تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,466 |
تعداد مقالات | 69,886 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,396,729 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 95,645,226 |
تجزیهوتحلیل فضایی و اولویتبندی خدمات اکوسیستم فرهنگی: مدلسازی تناسب خدمات تفرجی | ||
مجله علمی " آمایش سرزمین " | ||
مقاله 11، دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین 1401، صفحه 317-345 اصل مقاله (1.48 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jtcp.2021.330707.670255 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
ذبیح اله چاراهی1؛ شراره پورابراهیم* 2؛ امیر حسین پژمان3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه تهران، گروه محیط زیست، دانشکدة منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
2دانشیار دانشگاه تهران، گروه محیط زیست، دانشکدة منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
3دکتری دانشگاه تهران، دانشکدة محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف از این مطالعه مدلسازی تناسب خدمات تفرجی به منظور شناسایی نواحی دارای اولویت برای توسعة تفرج بود. به منظور شناسایی الگوهای فضایی خدمات تفرجی، شاخص پتانسیل تفرجی اکوسیستم، شاخص جذابیت لنداسکیپ، برآورد میزان بازدید، و توزیع دسترسی با استفاده از مجموعهای از زیرشاخصها در مقیاس منطقهای با یکدیگر ترکیب شدند. همچنین وزن هر یک از شاخصها با استفاده از متد وزندهی CRITIC محاسبه شد و میزان اهمیت هر یک از شاخصها در شکلگیری تناسب فضایی خدمات تفرجی تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد ارائة خدمات بالای تفرجی عمدتاً در مناطق دارای اکوسیستمهای جنگلی و دارای پوشش متنوع، مناطق حفاظتشده و اکوسیستمهای آبی مانند رودخانهها و تالابها است. در مقابل، مناطق شهری و ساختهشده دارای کمترین پتانسیل فراهمآوری خدمات تفرجیاند. از آنالیز آماری Getis-Ord Gi* statistic جهت مدلسازی تناسب تفرجی و شناسایی خوشههای تناسب تفرجی و زونبندی استفاده شد. زون 1، با تناسب بسیار کم، 9/19 درصد از منطقة مطالعاتی را پوشش میدهد. این زون غالباً با کاربریهای کشاورزی ، مرتعی و اراضی شهری پوشیده شده است. زون 5 با تناسب تفرجی بسیار زیاد 5/16 درصد از منطقة مطالعاتی را در بر میگیرد. کاربری اراضی غالب در این پهنه جنگل و سطوح آبی شامل رودخانهها و تالابها است. زون 3 با تناسب متوسط بیش از نیمی از مساحت منطقة مطالعاتی را به خود اختصاص میدهد. رویکرد ارائهشده در این مطالعه اولویتهای توسعه را با توجه به پتانسیلهای تفرجی اکوسیستمهای موجود در یک منطقه شناسایی میکند و میتواند در ارتقای برنامهریزی فضایی تفرج و توریسم جهت حفظ خدمات اکوسیستمی و استفادة پایدار از آنها به کار گرفته شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
برآورد میزان بازدید؛ برنامهریزی فضایی؛ پتانسیل تفرجی اکوسیستم؛ تناسب خدمات تفرجی؛ خوشهبندی فضایی؛ شاخص جذابیت لنداسکیپ | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Spatial Analysis and Prioritization of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Modeling the Suitability of Recreational Services | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Zabihollah Chaharahy1؛ Sharareh Pourebrahim2؛ Amir Hossein Pejmman3 | ||
1PhD Candidate, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Department of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The main purpose of this study was modeling the suitability of recreational services in order to identify the high-priority areas for the development of recreational activities. To identify the spatial patterns of recreational services, the landscape attractiveness index, visit rate estimation, and access distribution were combined using a set of sub-indices. Moreover, the weight of each index was calculated using CRITIC weighting method and the importance of each index in the formation of recreational services spatial suitability was determined. The results showed that the presentation of highly recreational services is mainly done in the areas with forest ecosystems, protected areas, and aquatic ecosystems such as rivers and wetlands that have diverse landscapes. On the contrary, urban and human-built areas have the least potential for the provision of recreational services. Getis-Ord Gi* statistic was used to model the recreational suitability, identify recreational suitability clusters, and zoning. With its very low suitability, Zone 1 covers 19.9 percent of the area under study. This zone is mainly filled with agricultural lands (54.7%), grasslands (36.1%), and urban lands (6.8%). In contrast, with its very high recreational suitability, Zone 5 covers 16.5 percent of the area under study. The main uses of the lands in this zone are forest lands (55.5%) and aquatic layers including rivers and wetlands (17.2%). Zone 3, which has an average suitability rate, covers more than half of the area under study. The approach presented in this study helps identify the development priorities in the light of the recreational potentials of the ecosystems existing in an area. Thus, it can be used to improve the spatial planning of recreation and tourism in order to preserve ecosystem services and sustainable use of them. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
spatial planning, recreational services suitability, spatial clustering, recreational potential of ecosystem, visit rate estimation, landscape attractiveness index | ||
مراجع | ||
ضیایی نژاد، هدی؛ حمیدرضا پورخباز؛ فروزان فرخیان (1394) ،" ارزیابی تناسب اراضی برای کاربری توریسم با استفاده از GIS مطالعه موردی: منطقه تنگ سولک بهمیی(کهگیلویه و بویراحمد)"، نشریه پژوهشهای محیط زیست، دوره 6، شماره 11، صص 99-108.
عرفانی، ملیحه ؛ طاهره اردکانی؛ آسیه صادقی؛ احمد پهلوانروی (1390) " مکانیابی برای تفرج متمرکز در منطقه چاهنیمه (شهرستان زابل) با استفاده از سیستم تصمیم گیری چند متغیره " ، پژوهشهای محیطزیست، سال 2 ،شماره 4 ، صص 41-50.
منصوری، معصومه؛ زهرا حواسی ابدالانی؛ ضیاءالدین بادهیان؛ محمد جواد عزیزی (1395) " ارزیابی قابلیت تفرج و تقاضای تفرجی پارک جنگلی مورینه شهرستان نورآباد"، فصلنامه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، دوره 18، صص 318-333.
موسوی، حجت؛ آسیه عباسیان؛ پریناز زورمند (1396)" ارزیابی توان اکولوژیکی توسعه تفرج متمرکز و گسترده اکوتوریسم در شهرضا" ، نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، سال هفدهم، شماره 64، صص 119-138.
References
Alemu I, J. B., Richards, D. R., Gaw, L. Y. F., Masoudi, M., Nathan, Y., & Friess, D. A. (2021). "Identifying spatial patterns and interactions among multiple ecosystem services in an urban mangrove landscape", Ecological Indicators, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107042
Bachi, L., Ribeiro, S. C., Hermes, J., & Saadi, A. (2020). "Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) in landscapes with a tourist vocation: Mapping and modeling the physical landscape components that bring benefits to people in a mountain tourist destination in southeastern Brazil", Tourism Management, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104017
Baró, F., Palomo, I., Zulian, G., Vizcaino, P., Haase, D., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2016). "Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region", Land Use Policy, 57, pp. 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
Caglayan, İ., Yeşil, A., Cieszewski, C., Gül, F. K., & Kabak, Ö. (2020). "Mapping of recreation suitability in the Belgrad Forest Stands", Applied Geography, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102153
Casado-Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M., Madariaga, I., & Verburg, P. H. (2014). "Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning", Landscape Ecology, 29(8), pp. 1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9945-2
Chhetri, P. & Arrowsmith, C. (2008). "GIS-based modelling of recreational potential of nature-based tourist destinations", Tourism Geographies, 10(2), pp. 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680802000089
Clark, R. N. & Stankey, G. H. (1979). "The recreation opportunity spectrum: a framework for planning, management, and research", General Technical Report, Forest Service, US Dept. Agriculture, PNW-98.
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). "Changes in the global value of ecosystem services", Global Environmental Change, 26(1), pp. 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Crossman, N. D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E. G., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M. B., & Maes, J. (2013). "A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services", Ecosystem Services, 4, pp. 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
Cunha, J., Elliott, M., & Ramos, S. (2018). "Linking modelling and empirical data to assess recreation services provided by coastal habitats: The case of NW Portugal", Ocean and Coastal Management, 162, pp. 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.12.022
De Valck, J., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., De Nocker, L., Van Orshoven, J., & Vranken, L. (2016). "Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping", Landscape and Urban Planning, 151, pp. 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.008
De Valck, J., Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., De Nocker, L., & Vranken, L. (2017). "Outdoor recreation in various landscapes: Which site characteristics really matter?", Land Use Policy, 65, pp. 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.009
Erfani, M., Ardakani, T., Sadeghi, A., & Pahlavanravi, A. (1390). “Locating for centralized recreation in Chah Nimeh area (Zabol city) using multivariate decision making system”, Environmental Research, Year 2, No. 4, pp. 41-50. (in Persian)
Fischer, L. K., Honold, J., Botzat, A., Brinkmeyer, D., Cvejić, R., Delshammar, T., Elands, B., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., Karle, S. J., Lafortezza, R., Nastran, M., Nielsen, A. B., van der Jagt, A. P., Vierikko, K., & Kowarik, I. (2018). "Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use", Ecosystem Services, 31, pp. 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.015
González-García, A., Palomo, I., González, J. A., López, C. A., & Montes, C. (2020). "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning", Land Use Policy, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104493
Hamann, M., Biggs, R., & Reyers, B. (2015). "Mapping social-ecological systems: Identifying “green-loop” and “red-loop” dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use", Global Environmental Change, 34, pp. 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008
Hermes, J., Albert, C., & von Haaren, C. (2018). "Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany", Ecosystem Services, 31, pp. 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2013). "An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators", Ecological Indicators, 29, pp. 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013
Kaptan Ayhan, Ç., Cengi̇z Taşlı, T., Özkök, F., & Tatlı, H. (2020). "Land use suitability analysis of rural tourism activities: Yenice, Turkey", Tourism Management, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.07.003
Khazaee Fadafan, F., Danehkar, A., & Pourebrahim, S. (2018). "Developing a non-compensatory approach to identify suitable zones for intensive tourism in an environmentally sensitive landscape", Ecological Indicators, 87, pp. 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.066
Kienast, F., Degenhardt, B., Weilenmann, B., Wäger, Y., & Buchecker, M. (2012). "GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation", Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(4), pp. 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015
Komossa, F., Wartmann, F. M., Kienast, F., & Verburg, P. H. (2020). "Comparing outdoor recreation preferences in peri-urban landscapes using different data gathering methods", Landscape and Urban Planning, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103796
Komossa, F., van der Zanden, E. H., & Verburg, P. H. (2019). "Characterizing outdoor recreation user groups: A typology of peri-urban recreationists in the Kromme Rijn area, the Netherlands", Land Use Policy, 80, pp. 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.017
Kulczyk, S., Woźniak, E., & Derek, M. (2018). "Landscape, facilities and visitors: An integrated model of recreational ecosystem services", Ecosystem Services, 31, pp. 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.016
Li, Z., Fan, Z., & Shen, S. (2018). "Urban green space suitability evaluation based on the AHP-CV combined weight method: A case study of Fuping county, China", Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082656
Liu, H., Remme, R. P., Hamel, P., Nong, H., & Ren, H. (2020). "Supply and demand assessment of urban recreation service and its implication for greenspace planning-A case study on Guangzhou", Landscape and Urban Planning, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103898
Liu, Z., Huang, Q., & Yang, H. (2021). "Supply-demand spatial patterns of park cultural services in megalopolis area of Shenzhen, China", Ecological Indicators, 121 (November 2019), 107066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107066
Lorilla, R. S., Kalogirou, S., Poirazidis, K., & Kefalas, G. (2019). "Identifying spatial mismatches between the supply and demand of ecosystem services to achieve a sustainable management regime in the Ionian Islands (Western Greece)", Land Use Policy, 88 (August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104171
Mansoori, M., Abdalani, Z., Badeh Yan, Z., & Aziz, M. (1395). “Evaluation of recreation capability and recreational demand of Morineh Forest Park in Noorabad city”, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 18, Special Issue No. 3, pp. 321-333. (in Persian)
Martnez-Harms, M. J. & Balvanera, P. (2012). "Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review", International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 8(1–2), pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis Report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. In Washington, DC.
Mousavi, H., Abbasian, A., & Zormand, P. (1396). “Assessing the ecological potential of the development of centralized and extensive ecotourism in Shahreza”, Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 17th year, No. 6, pp. 119-138. (in Persian).
Nahuelhual, L., Vergara, X., Kusch, A., Campos, G., & Droguett, D. (2017). "Mapping ecosystem services for marine spatial planning: Recreation opportunities in Sub-Antarctic Chile", Marine Policy, 81, pp. 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.038
Nahuelhual, L., Carmona, A., Lozada, P., Jaramillo, A., & Aguayo, M. (2013). "Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile", Applied Geography, 40, pp. 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004
Olson, L. E., Squires, J. R., Roberts, E. K., Miller, A. D., Ivan, J. S., & Hebblewhite, M. (2017). "Modeling large-scale winter recreation terrain selection with implications for recreation management and wildlife", Applied Geography, 86, pp. 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.023
Paracchini, M. L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J. P., Termansen, M., Zandersen, M., Perez-Soba, M., Scholefield, P. A., & Bidoglio, G. (2014). "Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU", Ecological Indicators, 45, pp. 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018
Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2015). "Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach", Ecosystem Services, 13, pp. 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008
Plieninger, T., Bieling, C., Ohnesorge, B., Schaich, H., Schleyer, C., & Wolff, F. (2013). "Exploring futures of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes through participatory scenario development in the Swabian Alb, Germany", Ecology and Society, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05802-180339
Rabe, S. E., Gantenbein, R., Richter, K. F., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2018). "Increasing the credibility of expert-based models with preference surveys – Mapping recreation in the riverine zone", Ecosystem Services, 31, pp. 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.011
Rall, E., Bieling, C., Zytynska, S., & Haase, D. (2017). "Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use", Ecological Indicators, 77 (September), pp. 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001
Rathmann, J., Beck, C., Flutura, S., Seiderer, A., Aslan, I., & André, E. (2020). "Towards quantifying forest recreation: Exploring outdoor thermal physiology and human well-being along exemplary pathways in a central European urban forest (Augsburg, SE-Germany)", Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126622
Santarém, F., Saarinen, J., & Brito, J. C. (2020). "Mapping and analysing cultural ecosystem services in conflict areas", Ecological Indicators, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105943
Schirpke, U., Candiago, S., Egarter Vigl, L., Jäger, H., Labadini, A., Marsoner, T., Meisch, C., Tasser, E., & Tappeiner, U. (2019). "Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services", Science of the Total Environment, 651, pp. 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235
Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T., & Tappeiner, U. (2018). "Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings", Ecosystem Services, 31, pp. 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017
Scholte, S. S. K., Daams, M., Farjon, H., Sijtsma, F. J., van Teeffelen, A. J. A., & Verburg, P. H. (2018). "Mapping recreation as an ecosystem service: Considering scale, interregional differences and the influence of physical attributes", Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.011
Sun, X., Tang, H., Yang, P., Hu, G., Liu, Z., & Wu, J. (2020). "Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous United States: A multiscale analysis", Science of the Total Environment, 703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135005
Sun, Y., Hao, R., Qiao, J., & Xue, H. (2020). "Function zoning and spatial management of small watersheds based on ecosystem disservice bundles", Journal of Cleaner Production, 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120285
Ustaoglu, E. & Aydınoglu, A. C. (2020). "Site suitability analysis for green space development of Pendik district (Turkey)", Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126542
Vallecillo, S., La Notte, A., Zulian, G., Ferrini, S., & Maes, J. (2019). "Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people", Ecological Modelling, 392, pp. 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023
Vierikko, K. & Yli-Pelkonen, V. (2019). "Seasonality in recreation supply and demand in an urban lake ecosystem in Finland", Urban Ecosystems, 22(4), pp. 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00849-7
Weyland, F. & Laterra, P. (2014). "Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: A method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics", Ecological Indicators, 39, pp. 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.023
Willibald, F., van Strien, M. J., Blanco, V., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2019). "Predicting outdoor recreation demand on a national scale – The case of Switzerland", Applied Geography, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102111
Wu, H. W., Zhen, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). "Urban rail transit operation safety evaluation based on an improved CRITIC method and cloud model", Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 16(xxxx). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100206
Xu, C., Ke, Y., Li, Y., Chu, H., & Wu, Y. (2020). "Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-II and CRITIC-TOPSIS", Energy Conversion and Management, 215(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112892
Zabihi, H., Alizadeh, M., Wolf, I. D., Karami, M., Ahmad, A., & Salamian, H. (2020). "A GIS-based fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) for ecotourism suitability decision making: A case study of Babol in Iran", Tourism Management Perspectives, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100726
Zhang, H., Gao, Y., Hua, Y., Zhang, Y., & Liu, K. (2019). "Assessing and mapping recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services in the Qinling Mountains, China", Ecosystem Services, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101006.
Ziaeinejad, H., Pourkhbaz, H., & Farrokhian, F. (1394). “Assessment of land suitability for tourism use using GIS (Case study: Tang-e-Sulk-Bahmi, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad areas)”, Environmental Research, Year 6, No. 11, pp. 99-108. (in Persian). | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 679 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 486 |