تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,119,427 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,225,811 |
Designing a Conceptual Model for Organizational Stupidity Using a Combination of Grounded Theory and Interpretive Structural Modeling | ||
Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies) | ||
دوره 15، شماره 3، مهر 2022، صفحه 549-568 اصل مقاله (1.09 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijms.2021.317451.674409 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Samaneh Karimi-Ghartemani1؛ Naser Khani* 1؛ Ali Nasr Isfahani2 | ||
1Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran | ||
2Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economic, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
While concepts such as organizational intelligence and critical thinking are continually studied by different scholars, Organizational Stupidity (OS) has received less attention in academic researches. This conceptual study investigated OS and different characteristics of it to present a model for OS. To this end, a combined method including Grounded Theory (GT) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was adopted. The qualitative part was comprised of face-to-face in-depth interviews with 12 respondents who worked in Iran Revenue & Agency (IRA), Isfahan Province Branch. A snowball sampling was employed in which the early participants were asked to introduce other people with information about OS. The data collected from interviews was analyzed using open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, and the conceptual model of OS was proposed using the GT assumptions (i.e., casual conditions, intervening factors, contextual factors, strategies, and consequences of the OS). In the quantitative part, the proposed model was restructured using ISM. For this purpose, two questionnaires were deigned, and the experts of senior faculty of academics (including 8 individuals) were asked to answer them. The proposed model shows the main reasons for OS by level of importance, and predicts the strategies for reducing the OS and its consequences. This model can be used to plan strategies for managing and reducing OS in organizations. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
organizational stupidity؛ qualitative analysis؛ quantitative analysis؛ grounded theory؛ interpretive structural modeling | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
ارائه مدل مفهومی کند ذهنی سازمانی با رویکرد ترکیبی (تحلیل داده بنیاد و مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
سمانه کریمی1؛ ناصر خانی1؛ علی نصر اصفهانی2 | ||
1گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران | ||
2دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
چکیده : در حالی که مفاهیمی مانند هوش سازمانی توسط محققان مختلف مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است، کند ذهنی سازمانی (OS) علاقه کمتری را در بین تحقیقات دانشگاهی به خود اختصاص داده است. این مقاله مفهوم کند ذهنی سازمانی و ویژگی های مختلف آن را مورد بررسی قرار می دهد که با رویکرد ترکیبی شامل نظریه داده بنیاد و مدل سازی ساختاری تفسیری انجام پذیرفت. در بخش کیفی ، مصاحبه های عمیق با 12 نفر از کارمندان شاغل در اداره امور مالیاتی استان اصفهان انجام پذیرفته است. نمونه گیری به روش گلوله برفی می باشد. داده های جمع آوری شده از مصاحبه ها با استفاده از کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته و مدل مفهومی کند ذهنی سازمانی با استفاده از مفروضات GT (شرایط علی، عوامل مداخله گر ، عوامل زمینه ای ، استراتژی ها و پیامدهای کند ذهنی سازمانی) ارائه شده است. در بخش کمی، مدل پیشنهادی با استفاده از ISM تغییر ساختار یافته است. برای این منظور دو پرسشنامه تنظیم شده است و متخصصانی شامل 8 نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی به آنها پاسخ داده اند. این مدل می تواند برای برنامه ریزی استراتژی های مدیریت کند ذهنی سازمانی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
کند ذهنی سازمانی, تحلیل کیفی, تحلیل کمی, نظریه داده بنیاد, مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری | ||
مراجع | ||
Albrecht, K. (2003). The power of minds at work : Organizational intelligence in action. AMACOM. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Power_of_Minds_at_Work.html?id=2BkALUR_OIsC
Albrecht, K. (2008). The power of minds at work: Organizational intelligence in action. International Kindle Paperwhite.
Alvedari, H., Daraei, M. R., & Razini, R. (2018). Model design of organizational dashboard development with BI logic in governmental organizations. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 6(3), 49–64. http://ipom.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_4292.html
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2017). The stupidity paradox : The power and pitfalls of functional stupidity at work. IPS - Profile Books; Main edition (April 4, 2017).
Aslipour, H., Zargar, M. (2018). Interpretive structural analysis of factors affecting the acceptance of innovative electronic public services in Iran. Public Management Perspectives, 9(1), 40–51.
Azar, A., & Bayat, K. (2008). Designing a business process-oriented model with an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Information Technology Management, 1(1), 3–18. http://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=88267
Bakken, T., & Wiik, E. L. (2017). Ignorance and organization studies. Organization Studies, 31(5) 017084061770931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617709312
Bernstein, J. H. (2009). Nonknowledge: The Bibliographical organization of ignorance, stupidity, error, and unreason: Part one. Knowledge Organization, 36(1), 17–29.
Butler, N. (2016). Functional stupidity: A critique. Ephemera, 16(2), 115–123. www.ephemerajournal.org
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Croissant, J. L. (2014). Agnotology: Ignorance and absence or towards a sociology of things that aren’t there. Social Epistemology, 28(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.862880
Doaei, M. (2012). Identify and assess the causes of group stupidity in Pars Aviation Services Company. Ms dissertation. Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan.
Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Bağcı, H. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on chaos and complexity theory in the social sciences. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0148-0
Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Cetin, B., & Potas, N. (2007). Multi-dimensional organizational intelligence scale Multimarine Journal. World Appl. Sci. J, 2(3), 151–157.
Farhadi Nejad, M., Lagzian, M., Mansoorian, Y., & Kaffash Poor, A. (2014). Managerial competencies for effective management in iranian governmental organizations: Grounded data theory. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 3(1), 55–70. http://ipom.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_1682.html
Forester, J. (2003). On fieldwork in a Habermasian way: Critical ethnography and the extra-ordinary character of ordinary professional work. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying Management Critically (pp. 46–65). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Freeman, J., Coyle, T. R., & Baggio, J. A. (2016). The functional intelligences proposition. 99 (3), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.057
Gabriel, Y. 2012. Organizations in a State of Darkness: Towards a Theory of Organizational Miasma. Organization Studies, 33(9): 1137-1152.
Ghorashi Bonabi, A. A. (2012). Qamoos Quran. Dar-al-Ketab Islamiyah. http://www.noorshop.ir/fa/book/2086/کتاب-قاموس-قرآن
Izak, M. (2013). The foolishness of wisdom: Towards an inclusive approach to wisdom in organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.07.002
Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the use of grounded theory in doctoral studies – An example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.28945/1429
Karimi-Ghartemani, S., Khani, N., & Nasr Esfahani, A. (2020). Stupidity for organizational developing a framework. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(2), 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2020.100392
Lange, A.-C. (2016). Organizational ignorance: An ethnographic study of high-frequency trading. Economy and Society, 45(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1220665
Malakouti, M. S., & Talebi, A. T. (2018). The issue of identity in children without identity card: A grounded theory study from Tehran, Iran. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 3(2), 62–71.
March, J. G. (2006). Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.515
Nachiappan, S., Andi, H. K., Veeran, V. P. K., Ahmad, A. I., & Zulkafaly, F. H. M. (2014). Analysis of cognition integration in intelligence quotient (IQ), emotional quotient (EQ) and spiritual quotient (SQ) in transforming Cameron highlands youths through hermeneutics pedagogy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 888–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1246
Omidvar, R., Sardari, A., & Yazdani, N. (2015). Analysis of barriers to green supply chain management using structural-interpretive modeling (ISM). Business Strategies, 22(5), 29-38.
Paulsen, R. (2017). Slipping into functional stupidity: The bifocality of organizational compliance. Human Relations, 70(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716649246
Paulsen, R. (2018). In the mood for obedience: Despair, cynicism, and seduction among employment service employees. Culture and Organization, 24(5), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2016.1186673
Roberts, J. (2013). Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown. Management Learning, 44(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612443208
Roberts, J. (2018). Managing only with transparency: The strategic functions of ignorance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 55, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPA.2017.12.004
Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101984
Tajeddini, K. (2013). Using grounded theory to model market orientation experiences at practice, International Journal of Business Excellence, 6(5), 553-571.
Tajeddini, K., & Trueman, M. (2008). The potential for innovativeness: a tale of the Swiss watch industry. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1-2), 169-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/026725708X273984
Takkar, J., S. G, D., & Gupta, A. D. (2007). Development of a balanced scorecard. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1), 25–59.
Tajeddini, K., & Mueller, S. L. (2012). Corporate entrepreneurship in Switzerland: evidence from a case study of Swiss watch manufacturers. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 8(1), 355-372.
Usmani, M., Davison, J., & Napier, C. J. (2020). The production of stand-alone sustainability reports: Visual impression management, legitimacy and “functional stupidity.” Accounting Forum, 44(4), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1782566
Yang. CH.& Lin.H.M, (2012), Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure. management decision.50(6).3-30.
Zhuang, W. L., Chen, K. Y., Chang, C. L., Guan, X., & Huan, T. C. (2020). Effect of hotel employees’ workplace friendship on workplace deviance behaviour: Moderating role of organisational identification. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(22), 102-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102531. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,105 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,104 |