پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,691 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,003,536 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,682,933 |
مدل سازی انتشار و شدت آلودگی صوتی منابع شهری و صنعتی خارک و تاثیر آن بر حضور و پراکنش فون شاخص پناهگاه حیات وحش خارک | ||
| نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی | ||
| دوره 74، شماره 1، خرداد 1400، صفحه 125-137 اصل مقاله (1.49 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jne.2021.303441.1996 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمیده کشتکار1؛ سید مهدی امینی نسب* 2؛ حسین مددی3؛ رسول زمانی احمد محمودی4 | ||
| 1دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد محیط زیست، دانشگاه صنعتی خاتم الانبیاء (ص) بهبهان | ||
| 2عضو هیات علمی دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری | ||
| 3عضو هیات علمی گروه محیط زیست، دانشگاه صنعتی خاتم الانبیاء (ص) بهبهان | ||
| 4عضو هیات علمی گروه محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهرکرد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه آلودگی صوتی به عنوان یکی از آلودگی‌های مهم محیط‌زیست شهری و صنعتی محسوب می شود که فرآیندهای اکولوژیکی محیط زیست و خدمات اکوسیستم ها، سلامت جسمی و روانی انسان ها و جمعیت های حیات وحش را با اختلال مواجه می‌سازد. در این تحقیق با هدف بررسی نحوه پراکنش آلودگی صوتی در هوا و تعیین شدت تراز صوت در زیستگاه های خشکی فون شاخص پناهگاه حیات وحش خارک از مدل SPreAD-GIS استفاده شد. گونه های حیات وحش آهو Gazella subgutturosa، پرستوهای دریائی تیره Chlidonias hybridus، پرستوهای دریائی پشت دودی Onychoprion anaethetus، لاک پشت های دریائی منقار عقابی Eretmochelys imbricate و لاک پشت های دریائی سبز Chelonia mydas به عنوان فون شاخص برای مطالعه انتخاب شدند. نتایج نشان داد که تراز شدت صوت ناشی از منابع آلوده کننده صوتی در منطقه تاثیر منفی معنی داری بر حضور و پراکنش گونه های مورد مطالعه نداشته است. به عبارتی، گونه های مورد مطالعه با صوت ناشی از منابع آلودگی در اطراف و مجاورت منابع آلودگی صوتی که شرایط امنیتی و حفاظتی مطلوبی فراهم نموده سازگاری پیدا کرده اند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آلودگی صوتی؛ حیات وحش؛ خارک؛ SPreAD-GIS؛ زیستگاه ساحلی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Modeling of dispersion and intensity level of noise pollution from urban and industrial sources in Kharg and its effects on presence and dispersal of indicator fauna in Kharg Wildlife Refuge | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamideh Keshtkar1؛ Seyed Mehdi Amininasab2؛ Hossein Madadi3؛ Rasool Zamani Ahmadmahmoodi4 | ||
| 1Environment Department,, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran | ||
| 3Academic staff member, Environment Department, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran | ||
| 4Academic staff member, Environment Department, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Today, noise pollution is considered as one of the major pollution of the urban and industrial environment that disrupts the ecological processes of the environment and ecosystem services, physical and mental health of humans and wildlife populations. In this research, the distribution of noise pollution in air and dtermination of noise intensity level in terrestrial habitats for indicator fanua in Khark Wildlife Refuge was done using SPreAD-GIS model. indicator fanua such as deer (Gazella subgutturosa), Whiskered Tern (Chalidonias hybridus), Bridled tern (Onychoprion anaethetus) and Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate), Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) were studied in this research. The results showed that the noise intensity level from noise sources in the region had no significant negative impact on the presence and distribution of studied species. In other words, the studied species have been adapted to the noise from sources of pollution. In addition, in the vicinity of the sources of noise pollution, there are security and protection conditions for the species to survive in the area without especial problems. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Noise Pollution, Kharg, Wildlife, SPreAD-GIS, Coastal Habitats | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials)., 1993. Guide on Evaluation and Abatement of Traffic Noise, 30p. Barber, j.R., Crooks, K.R. and Fristrup, K.M., 2009. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 180-189. Behrouzi-rad, B., and Tayefeh, F., 2008. Nest Counts for Western Reef Heron Egretta gularis and Four Sterna species (repressa, anaethetus, bergii, bengalensis) on Nakhiloo Island in the Persian Gulf from 2005 to 2007. Podoces 3(1/2), 45-52. Benítez-López, A., Alkemade, R. and Verweij, P. A., 2010. The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 143(6), 1307-1316. Clergeau, P., Croci, S., Jokima¨ki, J., Kaisanlahti-Jokima¨ki, M. J., and Dinetti, M., 2006. Avifauna homogenization by urbanization: Analysis at different European latitudes. Biological Conservation 127, 336–344. Francis, C. D., Ortega, C. P., and Cruz, A., 2011. Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency. PLoS one, 6(11). Ghadirian, O., Moradi, H., Madadi, H., Lotfi, A., and Senn, J., 2019. Identifying noise disturbance by roads on wildlife: a case study in central Iran. SN Applied Sciences 1, 808. Gharibi, S., Salmanmahiny, A., and Varaste, H., 2015. Modeling of the Relationship Between Bird Distribution, Traffic Noise and Other Environmental Variables Along Asian Highway in Golestan National Park. Environmental Research 11(6), 195-206. Goodwin, S.E., and Shriver, W.G., 2011. Effects of traffic noise on occupancy patterns of forest birds. Conservation Biology 25, 406-411. Habib, L., Bayne, E. M., and Boutin, S., 2007. Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. Journal of applied ecology, 44(1), 176-184. Halfwerk, W., Holleman, L. J., and Slabbekoorn, H., 2011. Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. Journal of applied Ecology, 48(1), 210-219. Hefner, J.H., and Hefner, E.H., 2010. The behavioral audiogram of whitetail deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127(3), 111–114. Ilkhani, E., Ataei, M., and Khalookakaei, R., 2017. Evaluation of environmental impact in Sangan Khaf open iron mine. Iranian Journal of Mining Engineering 11( 33), 81-93. Karami, P., Kamangar, M., Hosseini, M., 2016. Modelling of Habitat Suitability of Persian Gazella (Gazella Subgutturosa Subgutturosa) In Qaraviz No Hunting Area and Kermanshah Province by Using Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Animal Research (Iranian Journal of Biology) 29(3), 340-352. Keyel, A. C., Reed, S. E., Nuessly, K., Cinto-Meija, E., Barber, J. R., and Wittemyer, G., 2017a. Evaluating anthropogenic noise impacts on animals in natural areas. BioRxiv, 171728. Madadi, H., Moradi, H., Fakheran, S., Jokar, M. and Makki, T., 2014. Modeling the Propagation of Noise Pollution from Isfahan’s West Ringway in Ghamishloo Wildlife Refuge Using SPreAD-GIS. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 3(9): 43-56 (In Persian).Madadi, H., Moradi, H., Soffianian, A., Salman Mahiny, A., Senn, J., and Geneletti, D., 2017. Degradation of natural habitats by roads: Comparing land-take and noise effect zone. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 65, 147-155. 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.003.Magyar aus Budapest, T., 2009. The impact of artificial lights and anthropogenic noise on Loggerheads (Caretta caretta) and Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas), assessed at index nesting beaches in Turkey and Mexico. Phd Dissertation, Bonn university. 215p. Mann, J., and Teilmann, J., 2013. Environmental impact of wind energy. Environ. Research Letters 8, 035001 (3pp).Maxwell, A., Hansen, K. A., Ortiz, S. T., Larsen, O. N., Siebert, U. and Wahlberg, M., 2017. In-air hearing of the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). Biology Open 6, 496-502. Mobaraki, A., and Elmi, A.M., 2005. First sea turtles programme in Iran. Marine Turtle Newsletter 100, 6-7.Moshtaghi, M., Kaboli, M., Karami, M., kasmaie, Z., and Samai, Z., 2013. Study of Noise Ppollution in Wildlife Crossing Khojir National Park. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 15(3), 13-22.Ng, A. M. B., Pontius, M., De Ruiter, S. L., and Proppe, D. S. 2020. Noise, avian abundance, and productivity at banding stations across the Continental United States. Avian Conservation and Ecology 15(2):4. Negahdari, H., Javadpour, S., Moattar, F., and Negahdari, H., 2018. Risk assessment of noise pollution by analyzing the level of sound loudness resulting from central traffic in Shiraz. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal. 5, 211-220. Ortiz-Urbina, E., Diaz-Balteiro, L., and Iglesias-Merchan, C. 2020. Influence of anthropogenic noise for predicting Cinereous vulture nest distribution. Sustainability 12, 503. Papale, E., Prakash, S., Singh, S., Batibasaga, A., Buscaino, G., and Piovano, S. 2020. Soundscape of green turtle foraging habitats in Fiji, South Pacific. PloS one, 15(8), e0236628. Patricelli, G.L., and Blickley, J.L., 2006. Avian communication in urban noise: Causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123, 639–649.Rapoza, A., Sudderth, E., and Lewis, K., 2015. The relationship between aircraft noise exposure and day-use visitor survey responses in backcountry areas of national parks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 2090–2105. Raynor, E., Whalen, C., Bomberger Brown, M., and Powell, L., 2017. Location matters: evaluating Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido) boom chorus propagation. Avian conservation and Ecology, 12(2). Reed, S.E., Mann, J.P., and Boggs, J.L., 2009. SPreAD-GIS: an ArcGIS toolbox for modeling the propagation of engine noise in a wildland setting. Version 1.2. The Wilderness Society, San Francisco, CA. Reed, S.E., Boggs, J.L. and Mann, J.P., 2010. SPreAD-GIS: an ArcGIS toolbox for modeling the propagation of engine noise in a wildland setting. Wilderness Society, San Francisco, California, USA. Reed, S.E., Boggs, J.L., and Mann, J.P., 2012. A GIS tool for modeling anthropogenic noise propagation in natural ecosystems. Environmental Modelling & Software 37, 1–5. Rheindt, F.E., 2003. The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? Journal of Ornithology 144, 295–306. Schaub, A., Ostwald, J., and Siemers, B.M., 2009. Foraging bats avoid noise. Journal of Experimantal Biology 211, 3174–3180. Shannon, G., McKenna, M.F., Angeloni, L.M., Crooks, K.R., Fristrup, K.M., Brown, E., Warner, K.A., Nelson, M.D., White, C., Briggs, J., and McFarland, S., 2016. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biological Reviews. 91, 982-1005. Slabbekoorn, h., yeh, p., and hunt, K., 2007. Sound transmission and song divergence: a comparison of urban and forest acoustics. The Condor 109, 67-78. Slabbekoorn, H., and Ripmeester, E.A., 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17, 72–83. Quinn, J.L., Whittingham, M.J., Butler, S.J., and Cresswell, W., 2006. Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Journal of Avian Biology 37, 601–608. Xiong, Y., Meng, Q., Gao, J., Tang, X.F., and Zhang, H.F., 2017. Effects of relative humidity on animal health and welfare. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16, 1653-1658. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 620 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 371 |
||