پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,194,427 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,942,448 |
بازنمایی ژئوپلیتیکی روسیه در سینمای هالیوود | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 2، مهر 1399، صفحه 665-680 اصل مقاله (565.18 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2020.287491.449865 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| افشین متقی دستنایی* 1؛ مصیب قره بیگی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی | ||
| 2دکتری ژئوپلیتیک، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| رسانه به‌مثابۀ ابزاری قدرتمند و اثرگذار در جهان امروزی شناخته می‌شود که جریان‌های تولید قدرت در فضاها را جهت می‌دهد. سینما و فیلم به‌عنوان یکی از پایه‌های مهم رسانه که از نیروی اقناع، برانگیزندگی و جهت‌دهی بی‌مانندی برخوردار است، به ابزاری مهم برای رقابت در مقیاس‌های گوناگون ملی و فراملی تبدیل شده است. از همین رو، پژوهش دربارۀ رابطۀ میان ژئوپلیتیک و سینما که با رویکردهای پسامدرن و به‌ویژه با تأثیرپذیری از مکتب فرانکفورت آغاز شد، در پی مطالعۀ چگونگی بازنمایی کنش و واکنش بن‌مایه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی در حلقه‌های فیلم و تأثیرهای بیرونی آن بر مخاطبان است. در نوشتار حاضر با روش تحلیل گفتمان و تحلیل رواییِ سه فیلم منتخب «رمبو 2 (1985)، آسیب ناخواسته (2002) و سقوط (2012)»، می‌کوشیم چگونگی بازنمایی بن‌مایه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی روسیه در سینمای هالیوود را واکاوی کنیم. نتایج این نوشتار، نشان می‌دهد که دال‌های گفتمانی مانند جنگ سرد، غیریت‌سازی، فضای بی‌نظم، سه‌گانۀ روسیه و چین و ایران و تنش، مهم‌ترین بن‌مایه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی بازنمایی شده از روسیه در سینمای هالیوود هستند. در این فیلم‌ها، مکان رخدادِ سناریوهای فیلم، همان مکان‌هایی است که نظریه‌پردازان کلاسیک ژئوپلیتیک، همچون مکنیدر و اسپایکمن مطرح کرده‌اند؛ مکان‌هایی مانند هارتلند و ریملند یا فضاهایی که ژئوپلیتیک متخاصم بازمانده از دوران جنگ سرد را در ذهن تداعی می‌کند؛ همانند روسیه، کوبا، کلمبیا. هالیوود نیز باید این مکان‌های راهبردی را به‌عنوان «ژئوپلیتیک تنش» بازنمایی کند. از دیدگاه ژئوپلیتیک، به‌نظر می‌رسد سینمای هالیوود دارای «بازنمایی‌های هژمونیک» است که در ذهن مخاطبان «اجماعی جدید» و «خوانشی جدید» از نقشۀ جهان تولید می‌کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بازنمایی؛ جنگ سرد؛ روسیه؛ ژئوپلیتیک؛ سینما | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Geopolitical Representation of Russia in the Hollywood | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Afshin Mottaghi Dastnayi1؛ Mosayeb Ghareh Beygi2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Political Geography, Kharazmi University | ||
| 2Ph.D. in Geopolitics, University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The advent of photography and cinema, along with the development of technical tools for reproducing and disseminating images, has given many geographical spaces a great virtual appearance and confrontation with the public, a process that can be described as the “democratization” of space. In this process, the formation of a structure of all geographical spaces is represented. At least four factors must be used for parallelism: Duplication, Pluralization, Diversity, and Multiplicity. Matchmaking is an effort to produce and reproduce all features and characteristics of a space. Pluralism means the possibility of the presence of all opportunities in a space without a centrist force. Divergence also refers to centrifugal flow, based on which collectivism and pluralism are made and ultimately suffocation refers to a way in which there is no sign of separation, uniformity and assimilation. These four factors are an attempt to eliminate discrimination and inequality in the homogeneous distribution of space. This means that the four factors must be used to break the center-periphery relationship and centralize one space and marginalize other spaces. A central space tries to highlight its features and coordinates and turn it into an “audit center” and reduce spatial diversity. Cinema deals with both ways of parallelizing and distributing inequalities. In other words, on the one hand, cinema can give space to the marginal spaces of opportunity and create a democratic space and it can also move towards justifying and showing the superiority of the central space in opposition to the “other space”. How spatial representations are represented in cinema is a matter of linking cinema and geography. Result and discussion: Slavoj Žižek, the Slovenian post-Marxist philosopher, transformed the Hollywood film industry and its political-spatial developments by categorizing the American theatrical process from 1990 to 2001 after being affected by the September 11 attacks. He divides it into “Truman’s” and “Matrix’s” plays and explores the ideological and dramatic coordination of Americans’ understanding of the world after 9/11. Truman is a 1998 comedy, sci-fi, and drama film directed by Peter Lindsay Weir and starring Jim Carrey. The film depicts the life of a man whose life is being broadcast on television 24 hours a day for millions of people around the world without his knowledge. The film’s plot revolves around a middle-class man who, after a while, realizes what he has in mind about his happy and promising life. It’s a TV show. The Matrix is a 1999 science fiction film written and directed by the Wachowski Brothers. The film narrates the existence of human beings as fictional realities that are constructed by man-made machines and nourished by the human mind and energy. According to Žižek, both films represent the real-life credentials of everyday life in the United States and question “simulated reality” and represent “the Ultimate American Paranoid Fantasy”. Conclusion: Media is recognized as a powerful and influential tool in today’s world that directs the flow of power generation in space. Cinema and film have become an important tool for competing on a variety of national and transnational scales as one of the important pillars of the media which have the power to persuade, motivate and lead to uncertainty. Therefore, research on the relationship between geopolitics and cinema, which began with post-modern approaches and especially with the influence of the Frankfurt School, follows a study of how to represent the action and response of geopolitical foundations in film circles and its external effects are on the audience. The present study, by using discourse and narrative analyses of three selected films, Rambo 2 (1985), Unwanted Injury (2002), and Fall (2012), seeks to explore how Russian geopolitical foundations are represented in Hollywood cinema. The results of this study indicate that discourses such as the cold War, non-construction, unorganized space, Russia-China-Iran triangle, and tensions seem to be the most important elements of geopolitical representations of Russia in Hollywood cinema. In these films, the location of the film’s screenplays is the same locations proposed by classical geopolitical theorists such as Halford John Mackinder and Nicholas John Spykman; places such as Hartland and Rimland, or spaces where hostile geopolitics survived the cold War. It is reminiscent of Russia, Cuba, and Colombia. Hollywood also needs to represent these strategic locations as “geopolitical tensions”. From a geopolitical point of view, Hollywood cinema seems to have “hegemonic representations” that produce in the minds of the audience a “new consensus” and a ‘new interpretation” of the world map. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Cinema, Cold War, Geopolitics, Representation, Russia | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amess, T. (2014), “The Hollywood Vietnam War Machine: Failure to Capture Reality?”, Published in Sensiblereason, Aug. 9, Available at: http://sensiblereason.com/hollywood-vietnam-war-machine-failure-capture-reality/, (Accessed on: 12/6/2018).
Bennett, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter; a Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press.
Cantor, P. A. (2012), The Invisible Hand in Popular Culture: Liberty versus Authority in American Film and TV, USA: University Press of Kentucky.
Davis, A. (2014), Native Images: the Otherness and Affectivity of the Digital Body, Republished in JUMP CUT, Available at: http://ejumpcut.org/currentissue/DavisCGI/index.html, (Accessed on: 3/10/2019).
De Valck, M. and M. Hagener (2015), Cinephilia: Movies, Love and Memory, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Dodds, Klaus (2013), A New Approach to Critical Geopolitics, Translated by Rasoul Afzali, Omran Rasti, Afshin Mottaghi and Rasoul Babaei, Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi [in Persian].
Dodds, K., M. Kuus and J. Sharp (2013), The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics, Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
Dreyfus, Hubert and Paul Robinho (2007), Michel Foucault: Beyond Constructivism and Hermeneutics, Translated by Hossein Bashirieh, Tehran: Ney [in Persian].
Dyer, R. (2014). Introduction of Film Studies: Critical Approaches, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fouberg, Erin H., Alexander B. Murphy and H. J. de Blij (2012), Human Geography: People, Place and Culture, London: Wiley.
Gianos, P. L. (2018), Politics and Politicians in American Film, London: Praeger Publishers.
Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza (2012), Geopolitics: Principles and Concepts, Mashhad: Papeli [in Persian].
Hart W., Jennifer, R. B. Davis and R. Weed (2009), 24 and Philosophy: the World According to Jack, London: The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series.
Hjort, M. and S. MacKenzie (2013), Cinema and Nation, London: Routledge.
Jepson, R. (2009), 24 Terrorism through Television, Ulhul Sallano Ltd.
Jones, L. (2008), “A Geopolitical Mapping of the Post-9/11 World,” Journal of Media Geography, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 37-57.
Miklitsch, R. (2016), Roll over Adorno: Critical Theory, Popular Culture, Audio-visual Media, New York: State University of New York Press
Mojtahedzadeh, Pirooz (2012), Philosophy and Function of Geopolitics, Tehran: Samt [in Persian].
Mordak, Jonathan (2013), Poststructuralist Geography, Translated by Zahra Pishgahi Fard and Mosayeb Gharehbeygi, Tehran: Zeytoun-e Sabz [in Persian].
Mottaghi, Afshin and Mosayeb Gharabeyghi (2014), “Analysis of the Political Construction of Tehran Metropolitan Space Based on the Theory of Posts-Tructuralism”, First Conference on Geographical Sciences of Iran; Geography of Development, May, pp. 85-89 [in Persian].
Mottaghi, Afshin and Mosayeb Gharehbeygi (2015), Cinema and Geopolitics, Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi [in Persian].
Nans, L. (2014), “Love, Gender, and James Bond”, Journal of Identity and Gender, Vol. 27, No. 13, pp. 1-13.
Platts, T. K. (2013), “From Otherness to Apocalypse: the Evolution of the Modern Zombie”, Talk Given at “Wanted: Brains!’ The Zombie Conference”,, Columbia, MO, Oct. 5, Available at: http://academia.edu/ 4250399/From_Otherness_to_Apocalypse_The_Evolution_of_the_Modern_Zombie, (Accessed on: 5/8/2019).
Polan, D. and W. Haidee (2018), Young Art, Old Colleges: Inventing Film Studies, Durham: Duke UP.
Ross, S. J. (2011), Hollywood Left and Right: How Movie Stars Shaped American Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, I. (2013), American Politics in Hollywood Film, USA: Edinburgh University Press.
Zaniello, T. (2017), Working Stiffs, Union Maids, Reds, and Riffraff: an Expanded Guide to Films about Labor, (ILR Press books), USA: Cornell University Press.
Žižek, S. (2002), “The Matrix: or, Two Sides of Perversion”, in: W. Irwin (ed.), the Matrix and Philosophy: Welcome to the Desert of the Real, Chicago: Open Court, pp. 240-266.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 581 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 352 |
||