراکنده رویی؛ تغییرات روستایی؛ تغییرات فضایی؛ شهر بابل؛ گسترش|
|عنوان مقاله [English]|
|The Survey of Sprawl Trend and Spatial Changes of Babol City|
|Moosa Kamanroodi1؛ Ahmad Zanganeh1؛ Tajeddin Karami1؛ Sadegh Gholinia Firouzjaee2|
|1Assistant Professor, Department of geography and urban planning, Faculty of geographical Scienses, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran|
Sprawl as one form of expansion entered the literature of urban management and planning in the last half-century. Some Iranian cities have experienced this kind of expansion at a rapid pace. These cities have faced numerous problems including unplanned development, an increase in informal settlements, a sharp and environmental fluctuation in land prices and housing, high infrastructure costs and urban services, conversion of agricultural lands, consumption of more energy and pollution.
Iran urbanization ratio has risen from 28% in 1922 to 68.5% in 2007. Urban development accelerated in the country after rising oil revenues as well as increase in the level of urban migrations following 1960s and 1970s. Taking into consideration an exogeneous nature of Iran’s urban expansion, the motorization of cities , injection of oil revenues in the urban economy, the place of Iranian cities in the global economic system ,and land bourgeoisie all demanded wide range of inland areas expansion into periphery which could well exemplified itself in urban sprawl.
Babol is one of the medium-sized cities which is located to the northeast of Iran in Mazandaran Province. The corresponding latitude is 36 degree as opposed to 52 eastern longitude. The distance between this city and Tehran is 210 km. Its population amounted to be 250,217 which is associated with 3,036 hectares. The main question of this research is that what has been the pattern of expansion of Babol from 1957 to 2017? And what has this city changed in terms of spatial? Therefore, The main objective of this study is to find out the pattern of Babol expansion between 1957 and 2017as well as its spatial properties .
The research method has applied nature . It requires the application of Quantitative Technique. This research is conducted via descriptive-analytical method. The statistical society of this research is associated with city of Babol. The study period covers 1957 to 2017. Data gathering were conducted via documentary and field work technique. Data analysis demands application of GIS in order to analyze the rate, direction, and form of Babol sprawl during the study period. This is further followed by application of Holdren model regarding computation of degree of sprawl development in Babol. This study demands the usage of many variables including physical, economic, social and political ones along with 15 corresponding indicators.
Results and discussion:
This study suggests that the area of Babol has steadily risen from 1957 to 2017. Acccording to Holdren model over the entire study period from 1957 to 2017, approximately 74% of the city's horizontal growth is associated with population growth as apposed to 26% pertaining to sprawl development. This in turn has led to the integration of villages around the city. So far, 16 villages around this city have been merged within the legal range between 1957 and 2017. This dispersion is linearly attributed to both the northern and southern axes. It has led to physical changes in peripheral settlements. It has also changed the structure and functions of Babol.
The construction of public residential housing complexes around the city of Babol , the migration of poor to the periphery and the absence of natural barriers has led to sprawl development of the city. In addition, the connecting interra urban axis played a significant role in this regard. The largest expansion of the city was occurred in the north on the Babol-Babolsar axis and on the Babol-Babolkenar axis and Babol-Bandpe in the south. It is argued that, transit roads located from west to the east of Mazandaran have affected the expansion of the city to the west and east. As such ,most of the villages that have merged in Babol have been located along these connecting axes.
Babol expansion toward the periphery has led to the integration of villages, conversion of agricultural lands and pasturesas as well as economic, social, political and physical changes of villages. However, the construction of public residential housing complexes including Imam Khomeini, Western Kathi, Oriental and Gohardasht in the periphery and the creation of informal settlements i n the periphery, played an influential role in this regard.
This trend has brought about a fundamental changes. These could well eamplified themselves in the gross population density, area, land use, gross land per capita, employment of the economic sectors (especially the change of service role of the city toward commercial services). This in turn has led to dual nature of some of the nighboring districts of Babol. In such a way, the gross in land per capita has increased from 74.23 square meters in 1957 to 13.31 square meters in 2017.
This circumstances is one of the general characteristics of urban development in undeveloped countries including Iran (Saeedi and Sab6t, 2011:149). The proportion of urbanization in Iran has risen from 28% in 1957 to 68.5% in 2005 (Ahmadi, 2010: 6). This could be explained by, rising oil revenues in the 1970s, the concentration of pubic governmental investments in large cities, an increase in the rate of rural urban migration which were responsile for the rapid growth of urbanization (Shahsavarian, 2011: 2).
This research shows that the urban development such as this is generally consistent with the general trend of urban development in the country. Of course, the whole process shows the structural challenges and inefficiency with regard to land management in Iran. One of these structural challenges is the centralized, Sectoral and fragmentary structure of territorial management. This structure is not an integrated. In this structure, there is a functional fragmentation between management levels (vertical fragmentation) and between Sectoral management (Horizontal fragmentation). The most important vertical and horizontal fragmentation related to land management. For this reason, land is easily bought and sold, Land use changes easily, and cities are expanding.
|urban sprawl, urban expansion, Spatial changes, Babol, periphery villages|
13. Ahmadi, G.; Azizi, M.M. and Zebardast., S., 2010, Sprawl comparative survey in three middle cities of Iran-case study: cities of Ardebil, Sanandaj and Kashan, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Letter, No. 5, PP. 25-44 (In persion).
14. Barnes, K.B.; Morgan, J.M.; III, Roberge M.C. and Lowe, S., 2001, Sprawl Development: It’s Patterns, Consequences, and Measurement, A white paper, Towson University, URL: http:// Chesapeake. Towson, Edu/landscape/urbansprawl/ownload/sprawl white_paper.pdf.
15. Bhatta, B., 2010, Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
16. Bruegmann, R., 2006, Sprawl: a compact history, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637, Ltd., London.
17. Burchell, R.W.; Shad, N.A.; Lisotkin, D.; Phillips, H.; Downs, A.; Seskin, S., et al., 1998, The Costs of Sprawl Revisited, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
18. Burchell, W. R.; Downs, A.; McCann, B. and Mukherji, S., 2005, Sprawl Costs: Economic Impacts of Unchecked, Development, writing from the publisher: Island Press, 1718 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20009, Island Press is a trademark of The Center for Resource Economics.
19. Design and Inovation consultant engineers, 1987, Master plan of Babol city, Planning and Budget Organization of Mazandaran Province (In persion).
20. Dilorenzo, W., 2000, The myth of suburban sprawl. USA Today, Vol. 128, PP. 54-56.
21. Ding, C., 1998, The GIS-based human-interactive TAZ design algorithm: examining the impacts of data aggregation on transportation-planning analysis, Environment and Planning B, 25.
22. Duany, A.; Plater-Zyberk, E. and Speck, J., 2001, Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream, North Point Press, New York.
23. Ewing, R.; Pendall, R. and Chen, D.D.T., 2002, Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact, Smart Growth America, Washington, DC
24. Frumkin, H.; Frank, L. and Jackson, R., 2004, Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities, Island Press, and Washington, Covelo. London.
25. Galester, E.L. and Kahn, M.E., 2004, Sprawl and urban growth. In: V. Henderson and J. Thisse (eds.), the Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Oxford University Press, and Oxford.
26. Galester, G.; Hanson, R.; Wolman, H.; Coleman, S. and Freihage, J., 2001, Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept, Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 12, No. 4, PP. 681-717.
27. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W., 1997, Are compact cities a desirable planning goal, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, No. 1.
28. Gutfreund, Owen D., 2004, Twentieth Century Sprawl: Highways and the Reshaping of the American Landscape, published by Oxford University Press, Inc.198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016, www.oup.com.
29. Hekmatnia, H. and Mousavi, M., 2006, Application of Model in Geography with Emphasis on Urban and Regional Planning, Tehran: Elm e Novam Publication (In persion(.
30. Hess, G. R., 2001, Just what is sprawl, anyway? www4.ncsu.edu/grhess.
31. Johnson, M.P., 2001, Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda, Environment and Planning, A, 33.
32. Kamanroodi, K.M.; Azizpoor, F. and Janbazi, A., 2014, Sprawl of Shiraz City and Economic, Social and Physical Changes in Villages around-Case Study: the Guim Village, Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development, Vol. 3, No. 9, PP. 41-62 (In persion(.
33. Kord Darunkolayi, S., 2005, Investigating the Physical Development of the City of Babol and Integrating the Villages in the City-Case Study: Kamangarkola Village with Using GIS and RS, Master's Thesis, Guidance Mohammad Soleimani, Tarbiat Moalem University of Tehran (In persion(.
34. Leontidou, L. and Chris C., 2007, Urban Sprawl and Hybrid Cityscapes in Europe: Comparisons, Theory Construction and Conclusions, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
35. Majedi, H., 1999, Earth The main issue of urban development, Magazine Abadi, Journal of Architecture and Urbanisme Studies and Research Center of Iran, Vol. 9, No. 33, PP. 6-8 (In persion(.
36. Meshkini, A.; Zanganeh, A. and Mahdnejad, H., 2014, Income on Sprawl, Tehran: Jahad Publishing University, Kharazmi Branch (In persion).
37. Ottensmann, J.R., 1977, Urban sprawl, land values and the density of development. Land Economics, Vol. 53, No. 4.
38. Peiser, R., 2006, Decomposing urban sprawl, Town Planning Review, Vol. 72, No. 3.
39. Pendall, R., 1999, Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environ Plan, Vol. 26, No. 4, PP. 555-571.
40. Rahman, G.; Alam, D. and Islam, S., 2008, City growth with urban sprawl and problems of management, Proceedings of 44th ISOCARP Congress Dalian, China, September 19–23, International Society of City and Regional Planners and Urban Planning Society of China.
41. RERC (Real Estate Research Corporation) 1974, The costs of sprawl: Environmental and economic costs of alternative residential patterns at the Urban Fringe, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
42. Robert, O. Harvey, D and Clark, W. A. V., 1965, The Nature and Economics of Urban Sprawl, Land Economics, Published by: University of Wisconsin Press, Vol. 41, No. 1, PP. 1-9.
43. Saeedi, A. and Shafiee Sabet, N., 2011, Landscape gobbling and transformation of agricultural land use-case: Tehran metropolitan peremergency villages, In: Saeedi, A., Rural-Urban Relationships and Linkages in Iran, Publishing Mino, Tehran (In persion(.
44. Shahsavarian, M., 2011, Study of the causes and factors affecting dispersion in the urban area of Karaj and presenting a suitable model for its control, master's thesis, directed by Mohammad Sheikhi, Allameh Tabatabaei University.
45. Statistics Center of Iran, 1956 to 2011, Identification card of Mazandaran province (In persion).
46. Statistics Center of Iran, 1956 to 2011, Population and Housing Census (In persion).
47. Tabibian, M. and Asadi, I., 2008, Investigation and analysis of dispersion factors in the spatial development of metropolitan areas, Architecture and urban planning, Vol. 1, No. 1, PP. 5-24 (In persion).
48. Weitz, J. and Moore, T., 1998, Development inside urban growth boundaries: Oregon’s empirical evidence of contiguous urban form, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 64, No. 4.
49. Williamson, T., 2010, Sprawl, Justice, and Citizenship: The Civic Costs of the AmericanWay of Life, Published by Oxford University Press, Inc.198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016, and www.oup.com.
50. Wilson, E.H.; Hurd, J.D.; Ciivco, D.L.; Parisloe, S. and Arnold, C., 2003, Development of a geospatial model to quantity, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 86, No. 3, PP. 275-285.
51. Zhang, B., 2004, Study on Urban Growth Management in China, Xinhua Press, Beijing.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 597
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 218