پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,500 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,089,539 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,192,899 |
ارزیابی جریان زیست‌‌محیطی رودخانه هررود لرستان با استفاده از روش‌های هیدرولوژیکی | ||
| اکوهیدرولوژی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 8، شماره 2، تیر 1400، صفحه 431-445 اصل مقاله (1.68 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ije.2021.320387.1479 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین یوسفی1؛ بابک شاهی نژاد* 2؛ علی کاکاوند3؛ مریم میر بیک سبزواری3؛ سیده حدیث شاهرخی3 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه انرژی های نو و محیط زیست، دانشکدۀ علوم و فنون نوین دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری سازه های آبی، دانشکدۀ کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با توجه بحران جهانی آب، لزوم برنامهریزی در حفظ و بقای آب از مهمترین برنامههای توسعۀ هر کشور است. بهمنظور حفظ اکوسیستمهای موجود در حوضههای آبریز و همچنین، به دلیل کمبود منابع آب و توزیع نامناسب زمانی و مکانی بارش در کشور، باید نیازهای زیست‌‌محیطی رودخانهها مورد توجه قرار گیرد. در پژوهش حاضر، نیاز زیستمحیطیحوضۀ آبریز رودخانۀ هررود واقع در استان لرستان در دو ایستگاه هیدرومتری کاکارضا و دهنو طی دورۀ آماری بلندمدت 40 ساله با استفاده از روش‌های هیدرولوژیکی تنانت، تسمن، جریان پایۀ آبزیان، تحلیل منحنی تداوم جریان، تغییر منحنی تداوم جریان که از نرمافزار GEFC استفاده شد و اسمختین بررسی شد. آنالیز روند تغییرات آبدهی حوضۀ کاکارضا و دهنو با استفاده از آزمون گرافیکی منکندال بررسی شد و نتایج نشان داد نمیتوان روندی را برای رودخانۀ هررود در محل ایستگاههای هیدرومتری کاکارضا و دهنو متصور شد. بین روش‌های هیدرولوژیکی یادشده، روش تغییر منحنی تداوم جریان به علت در نظر گرفتن کلاسهای مدیریتی اکولوژیکی، توجه به نوسان‌های طبیعی جریان رودخانه و تلاش برای حفظ این نوسان‌ها در جریان زیست‌‌محیطی پیشنهادی خود در مقایسه با سایر روش‌های مطرحشده کارایی بیشتری دارد. نتایج نشان داد برای حفظ نیاز زیست‌‌محیطی رودخانۀ هررود در کلاس C (کمترین وضعیت اکولوژیکی قابل قبول) در ایستگاههای کاکارضا و دهنو بهترتیب 47/49 و 34/56 درصد متوسط جریان سالانه (بهترتیب 63/5 و 42/1 مترمکعب بر ثانیه) مورد نیاز است. توجه به این نکته ضروری است که روش‌های ارائهشده در پژوهش حاضر، راهحل قطعی برای ارزیابی جریان زیست‌‌محیطی نیستند، اما بهکارگیری این روشها در نبود اطلاعات اکولوژیکی لازم و بهمنظور برنامهریزی اولیه برای مدیران، مفید خواهد بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| جریان سالانه؛ رودخانۀ هررود؛ کلاس های مدیریتی؛ منحنی تداوم جریان؛ نیاز زیست محیطی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of ecological flow of Lorestan Herrud river using hydrological methods | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hossein Yousefi1؛ Babak Shahinejad2؛ Ali Kakavand3؛ M S3؛ S Sh3 | ||
| 1Department of Renewable Energies and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Lorestan University | ||
| 3LU | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In order to preserve the existing ecosystems in catchments and also due to lack of water resources and inappropriate temporal and spatial distribution of rainfall in the country, it is necessary to consider the environmental needs of rivers. In the present study, the environmental needs of the Herrud River catchment area located in Lorestan province in two hydrometric stations of Kakarza and Dehno during a long-term statistical period of 40 years using hydrological methods of tenant, tesman, aquatic basin flow, flow continuity curve analysis, change The flow continuity curve using GEFC software and smokhtin was investigated. The analysis of the trend of discharge changes in Kakarza and Dehno basins was investigated using Monkendal graphic test and the results showed that it is not possible to imagine a trend for Herrud river in the location of Kakarza and Dehno hydrometric stations. Among the mentioned hydrological methods, the method of changing the flow continuity curve due to considering ecological management classes, paying attention to the natural fluctuations of river flow and trying to maintain these fluctuations in its proposed environmental flow compared to other methods. These are more efficient. The results showed that in order to maintain the environmental needs of the Herrud River, in class C (lowest acceptable ecological status) in Kakarza and Dehno stations, 49.47% and 56.34% of the average annual flow (5.63%, respectively) And 1.42 cubic meters per second) is required. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Annual flow, Environmental needs, Flow continuity curve, Herrud river, Management classes | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Blanckaert K, Garcia XF, Steiger J, Uijttewaal W. Ecohydraulics: linkages between hydraulics, morphodynamics and ecological processes in rivers. Ecohydrology. 2013; 6(4):507-510. [2]. Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, et al. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology. 2010; 55(1):147-70. [3]. Brown, C., King, J. Environmental flows concept and methods. Water resource and environment technical note C-1, World Bank. 2003; 28p. [4]. Tabatabai MM, Nadushan RM, Hashemi S. Impact of hydrogeomorphic processes on ecological functions of brown trout habits. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2017; 14(8):1757-70. [5]. Bergkamp, G., McCartney, M., Dugan, P., McNeely, J. and Acreman, M. "Dams, ecosystem functions and environmental restoration", WCD Thematic Review Environmental Issues II.1, Final Report to the World Commission on Dams. Secretariat of the World Commission on Dams: Cape Town, South Africa, p. 2000; 199. [6]. Bahukandi KD, Ahuja NJ. Building block methodology assisted knowledge-based system for environmental-flow assessment of Suswa River of Dehradun Dist., India: A reminiscent framework, International Research Journal of Environment Sciences.2013; 2(12):74-80. [7]. Shokoohi AL, Amini MA. Introducing a new method to determine rivers’ ecological water requirement in comparison with hydrological and hydraulic methods. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2014; 11(3):747-56. [8]. Zhang H, Singh VP, Zhang Q, Gui L, Sun W. Variation in ecological flow regimes and their response to dams in the upper Yellow River basin. Environmental Earth Science. 2016; 75:938:1-16, doi: 10.1007/s 12665-016-5751-x. [9]. Tennant, D.L. In stream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries, 1976; 1(4): 6-10. [10]. Liu, S. X., Mo, X. G. and J. Xia. Uncertainty analysis in estimating the minimum ecological instream flow requirements via wetted perimeter method: Curvature technique or slope technique. Acta Geographia Sinica, 2006; 61 (3): 273-281. [11]. Shang, S. H. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to estimate minimum environmental flows based on wetted perimeter. River Research and Application, 2008; 24: 54–67. [12]. Li. Yuan and Zhifeng. Yang, “Network structure analysis for environmental flow toward sustainable water use” International Society for Environmental Information Sciences 2010 Annual Conference (ISEIS), 2010; p 1737-1744. [13]. Shokoohi A., and Behrooznia M. Evaluation of environmental flows in rivers using hydrological and hydraulic methods. 9th Iranian hydraulic conference, Tarbiat Modares University, 2010; Tehran. [Persian]. [14]. Alfredsen. K, Harby. A, Linnansaari. T, Ugedal.O. “Development of an inflow-cotrolled environmental flow regime for a Norwegian river”, River Research and Application, Applic. 2011; 19: p 1-9. [15]. Caissie. J, Caissie. D, El. Jabi. N. “Hydrologically environmental flow method applied to river in the Maritime Provinces (Canada)”, River Research and Application, Applic. 2015; 31: p 651-662. [16]. Mostafavi, S. Evaluation of environmental flow of Baranduz-chai River, Master of Science thesis, faculty of agriculture, Urmia University, 2013; Urmia [Persian]. [17]. Sedighkia M, Ayyoubzadeh S.A, Hajiesmaeli M. Investigation of Requirements for Estimation of the Environmental Flow in Rivers by Hydroacoustic Methods (Case Study: Delichay River located in Tehran Province). Journal of Ecohydrology. 2015; 2(3):289-300. [18]. Sedighkia M, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Hajiesmaeli M. Modification of Tennant and Wetted Perimeter Methods in Simindasht Basin, Tehran Province. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal. 2017; 50(2):221-31. [19]. Shokoohi, A. Sensitivity analysis of Hydraulic models regarding hydro morphologic data derivation methods to determine environmental water requirement. J Water Waste Water. 2015; 26(3), 104- 115. [Persian]. [20]. Karimi, S., Salarijazi, M., Ghorbani, Kh. River Environmental Flow Assessment Using Tennant, Tessman, FDC Shifting and DRM Hydrological Methods, Ecohydrology, 2018; 4(1) 177- 189. [Persian]. [21]. Naderi, M. H., Zakerinia, M., Salari M. Using the model... in explaining the ecological regime of the river in order to estimate the environmental flow and compare it with hydrological methods (Qarasu River). Journal of Echo Hydrology. 2018; 5 (3): 941-955. [22]. Volchek. Alexander, Kirvel. Ivan, Sheshko Nikolay. “Environmental flow assessment for the Yaselda River in its Selets reservoir section”, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 19, 2019; p 109–118. [Persian]. [23]. Hosseinpour, D., Zare Bidaki, R. And Karimian Kakli, R. Use of hydraulic method in estimating the minimum environmental flow of a part of Do Samsam river in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Journal of Natural Environment, Natural Resources of Iran, 2019; 72 (1): 59-72. [24]. Mahmood. Rashid, JIA. Shaofeng, Lv. Aifeng, Zhu. Wenbin. “A preliminary assessment of environmental flow in the three rivers' source region, Qinghai Tibetan Plateau, China and suggestions”, Ecological Engineering. 2020; 144, 105709. [25]. Sedighkia M, Abdoli A, Ayyoubzadeh S.A, Ahmadi A.A, Gholizadeh M. Development of the native method of environmental flow in the rivers of the southern basin of Kaspian-Lar National Park. Journal of Ecology. 2018; 43(3):543-560. [Persian] [26]. Shokoohi AL, Amini MA. Introducing a new method to determine rivers’ ecological water requirement in comparison with hydrological and hydraulic methods. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2014; 11(3):747-56. [27]. Abdi R, Yasi M. Evaluation of environmental flow requirements using eco-hydrologic–hydraulic methods in perennial rivers. Water Science and Technology. 2015; 72(3):354-63. [28]. Tessman, SA. Environmental Assessment, Technical Appendix E, in Environmental Use Sector Reconnaissance Elements of the Western Dakotas Region of South Dakota Study. Water Resources Research Institute, South Dakota state University, 1980; Brookings, SD. [29]. Office of Standard and Technical Criteria, Planning and Budget Organization of Iran. Drinking Water Standards. 1992; (Publication No. 116-3), Tehran. [Persian]. [30]. King, JM. Tharme, RE and Villers, MS. Environmental flow assessments for rivers: manual for the Building Block Methodology. Water Research Commission Technology Transfer Report. 2003; NO. TT131/00. Pretoria, South Africa. [31]. Smakhtin, VU. Revenga, C. and Doll, P. A pilot Global Assessment of Environment Water Requirement and Scarcity; International water Resources Association, 2004; pp 307-317. [32]. Smakhtin VU, Anputhas M. An assessment of environmentalflow requirements of Indian river basins. IWMI Research Report107. International Water Management Institute, 2006; Colombo. [33]. Torabi P H, Emamgholizadeh S. Investigation of changes in river discharge in Lorestan Province Using TFPW-MK. Scientific Journals Management System. 2015; 35:73-93. [Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 454 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 350 |
||