پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,479 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,032 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,992,489 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,222,438 |
بررسی رفتار اقتصادی گندم‌کاران کرمانشاه برای کاهش آثار منفی زیستمحیطی کودهای شیمیایی (کاربرد روش ارزش گذاری مشروط) | ||
| تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 50، شماره 4، دی 1398، صفحه 643-657 اصل مقاله (1.15 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2019.275898.668722 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمید بلالی* 1؛ میترا محمدی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران | ||
| 2دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بخش کشاورزی بهعنوان زیربنای اصلی تحقق امنیت غذایی، از مهمترین بخشهای اقتصادی جوامع محسوب میشود. امروزه، رشد سریع جمعیت و افزایش تقاضا برای موادغذایی در دنیا، باعث افزایش فشار بر منابعطبیعی و وابستگی شدید به مصرف نهادههای شیمیایی در فعالیتهای کشاورزی شده است. کشاورزی متعارف که در آن تمرکز تولید افزایش استفاده از نهادههای شیمیایی مانند انواع کودهای شیمیایی است، نه تنها باعث کاهش کیفیت منابع آب، خاک و کیفیت محصولات تولیدی میگردد، بلکه سلامت مصرفکنندگان را نیز با خطر مواجه مینماید. هدف این مطالعه، بررسی رفتار اقتصادی کشاورزان گندمکار شهرستان کرمانشاه در مورد برنامههای کنترل آثار منفی زیستمحیطی کودهای شیمیایی با استفاده از روش ارزشگذاری مشروط و در قالب تمایل به پرداخت کشاورزان میباشد. برای این منظور، تعداد 245 نفر از کشاورزان گندم کار این شهرستان با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شده و دادههای مورد نیاز از طریق پرسشنامه جمعآوری گردید. روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه توسط 20 نفر از اساتید و کارشناسان مورد بررسی و تایید قرار گرفت و ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه 838/0 محاسبه گردید. بر اساس نتایج تحقیق، میانگین تمایل به پرداخت کشاورزان برای کاهش آثار منفی زیستمحیطی کودهای شیمیایی معادل 1585 ریال برآورد گردید. برای بررسی عوامل موثر بر تمایل به پرداخت کشاورزان از الگوی لاجیت استفاده شد و نتایج حاصل از آن نشان داد که متغیرهای توضیحی تحصیلات و نگرش کلی کشاورزان نسبت به خطرات استفاده از کود شیمیایی در سطح پنج درصد از لحاظ آماری تاثیر مثبت و معنی‌دار بر تمایل به پرداخت کشاورزان دارند و متغیرهای سن و مالکیت زمین از لحاظ آماری تاثیر معنیداری بر تمایل به پرداخت کشاورزان ندارند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزشگذاری مشروط؛ تمایل به پرداخت؛ الگوی لاجیت؛ کودشیمیایی؛ کشاورزی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the economic behavior of wheat farmers in Kermanshah to reduce the negative environmental impacts of chemical fertilizers (Application of Contingent Valuation Method( | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamid Balali1؛ Mtra Mohammadi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| 2M.Sc. of Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Agriculture as one of the main basis of realizing food security is one of the most important economic sectors of societies. Nowadays, rapid population growth and rising demand for food in the world have increased the pressure on natural resources and dependence on the consumption of chemical inputs in agricultural activities. Conventional agriculture, in which production focus is based on increasing the use of chemical inputs, such as various fertilizers, not only reduces the quality of water, soil and quality of the products produced, but also jeopardizes the health of consumers of agricultural products. The aim of this study was to investigate the economic behavior of wheat farmers in Kermanshah city regarding environmental control programs for chemical fertilizers using Contingent Valuation Method and in the form of willingness to pay farmers. For this purpose, 245 wheat farmers in this city were selected by simple random sampling method and required data were collected through a questionnaire. The content validity of the questionnaire was verified by 20 faculty members and experts and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the reliability of the questionnaire was calculated as 0.838. According to the results of the research, the average willingness to pay farmers to reduce the negative environmental impacts of chemical fertilizers is estimated at 1585 Rials. To investigate the factors affecting the willingness to pay of farmers, the logit model was used and the results showed that explanatory variables of education and general attitude of farmers about the risks of using chemical fertilizer at the level of 5% had a significant positive effect on the tendency to payments, and age and land ownership did not statistically affect farmers' willingness to pay. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Contingent Valuation, Willingness to Pay, Logit Model, Chemical Fertilizers, Agriculture | ||
| مراجع | ||
10. Baidoo, I., Ramatu, M. A., Asuming-Brempong, S., Oser-Akoto, I., Asante, F. A., 2013. Willingness to pay for improved water for farming in the upper east region of Ghana. Greener Journal of Agriculture Science. 34(4), 271-279. 11. Benjamin, E. O., Blume, M., 2015. Participation of smallholders in agroforestry agri-environmental scheme: a lesson from the rural mount Kenyan region. Journal of Developing Areas 49(4),127-143. 12. Bonilla, T. (2010). Analysis of consumer preferences toward 100% fruit juice packages and labels". Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and MechanicalCollege in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness by Tatiana Bonilla BS, Universidad de Costa Rica. 13. Brethour, C. & Weersink, A.(2001). An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 25(1), 219-226. 14. Cardona, J.T., Bonnichsen, O., Speelman, S., Verspecht, A., & Buysse, J.(2019). Farmers reasons to accept bio-based fertilizer: A choice experiment in seven different European countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(1), 406-416. 15. Carson, R.T. Flores, N.E. Martin, K.M.and Wright, J.L.(1996) Contingent valuationand revealed preference methodologies:Comparing the estimates for quasi-publicgoods.. Land Economics, 72(1),80-99. 16. Chang, Ch., Lee, Ch., Chiou, Ch., & Jeng, F.(1998). Recovery assessment of lumber mill wastes: composting product field test. Resources, conservation and recycling, 25(2), 133-150 17. Conway, G,R., Barbier, E.B., 2013. After the Green Revolution: Sustainable Agriculture for Development Routledge. 18. Danso. G., Drechsel, P., Failor, S., Giordano. M. 2006. Estimating the demand for municipal waste compost via farmers willingness to pay in Ghana, Waste Manage. 26(2), 1400-1409. 19. Davey. K. A., Furtan, W. H. 2008. Factors that affect the adaption decision of conservation tillage in the prairie region of Canada, Can. Journal of Agricultural Economic, 56(3). 257-275. 20. FAO. 2007. Food Outlook, Global Market Analysis. Global Informationand Early Warning System on food and agriculture”. FAO, Rome. 21. Fattahi. A.,(2013). Princibles of Economic Valuation of Natural of Resources. Ardakan University Press.(In Farsi). 22. Garming, H. & Waibel, H.(2006). Willingness to pay to avoid health risks from pesticides: A case study from nicarague, Presentation at the 46th Annual Meeting of the German Association of Agricultural Economics(Gevisola) in Giessen, 4-6 October. 23. Ghadiyali Tejaskumar, R., Kayasth Manish, M., 2012. Contribution of green technology in sustainable development of agriculture sector. Journal of Environment, Research and Development, 7(1A), 590-596. 24. Ghadimi, S., Shabanali, A., & Asadi, A.(2013). Investigating Factors Affecting Farmers' Attitudes toward Organic Farming: Case study of Fereidoon city, Journal of Agricultural extension and education research, 9(3), 97-122. (In Farsi) 25. Ghosh, N., 2004, Reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers and its financial implications for farmers in India. Ecological Economic, 49(2), 149-162. 26. Ghorbani, M.(1997). Insurance efforts on productivity of wheat production in Mazandaran: data modeling. Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, 20(1): 91-73. (In Farsi) 27. Ghorbani, M., Darijani, A., Koocheki, A. & Zare Mirakabad, H.(2008). A model for pre-estimation of production of organic cotton in Iran: Case study of Khorasan Province. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(1), 13-17. 28. Ghorbani, M., Nemati, A., Ghorbani, R., & Liaghati, H.(2009). Economic behavior of wheat farmers of Khorasan Razavi province for control of weeds environmental damages: Application of CVM method. Journal of Iranian Agricultural Economic & Development Research, 41(3), 257-266. (In Farsi) 29. Ghorbani, M., Nemati, A., & Ghorbani, R.(2010). Investigating the willingness of farmers to pay wheat for control of weeds at different stages of its growth (Case Study: Khorasan Razavi). Journal of Agricultural Economic & Development,.25(1), 20-28. (In Farsi) 30. Hatirli, S. A., Ozkan, B, & Fert, K.(2005) An econometric analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 9(1), 62-608. 31. Horton, B. Colarullo, G., Bateman, I.J., Peres, A. A.2003. Evaluation non- user willingness to pay for a large-scale conservation programme in Amazonia: a Uk/ Italian contingent valuation study, Journal of Environment Conservation. 30(2). 139-146. 32. Hosseini, s. safdar; Sharzehei, golam ali; Naimi far, afsaneh (2010). Evalvation the Benefits of Nitate Contamination Abatement in Consumed Water Using Contigent Valuation Method. Journal of agricultural economics and development research, 42(3). 33. Hossein Zad, J., Shorafa, S., Dashti, Gh., Haitati, B., Kazemiyeh, F. (2010). "Economical Assessment of Environmental Resources of Pesticide Reduction Plans (Case Study of Khuzestan Province)." Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, Vol. 2, No. 4(In Farsi). 34. Hosein Zad, J., shorafa, S., & Dashti, Gh.(2011). Economic analysis of environmental benefits of Integrated Pests Management(Case Study of Khoozestan Province Farms). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 41(3), 267-274. (In Farsi) 35. Jiang, J. Y., Ke, M. F., Zhang, S. Y. Yin, C. B. 2012. Analysis on the influence factors of farmers willingness to control the quality and safety of vegetables: survey of 151 farmers in Gaocheng, Hebei Province, Agricultural Economic. 5(1), 32-42. 36. Jones, N. Sophoulis, C. M. and Malesios, C. (2007) Economic valuation ofcoastal water quality and protest responses: A case study in Mitilini Greece”.The Journal of Socio-Economics, article in press. 37. Kavoosi Kalashemi, M., Heidari Shalmani, M.,& Nazari, M.R.(2016). Estimation of willingness to pay of consumers for organic rice in urban households in Guilan province, Journal of Environmental Science, 13(1) 113-124. (In Farsi) 38. Keshavarz, P.(2013). Management Strategies for Increasing Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Agriculture. Journal of Modiriat – Arazi, Vol(1), N(1) (In Farsi). 39. Kurkalova, L. A. .,Kling, C, Zhao, J. H. 2001. The subsidy for adapting conservation tillage: estimation from observed Behavior. CARD Working Paper 01-Wp. 286-304. 40. Lohr, L., Park, T. & Highley, L. (1999) Farmer risk assessment for voluntary insecticide reduction”. Journal. Economic of Ecology 30: 121-130. 41. Mafi, H., Saleh, A. & Hoseini, S. S.(2012). The Estimation of Willingness to Pay for Organic Products, Case Study: Vegetables and Cucumbers in Gilan and Tehran Provinces. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, (1) 11-18.(in Farsi) 42. Malakoti, Mohammad Jafar (2010) "The Effect of Optimum Use of Fertilizer and the Production of Healthy Crop Products". Scientific Journal of Eco-physiology of Crops and Weeds. forth year. No. 16, 133-150. 43. Mitchell,R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989) "Using Survey to Value PublicGoods: The Contingent Valuation Method". (Washington DC, Resourcesfor the Future). 44. Nemati, A., Ghorbani, M.(2013). Reconciliation of farmers' economic and environmental behavior in weed management, Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 4(3), 39-58. (In Farsi) 45. Noguero, M., Lacombe, B., 2016. Transporters Involved in Root Nitrate Uptake and Sensing by Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 7, 1-7. 46. Owens, N. N., Swinton, S. M. & Van Ravenswaay, E. O..(1998) Farmer demand for safer corn herbicides: survey methods and descriptive results .michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, Michigan State University, East Lasing, MI. 47. Patrica, A.Champ,A.A. and Correas.(2005), Using Contingent Valuation to Value a naxious weeds control program: the effects of including an unsure response category. Journal of Ecological economics,55: 47-60. 48. Pearce, D., T. Seccombe.(2000). Economic valuation and environmental decision- making in Europe. Environmental Science and Technology. 34: 1419-1425. 49. Pingali, P.L., 2012. Green Revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(31), 12302-12308. 50. Pourmozaffar, S, H., Laiani, Q., Shahabi Ahangarkolaei, S. & Rafiey, H.(2014). Estimating the consumers willingness to pay in order to take advantage of organic tomatoes: Application of Hechmans tow stage method: Study sample: Organic Cucumber in Mazandaran Province. Environment Research, 5, 97-108.(In Farsi). 51. Pourghasem, F., and Ali Beigi, A.H.(2014). An analysis of the tendency of farmers of Kermanshah to replace organic fertilizers instead of chemical fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural extension and education research, 6(3), 33-48. (In Farsi) 52. Roberts, T. L.(2008), Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture. 32: 177-182. 53. Sandooghi, A., Amini, A.A., A, Yousefi.(2016). Measurement of the factors affecting the healthy and organic cucumber consumers in Isfahan using empirical selection method, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 29(2),139-149. (In Farsi) 54. Smale, M., Simpungwe, E.,Birol, E., Kassie, G.T., De Groote, H., Mutale,R., 2015. The changing structure of the maize seed industry in Zamibia: prospects for orange maize. Agribusiness 31(1), 132-146. 55. Stallman, H.R., James Jr, H.S.2015. Determinants affecting farmers willingness to cooperate to control pests, Ecological Economic. 117(2), 182-192. 56. Stuart, D., Schewe, R.L., Mc Dermott, M., 2014. Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: understanding farmer decision-making and potential barriers to change in the us. Land Usee Policy, 36. 210-218. 57. Sutton, M. A., Oenema, O., Erisman, J. W., Leip, A., van Grinsven, H., Winiwarter, W.,2011. Too much of a good thing. Nature, 472, 159-161. 58. Tao, ZH.Yan, H. Zhan, J.(2012). Economic valuation of forest ecosystem services in heshui watershed using contingent valuation method .procedia environmental sciences13,2445-2450. 59. Tang, X. Y., Zhang, H.P., Li, S.P.2012. Economic value of prevention and control of agricultural non – point source pollution – analyses of willingness to pay based on the perspective of production households of safe agricultural products, Chin. Rural Economic. 3. 53-66. 60. Tehrani, M. (2015). The use of chemical fertilizer in Iran is equal and even lower than the lobal standard. Tehran: Ministry of Agricultural Jihad Research Institute. (In Farsi) 61. Turner, R. K. Morse-Jones, S. and Fisher, B.(2010), Ecosystem valuation, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1): 79-101. 62. Veldstra, M. D., Alexandre, C. E., Marshall, M. I.(2014). To certify or not to certify? Separating the organic production and certification decisions, www. Elsevier.com/locate/foodpol 63. Zhou, Y., Zhou, Q., Gan, S., and Wang, L. 2018. Factors affecting farmers willingness to pay for adapting vegetable residue compost in North China, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38. 401-411. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 530 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 454 |
||