تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,117,152 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,222,263 |
بکارگیری الگوی طرح تدریس اعضای تیم (TMTD) در تقویت رفتار کار تیمی و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان دانشگاه اراک | ||
تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
مقاله 14، دوره 51، شماره 3، مهر 1399، صفحه 603-616 اصل مقاله (849 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.289893.668820 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
زهرا خوشنودی فر1؛ عنایت عباسی* 2؛ همایون فرهادیان3؛ حسین صالحی ارجمند4؛ عبدالمطلب رضایی5 | ||
1دانش آموخته دکتری، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس و استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی مجتمع آموزش عالی سراوان، سراوان، ایران | ||
2دانشیار، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
3دکتریِ، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
4استادیار، گروه گیاهان دارویی و معطر، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران | ||
5استادیار، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
در دانشکدههای کشاورزی، عموماً برای آموزش از روش سخنرانی استفاده میشود. یادگیری از طریق مشارکت و فعالیت تیمی، یکی از روشهای متداول آموزشی در عصر حاضر است. این مطالعه با هدف بکارگیری الگوی طرح تدریس اعضای تیم (Team Member Teaching Design-TMTD) در تقویت رفتار کار تیمی و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان در دانشگاه اراک انجام شده است. روشها: در این مطالعه نیمه تجربی، از طرح پیشآزمون و پسآزمون با گروه کنترل استفاده شده است. نمونههای مورد مطالعه دانشجویان گروه گیاهان دارویی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه اراک در سال تحصیلی 98-1397 بهمنظور مقایسه روشهای تدریس سخنرانی و طرح تدریس اعضای تیم (TMTD) بودند. نتایج: در گروههای مورد مقایسه، اثر روش تدریس طرح تدریس اعضای تیم (TMTD) بر پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان نشان داده شد. نتایج آزمونهای مقایسه میانگین نیز حکایت از تفاوت معنیدار دو روش تدریس در زمینه تقویت رفتار کار تیمی دانشجویان دارند. این مقاله در مورد اجرای روش تیمی، طرح تدریس اعضای تیم، و پیامدهای آن در تدریس بحث کرده و مسیری برای استفاده مؤثر از روشهای تدریس جهت کسب نتایج بهتر در فرایند تدریس و یادگیری در کلاس ارائه نموده است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
نظام آموزش عالی کشاورزی؛ روشهای تدریس سخنرانی و طرح تدریس اعضای تیم؛ رفتار کار تیمی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Applying the Team Member Teaching Design (TMTD) Model to Strengthen Teamwork Behavior and Academic Achievement of Arak University Student | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Zahra Khoshnodi far1؛ Enayat Abbasi2؛ Homayoun Farhadian3؛ Hossein Salehiarjomand4؛ Abdolmotalleb Rezaei Rezaei5 | ||
1Ph.D. graduate, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University and Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Higher Education Complex of Saravan, Saravan, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Ph.D., Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
4Assistant Professor, Department of Medicinal Plants, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak, Iran | ||
5Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Objectives: In the colleges of agriculture in Iran, the lecture is used as a dominated teaching method. Team learning is one of the most commonly used educational methods in the present era. The aim of this study was to compare the Team Member Teaching Design (TMTD) and the regular lecture method on the academic achievement and teamwork behavior of agricultural students. Methods: A within-subject design was followed for two groups in which the first group attended a series of lectures and the second group participated in team teaching. Differences between lecture and team teaching methods were examined for their academic achievement and teamwork. The study samples were taken of the medicinal herb Department of the University of Arak during the academic year of 2018-19. The mean scores of academic achievement and the teamwork behavior of students were compared. Results: In compared groups, the effect of the TMTD method on the academic achievement of students was shown. The results of means comparison tests indicated a significant difference between the two methods of teaching in the field of academic achievement and the strengthening of the teamwork behavior of students. Discussion: The paper further discussed team method implementation and its implication for teaching and proffered the way forward for effective use of teaching methods for better results in the classroom teaching and learning process. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Agricultural education system, lecture and TMTD methods, Teamwork behavior | ||
مراجع | ||
10. Hart, P. D. (2010). Employers' views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. Washington, DC: The Association of American Colleges and Universities. 11. Hejazi, S. H. (2006). Teaching methods in education. Tehran: Tohfe Publications, 48. 12. Heravi Karimooy, M. (2007). Effectiveness of lectures teaching methods and focus group on learning of nursing students in community health course (1). Iranian Journal of Medical Education. (11): 52- 56 (In Farsi). 13. Khoshnodifar, Z., Abbasi, E., Farhadian, H., Sadighi, H., & Pouratashi, M. (2019). Strengthening Requirements of Students Teamwork Behavior in Agricultural Higher Education System. Thesis of Ph.D. Tarbiat Modares University. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education. 14. Jorczak, R. L. (2011). An Information Processing Perspective on Divergence and Convergence in Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 6(2): 207-221. 15. Karami, M., Saeedipoor, B., Sarmdi, M. R., & Farajollahi, M. (2017). Comparing the Impact of Team Memebers Instruction on Students' Learning-Teaching with Restatement Teaching Method: The Case in Ilam Farhangyan University. Research in Curriculum Planning (In Farsi). 16. Koncz, A. & Collins, M. (2010). Employers Rank Communication Skills First among Job Candidate Skills and Qualities. Press Release. National Association of Colleges and Employers. Retrieved from http://www.naceweb.org/press-releases.aspx. 17. Lak Dizji, S., Razavi, N., Davoodi, A., & Valizade, S. (2005). Comparison of the Effects of Teaching Methods Lecture and discussion on the learning rate: Nursing Students. Proceedings of the Seventh National Congress on Medical Education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 14-15: (14) (In Farsi). 18. Mansoorian, M. R., Khosrovan, S., Sajjadi, M., Soltani, M., KHazaei, A. (2018). Effect of Team Member Teaching Design on Knowledge of Health Personnel about Diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Nursing. 6(2): 439-451 (In Farsi). 19. Martin, A. R. (1991). Perceptions of Iowa Vocational Agriculture Teachers Regarding Methods Used in Agricultural Education. Retrieved from: http://pubs.aged.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol32/32-01-13.pdf. 20. Matheson, C. (2008). The educational value and effectiveness of lectures. Clin Teach, 5: 218–221. 21. Mogharab M, Nzteghi K, Sharifzade G. (2014). Effects of lecture and team member teaching design on nursing students' learning and academic motivation. Mod Care J, 10(3):173-82 (In Farsi). 22. Mortazavi, H., Nemat, R., Rashidi, S., & Armat, M. R. (2004). Effectiveness of teaching methods and interactive learning in educational processes. Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Medical Education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education.14 (In Farsi). 23. National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: Association of American College and universities. 24. Neyestani, M. (2014). Educational planning, quality improvement strategies at unit level (school, university, and virtual education). Agah Publications. Tehran. 25. Oakley, B., Hanna, D. M., Kuzmyn, Z. & Felder, R. M. (2007). Best practices involving teamwork in the classroom: Results from a survey of 6435 engineering student respondents. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(3): 266-272. 26. Omowunmi, S. A., & Ezekiel, O. O. (2007). Effects of project, inquiry and lecture-demonstration teaching methods on senior secondary students. Achievement in separation of mixtures practical test, Educational Research and Review, 2 (6): 124-132. 27. Parr, B., & Edwards, M. C. (2004). Inquiry-Based Instruction in Secondary Agricultural Education: Problem. Solving- an Old Friend Revisited. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4): 106-117. 28. Payame Bussari, M., Fathi Azar, A., Mousavi Nasab. N. (2006). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Team Member Teaching Design (TMTD) and Lecture with Questions and Answers on Academic Achievement of Nursing Students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, autumn and winter. 6(2): 45-52 (In Farsi). 29. Rouhani, H., Foroughi, A., Nazari, S. (2015). Comparison of the method of research group and lecture on students' teaching (Applied Scientific School of Agriculture, Khorasan Razavi). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46-2(44): 697-706 (In Farsi). 30. Safari, M. (2005). Comparison of the lecture method of teaching and Discussion on student learning and satisfaction. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 6(1): 59-64 (In Farsi). 31. Safavi, A. (2006). Methods, techniques, models of teaching. Tehran: Samt Publications, 116. (In Farsi). 32. Salas, E., Sims, D. E. & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork?, Small Group Res, 36(5): 555. 33. Shafiei, M. R., Shafiei, N. (2017). Comparing the effect of team teaching and lecture teaching on nursing students' learning in Larestan Medical School. National Conference of Modern Iranian and World Research in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Social Studies. (In Farsi). 34. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning, National Education Association, Washington D. C., 3: 95. 35. Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3): 290-322. 36. Stewart, J. C., DeCusatis, C. S., Kidder, K., Massi, J. R. & Anne, K. M. (2009). Proceedings of Student-Faculty Research Day, CSIS, Pace University. Retrieved from: http://csis.pace.edu/~ ctappert/srd2009/b3.pdf. 37. Wang, J. & Hu, X. Xi. J. (2012). Cooperative learning with role play in Chinese pharmacology education, Indian J Pharmacol, 44(2): 253-256. 38. Weinstein, J., Morton, L., Taras, H. & Reznik, V. (2013). Teaching Teamwork to Law Students. Journal of Legal Education, 63(1): 36-64. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning: Influence on students' learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2): 253-280 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 842 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 510 |