سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,225
تعداد مقالات67,685
تعداد مشاهده مقاله114,958,876
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,631,954
علم بیگی, امیر, صاحبدل, سینا, رضوانفر, احمد. (1400). تحلیل اثر ناهمگونی نقش رهبری در کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان ترویج کشاورزی با استفاده از الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود (FIMIX). , 52(1), 143-158. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.256768.668599
امیر علم بیگی; سینا صاحبدل; احمد رضوانفر. "تحلیل اثر ناهمگونی نقش رهبری در کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان ترویج کشاورزی با استفاده از الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود (FIMIX)". , 52, 1, 1400, 143-158. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.256768.668599
علم بیگی, امیر, صاحبدل, سینا, رضوانفر, احمد. (1400). 'تحلیل اثر ناهمگونی نقش رهبری در کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان ترویج کشاورزی با استفاده از الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود (FIMIX)', , 52(1), pp. 143-158. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.256768.668599
علم بیگی, امیر, صاحبدل, سینا, رضوانفر, احمد. تحلیل اثر ناهمگونی نقش رهبری در کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان ترویج کشاورزی با استفاده از الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود (FIMIX). , 1400; 52(1): 143-158. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.256768.668599

تحلیل اثر ناهمگونی نقش رهبری در کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان ترویج کشاورزی با استفاده از الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود (FIMIX)

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
دوره 52، شماره 1، فروردین 1400، صفحه 143-158    اصل مقاله (893.33 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2020.256768.668599
نویسندگان
امیر علم بیگی* 1؛ سینا صاحبدل2؛ احمد رضوانفر3
1، استادیار گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
2دانشجو کارشناسی ارشد گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
3استاد گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش کاربردی حاضر، با هدف بررسی نقش رهبری در کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان صورت گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش را کارکنان ترویج سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان تهران، تشکیل دادند که از بین آن‏ها، 51 نفر به­عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. پاسخگویان به روش نمونه‏گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه‏ای بود که روایی آن به­شکل روایی صوری، روایی سازه و روایی تشخیصی تأیید و پایایی آن به کمک محاسبه ضرایب آلفای کرونباخ و تتای ترتیبی بررسی شد که ضرایب نشان از پایایی ابزار داشت. روش غالب آماری، مدل‌سازی حداقل مربعات جزیی بود که با محاسبه ضرایب آن و با استفاده از الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود، کلاس‏های ناهمگونی نامشهود در بافت داده‏های پژوهش اکتشاف و با تطبیق نتایج حاصل از بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود با طبقه‏بندی بر مبنای مقیاس LMX مشخص شد که معماری فضای کنش رهبر-عضو در سازمان ترویج از یک معماری دولایه پیروی می‏کند. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که در فضای کنش رهبری در سازمان ترویج، کارکنانی که در فضای برون‏گروهی قرار می‏گیرند، دارای کیفیت زندگی کاری بسیار نامطلوبی بوده و احتمال قرارگیری در شرایط فرسودگی شغلی را دارند. از این‏رو، به­نظر می‏رسد مطالعه معماری فضای رهبری سازمانی در سازمان ترویج، گام مهمی در بهبود امور مدیریت منابع انسانی باشد. نظر به اینکه موضوع رهبری در ترویج کشاورزی از اهمیت بسیار بالایی برای تحریک تغییر اجتماعی برخوردار است، بهبود فضای رهبری سازمانی آن می‏تواند تاثیر مهمی بر آمادگی نظام اجتماعی برای تغییر داشته باشد. با تلفیق نتایج این پژوهش با تئوری رهبری اقتضایی و رهبری تحول‏آفرین می‏توان به یک مدل جامع رهبری از نقطه نظر تعیین فضای مطلوب کنش رهبر-عضو و کاهش تعارضات سازمانی دست یافت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تبادل رهبر-عضو؛ کیفیت زندگی کاری؛ الگوریتم بخش‌بندی ترکیب محدود (FIMIX)؛ رهبری در ترویج کشاورزی
عنوان مقاله [English]
An Analysis of Heterogeneity Effect of Leadership on the Quality of Work Life of Agricultural Extension Staff, Using FIMIX Algorithm
نویسندگان [English]
Amir Alambeigi1؛ Sina Sahebdel2؛ Ahmad Rezvanfar3
1Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural extension and education, Faculty of Economics and development, university of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2MSc. Student, Department of Agricultural extension and education, Faculty of Economics and development, university of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3Professor, Department of Agricultural extension and education, Faculty of Economics and development, university of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]
Current empirical research was conducted with the aim of examining the role of leader-member exchange quality on the quality of work life of employees. The statistical population was consisted of employees of the Agricultural extension in Tehran province, among which 51 were selected as the sample. Respondents were selected by simple random sampling method. The research tool was a questionnaire whose validity was verified by face validity, structural validity and discriminant validity, and reliability coefficients including Cronbach's alpha and ordinal tetha showed satisfied reliability. The dominant statistical method was partial least squares modeling which, by calculating its coefficients and using the finite Mixture algorithm, the intangible heterogeneity classes in the research data of the research are explored and by matching the results of the classifier composition of FIMIX on the LMX scale, it became clear that the leader-member action space architecture followed the organizational dual architecture. The results of the research show that in the organization of agricultural extension in the area of leadership task, the employees, who are in the out-of-band environment, experience adverse work life quality and are likely to be exposed to burnout conditions. Therefore, it seems that studying the architecture of organizational leadership space is an important step in improving human resource management. Given that leadership is very important for stimulating social change, improving its organizational leadership can have a significant impact on the social system's preparedness for change. By combining the results of this research with the theory of contingency leadership and transformational leadership, a comprehensive leadership model can be found from the point of view of determining the favorable climate of the leader-member's action and reducing organizational conflicts.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Leader-Member Exchange, Quality of Work Life, FIMIX Algorithm, Leadership in Agricultural Extension
مراجع
  1. Afjeh, S.A.A. (2006). Philosophical Foundations and Theories of Leadership and Organizational Behavior, SAMT pub. Tehran, 5 editions, p. 467. (In Farsi).
  2. Alambeigi, A., Malek Mohammadi, I., & Moghimi, S. M. (2009). An Investigation of the Influence of Organizational Factors on Intrapreneurship Development in Iranian Agricultural Extension Organization (IAEO). Iran's Economic and Agricultural Development Research, 43 (4), 715-725.
  3. Ali, H. (2007). Study The Quality of Work Life of the Employees of Islamic Azad University of Tabriz Branch and Provide a Suitable Model for IT. Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch. (In Farsi).
  4. Baghery, M. & Tavallaee, R. (2010). Investigation the Effect of Organizational Commitment on Organization Performance Reviewed. Police Organizational Development Journal, 7(30), 73-96. (In Farsi).
  5. Ballon, B., & Goodwin, N. H. (2007). Quality of Work Life. Strategic Finance, 89(4). P. 101-115.
  6. Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader-Member Exchange in Teams: An Examination of the Interaction Between Relationship Differentiation and Mean LMX In Explaining Team-Level Outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246–257.
  7. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 11). Academic Pr. Kearney, E., & Gebert, D.(2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77-89.
  8. Censidine, G., & Callus, R. (2001). The Quality of Work Life of Australian Employees. The development of an index, university of Sydney. Retrived at: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/handle/2123/13404/WP73.pdf;jsessionid=97CE37D77D373393DD675B31C0A3458A?sequence=1.
  9. Culbertson, S. S., Huffman, A. H., & Alden-Anderson, R. (2010). Leader-Member Exchange and Work-Family Interactions: The Mediating Role of Self-Reported Challenge and Hindrance-Related Stress. Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 15–36.
  10. Dansereau, F. (1995). A Dyadic Approach to Leadership: Creating and Nurturing this Approach Under Fire. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 479– 490.
  11. Dusterhoff, C., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2014). The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader–Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 265-273.
  12. Flemming, P.L. (2009). A Study of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership Traits and Organizational Culture Types in Improving Performance in Public Sector Organizations: Caribbean Perspective, PhD Dissertation, Capella University, p33.
  13. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying A Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
  14. Hahn, C., Johnson, M.D., Herrmann, A. & Huber, F. (2002). Capturing Customer Heterogeneity Using a Finite Mixture PLS Approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(3), 243-269.
  15. Harris, K.J., Wheeler, A.R. & Kacmar, K. M. (2009). Leader–Member Exchange and Empowerment: Direct and Interactive Effects on Job Satisfaction, Turnover Intentions, and Performance. Journal of Leadership Quarterly, 20(1): 371–382.
  16. Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) in Context: How LMX Differentiation and LMX Relational Separation Attenuate LMX’s Influence on OCB and Turnover Intention. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 314–328.
  17. Hatami, H., Mirjafari, S.A. & Mojahadi-Jahromi, S. (2012). Investigation into The Relationship of Working Life Quality to Organizational Commitment and Productivity in Jahrom Medical Science University. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 2(3), 25-40. (In Farsi).
  18. Sinkovics, R. R., Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International marketing review.
  19.  Hill, N. S., Kang, J. H., & Seo, M. G. (2014). The Interactive Effect of Leader–Member Exchange and Electronic Communication on Employee Psychological Empowerment and Work Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 772-783.
  20. Kang, D. S., & Stewart, J. (2007). Leader‐member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership and HRD. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
  21.  Karimi Goghari, H., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Effect of Quality of Working Life on Organizational Commitment of Agricultural Extension Experts (Case Study: Kerman Province). Research on Agricultural Economics and Development, 45 (1), 125-141. (In Farsi).
  22. Karimi-Gougheri, H., Karami, Sh. & Bazrafshan, M. (2012). Eradication of Desertification in Line with Sustainable Development: The Mission of Agricultural Extension and Education. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Watershed Management and Soil and Water Resources Management. 29-30 February, 2012: Iranian Society of Irrigation and Water Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran. (In Farsi).
  23. Lowe, C. A., & Goldstein, J.W. (1970). Reciprocal Liking and Attributions of Ability: Mediating Effects of Perceived Intent and Personal Involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 291–297.
  24. Mehmandost, S., Jalali-Farahani, M. & Hamidi, M. (2008). The Relation Between Quality of Work life and Organizational Commitment of Experts in Tehran City Physical Education Faculties. M.Sc Thesis. University of Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi).
  25. Monajemzadeh, Z., & Baradaran, M. (2009). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Relationship Between Quality of Work Life and Performance of Employees of Agricultural and Natural Resources University of Ramin. Iran's Economic and Agricultural Development Research, 2 (3).14-19.
  26. Monajemzadeh, Z., & Baradaran, M. (2009). Relation between Quality of Work Life (QWL) and Ramin Agricultural and Natural Resource University Personnels. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 2-40(3), 39-47. (In Farsi).
  27. Movahedi, R., Samiyan, M., & Mohammad Mehr, S. (2017). The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Innovative Behaviors of Agricultural Jihad Employees in Kermanshah Province. Agriculture Economics and Development Research, 48 (1), 123-136. (In Farsi).
  28. Najafi, A. (2006). Investigating the Relationship Between Quality and Productivity of Middle Managers of Gas Companies. Ms.C. thesis, Allameh Tabatabaee University, p. 3. (Unbpulished). (In Farsi).
  29. Niknami, M. (2009). Aims and Strategies for Using ICTs to Foster Development of Agricultural Extension. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 2(4), 41-50. (In Farsi).
  30. Rajaee, N., Kalantari, Kh., Fami, H.S. & Hosseini, S.M. (2009). Study Factors Affecting Farmers' Use of Formal Loans. Proceedings of the 7th Iranian Conference on Agricultural Economics. 3-4 February 2010: Iranian Agricultural Economics Society, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi).
  31. Rezaee, A.M. & Rezvanfar, A. (2008). Correlation Analysis of Professional and Personal Characteristics and Job Performance (Case Study of Extension Experts of Yazd Province). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 14(6), 349-358. (In Farsi).
  32. Rezaee, R., Hosseini, S.M., Fami, H.S., & Sarafrazi, A.M. (2009). Identification and Analysis of Mechanisms of Development of Nanotechnology in Agriculture. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi).
  33. Richardson, H., Vandenberg, R., & Wilkerson, J. (2000). Using Systems of Practices to Gain Top Performance. Loma: Reprinted from RESOURCE.
  34. Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture: A Meta-analysis of Correlates of LMX across 23 Countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1130.
  35. Sarstedt, M., Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C.M. & Schwaiger, M. (2011). Uncovering And Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity With FIMIX-PLS: Which Model Selection Criterion Provides an Appropriate Number of Segments?. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(1), 34-62.
  36. Sayyed Ameri, M., Savare, O., & Ebrahimi, L. (2015). The Relation Between Social Capital and Quality of Life of the Staff of the General Directorate of Sports and Youth of West Azerbaijan. Sports Management Journal, 7 (3), 335-349.
  37. Schyns, B., & Croon, M. A. (2006). A Model of Task Demands, Social Structure, And Leader-Member Exchange and Their Relationship to Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(4), 602–615.
  38. Swamy, D. R., Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Rashmi, S. (2015). Quality of Work Life: Scale Development and Validation. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 8(2), 281-295.
  39. Zare-Mehrjerdi, M.R. & Javedan, A. (2009). Anticipated Growth in The Agricultural Sector of Iran Parametric or Nonparametric Econometric Techniques and Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 7th Iranian Conference on Agricultural Economics. 3-4 February 2010: Iranian Agricultural Economics Society, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi).
  40. Zhao, H. (2014). Relative leader-member exchange and employee voice: Mediating Role Of Affective Commitment And Moderating Role Of Chinese Traditionality. Chinese Management Studies, 8(1), 27-40.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 499
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 314


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب