سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,500
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,090,185
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,193,884
شعله, فریبا, گلابچی, محمود, حاجی یخچالی, سیامک. (1397). طراحی مدل عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر انتقال دانش با هدف کاهش مخاطرات محیطی در پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز ایران. , 5(4), 381-400. doi: 10.22059/jhsci.2019.269712.420
فریبا شعله; محمود گلابچی; سیامک حاجی یخچالی. "طراحی مدل عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر انتقال دانش با هدف کاهش مخاطرات محیطی در پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز ایران". , 5, 4, 1397, 381-400. doi: 10.22059/jhsci.2019.269712.420
شعله, فریبا, گلابچی, محمود, حاجی یخچالی, سیامک. (1397). 'طراحی مدل عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر انتقال دانش با هدف کاهش مخاطرات محیطی در پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز ایران', , 5(4), pp. 381-400. doi: 10.22059/jhsci.2019.269712.420
شعله, فریبا, گلابچی, محمود, حاجی یخچالی, سیامک. طراحی مدل عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر انتقال دانش با هدف کاهش مخاطرات محیطی در پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز ایران. , 1397; 5(4): 381-400. doi: 10.22059/jhsci.2019.269712.420

طراحی مدل عوامل سازمانی مؤثر بر انتقال دانش با هدف کاهش مخاطرات محیطی در پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز ایران

مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی
مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 4، دی 1397، صفحه 381-400    اصل مقاله (892.47 K)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی بنیادی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhsci.2019.269712.420
نویسندگان
فریبا شعله* 1؛ محمود گلابچی2؛ سیامک حاجی یخچالی3
1دانشجو دکتری مدیریت پروژه و ساخت، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2استاد دانشکدۀ هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3استادیار دانشکدۀ مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
صنعت نفت‌وگاز تأثیر زیادی بر محیط زیست دارد و فرایندهای احداث و بهره‌برداری از پروژه‌های نفت‌وگاز از مهم‌ترین عوامل انسانی مؤثر بر محیط زیست است. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی عوامل مؤثر در انتقال دانش در سازمان‌ها به‌عنوان راهکاری برای کاهش مخاطرات محیطی در پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز می‌پردازد. سازمان‌ها مهم‌ترین ارکان را در شکل‌دهی و جهت‌دهی رفتار کارکنان خود دارند و امروزه بسیاری از رفتارهای کارکنان منشأ سازمانی دارد. با پیشرفت جوامع امروزی، مدیریت دانش بیش از پیش مورد توجه سازمان‌ها قرار گرفته است. در فرایند جریان دانش، انتقال دانش تأثیر بسزایی دارد. انتقال نادرست دانش در سازمان‌ها ممکن است به مخاطرات زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی گسترده‌ای منجر شود. عوامل متعددی در انتقال دانش مؤثرند که یکی از تأثیرگذارترین آنها، شاخص‌های مربوط به سازمان است. تمرکز این پژوهش بر شناسایی عوامل سازمانی مؤثر در انتقال دانش است. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر کمّی است و از راهبرد پژوهشی توصیفی نیز استفاده می‌کند. جامعۀ آماری، شرکت‌های فعال در حوزۀ نفت‌وگاز است و گردآوری داده‌ها به استفاده از مصاحبه و پرسشنامه انجام گرفته است. بررسی‌ها و تحلیل‌ها بیانگر یازده عامل تأثیرگذار در انتقال دانش در سازمان‌ها از جمله فرهنگ سازمانی، روابط سازمانی و سیستم پاداش است.‌ همچنین براساس یافته‌ها، سازمان‌ها می‌توانند بستر خود را به‌منظور انتقال هرچه بیشتر دانش، با هدف کاهش مخاطرات زیستی در حین اجرای پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز بهبود بخشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
انتقال دانش؛ پروژه؛ دانش؛ عوامل سازمانی؛ مخاطرات محیطی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing Organizational Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Model Aimed at Reducing Environmental Hazards in Iranian Oil and Gas Projects
نویسندگان [English]
Fariba Shoeleh1؛ Mahmoud Golabchi2؛ Siamak Haji Yakhchali3
1PhD Student, Department of Architecture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2Professor, Department of Architecture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Abstract
Despite the potential threats to the environment, the oil industry plays a positive role in society. Knowledge transfer not only plays a significant role in knowledge process, but also helps the oil and gas industry to reduce their environmental impact with improvement in their operational efficiency. Sharing of knowledge, information, and practices across cultural and national boundaries has become a means to address critical global problems. This paper explores oil and gas industry projects and identifies the critical organizational factors that affect knowledge transfer and influence their performance. The paper concludes with a conceptual model that accounts for the relationships among these factors that can guide further research in understanding knowledge and information transfer across national and cultural boundaries.
Introduction
The oil industry holds a major potential of hazards for the environment, and may impact it at different levels. Despite its potential threats to the environment, the oil industry plays a positive role in society as well. It is still necessary to find ways to conciliate industry development, especially active organizations in this industry, with environmental protection. Organizations have the most essential effects in forming and directing the behavior of their staffs. Advances in modern societies have led to more consideration of knowledge management by organizations. Knowledge transfer plays a significant role in knowledge process. Besides, it helps the oil and gas industries to improve their operational efficiency and so reduce their environmental impact. There are various effective factors in knowledge transfer. These factors are generally related to individuals, organizations, and technology. Based on previous studies (Mei et al., 2007; Hassandoust et al., 2001; Wickramasinghe & Widyaratne, 2012), the effective factors can be divided into two main categories named content and context. Though in the literature that are many studies which have been focused on the different factors affecting knowledge transfer, limited studies have examined the organizational factors, and there are still many challenges to understanding the essential organizational factors which affect the knowledge transfer procedure in an industrial organization, company or group. This paper focuses on this type of factors, which affects knowledge transfer, from both theoretical and empirical viewpoints. We provide an integrative conceptual framework for organizing the literature on effective organizational factors for knowledge transfer. Most top ten effective factors are identified from the questionnaires filled out by 137 experts from Iranian oil and gas companies. The obtained results reveal that organizational culture, organizational relationships and reward system have the most significant influence on the knowledge transfer. Besides, we provided effective solutions for the organizations to improve their knowledge transfer process. Our findings can help practitioners develop a more focused approach in dealing with the most significant factors.
Materials and methods
Regarding the lack of theoretical point of views, complete and better frameworks is essential to summery and conduct all organizational factors which are most effective in a knowledge transfer process. In this research, it would be realized by answering the following research question.
Research Question: What are the most important organizational factors in knowledge transfer within projects?
The paper develops a conceptual framework for the analysis of knowledge flow transfers in projects. Based on this theoretical framework, the paper proposes research hypotheses and builds a causal model that links the constructs of the model. The organizational factors regarding knowledge transfer in general are summed up from literature and then the issue is studied by conducting a survey in companies. Participants of the study included well-known and successful oil and gas companies. Using in-depth data from Iranian oil and Gas Company, we study the role of organizational factors in knowledge transfer.
Discussion and Results
Based on a systematic investigation of effective factors in knowledge transfer currently available in the literature, a common frame of reference for knowledge transfer development is developed. This frame of reference consists of thirteen organizational factors. Besides, it will provide a good departure point for future work in knowledge transfer, both academically and practically. These factor including organizational structures, reward system, leadership characteristic, organizational culture, organization commitment, motivation, management support, strategy, organization relationship, training, opportunities to share, control mechanism and team orientation. These factors have investigated in oil and gas projects and it has been identified that 11 items of mentioned factors are effective on transferring knowledge and there is a direct relationship between them. Organizations should attempt to maximize the effect of these factors in order to increase knowledge transfer rate.
Organizational culture has been identified as the most important factor in knowledge transfer. All organizations have personalities as people do and characteristics such as flexibility, innovation, and more. In order to more success, an organization should implement the knowledge orientation culture, such that providing knowledge becomes institutionalized. The second identified priority is the organizational relationship. In order to succeed in knowledge transferring, organizations should create this motivation in their employees. Cash, non-cash, and organizational position lead to better performance of employees in knowledge transfer. Organizations can achieve the best response from their employees by proper defining their reward system. Among the factors studied, it was found that training and team orientations would not have a significant effect on the knowledge transfer in the projects. In addition, despite the positive effects of team works, this factor will not be lonely a motivator for more knowledge transfer. Organizations, with Strengthening and planning on effective organizational factors in knowledge transfer, can prepare the workplace so that knowledge transfer and sharing can be greatly increased.
Conclusion
Organizations have essential effects in forming and directing the behavior of their staffs. Today, most behaviors of the staffs have an organizational origin. This paper aims to identify the most effective organizational factors in knowledge transfer process in order to reduce environmental hazards in oil and gas projects. we developed a conceptual model and hypotheses to verify the role of organizational factors in knowledge transfer. The results reveal that organizational culture, organizational relationships, and reward system have the most significant influence on the knowledge transfer.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
knowledge transfer, Environmental hazards, Knowledge, organizational factors, projects
مراجع
  1. اسمیت، کیت (1382). مخاطرات محیطی، ترجمۀ ابراهیم مقیمی و شاپور گودرزی‌نژاد، تهران: سمت.
  2. انوشه، زهرا (1394). معرفی آلودگی‌های صنعت پالایش نفت و اقدامات کنترلی. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکدۀ محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات اهواز.
  3. حاجی‌یخچالی، سیامک؛ پرچمی جلال، مجید؛ و اسدی، محمدکاظم (1396). «انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان در زنجیرۀ تأمین سبز پروژه‌های صنعت نفت‌وگاز با ترکیب روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیارۀ فازی»، مدیریتمخاطراتمحیطی، دورۀ 4، ش 3، ص 246- 231.
  4. حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا (1395). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، تهران: سمت.
  5. دانش، شهناز؛ زندگانی، رضا؛ و درخشان، سهیل (1394). آلودگی‌های نفتی خلیج فارس و مخاطرات زیست‌محیطی ناشی از آن، همایش آب و محیط زیست، دورۀ اول.
  6. سی‌ریز، جان (1390). کنترل زیست‌محیطی در صنعت نفت، ترجمۀ سید حسین داودی، تهران: مرکز آموزش و تحقیقات صنعتی ایران.
  7. صالحی طالشی، محمدجواد؛ اربابی، هانیه؛ و حسینعلی‌پور، مجتبی (1396). «بررسی دفتر مدیریت پروژه در سازمان‌های پروژه‌محور صنایع بالادستی نفت‌وگاز ایران و رابطۀ آن با موفقیت پروژه»، بهبود مدیریت، سال یازدهم، ش 2، ص 143-119.
  8. صبحیه، محمدحسین؛ اقدسی، محمد؛ شامی زنجانی، مهدی؛ و حکمیان، حمید (1397). «نگاه یکپارچه به یادگیری در سازمان‌های پروژه‌محور»، مطالعاتمدیریت(بهبودوتحول)، دورۀ 27، ش 88، ص 24-1.
  9. موسویون، زهرا؛ و پورخباز، حمیدرضا (1396). آلودگی‌های ناشی از صنایع نفت، گاز و پتروشیمی، چهارمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت محیط زیست.
  10. مقیمی، ابراهیم؛ جعفربیگلو، منصور؛ مقصودی، مهران؛ مونیر، نولبرتو؛ و احمدی، امیر (1397). «تأثیر مخاطرات ژئومورفولوژیک آبراهه‌ای بر خطوط انتقال انرژی با استفاده از مدل محور ریسک خط لوله؛ مطالعۀ موردی: خط لولۀ گاز نهم سراسری»، مدیریتمخاطراتمحیطی، دورۀ 5، ش 2، ص 216- 199.
  11. مقیمی، ابراهیم (1394). دانش مخاطرات، چ دوم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  12. معین، محمد (1393). فرهنگ فارسی، تهران: امیرکبیر.
  13. Ahmad, F. (2018). “Knowledge sharing in a non-native language context: Challenges and strategies”, Journal of Information Science, 44(2), pp: 248-264.
  14. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). “Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues”. MIS quarterly,pp: 107-136.
  15. Almeida, M. V., & Soares, A. L. (2014). “Knowledge sharing in project-based organizations: Overcoming the informational limbo”, International Journal of Information Management, 34(6), pp:770-779.
  16. Andersson, U., Dasí, À., Mudambi, R., & Pedersen, T. (2016). “Technology, innovation and knowledge: The importance of ideas and international connectivity”,  Journal of World Business, 51(1), pp: 153-162.
  17. Arthur, J. B., & Huntley, C. L. (2005). “Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6),pp: 1159-1170.
  18. Asrar-ul-Haq, M, & Sadia A. (2016). “A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges”, Cogent Business & Management, 3.1.
  19. Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). “Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), pp: 64-76.
  20. Bengoa, D. S., Czinkota, M. R., Kaufmann, H. R., & Schrader, M. (2015). “A concerted effort to transfer knowledge within European MNCs”, European Journal of International Management,9(3), pp: 288-305.
  21. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate”, MIS quarterly, pp: 87-111.
  22. Boh, W. F. (2007). “Mechanisms for sharing knowledge in project-based organizations”, Information and organization, 17(1), 27-58.
  23. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (2010). “Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1), pp: 5-20.
  24. Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2003). “Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments”, Journal of project management, 21(3), pp: 157-166.
  25. Cheng, T., Tai, M., & Chen, M. (2008, October). “The influence factors of knowledge transfer in project management: An empirical survey. In Wireless Communications”, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2008. WiCOM'08. 4th International Conference on (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
  26. Chiu, C., Hsu, M., & Wang, E. (2006). “Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories”, Decision support systems, 42(3), pp: 1872-1888.
  27. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K.G.(2006). “Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms”, Academy of management journal, 49(3),544-560.
  28. Connelly, C. E., & Kevin Kelloway, E. (2003). “Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), pp: 294-301.
  29. Dawes S, Gharawi,M, & Burke,G. (2012). “Transnational public sector knowledge networks: Knowledge and information sharing in a multidimensional context”, Government Information Quarterly, 29, pp:112-120.
  30. Fletcher-Chen, C. (2015). “Impact of language diversity and social interaction on knowledge transfer”, US-China Education Review, 5(3), pp: 159-180.
  31. Frey, P., Lindner, F., Muller, A., & Wald, A. (2009). “Project Knowledge Management Organizational Design and Success Factors-An Empirical Study in Germany”, International Conference HICSS'09(1-14).
  32. Gang, Q., & Bosen, L. (2010, May). “Research on model of knowledge transfer in outsourced software projects”, International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE), (pp. 1894-1899).
  33. Gopal, J., Sangaiah, A. K., Basu, A., & Reddy, C. P. (2015). “Towards identifying the knowledge codification effects on the factors affecting knowledge transfer effectiveness in the context of GSD project outcome”, 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India (CSI) , Volume 1 (611-620).
  34. Grevesen, C. & Damanpour, F.(2007). “Performance implications of organisational structure and knowledge sharing in multinational R&D networks”, Journal of Technology Management,38,113-136.
  35. Hamid, N. A. A., & Salim, J. (2010, March). “Exploring the role of transactive memory system (TMS) for knowledge transfer processes in Malaysia E-government IT outsourcing”, In Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management,(CAMP), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 303-309). IEEE.
  36. Hassandoust, F., Logeswaran, R., & Farzaneh Kazerouni, M. (2011). “Behavioral factors influencing virtual knowledge sharing: theory of reasoned action”, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 3(2), pp: 116-134.
  37. Hofer, F. (2011). “Knowledge transfer between academia and industry”, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, 2nd Edition, pp: 977-986. IGI Global.
  38. Ipe, M. (2003). “Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework”, Human resource development review, 2(4), pp: 337-359.
  39. Ismail Al-Alawi, A, Yousif Al-Marzooqi, N, & Fraidoon Mohammed, Y. (2007). “Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors”, Journal of knowledge management, 11(2),22-42.
  40. Jonsson, A., & Kalling, T. (2007). “Challenges to knowledge sharing across national and intra-organizational boundaries: case studies of IKEA and SCA Packaging”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(3), 161-172.
  41. Khan, Z., Shenkar, O., & Lew, Y. K. (2015). “Knowledge transfer from international joint ventures to local suppliers in a developing economy”, Journal of International Business Studies, 46(6), 656-675.
  42. Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). “The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge‐sharing capabilities”, Public administration review, 66(3),pp: 370-385.
  43. Liebowitz, J. (2004). “A knowledge management strategy for the Jason organization: A case study”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 1-5.
  44. Liebowitz, J., & Megbolugbe, I. (2003). “A set of frameworks to aid the project manager in conceptualizing and implementing knowledge management initiatives”, International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), pp: 189-198.
  45. Lin, H. F. (2007). “Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions”, Journal of information science, 33(2), 135-149.
  46. Lupton, N. C., & Beamish, P. W. (2016). “The mutual construction of knowledge transfer and shared context in capability development within the networked MNC”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(1), pp:150-157.
  47. Ma, Z., Qi, L., & Wang, K. (2008). “Knowledge sharing in Chinese construction project teams and its affecting factors: an empirical study”, Chinese Management Studies, 2(2), pp: 97-108.
  48. Mei, C., Tiexin, C., & Hongqin, W. (2007, November). “A context-based model of knowledge transferring in project management”, In Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, 2007. GSIS 2007. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1465-1469). IEEE.
  49. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). “Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535.
  50. Michailova, S., & Minbaeva, D. B. (2012). “Organizational values and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations: The Danisco case”, International Business Review, 21(1), pp: 59-70.
  51. Mueller, J. (2012). Knowledge sharing between project teams and its cultural antecedents. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(3), pp: 435-447.
  52. Mukkamala, A. M., & Razmerita, L. (2014). “Which factors influence the adoption of social software? An exploratory study of Indian information technology consultancy firms”, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 17(3), pp: 188-212
  53. Nooshinfard, F., & Nemati-Anaraki, L. (2014). “Success factors of inter-organizational knowledge sharing: a proposed framework”, The Electronic Library, 32(2), pp: 239-261.
  54. Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2006). “Transnational corporations and strategic challenges: An analysis of knowledge flows and competitive advantage”, The Learning Organization, 13(6), pp: 544-559.
  55. Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., Kedia, B., Datta, D., & Rasheed, A. (2008). “Effectiveness and efficiency of cross‐border knowledge transfer: An empirical examination”, Journal of management Studies, 45(4), 714-744.
  56. Qi, L.Wang, K.,&Ma, Z.(2010). “Antecedent Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Teams: Evidence from Chinese Construction Sector”, International Conference E-Business&E-Government(ICEE).
  57. Šajeva, S. (2007). “An Investigation of Critical Barriers to Effective Knowledge Management”, Social Sciences (1392-0758), 58(4).
  58. Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Chini, T. C. (2003). “Knowledge transfer between marketing functions in multinational companies: a conceptual model”, International Business Review, 12(2), pp: 215-232.
  59. Schomaker, M. S., & Zaheer, S. (2014). “The role of language in knowledge transfer to geographically dispersed manufacturing operations”, Journal of International Management, 20(1), pp: 55-72.
  60. Siakas, K. V., Georgiadou, E., & Balstrup, B. (2010). “Cultural impacts on knowledge sharing: empirical data from EU project collaboration”, Vine, 40(3/4), pp: 376-389
  61. Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. A. (2004). “Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing”, Journal of knowledge management, 8(6), pp: 117-130.
  62. Van den Hooff, B., & Huysman, M. (2009). “Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches”, Information & management, 46(1), pp: 1-8.
  63. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). “Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research”, Human resource management review, 20(2), pp: 115-131.
  64. Wickramasinghe, V., & Widyaratne, R. (2012). “Effects of interpersonal trust, team leader support, rewards, and knowledge sharing mechanisms on knowledge sharing in project teams”, 42(2), pp:214-236.
  65. Yang, C., & Chen, L. C. (2007). “Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior?”, Journal of information science, 33(1), pp: 95-109.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 686
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 348


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب