پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,229 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,745 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,088,604 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,835,308 |
The Impact of the Principles of Islamic Thought on the View of International Relations: From Dominant Paradigm Critique to Alternative Presentation Capacities | ||
| Contemporary Researches on Islamic Revolution | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 3، شماره 10، بهمن 2021، صفحه 103-126 اصل مقاله (355.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Science - Research | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Alireza Khosravi* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, IRAN. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| With the help of Islamic principles, it is possible to critique the mainstream and the dominant paradigm in International Relations. Still, the capability of the Islamic tenets is higher and does not remain at the level of rejection and criticism. Instead, it can provide alternatives by having specific ontological, anthropological, and epistemological foundations. The present study enumerates theoretical foundations and assumptions of the dominant paradigm in international relations. It describes four critical perspectives and then refers to a distinct view in the Islamic approach. After that, address this fundamental question: 'where is the turning-point of this approach for alternative presentation and construction of an alternative order in International Relation?’ The results indicated that according to the Meta-theoretical foundations of the dominant paradigm, they had created contradictory concepts. They are including material/meaning, nature/metaphysics, and reality/truth but by prioritizing truth (over material objectivity), those dualities become invalid and new dualities are drawn, such as the weak / the arrogant, which can design an alternative to the current dominant system. According to these principles, the effects of originality on the necessity and the priority of creature on nature is emphasized, and truth-seeking generally replaces materialism. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| International Relation؛ Mainstream؛ Paradigm؛ Realism؛ Critical Approach؛ Islamic Approach | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| تاثیر مبانی اندیشه اسلامی بر دیدگاه روابط بین الملل؛ از نقد پارادایم غالب تا ظرفیت های ارائه جایگزین | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| علیرضا خسروی | ||
| استادیار روابط بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| رهیافت اسلامی به روابط بین الملل فارغ از تشابهی که با جریان انتقادی در خصلت نقد به جریان اصلی و پارادایم غالب دارد؛ در ردّ و انتقاد متوقف نمی ماند، بلکه بواسطه برخورداری از مبانی هستیشناسانه، انسانشناسانه و معرفت شناسانه خاص، ظرفیت ارائه جایگزین می یابد. در مقاله پیشرو ضمن برشمردن مبانی فرانظری و مفروضات پارادایم غالب در روابط بین الملل و تشریح چهار دیدگاه انتقادی به آن، به رهیافت متمایزی در قالب رهیافت اسلامی اشاره و به این پرسش اساسی پرداخته می شود که نقطه عزیمت این رهیافت برای ارائه جایگزین و نظم سازی بدیل در روابط بین الملل کجاست؟ یافته های حاصله موید آن است که رهیافت مذکور جفت پنداری متضاد و برساخته ی ناشی از مبانی فرانظری جریان اصلی و پارادایم غالب نظیر: مادی/ معنا، طبیعت/ مابعدالطبیعه، خلقت/طبیعت، واقعیت/حقیقت را از طریق ضرورت بخشی به تأکیدات پارادایم غالب، و همزمان با اصالت بخشی به حقیقت و نه عینیت مادی؛ بی اعتبار و دوگانه های جدیدی را نظیر: مستضعفین/مستکبرین برمی سازد که امکان نظم سازی بدیل را مهیا می کند. چنین رهیافتی با مبانی فرانظری منحصری که دارد از طریق تعمیم اصالت بر ضرورت و خلقت بر طبیعت در پی عام کردن حقیقت جویی بر ماده گرایی است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| روابط بین الملل, جریان اصلی, پارادایم رئالیسم, جریان انتقادی, رهیافت اسلامی | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Holy Quran
Abedi Ardakani, M. (2008 AD/1387 SH). The Ratio of Ethics and Politics in Transcendental Wisdom and Dominant Theory in Western Political Philosophy. Journal of Research in the Field. Vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 106-136.
Alam, A. (2005 AD/1384 SH). Foundations of Politics. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Alaqeband, K. (2008 AD/1387 SH). The Role of Anthropology in Transcendental Politics. Abstracts and Articles. Qom: Islamic Science and Culture Researcher.
Amid Zanjani, A. (1994 AD/1373 SH). Political Jurisprudence. Tehran: Amirkabir Publications.
Asgarkhani, A. (2004 AD/1383 SH). International Regimes. Tehran: Abrar Moaser Publications.
Ashley, R. (1984 AD/1363 SH). New Realism Poverty. Volume: New Realism, Critical Theory and Breakdown School. (Tayeb, A. Trans). Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies.
Burchill, S. et al. (2001 AD/1380 SH). Realism and Neo-Realism. Theories of International Relations. England: Palgrave Basingstoke.
Dessler, D. (1989 AD/1368 SH). What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate? International Organization. Vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 441-473.
Diez, T; Steans, J. (2005 AD/1384 SH). A Useful Dialogue? Habermars and International Relation. Review of International Studies. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 127-140.
Edkins, J; Zehfuss, M. (2005 AD/1384 SH). Generalising the International. Review of International Studies. Vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 451-472.
Eftekhari, Q. (2008 AD/1387 SH). Methodology and Research League. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Fathi, Y. (2008 AD/1387 SH). The Ethics and Politics in the Transcendental Wisdom Emphasized Imam Khomeini's Thoughts. Abstract of the Meetings and Articles. Qom: Islamic Science, and Islamic Culture Research Institute.
Ghavam, A; Fatemijad, A. (2008 AD/1387 SH). From the Conflict to Solidarity: Investigating the International Relations of the Middle East from the Perspective of Parliamentary School. Tehran: Azad University of Science and Research.
Guzzini, S. (2004 AD/1383 SH). The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 533–568.
Jafari Faeri, Q. (2008 AD/1387 SH). Foreign Policy of the Prophet of Islam (PBUH). Qom: Zaer Publications.
Javadi Amoli, A. (2007 AD/1386 SH). The Dignity of Reason in the Geometry of Religious knowledge. Qom: Isra Publications.
Kalantari, A. (1996 AD/1375 SH). Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Kufr and their Special Works. Journal of Jurisprudence. Vol. 3, no.10, pp. 32-117.
Khosravi, A. (2012 AD/1391 SH). The Security School of Imam Khomeini; Modern and Security Principles in the Islamic Revolutionary Discourse. Tehran: Abrar Moaser Publishing.
Kuhn, T. (1970 AD/1349 SH). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicaro Press.
Lakzaei, N. (2008 AD/1387 SH). Transcendental Policy and Hadi Government in Sadr al-Muta’Allehin, Abstract and Articles. Qom: Islamic Science and Culture Research Institute.
Lapid, Y. (1989 AD/1368 SH). The Third Debate: on the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 235-254.
Lawson, G. (2006 AD/1385 SH). The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Review of International Studies. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 397-423.
Mansurnejad, M. (2004 AD/1383 SH). Wisdom in Three Significant Religions: Zoroastrian, Christianity and Islam. Tehran: Author publishing.
Mesbah, M. (1996 AD/1375 SH). Velayat-e-Faqih Beyond the Borders. Islamic Government Quarterly. Vol. 1, no.1, pp. 81-95.
Mohammadi, M. (2001 AD/1380 SH). Foreign Policy of Iran; Principles and Issues. Tehran: Dadgostar Publishing.
Mohammadi Reyshahri, M. (2000 AD/1379 SH). Imam Ali (AS) Letter Policy. Qom: Dar al-hadith Publications.
Moravcsik, A. (1997 AD/1376 SH). Taking Preferences Seriously: A libral Theory of International Politics. International Organization. Vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 513-553.
Moshirzadeh, H. (2006 AD/1385 SH). Changes in the Views of International Relations. Tehran: Samt.
Onuf, N; Frank, F. (1998 AD/1377 SH). Klink Anavchy, Authority, Rule. International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 149-173.
Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture. (2008 AD/1387 SH). Challenges of Transcendental Wisdom in Politics, Abstract Summaries and Articles. Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture.
Sabouri, Z. (2008 AD/1387 SH). Foreign Policy; Soft Power and Alien Representation. https://hawzah.net/fa/Magazine/View /3814/6695/79412.
Sahifah al-Sajjadiyyah Borders' Prayer. (2002 AD/1381 SH). (Shirvani, A. Trans). Qom: Dar al-Fekr Publishing.
Schweller, R; Priess, D. (1997 AD/1376 SH). A Tale of Two Realisma: Expanding the Institutions Debate. Mershon International Studies Review. Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1-32.
Seifzadeh, H. (2002 AD/1381 SH). International Relations. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
Sison, A; Peterson, S. (2007 AD/1386 SH). The Future of the Tradition Breaking of Realism: The Woman's Overthrow of International Relations. Volume: Neorealism, the Critical Theory. (Tayyeb, A. Trans). Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Smith, S. (1995 AD/1374 SH). The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Soleimani, F. (2008 AD/1387 SH). Man, Sharia, and Policy from the Perspective of Sadr al-Mutia’Allehin. Quarterly Journal of Hawzah. Vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 83-105.
Tinkner, A. (2007 AD/1386 SH). Political Realism in Hans Morgenta: A New Formulation of the Older Woman. Volume: Neorealism, the Critical Theory and the Breakdown School. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Vasquez, J. (1997 AD/1376 SH). The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative Versus Progressive Research Programs. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 899-912.
Waltz, K. (2007 AD/1386 SH). Thought of Realism and Newrealism Theory. Volume: Newrealism, Critical Theory and Construction School. (Tayyeb, A. Trans). Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies.
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــ. (1997 AD/1376 SH). Evaluating Theories. American Political Science Association, University of California, Berkeley. Vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 913-917.
Wendt, A. (1987 AD/1366 SH). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 335-370.
Wight, M. (1966 AD/1345 SH). Why Is There No International Theory? Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. (Butterfield H; Wight M.). London: George Allen and Unwin. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 215 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 202 |
||