پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,970,292 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,641,915 |
تبیین مؤلفه های تأثیر گذار بر رفتار حرارتی الگوهای غالب معماری مسکونی تبریز | ||
| محیط شناسی | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 46، شماره 2، شهریور 1399، صفحه 413-430 اصل مقاله (1.4 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jes.2021.312453.1008083 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فروغ فرازجو1؛ مهناز محمودی زرندی* 2 | ||
| 1گروه معماری،دانشکده فنی مهندسی،دانشگاه آزاد کرج،کرج،ایران | ||
| 2گروه معماری،دانشکده مهندسی،واحد تهران شمال،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران،ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این مقاله ، رفتارحرارتی و برودتی سه الگوی هندسی غالب مسکن از نظر موجودیت در بافت کنونی شهری سرد و خشک تبریز مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت تا مشخص گردد بهترین عملکرد مصرف متعلق به کدامین الگو و اهمیت شاخصه های طراحی به چه میزان خواهد بود . پارامترهای متغیر وابسته در این پژوهش عبارتند ز: جهتگیری ، مصالح بنایی و بازشوها ، عایق حرارتی و فرم در سه الگوی حیاط مرکزی ، تراکم %60 و بلندمرتبه. برای بررسی رفتار بناها، پس از شبیه سازی در نرم افزار اکوتکت، از نرم افزار انرژی پلاس جهت تحلیل داده ها استفاده گردید. برای اعتبارسنجی مدل، از یک برداشت میدانی نیز استفاده شد. نتایج نشان میدهد میزان انرژی لازم جهت گرمایش تقریباً سه برابرمیزان انرژی است که جهت سرمایش دربناهای مسکونی شهرتبریزمورد نیازمی باشدکه ازاین سهم بنای مسکونی حیاط مرکزی بامصرف %21.8 از کل بارسرمایشی و بنای مسکونی بلندمرتبه با مصرف %14 از کل بارگرمایشی به ترتیب به عنوان بهترین الگوی سرمایشی و گرمایشی ماههای گرم و سرد سال در این اقلیم میباشند . اولویت وزنی پارامترهای متغیر در تبریز به ترتیب عایق حرارتی 0.41 ، نوع بازشو 0.32، مصالح بنایی 0.23 و جهتگیری 0.04 میباشد . | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بهینه سازی؛ رفتار حرارتی؛ طراحی اقلیمی؛ مسکن تبریز؛ مصرف انرژی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Influence of Architectural Features on Thermal Behavior of Dominant Residential Structure Patterns in Tabriz Housing | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Forough Farazjou1؛ Mahnaz Mahmoody Zarandi2 | ||
| 1Department of Architecture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Architecture, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This paper studies thermal behavior of dominant residential structure patterns in the city of “Tabriz” that has cold and dry climate. With this regard, thermal behavior of three typical residential structure patterns, including: traditional courtyard, row house, and high-rise building is studied to determine the most sustainable structure pattern that is capable of achieving the optimal energy consumption in Tabriz environment. For this purpose, it is necessary to study the thermal behavior of each type of structure patterns from different aspects. Therefore, the influences of several architectural features on energy consumption are investigated to provide designers, constructors, and consumers with useful measures for residential construction in the city of Tabriz. Thermal behavior of each type of structure patterns is simulated using “Ecotect” software. The simulation results are then analyzed using “EnergyPlus” software. Based on the results, in the city of Tabriz, the amount of energy required for heating residential structures under cold weather conditions are three times more than the amount needed for cooling them during hot season. Amongst all three types of dominant residential structure patterns in the city of Tabriz, the high-rise building pattern provides the best heating performance due to proper insulation and also for the maximum use of sunlight. On the other hand, the traditional courtyard pattern provides the best cooling performance due to the minimum heat exchange of its outer walls. The results also suggest that insulation with impact of 0.41 is the most significant variable parameter for residential constructions in Tabriz environment. Materials and Methods In this research thermal behavior of three dominant residential structure patterns, including: traditional courtyard, row house, and high-rise building is studied to determine the most sustainable structure pattern that is capable of achieving the optimal energy consumption in Tabriz environment. For this purpose, the thermal behavior of each type of structure patterns is carefully studied from different aspects. With this regard, the influences of several architectural design parameters on energy consumption are investigated to provide designers, constructors, and consumers with useful measures for residential construction in the city of Tabriz. In this research, form of the structure and age of the building are selected as two independent parameters according to national thermal standards. In addition, four variable parameters namely: orientation, construction materials, type of overlay, and insulation are also measured. Effects of these parameters on energy consumption are studied for all three types of structure patterns considered in this research. Thermal behavior of each type of structure patterns is simulated using “Ecotect” software. The simulation results are then analyzed using “EnergyPlus” software. In addition, for validation of the results obtained through software simulation, a number of consumers’ bills related to each structure pattern are collected as field impressions and comparison of energy consumption is conducted. In order to determine the importance of each architectural feature for each type of structure, the criteria are weighted using AHP 8 (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. Hence, variable parameters together with independent parameters are organized in a matrix (shown in Table 5), and then multiple criteria are weighted using AHP method. Calculation of multiple weighted criteria results in precedence of parameters. Thus, the importance of each parameter in each pattern is determined. Discussion of Results First, all three models are simulated and the amount of annual energy consumption for heating and cooling for each month is measured and the results are presented as bar charts accordingly. The results in Figure 7 show that the highest level of energy required for heating is during November to April, which is due to the cold climate of Tabriz. This amount exists on average and with a significant difference between a high-rise building (B.M.3) with a row house (B.M.2) and a courtyard house (B.M.1). Thus, considering the amount of energy required for heating regarded to square meters of the building, with a high difference, the high-rise pattern with lowest amount achieved the most optimal level of energy consumption. Among the other two patterns, the amount of energy consumption for heating in a courtyard house is slightly higher than in a row house. According to the results, the percentage of total amount of energy required for heating for each pattern is 43.2% for B.M.1, 42.8% for B.M.2, and 14% for B.M.3, respectively. On the other hand, the results in Figure 8 show that the highest level of energy required for cooling is during January to September, which is due to the short summer season in Tabriz. Based on the obtained results, the traditional courtyard pattern has the advantage of proper climate design in that slight amount of energy is required for cooling. On the other hand, the high-rise building requires the highest amount of energy for cooling. Yet, this pattern provides the best heating performance due to proper insulation and also for the maximum use of sunlight. According to the results, the percentage of total amount of energy required for heating for each pattern is 21.8%for B.M.1, 34.7%for B.M.2, and 43.5% for B.M.3, respectively. Based on calculations of the weighted parameters, significant architectural features are insulation (0.41), type of opening (0.32), construction materials (0.23), and orientation (0.04), respectively. In fact, consideration of these measures at the early stages of designing residential structures leads to optimal energy consumption in Tabriz environment. Conclusions In this paper, thermal behavior of three dominant residential structure patterns in Tabriz housing is studied to find out how different architectural features affect energy performance of residential structures. Overall, the outcomes of this study can be summarized as below: 1. The effect of independent parameters on the amount of energy required for heating and cooling is presented in Table 6. 2. Numerical figures indicate that the amount of energy required for heating residential structures under cold weather conditions are three times more than the amount needed for cooling them during hot season. 3. Based on this study, the high-rise building pattern provides the best heating performance due to appropriate insulation and also for the maximum use of sunlight, However, this type of structure has low performance in term of energy required for cooling, which is due to large openings in front design of this type of structure. 4. According to the analytical data, the row house pattern (the urban block model of 60% density) fails to compete with other residential structure patterns in terms of energy performance. 5. Generally, due to the cool weather condition in Tabriz during May to October, there is no need for any cooling or heating equipment for residential structures, and the weather conditions comply with the thermal comfort situation. 6. Simulations confirm the importance of selecting appropriate form of the structure as well as correct direction of the structure considering the maximum absorption of direct sunlight. Appropriate selection of these parameters improves the energy performance in terms of heating residential structures under cold weather condition in Tabriz. 7. Calculations performed using AHP method, determines that architectural features including insulation, type of opening, construction materials, and orientation have great impact on thermal behavior of residential structures in Tabriz housing. In fact, consideration of these influential features at the early stages of designing residential structures leads to optimal energy consumption in Tabriz environment. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Tabriz housing, climate design, energy consumption, thermal behavior, optimization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
ایمانی،ف؛ حیدری، ش، (1397)، بررسی میزان مصرف انرژی ساختمان زیرزمینی در مقایسه با مدل مشابه بر روی سطح زمین در اقلیم‌های تهران، یزد و تبریز، مطالعات معماری ایرانی، (13)، صص 106-89. حبیب، ف؛ برزگر، ز، (1393). رتبه‌بندی پارامترهای مؤثر بر مصرف انرژی ساختمان با کاربرد فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی، نقش جهان، (2)، صص 61-55. حبیبی، آ ؛ ایزدیار، ا، ( 1393). تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی، انتشارات نشر کتیبه گیل، رشت. حیدری،ش؛ غفاری جباری،ش،(1389). تعیین محدوده زمانی آسایش حرارتی برای شهر تبریز، مهندسی مکانیک مدرس، 10(4)، صص44-37. حیدری،ش؛ غفاری جباری،ش،(1389). منطقه راحتی حرارتی در اقلیم سرد و خشک ایران، هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، (44)، صص 42-37. قائیلی اردبیلی، ن، (اسفند1391). بررسیوتحلیلتأثیرعواملاقلیمیدرطراحیاقلیمیشهرتبریزبراساسجداولبیوکلیماتیک، اولین همایش ملی جغرافیا مخاطرات محیطی و توسعه پایدار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران. هاشمی،ف؛ حیدری، ش، (1391)، بهینه سازی مصرف انرژی در ساختمان‌های مسکونی اقلیم سرد (نمونه موردی: شهر اردبیل)، صفه، (56)، صص86-75. هاشمی،ف؛ حیدری، ش، (1390)، بررسی کارکرد اقلیمی حیاط زمستان نشین در مناطق سردسیر نمونه موردی: شهر اردبیل، معماری و شهرسازی، (6)، صص 154-139. Augenbroe, G., (2001, August 13-15) Building simulation trends going into the new millennium. Seventh International IBPSA Conference, Brazil, http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs2001/bs01_0015_28.pdf. De Wilde, P. (2004). Computational Support for Selection of Energy Saving Building Components (PhD thesis). Delft University of Technology of Netherlands. Genjo, K., & Matsumoto, Sh., & Hasegawa, K., & Yoshino, H. (2005, September 27-29). Energy consumption of houses and lifestyle in cold climatic area of japan. World Sustainable building Conference, Japan, Tokyo. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB3184.pdf Hong, T., & Chou, S.K., & Bong, T.Y. (2000), Building simulation: an overview of developments and information sources, Building and Environment, 35(4), 347–361. Jeberaj, S., Iniyan, S., (2006), A review of energy models, Renew & Sustain Energy Reviews, 10 (4), 281–311. Nasrollahi, F., (2007), Effect of Architecture on Building Energy Demand in Cold Climates, EcoPapers Building Technology and Design Energy and Environmental Modeling 2007, (24000045), https://econpapers.repec. org/paper/ekd000240/ 24000045.htm . Tereci, A., & Tahira Elias Ozkan, S., & Eicker, U. (2013), Energy benchmarking for residential buildings, Energy and Building, (60), 92-99. Xia, Ch. (2008). Research on Design Methods of Energy-efficient Design for Building Scheme (PhD Thesis). Tsinghua University of Beijing.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 424 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 351 |
||