پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 160 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,322 |
| تعداد مقالات | 68,643 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 118,180,970 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 92,815,627 |
مقایسه حذف آرسنیک آب توسط نانوذرات مگنتیت و اکسید تیتانیوم، آلیاژ فروسیلیس و فروسیلیس منیزیم | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| مقاله 19، دوره 50، شماره 10، اسفند 1398، صفحه 2633-2644 اصل مقاله (775.48 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2019.276436.668147 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد بابااکبری* 1؛ شهربانو حسنی2؛ محمد امیر دلاور1؛ محمود رضا نیستانی3 | ||
| 1گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران | ||
| 3گروه شیمی تجزیه ، دانشکده علوم، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| شبه فلز آرسنیک، یک آلاینده سمی و دارای اثرات سرطانزایی شدیدی است. یکی از راه‌های جدید و موثر برای کاهش غلظت آرسنیک درآب‌های آلوده، استفاده از اصلاحکننده‌های معدنی است. هدف از این مقاله بررسی میزان کاهش آرسنیک در آب با استفاده از نانوذرات مگنتیت، نانوذرات تیتانیوم، فروسیلیس و فروسیلیس‌منیزیم است. در این تحقیق اثر زمان، غلظت اولیه آرسنیک، مقدار جاذب و pH با انجام آزمایشهای ناپیوسته بر تغییر غلظت آرسنیک محلول مطالعه شد. پس از تعیین زمان تعادل، مقدار بهینه جاذب‌ها به دست آمد و ایزوترم‌های جذب سطحی رسم شد. زمان تعادل برای نانوذرات مگنتیت و تیتانیوم دو ساعت، برای فروسیلیس‌منیزیم 16 ساعت و برای فروسیلیس 24 ساعت به‌دست آمد. ایزوترم فرندلیچ با دادههای آزمایش همبستگی بیشتری نشان داد (R2≥089). با افزایش pH درصد حذف آرسنیک کاهش یافت و حداکثر حذف (90 درصد) توسط نانو ذرات آهن و تیتانیوم در 3=pH مشاهده شد. نانوذرات مگنتیت و نانوذرات اکسید تیتانیوم جاذب‌های کاراتر و فروسیلیس منیزیم جاذب‌های ارزان قیمت‌تری برای حذف آرسنیک از آب آلوده بودند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| " آرسنیک" " ایزوترم جذب سطحی"؛ "فروسیلیس"؛ "نانوذره تیتانیوم"؛ "نانوذره مگنتیت" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparison of Arsenic Removal from Water by Magnetite and Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles, Ferrosilicon and Ferrosilicon Magnesium | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| mohammad babaakbari1؛ shahrbanoo hasani2؛ Mohammad Amir Delavar1؛ mahmodreza neyestani3 | ||
| 1Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, , Zanjan Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Analytical Chemistry, College of Science, University of Zanjan, , Zanjan Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Arsenic metalloid is a toxic contaminant and has a high carcinogenic effect. One of the new and effective methods to reduce the concentration of arsenic in contaminated water is to use mineral amendments. The purpose of this research is to investigate the reduction rate of arsenic in water using magnetite nanoparticles, titanium nanoparticles, ferrosilicon and magnesium ferrosilicon. In this study, the effect of time, initial concentration of arsenic, the amount of adsorbent and pH on variation of arsenic concentrations of solutions were studied by performing batch experiments. The equilibrium time, the optimum amount of adsorbents and the most suitable adsorbent were determined and the adsorption isotherms were plotted. The equilibrium time was two hours for magnetite nanoparticles and titanium nanoparticles, 16 hours for magnesium ferrosilicon, and 24 hours for ferrosilicon. Freundlich isotherm showed greater correlation with test data (R2≥089). With increasing pH, the percentage of arsenic removal decreased and maximum removal (90%) was observed by iron nanoparticles and titanium at pH = 3. Magnetite nanoparticles and titanium oxide nanoparticles were more efficient adsorbent. Ferrosilicon and magnesium ferrosilicon were cheaper adsorbents for removal of arsenic from water. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| "Arsenic", "Adsorption isotherm", "Ferrosilicon", "Magnetite nanoparticles", "titanium nanoparticles" | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ambashta R.D., Sillanpää M. (2010). Water purification using magnetic assistance: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 180(1): 38-49 Arsiya, F., Sayadi, M.H. and Sobhani, S. (2017). Arsenic (III) Adsorption Using Palladium Nanoparticles from Aqueous Solution. Journal of water Environmental Nanotechnology, 2(3), 166-173. Asere, T.G., Mincke, S., De Clercq, G. and Verbeken, K. (2017). Removal of Arsenic (V) from Aqueous Solutions Using Chitosan–Red Scoria and Chitosan–Pumice Blends. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1-19. Babaakbari Sari, M ., Farahbakhsh, M., Savaghebi, Gh.R. and Najafi, N. (2012). Investigation of Arsenic Concentration in Some of the Calcareous Soils of Ghorveh and Arsenic Uptake by Maize, Wheat and Rapeseed in a Natural Contaminated Soil. Journal of Water and Soil, 23(4), 1-17. Babaei, A.A., Ahmadi, M., Baboli, Z., Jaafarzadeh, N., Goudarzi, G.h., Mostufi, A. (2015). Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions by nano-sized magnetite modified with SDS. ISMJ, 18(5), 944-959. Bahrami M., Boroomandnasab S., Kashkuli H. A., Farrokhian Firoozi A., Babaei, Ali. (2012). Removal Of Cd(II) From Aqueous Solution Using Modified Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Report and Opinion, 4(5). Bazrafshan, E., Kord Mostafapour, F., Faridi, H., Mahvi, A., Sargazi, Sh. SA. (2013). Removal of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) from aqueous environments using single-walled carbon nanotubes. Health Scope, 2, 39-46. Boddu, V.M., Abburi, K., Talbott, J.L., Smith, E.D. and Haasch, R. (2008). Removal of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) from aqueous medium using chitosan-coated biosorbent. Water Resercher, 42, 633-42. Caner, N., Kiran, I., Ilhan, S. and Iscen, C.F.(2009). Isotherm and kinetic studies of Burazol Blue ED dye Biosorption by dried anaerobic sludge, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165, (1–3), 279-84. Chang, Y.C. and Chen, D.H. (2005). Preparation and adsoption properties of monodisperse chitosan-bound Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for removal of Cu (II) ions. Journal of Colloud and Interface. 283 (2), 446-451. Chen, G., Liu, X. and Su; CH. (2011). Transport and retention of TiO2 rutile nanoparticles in saturated porous media under low – ionic – strength condition, Measurements and mechanisms, Langmuir. 27: 5393-5402. Dang, V.B.H., Doan, H.D., Dang-Vu, T.and Lohi, A. (2009). Equilibrium and kinetics of biosorption of cadmium (II) and copper (II) ions by wheat straw. Bioresours Technology, 100, 211-19. Debasis, D., Santi, M., Mandal, J., Bhattacharya, Sh. R. and Sanat K. R. (2009). Iron oxide nanoparticle-assisted arsenic removal from aqueous system. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 21,40-58. Donat, R., Akdogan, A., Erdem, E. aand Cetisli, H. (2005). Thermodynamics of Pb and Ni adsorption onto natural bentonite from aqueous solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 286(1), 43–52. El-Reash Y.A., Otto M. and Kenawy I.M. (2011). Adsorption of Cr (VI) and As(V) ions by modified magnetic chitosan chelating resin. International Journal of Biology Macromology, 49, 513-22. Evita, A., Dimitrios, K., Evan, D. (2014). Arsenic and chromium removal from water using biochars derived from rice husk, organic solid wastes and sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental, 309-314. Hua, M., Zhang, S., Pan, B., Zhang, W., Lv, L. and Zhang, Q. (2012). Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volumes 211–212: 317-331. Gao, Y., Wahi, R., Kan, A.T., Falkner, J.C., Colvin, V.L. and Tomson, M.B. (2004). Adsorption of Cadmium on anatase nanoparticles effect of crystal size and pH. Journal of Environmental Nanotechnology, 9585–9593. Gholizadeh, A., Kermani, M., Gholami, M., Farzadkia, M. and Yaghmaeian, K. (2013). Removal efficiency, adsorption kinetics and isotherms of phenolic compounds from aqueous solution using rice bran ash. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 781- 778. Gil, A., Assis, F.C.C., Albeniz, S. and Korili, S.A. (2011). Removal of dyes from wastewaters by adsorption on pillared clays, Chemical Engineering Journal.; 168(3): 1032-1040. Giri, S.K., Das, N.N., and Pradhan, G.C. (2011). Synthesis and characterization of magnetite nanoparticles using waste iron ore tailings for adsorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution. Colloids and Surfaces A; Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects; 389(13), 43-49. Habuda-Stani M. and Stjepanović, M. (2015). Arsenic removal by nanoparticles: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(11):8094-8123 Jafari Mansoorian. H., Mahvi, A.H., Mostafapoor, F.K., Alizade, M. (2013). Equilibrium and synthetic studies of methylene blue dye removal using ash of walnut shell. Journal of Health in the Field, 1(3), 48-55. Jiang J.Q., Cooper, C., Ouki, S. (2002). Comparison of modified montmorillonite adsorbents:part I: preparation, characterization and phenol adsorption. Chemosphere, 47(7), 711-16. Jiefei, L., Hiroki, G., Akinari, S., Qi, F. and Mei, X. (2017). Removal of trace arsenic to below drinking water standards using a Mn–Fe binary oxide. journal of Royal Society of Chemistry, 1490–1497. Mahimairaja, S. N., Bolan, S., Adriano, D. C. and Robinson, B. (2005). Arsenic contamination and its risk management. Advances in Agronomy. Elsevier International. 133, 309-314. Maleki, A., Eslami, A. (2011). Isotherm and kinetics of arsenic (V) adsorption from aqueous solution using modified wheat straw. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 3(4), 439-450. Moazeni, M., Ebrahimi, A., Rafiei, N. and Pourzamani, H. R. (2016). Removal of Arsenic (III) and Chromium (VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using Nanoscale Zero Valent Iron (nZVI) Particles and Determining Adsorption Isotherms. Journal of Health System Research, 13, 126-133. Monárrez-Cordero, B. E., Amézaga-Madrid, P., Leyva-Porras, C. C. Miki-Yoshida, M. (2016). Study of the Adsorption of Arsenic (III and V) by Magnetite Nanoparticles Synthetized via AACVD, Journal of Materials Research, 220, 185-194. Salari, A. Tabarsa, T., Khazaeian, A. and Saraeian, A. (2013). Improving some of applied properties of oriented strand board (OSB) made from underutilized low quality paulownia (Paulownia fortunie) wood employing nano-SiO2. Industrial Crops and Products. 42, 1-9. Sanchez, A.G., Ayuso, E.A., and De Blas, O.J. (1999). Sorption of heavy metals from industrial waste water by low-cost mineral silicates. Clay Minerals, 34, 469-477. Shipley, H.J., Yean, S., Kan, A.T. Tomson, M.B. (2009). Adsorption of arsenic to magnetite nanoparticles: effect of particle concentration, pH, ionic strength, and temperature, Journal of Environmental Topical Chemical 28(3): 509–515. Siddique, M., Farooq, R., Khalid, A., Farooq, A., Mahmood, Q., Farooq, U. (2009). Thermal-pressure-mediated hydrolysis Of Reactive Blue 19 dye. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172 (2–3): 1007-1012. Simón, M., González, V., Haro, S.D. and GarcíaIn, E.S. (2015). Are soil amendments able to restore arsenic-contaminated alkaline soils? Journal of Soils Sediments 15, 117–125. Suda, A., Baba, k., Yamaguchi, N., Akahane, I. and Makino, T. (2015). The effects of soil amendments on arsenic concentrations in soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1–11. Wang, Y., Morin, G., Ona-Nguema, G., Juillot, F., Calas, G. and Brown, G. E. (2011). Distinctive arsenic (V) trapping modes by magnetite nanoparticles induced by diferent sorption processes. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 7258-7266. Zhao, X., Shi, Y., Wang, T., Cai, Y. and Jiang, G. (2008). Preparation of silica-magnetite nanoparticle mixed hemimicelle sorbents for extraction of several typical phenolic compounds from environmental water samples, Journal of Chromatography , 1188(2), 140-147. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 552 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 322 |
||