The Study of the Impact of Price Limits and Trading Halts on Trading Activities, Liquidity and Price Volatility in the Tehran Stock Exchange | ||
| تحقیقات مالی | ||
| Article 4, Volume 21, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 213-236 PDF (1.22 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/frj.2019.274235.1006811 | ||
| Authors | ||
| dariush damoori* 1; Hadi Khoshnud2 | ||
| 1Prof., Department of Accounting & Financial, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| 2MSc., Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Objective: This study is aimed at examining the relative performance of trading halts and price limits in the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this research, we determined if the mechanisms involved in trading halts and price limits in the Tehran Stock Exchange affect the market variables or not. This was done through studying the trading activity, liquidity, volatility and abnormal returns. We have also examined the efficiency of the mechanisms involved in trading halts with respect to the price limits. Methods: In this study, the pre and post events period’s average changes were compared to test the relative performance of the trading halts and price limits. We examined 400 trading suspensions and 893 price limits related to 80 companies from 1392 to 1396, and the data was selected by the omissive sampling method. The hypothesis test has been performed using the SPSS software, the mean comparison method and Wilcoxon test. Results: Through testing the hypotheses it was concluded that the trading activity reduces after trading halts but increases after price limits. On the other hand, liquidity increases after the trading halt, but reduces after prices limits. The results also show that volatility reduces after trading halts although there is no significant difference after price limits. Meanwhile the result also show that abnormal returns increase after trading halts but decreases after price limits. Conclusion: According to the volatility and liquidity criteria, trading halts are more efficient, but based on the trading activity and abnormal returns criteria, price limits seem to be more efficient. Therefore, in order to compare the relative performance of the trading halts and price limit in the Tehran Stock Exchange, we cannot express a definitive opinion. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Price limits; Trading halts; Trading activity; liquidity; Price volatility | ||
| References | ||
|
References Abken, P. A., & Nandi, S. (1996). Options and volatility. Economic Review, 81(3-6), 21. Aitken, M., & Comerton-Forde, C. (2003). How should liquidity be measured? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(1), 45-59. Bacha, O.I., Rashid, M. E.S.A., & Ramlee, R. (2008). The efficiency of trading halts: Emerging market evidence. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 5(2), 124-148. Damoori, D., & Zarei, M. (2014). The Study of the Impact of Relative Performance of Trading halts on Market Quality (The Study of Tehran Stock Exchange). Journal of Asset Management & Financing, 2(3), 49-62. (in Persian) Danışoğlu, S., & Güner, Z. N. (2018). Do price limits help control stock price volatility? Annals of Operations Research, 260(1-2), 129-157. Eslami-Bidgoli, Gh., Ghalibaf-Asl, H., & Alishavandi, A. (2010). The Effects of Price Limit Modification on Volatility, Return, Trade Frequency, Trade Size and Turn-over Velocity in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial research journal, 11(27), 3-22. (in Persian) Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. Farag, H. (2013). Price limit bands, asymmetric volatility and stock market anomalies: Evidence from emerging markets. Global Finance Journal, 24(1), 85-97. Frino, A., Lecce, S., & Segara, R. (2011). The impact of trading halts on liquidity and price volatility: Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(3), 298-307. Ghorbani, M.N. (2011). The impact of trading halts on liquidity and price volatility of Tehran stock exchange. Master Thesis, University of Economic Sciences. (in Persian) Hauser, S., Kedar-Levy, H., Pilo, B., & Shurki, I. (2006). The effect of trading halts on the speed of price discovery. Journal of Financial Services Research, 29(1), 83-99. Jalal duste Astaneh, H. (2005). The Effect of Trading halts on Iran Stock Exchange. Master Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. (in Persian) Jalali Naeini, Seyyed Gholam Reza, Hashemi Nezhad, Seyyed Mohammad, Sanaei Alam, Mohsen, & Ebrahimi, Seyyed Babak. (2011). Effect Analysis of Price Limit Regulation on the Efficiency of Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Securities Exchange, 4(13), 87-111. (in persian) Kim, Y. H., & Yang, J. J. (2004). What makes circuit breakers attractive to financial markets? A survey. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 13(3), 109-146. Kim, Y. H., Yagüe, J., & Yang, J. J. (2008). Relative performance of trading halts and price limits: Evidence from the Spanish Stock Exchange. International Review of Economics & Finance, 17(2), 197-215. Miller, M. H. (1991). Financial innovations and market volatility (pp. 1-288). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Shooshtarian, Z., & Elya, A. (2010). The Study of the Impact of Capital Increase from Stock Rights on Trading Volume in Tehran Stock Exchange. Human Sciences University of Shiraz, 26(1), 95-115. (in Persian) Subrahmanyam, A. (1995). On rules versus discretion in procedures to halt trade. Journal of Economics and Business, 47(1), 1-16. Veld-Merkoulova, Y. V. (2003). Price limits in futures markets: effects on the price discovery process and volatility. International Review of Financial Analysis, 12(3), 311-328. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,192 PDF Download: 1,048 |
||