تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,093,648 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,198,256 |
Modelling of some soil physical quality indicators using hybrid algorithm principal component analysis - artificial neural network | ||
Desert | ||
مقاله 13، دوره 24، شماره 1، شهریور 2019، صفحه 133-141 اصل مقاله (529.01 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdesert.2019.72447 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
F. AmiriMijan* 1؛ H. Shirani1؛ I. Esfandiarpour1؛ A.A. Besalatpour2؛ H. Shekofteh3 | ||
1College of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran | ||
2Inter 3 GmbH - Institut for Ressources management, Otto-Suhr-Allee 59, 10585 Berlin, Germany | ||
3Soil Science Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Jiroft University, Jiroft, Kerman, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
One of the important issues in the analysis of soils is to evaluate their features. In estimation of the hardly available properties, it seems the using of Data mining is appropriate. Therefore, the modelling of some soil quality indicators, using some of the early features of soil which have been proved by some researchers, have been considered. For this purpose, 140 disturbed and 140 undisturbed soil samples were collected from Jiroft, southern Kerman, Iran. Some physical and chemical properties of soil, for example, sand, silt and clay percentage, organic matter (OM), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), electrical conductivity at saturation (ECe), porosity (F), and bulk density (BD) were measured using standard methods. Some soil physical property indicators, including plant available water (PAW), relative field capacity (RFC), air capacity (AC) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) were also calculated. Using the hybrid algorithm of principle component analysis-artificial neural network (PCA-ANN), the calculated indicators were predicted by the easily available properties. The results showed that PCA-ANN had an acceptable accuracy in the modelling of soilphysical quality. The coefficient of determination (R2) of training and testing data for PAW, RFC and AC were 0.82 and 0.81, 0.90 and 0.79, 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. The optimization of Ks did not have the desired results. In other words, the R2 values of the training and testing data for this indicator were equal to 0.25 and 0.13, respectively. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Aeration capacity؛ Plant available water؛ Relative field capacity؛ Sustainable agriculture | ||
مراجع | ||
Alliaume, F., W.A.H. Rossing, M. García, K.E. Giller, S. Dogliotti, 2013. Changes in soil quality and plant available water capacity following systems redesign on commercial vegetable farms. European Journal of Agronomy, 46; 10– 19. Alison, L. E., C.D. Modie, 1965. Carbonate. In: C. A. Black, (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part II, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI. P. 1379-1396. Al-Sulaiman, M. A., A. M. Aboukarima, 2016. Prediction of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Agricultural Soils Using Artificial Neural Network and c#. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 5; 1-15. Anlauf, R., P. Rehrmann, 2012. Effect of compaction on soil hydraulic parameters of vegetative landfill covers. Geomaterials, 2; 29–36. Andrewsa, S.S., C.B. Florab, J.P. Mitchellc, D.L. Karlen, 2003. Growers’ perceptions and acceptance of soil quality indices. Geoderma, 114; 187– 213. Andrews, S S., D. L. Karlen, C.A. Cambardella, 2004. The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society American Journal, 68; 1945-1962. Archer, J.R., P.D. Smith, 1972. The relation between bulk density, available water capacity, and air capacity of soils. Journal of Soil Science, 23; 475-480. Armenise, E., M.A. Redmile-Gordon, A.M. Stellacci, A. Ciccarese, P. Rubino, 2013. Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment. Soil Tillage Res., 130; 91–98. Asgharzadeh, H., M.R. Mosaddeghi, A.A. Mahboubi, A. Nosrati, A.R. Dexter, 2010. Soil water availability for plants as quantified by conventional available water, least limiting water range and integral water capacity. Plant Soil, 335; 229-244. Blake, G. R., Hartge, K. H., 1986. Particle Density, in: Klute, A. (eds), Methods Of Soil Analysis, Part 1(Physical and Mineralogical Methods), Second Edition, Madison, Wisconsin USA, pp. 363-382. Bodhinayake, W., B.C. Si, 2004. Near-saturated surface soil hydraulic properties under different land uses in the St Denis National Wildlife Area Saskatchewan, Canada. Hydrol. Process, 18; 2835–2850. Botula, Y.D., A. Nemes, P. Mafuka, E. Van Ranst, W.M. Cornelis, 2013. Prediction of water retention of soils from the humid tropics by the nonparametric k-nearest neighbor approach. Vadose Zone J, 12; http://dx.doi.org /10.2136/vzj2012.0123. Bouyoucos, G. J., 1951. A recalibration of hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal, 43; 434-438. Cockroft, B., K.A. Olsson, 1997. Case study of soil quality in south eastern Australian management of structure for roots in duplex soils. In: Gregorich, E.G., Carter, M.R. (Eds.), Soil Quality for Crop Production and Ecosystem Health. In: Developments in Soil Science, vol. 25. Elsevier, New York, NY. Pp. 339– 350. Idowu, O.J., H.M. van Es, G.S. Abawi, D.W. Wolfe, J.I. Ball, B.K. Gugino, B.N. Moebius, R.R. Schindelbeck, A.V. Bilgili, 2007. Farmer-Oriented Assessment of Soil Quality using Field, Laboratory, and VNIR Spectroscopy Methods Plant and Soil. In review. Ghanbarian-Alavijeh, B., A.M. Liaghat, S. Sohrabi, 2010. Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity from Soil Physical Properties using Neural Networks Model. International Scholarly and Scientific Research and Innovation, 4; 58-63. Ghosh, S., B. Wilson, S. Ghoshald, N. Senapati, B. Mandal, 2012. Organic amendments influence soil quality and carbon sequestration in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 156; 134– 141. Hebb, Ch., D. Schoderbek, G. Hernandez-Ramirez, D. Hewinsd, C.N. Carlyle, E. Bork, 2017. Soil physical quality varies among contrasting land uses in Northern Prairie regions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 240; 14–23. Karlen, DL., S.S. Andrews, JW. Doran, 2001. Soil quality: Current concepts and applications. Advances in Agronomy, 74; 1-40. Karlen, D.L., C.A. Ditzler, S.S. Andrews, 2003. Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma, 114; 145–156. Karhua, K., T. Mattilab, I. Bergstr, M.K. Regina, 2011. Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity - Results from a short-term pilot field study. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140; 309–313. Khotabaeia, M., H. Emami, A.R. Astaraei, A. Fotovat, 2013. Improving Soil hysical Indicators by Soil Amendment to a Saline-Sodic Soil. Desert, 18; 73- 78. Marquez, C.O., V.J. Garcia, C.A. Cambardella, R.C. Schultz, T.M. Isenhart, 2004. Aggregate size stability distribution and soil stability. Soil Science Society American Joiurnal, 68; 725-735. Marzaioli, R., Ascoli, R.D., De Pascale, R.A., Rutigliano, F.A., 2010. Soil quzwartality in a Mediterranean area of Southern Italy as related to different land use types. Applied Soil Ecology, 44; 205–212. Moebius, B.N., H.M. van Es, R.R. Schindelbeck, O.J. Idowu, D.J. Clune, J.E. Thies, 2007. Evaluation of laboratory-measured soil physical properties as indicators of soil physical quality. Soil Sci., 172; 895- 912. Moncada, M.P., D. Gabriels, W.M. Cornelis, 2014. Data- driven analysis of soil quality indicators using limited data. Geoderma, 235–236; 271–278. Mueller, L., B.D. Kay, B. Been, C. Hu, Y. Zhang, M. Wolff, F. Eulenstein, U. Schindler, 2008. Visual assessment of soil structure: Part II. Implications of tillage, rotation and traffic on sites in Canada, China and Germany. Soil Tillage. Research, 103; 188–196. Noori, R., A. R. Karbassi, A. Moghaddamnia, D. Han, M. H. Zokaei-Ashtiani, A. Farokhnia, M. Ghafari Gousheh, 2011. Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, Gamma test, and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 401; 177-189. Oliveira, T.C., L.F.S. da Silva, M. Cooper, 2014. Evaluation of Physical Quality Indices of a Soil under a Seasonal Semideciduous Forest. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 38; 444-453. Obe, O.O., D.K. Shangodoyin, 2010. Artificial Neural Network Based Model for Forecasting Sugar Cane Production. Journal of Computer Science, 6; 439-445. Obriot, F., M. Stauffer, Y. Goubard, N. Cheviron, G. Peres, M. Eden, A. Revallier, L. Vieublé-Gonod, S. Houot, 2016. Multi-criteria indices to evaluate the effects of repeated organic amendment applications on soil and crop quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 232; 165–178 Rajkai, K.L., S.N. Kabos, M.Th. van Genuchten, 2004. Estimating the water retention curve from soil properties: comparison of linear, nonlinear and concomitant variable methods. Soil and Tillage Research, 79; 145–152. Raats, P.A.C., D.E. Smiles, A.W. Warrick, 2002. Contributions to environmental mechanics: Introduction. In Environmental Mechanics: Water, Mass and Energy Transfer in the Biosphere (Raats, P.A.C., Smiles, D.E., Warrick, A.W., Eds.), pp. 1–28. Geophys. Monogr 129. American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC. Reynolds, WD., BT. Bowman, CF. Drury, C.S. Tan, X. L u., 2002. Indicators of good soil physical quality, density and storage parameters. Geoderma, 110; 131- 146. Reynolds, W.D., G.C. Topp, 2008. Soil water desorption and imbibition: tension and pressure techniques. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG. (Eds.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edition. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Taylor and Francis, LLC, Boca Raton, FL. Pp. 981-997. Reynolds W.D., C.F. Drury, C.S. Tan, C.A. Fox, X.M. Yang, 2009. Use of indicators and pore volumefunction characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma, 152; 252-263. Reichert; J.M., J.A. Albuquerque, D.R. Kaiser, D.J. Reinert, F.L. Urach, R. Carlesso, 2009. Estimation of water retention and availability in soils of Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo, 33; 1547-1560. Richards, L. A., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Soil Science, 78; 7-33. Robinson, D.A., I. Lebron, H. Vereecken, 2009. On the definition of the natural capital of soils: a framework for description evaluation, and monitoring. Soil Science Society American Joiurnal, 73; 1904–1911. Safadoust, A., P. Feizee, A.A. Mahboubi, B. Gharabaghi, M.R. Mosaddeghi, B. Ahrens, 2014. Least limiting water range as affected by soil texture and cropping system. Agricultural Water Management, 136; 34– 41 Samuel-Rosa; A., R.S. Diniz Dalmolin, P. Miguel, 2013. Building predictive models of soil particle-size distribution. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 37; 422-430. Saxton, K. E., W. J. Rawls, 2006. Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions. Soil Science Society American Joiurnal, 70; 1569–1578. Sena, M.M., R.T.S. Frighetto, P.J. Valarini, H. Tokeshi, R.J. Poppi, 2002. Discrimination of management effects on soil parameters by using principal component analysis: a multivariate analysis case study. Soil and Tillage Research, 67; 171–181. Shahab, H., H. Emami, G.H. Haghnia, A. Karimi, 2013. Pore size distribution as a soil physical quality index for agricultural and pasture soils in Northeastern Iran. Pedosphere, 23; 312–320. Shirani, H., M. Habibi, A.A. Besalatpour, I. Esfandiarpour, 2015. Determining the features influencing physical quality of calcareous soils in a semiarid region of Iran using a hybrid PSO-DT algorithm. Geoderma, 259–260; 1–11. Skopp, J., M.D. Jawson, J.W. Doran, 1990. Steady-state aerobic microbial activity as a function of soil water content. Soil Science Society American Joiurnal, 54; 1619–1625. Sys, C., E. Van Ranst, J. Debaveye, 1991. Land Evaluation. Part I, General Administration for Development Cooperation Eds., Brussels, Belgium, Vomocil, J.A., 1965. Porosity. In: Black, C.A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA, Madison, WI. pp. 299–314. Warrick, A.W., 2002. Soil Physics Companion. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, USA. White, R.E., 2006. Principles and Practice of Soil Science, 4th edition. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. Walkley, A., I.A. Black, 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science Society American Joiurnal, 37; 29–38. Willekens, K., B. Vandecasteele, A. De Vliegher, 2014. Soil quality and crop productivity as affected by different soil management systems in organic agriculture. Building Organic Bridges’, at the Organic World Congress. 13-15 Oct., Istanbul, Turkey. White, R. E., 2006. Principles and Practice of Soil Science. 4th Edition, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. P. 363. Yan, Xu., X. You, 2013. Estimating Parameters of Van Genuchten Model for Soil Water Retention Curve by Intelligent Algorithms. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 7; 1977-1983. Yang, J., Zh. He, W.J. Zhao, J. Du, L.F. Chen, X. Zhu, 2016. Assessing artificial neural networks coupled with wavelet analysis for multi-layer soil moisture dynamics prediction. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 8; 116-124. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 521 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 568 |