تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,113,936 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,217,719 |
تحلیل اعتبارسنجی ابعاد زیستپذیری جامعۀ محلی (منطقۀ مورد مطالعه: شهرستان قلعه گنج، استان کرمان) | ||
تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 51، شماره 2، تیر 1399، صفحه 243-261 اصل مقاله (1.44 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2019.281534.668755 | ||
نویسنده | ||
مهدی قربانی* | ||
دانشیار گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
رویکرد زیستپذیری به سیستم روستای سالم، امن، با دسترسی مناسب و مقرونبهصرفه اطلاق میشود که کیفیت بالای زندگی را موجب شده و رویکردی منتج از نظریه توسعه پایدار تلقی میگردد. لذا، هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل اثرات اعتبار مالی خرد بر ابعاد زیستپذیری خانوارهایی روستایی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیة اعضای صندوقهای خرد روستایی دهستان سرخ قلعه در شهرستان قلعه گنج بود. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 512 نفر محاسبه شد و روش نمونهگیری بهصورت طبقهای تصادفی صورت گرفت. تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها با استفاده از نرم افزارهای SPSS و LISREL. انجام شد. بهمنظور بررسی برازش مدل اندازهگیری سازه ابعاد زیستپذیری، دادههای گردآوری شده با استفاده از نرمافزار لیزرلبه روش تحلیل عاملی تاییدی مرتبه دوم انجام شد. یافتهها نشانداد شاخصهای نیکویی برازش عالی و مدل تحقیق، اندازهگیری ابعاد زیستپذیری را با دادههای مشاهده شده، تایید نمود. همچنین، عامل "پیوستگی و تعلق مکانی" بهعنوان قویترین شاخص زیستپذیری شناسایی شد. بر این اساس، فرهنگ پیوستگی و تعلق مکانی عامل زیربنایی و حتی پایه و اساس سایر بسترهای ضروری زیستپذیری است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
کیفیت محیطی؛ مشارکت و همبستگی؛ پیوستگی و تعلق مکانی؛ زیستپذیری؛ دهستان سرخ قلعه | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
An Analysis of Validation of livability constructs of the Local Communities (Case study: Ghale Ganj District) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mehdi Ghorbani | ||
Associate Professor Department of revitalization of arid and mountainous regions, Faculty of natural resource, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
A holistic approach to the system of healthy, secure, accessible, and cost - effective village is defined as an effective and cost - effective approach that results in sustainable development. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of microfinance on the biomass of rural households. The statistical population of the study consisted of all members of the rural microfinance facilities of the Sorkh Qhala Rural district. The sample size was calculated using the Cochran sampling formula of 512 individuals. The sampling method was stratified randomly. Data analysis was performed with SPSS25 and LISREL8.8 software. In order to study the fitting of the livability structure measurement model, the collected data were analyzed with LISREL software by the second factor confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that among livability indicators, association and place attachment were in better condition than other indicators. In addition, It was as well found out that absoulte fit indices (GFI= 0.92, AGFI= 0.91), adjusted goodness of fit (CFI= 0.92, NNFI= 0.91), and parsimony (X2/df=2.899, RMSEA= 0.076) altogether confirmed the high goodness of fit of the model measuring constructs of livability with observed data. The results show that “Association and place attachment” is as potentiional indicator of livability. So, Association and place attachment is a basic factor for others relation to livability. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Environmental condition, Collaboration and solidarity, Association and place attachment, Livability, Sorkh Qhaleh | ||
مراجع | ||
1- AAzami, M., Bakhtiari, A. & Shanazi, K. (2018). Livelihood effects of the aquaculture fish farming units on occupier household (the case of Hamedan province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 49(4), 735-747. (in Farsi) 2- Aliakbari, I; & Akbari, M. (2016). Structural model - the interpretation of factors affecting the livability of tehran metropol. Space Planning and Approach, 21(1) , 1-31. (in Farsi) 3- American, I. O. A. (AIA) (2005). What Makes a Community Livable? Retrived from https://www.aarp.org/livable-communities/about/info-2014/what-is-a-livable-community.html. No 101, pp 10-11. 4- Anabestani, A.; Sadeghloo, T.; & Moradi, K. (2018). An Analysis of the Role of Managing Entrepreneurial Projects in the Empowerment of Rural Women Case Study: The Occupation of Agricultural Trade System in Mahallat County. Journal Space Economy & Rural Development. 7(1) 219-203. (In Farsi) 5- Azizpour, F. & Hosini Hasel, S. (2008), Review on Physical Transition Process in Villages in the Country (with Emphasize on Villages Guide Plan). Housing and rural environment. 27(123), 42-55,(2008) .(in Farsi) 6- Balsas, C.J.L., (2004). Measuring the Livability of an Urban Centre: An Exploratory Study of Key Performance Indicators. Planning, Practice and Research. 19(1), 101–110. 7- Bandarabad; A. R. (2011). The city is Livability. Urbanization searches Summer and Autumn. 8- Borzoo, Gh. R., Shah Hosseini, A., Abasizadeh Ghanavati, M. S., Valizadeh, A., Baghernasab, M., Baharami, M., Abdolmaleki, S., & Zarafshani, K. (2011). Qualitative Evaluation of Hadi Project of Karnachi Village in Kermanshah Township: Applying the Grounded Theory Approach. Journal of Rural Research. 1(3), 153-172. (in Farsi) 9- Bricker, S. H., Banks, V. J., Galik, G., Tapete, D., & Jones, R. (2017). Accounting for groundwater in future city visions. Land Use Policy, 69(July), 618–630. 10- Brittne, N. & Gu. Terri., (2009). Going from good to great: A Livable Communiies Survey in Westchester County in New York. AARP, 2009. 11- Eremia, M., Toma, L., & Sanduleac, M. (2017). The Smart City Concept in the 21st Century, 12- Fezoni ardakani, Z., & Haiati, D. (2011). Ceretical on rural guide plan implementation with a attitude toward the experience of Sepidan Fars. The Proceedings of the First National Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Zanjan University, Zanjan. 10-16 September 2011.(in Farsi) 13- Holt, J. A., (2001). Individual Relational Space in Deprived Urban Neighbourhoods. Paper Presented at ENHR conference, 25_29 June, 2001, Pultusk, Poland. http://www.nhh.no/geo/NEHOM/publications/ENHR%20Warsawa%202001 .pdf (accessed on 5 July 2006). 14- Inglehart, R., (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. 15- Islam, N., A. Ezaz, J. Chew, B. D’Netto (2012). Determinants of empowerment of rural women in Bangladesh, World Journal of Management, 4(2). 36 – 56. 16- Jome’e pour, M. & Tehrani, S. (2013). Explanation of the rate of viability and quality of life in urban villages (Case study of central part of Shahriar County). Quarterly Journal of Space Programming, 3, 49-60. (in Farsi) 17- Kennedy, RJ, & Buys, L. (2010). Dimension of liveability: A tool for sustainable cities. In Proceedings of SB12mad Sustainable Building Conference, Stockholm, Sweden 18- Kotkin, J., (2001). The New Geography: How the Digital Revolution in Reshaping the American Landscape., NY: Random House Paper Backs. 19- Langarodi., S. S. & Yari, O. (2010). Environmental protection and the planning of the physical development of the village with emphasis on the assessment of conductor projects. The Quarterly Review of Geography and Environmental Planning. 21(3), 45 - 60.(in Farsi) 20- Lau, L., Jasmine & Hashim, Ahmad, H., (2010). Liveability Dimensions and Attributes: Their Relative Importance in the Eyes of Neighbourhood Residents, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), 67–91. 21- Leby, J. L. & Hashim, A. H., (2010). Liveability Dimensions and Attributes: Their Relative Importance in the Eyes of Neighborhood Residents. Journal of ConstFruction in Developing Countries, 12 (1), 76–31. 22- Mohammadi, S. & Manuchehri, S. (2019). An analysis of the relationship between Livability and Resilience of rural communities (Case Study: Rural villages of Marivan County), Spatial Planning Research, 8(4): 90-110. 23- NDRII , (2007). Principles, Criterions, and Critercons for place making and designing of new Rural Areas. Natural Disaster Research Institute of Iran. 24- Omuta, G.E.D., (1988). The Quality of Urban Life and the Perception of Livability: A Case study of Neighbourhoods in Benin City, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 20(4): 417–440. 25- Perogordo Madrid, D. (2007). The Silesia Megapolis, European Spatial Planning 26- Rezvani , M. R. , Motakan , A.A , Mansorian , H. & Satari , M .H. (2009), Development and Assessment of indicator of Urban Life Quality - Urban. Journal of Urban geography, 1(2), 87 – 110. (in Farsi) 27- Rocchi, B., (2009), Gathering Information on Total Household Income Within an “Industry riented” Survey on Agriculture: Methodological Issues and Future Perspectives, Wye City Group on Statistics on Rural Development and Agriculture Household Income Second Meeting, Rome, Italy. 28- Rostamalizadeh, V., & Saliani, M. (2011). Desirable rural life with an emphasis on rural community wellbeing. Journal of Population Studies. 3(2), 165-186. (in Farsi) 29- Saei, M.; & Ziaee, S. (2016). Investigating the effect of microcredit funds on alleviating poverty, generating income and creating employment in Kerman province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 47(1), 227-235. (in Farsi) 30- Sajasi gheydari, H., Sadeghlu, T. & Mahmoudi, H. (2019). Ranking of villages based on biodiversity indices (Case Study: Nezam Abad Village of Islam City), Human Geography Researches, 51(1): 129-144. (in Farsi) 31- Salehi Chegeni, M.; rahimian, M.; & Gholamrezai, S. (2018). Analyzing the Solutions of Microcredit Funds to Empower Rural Women (Case study: Lorestan Province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 49(4), 675-687. (in Farsi) 32- Sasanpour, F., Tavallaee, S., & Jafari Asadabadi, H. (2014). Capability of cities for sustainable urban development (Case study: Tehran metropolis). The Quarterly Review of Geography, New Era, Twelfth, Number 42, Autumn 2014. (in Farsi) 33- SasanPour, F., Alizadeh, S., & Arabi Moghadam, H. (2018). Investigating the Feasibility of Urumia Urban Areas Livability using RALSPI Model. Researches in Geographical Sciences. 18 (48), 241-258. (In Farsi) 34- Smith, K. (2003). Environmental Hazards.Ebrahimmoghimi and Shapour Gudarzinejad. Tehran: Samt Publications, Pp: 35. 35- Song yang. (2011). A livable city study in china: using structural Equation models, thesis submitted in statistics, department of statistics Uppsala university. 36- UNWTO, (2004), Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations: A guidebook, Madrid, Spain: World Tourism Organization. 37- Vancouver M., (2004). City of Vancouver Community Assessment Survey, Executive Summary, 2004. 38- Visser, P., Van Dam, F. & Hooimeijer, P., (2005). The influence of Neighbourhood Characteristics on Geographical Differences in House Prices in the Netherlands. Paper Presented at European Network for Housing Research (ENHR) International Housing Conference, 29 June–3 July 2005, Reykjavik, Iceland. http://www.borg.hi.is/enhr2005iceland/index. Php? Option=content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=37 (accessed 2 September 2006). 39- Wheeler, M, (2001). “Planning Sustainable and livability Cities”, Stephen, (20), 39-44 40- World Bank, (2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Pp: 125 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 427 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 294 |