News

Badiee Azandehie, M., Zarei, B., BarzegarzadehZarandi, M. (2022). The impact of Indo-China geopolitical competition on south Asian region security with emphasis on US intervention. , 54(1), 375-389. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.326457.1008335
Marjan Badiee Azandehie; Bahador Zarei; Moein BarzegarzadehZarandi. "The impact of Indo-China geopolitical competition on south Asian region security with emphasis on US intervention". , 54, 1, 2022, 375-389. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.326457.1008335
Badiee Azandehie, M., Zarei, B., BarzegarzadehZarandi, M. (2022). 'The impact of Indo-China geopolitical competition on south Asian region security with emphasis on US intervention', , 54(1), pp. 375-389. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.326457.1008335
Badiee Azandehie, M., Zarei, B., BarzegarzadehZarandi, M. The impact of Indo-China geopolitical competition on south Asian region security with emphasis on US intervention. , 2022; 54(1): 375-389. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.326457.1008335

The impact of Indo-China geopolitical competition on south Asian region security with emphasis on US intervention

پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی
Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2022, Pages 375-389    PDF (356.24 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.326457.1008335
Authors
Marjan Badiee Azandehie* 1; Bahador Zarei1; Moein BarzegarzadehZarandi2
1Assistant Professor./ University of Tehran
2Political geography university of Tehran
Abstract
One of the world’s geographical regions which has been exposed to the geopolitics tensions was southern Asian region which has more than 2 billion population. In this geopolitical region, the presence and the impact of China and India which are trying to develop their impression all the time and the special notice of America has caused that the domain of regional and world competitions find new dimensions. The importance and the domain of these competitions in the geographical region of southern Asia is so huge that this region has been able to be a place for getting the strategic Excellency in Asian continent, and probably a focal for changing the balance of world power in the 21 century. This issue has caused that the study of the structure of geopolitical competition between China and India and the role of America in the Southern Asia region is an interesting issue for academicals studies.

In this research, the goal is to investigate this tip with the way of descriptive analytical research which the nature of geopolitical competition between China and India in this geographical region is created on what basis; and what the process of America’s intervention has influenced on the power equations. The result of the research indicates that the most important influential factor on the geopolitical competition of China and India is the development of the economy’s role in the world’s changes. In a way that the competition between themselves has been transformed from security domain to the economic domain. In this process, the United States with the notice of the profits unity with India is trying to restrain the impact of China in peripheral regions, being an obstacle to achieve China’s economical and communicational plans in the countries like Pakistan, Myanmar and Bangladesh. This issue has cause the increase of China’s penetration costs and on the other hand has caused the increase of competition power of India which seems in a short time neither of China and India countries aren’t able to acquire absolute geopolitical and geo-economics excellence towards each other.

One of the world’s geographical regions which has been exposed to the geopolitics tensions was southern Asian region which has more than 2 billion population. In this geopolitical region, the presence and the impact of China and India which are trying to develop their impression all the time and the special notice of America has caused that the domain of regional and world competitions find new dimensions. The importance and the domain of these competitions in the geographical region of southern Asia is so huge that this region has been able to be a place for getting the strategic Excellency in Asian continent, and probably a focal for changing the balance of world power in the 21 century. This issue has caused that the study of the structure of geopolitical competition between China and India and the role of America in the Southern Asia region is an interesting issue for academicals studies.

In this research, the goal is to investigate this tip with the way of descriptive analytical research which the nature of geopolitical competition between China and India in this geographical region is created on what basis; and what the process of America’s intervention has influenced on the power equations. The result of the research indicates that the most important influential factor on the geopolitical competition of China and India is the development of the economy’s role in the world’s changes. In a way that the competition between themselves has been transformed from security domain to the economic domain. In this process, the United States with the notice of the profits unity with India is trying to restrain the impact of China in peripheral regions, being an obstacle to achieve China’s economical and communicational plans in the countries like Pakistan, Myanmar and Bangladesh. This issue has cause the increase of China’s penetration costs and on the other hand has caused the increase of competition power of India which seems in a short time neither of China and India countries aren’t able to acquire absolute geopolitical and geo-economics excellence towards each other.

One of the world’s geographical regions which has been exposed to the geopolitics tensions was southern Asian region which has more than 2 billion population. In this geopolitical region, the presence and the impact of China and India which are trying to develop their impression all the time and the special notice of America has caused that the domain of regional and world competitions find new dimensions. The importance and the domain of these competitions in the geographical region of southern Asia is so huge that this region has been able to be a place for getting the strategic Excellency in Asian continent, and probably a focal for changing the balance of world power in the 21 century. This issue has caused that the study of the structure of geopolitical competition between China and India and the role of America in the Southern Asia region is an interesting issue for academicals studies.

In this research, the goal is to investigate this tip with the way of descriptive analytical research which the nature of geopolitical competition between China and India in this geographical region is created on what basis; and what the process of America’s intervention has influenced on the power equations. The result of the research indicates that the most important influential factor on the geopolitical competition of China and India is the development of the economy’s role in the world’s changes. In a way that the competition between themselves has been transformed from security domain to the economic domain. In this process, the United States with the notice of the profits unity with India is trying to restrain the impact of China in peripheral regions, being an obstacle to achieve China’s economical and communicational plans in the countries like Pakistan, Myanmar and Bangladesh.
Keywords
South of Asia; regions Competition; Geopolitical of China and India; Intervention; US
References
  1. احمدی، سیدعباس؛ حافظ‏نیا، محمدرضا؛ بدیعی ازنداهی، مرجان و حیدری موصلو، طهمورث، 1397، تبیین نظری بسترهای شکل‏گیری رقابت ژئوپلیتیکی، پژوهش‏های جغرافیای انسانی، دورة 50، ش 1، صص 199-216.
  2. احمدی‏پور، زهرا و رشیدی، یونس، 1397، تحلیل ژئوپلیتیک: بازنمایی فضاهای ترس در سینما، فصل‏نامة ژئوپلیتیک، س ۱۴، ش ۲، صص 21-55.
  3. احمدی‏پور، زهرا و رشیدی، یونس، 1399، تصویرسازی جغرافیایی و بازنمایی ژئوپولیتیکی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
  4. برزگر، کیهان؛ رضائی، مسعود، 1396، آینده رقابت های راهبردی متداخل در اقیانوس هند، فصلنامه سیاست- مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دورة 47، ش 1، صص 21-1.
  5. برزگرزاده زرندی، معین، 1394، تبیین کشمکش‏های سرزمینی در منطقة جنوب آسیا، پایان‏نامة کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران.
  6. برژینسکی، زیبگینیو، 1386، انتخاب: سلطه یا رهبری، تهران: نشر نی.
  7. برژینسکی، زیبگینیو، 1391، نگاه استراتژیک ایالات متحدة امریکا و بحران قدرت جهانی، تهران: نشر میزان.
  8. بوزان، باری و ویور، ال، 1383، مناطق و قدرت‏ها: ساختار امنیت بین‏المللی، ترجمة قدیر نصری، فصل‏نامة مطالعات راهبردی، ش 24، صص 343-358.
  9. پیردشتی، حسن و کمری، مریم، 1395، مناقشات مرزهای دریایی در سواحل شمالی اقیانوس هند، همایش فراوری پتانسیل‏های ژئوپلیتیکی توسعه در کرانه‏های اقیانوسی جنوب شرق کشور، تهران: انجمن ژئوپلیتیک ایران و وزارت کشور جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
  10. حافظ‏نیا، محمدرضا، 1389، یک منطقة ژئوپلیتیکی چگونه تحول می‏یابد؟، فصل‏نامة ژئوپلیتیک، ش
  11. حسین پور پویان، رضا؛ مجتهدزاده, پیروز؛ حافظ نیا، محمدرضا؛ عزتی، عزت اله؛ 1391، تبیین ژئوپلیتیک روابط قدرت در منطقه شبه‌قاره هند پس از وقایع 11 سپتامبر 2001م. فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک, س 8 ش 3, صص1-34.
  12. درایسدل، آلاسدایر و بلیک، جرالد اچ، 1370، جغرافیای سیاسی خاورمیانه و شمال افریقا، ترجمة دره میرحیدر، چ ۲، تهران: دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین‏المللی وزارت امور خارجه.
  13. دهشیار، حسین، 1391، سیاست خارجی امریکا در تئوری و عمل، تهران: نشر میزان.
  14. دهشیری، محمدرضا و همکاران، 1396، تأثیر امنیت منطقه‏ای بر رفتارشناختی مجموعه‏های امنیتی مناطق، فصل‏نامة سیاست جهانی، دورة ۶، ش ۱، صص 43-78.
  15. دهقان، یدالله و کاظمی، مهدی، 1390، بررسی روابط ایران و هند در سایة شهور هند به‏عنوان یک قدرت منطقه‏ای، کتاب آبی، تهران: ابرار معاصر.
  16. ذکی، یاشار و گلفشان، عاطفه، 1394، جهان‏شهرها و نقشه‏های جدید ژئوپلیتیکی، فصل‏نامة علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی (سپهر)، دورة 24، ش 95، صص 63-80.
  17. رحیمی، حسن، 1395، بسترها و زمینه‏های منازعه و رقابت بین کشورهای منطقة ژئوپلیتیکی اقیانوس هند، مجموعه‏مقالات همایش فرآوری پتانسیل‏های ژئوپلیتیکی توسعه در کرانه‏های اقیانوسی جنوب شرق کشور، تهران: وزارت کشور.
  18. زارعی، بهادر و موسوی شهیدی، سیدمهدی، 1399، همکاری‏های ژئواکونومیکی و رقابت‏های ژئوپلیتیکی چین و امریکا در منطقة آسیا- پاسیفیک در قرن بیست‏ویکم، پژوهش‏های جغرافیای انسانی، دورة 52، ش 3، صص 1103-1130.
  19. سازمند، بهاره و ارغوانی پیرسلامی، فریبرز، 1391، چالش‏های ژئوپلیتیک منطقه‏ای و دکترین ظهور مسالمت‏آمیز چین، فصل‏نامة روابط خارجی، س ۴، ش 2.
  20. سعادتی، حسن؛ کریمی‏پور، یدالله؛ کاویانی‏راد، مراد و کارگر، احمد، 1398، تبیین نقش و کارکرد ژئوپلیتیک خلیج چابهار در تحولات اقیانوس هند با تأکید بر رقابت‏های میان هند و چین، پژوهش‏های جغرافیایی انسانی، دورة 51، ش 4، صص 1051-1071.
  21. سوواکول، بنجامین، 1391، مرجع امنیت انرژی، ترجمة علیرضا طیب، تهران: ابرار معاصر.
  22. عیوضی، محمدرحیم، 1388، جهانی‏شدن و تأثیر آن بر امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی، مجلة اندیشة انقلاب اسلامی، ش 26.
  23. قوام، سیدعبدالعلی، 1392، روابط بین‏الملل: نظریه‏ها و رویکردها، تهران: سمت.
  24. کریمی‏پور، یدالله، 1392، جزوة درسی بنیان‏های ژئوپلیتیک ایران، تهران: دانشگاه خوارزمی.
  25. کوهن، سوئل. بی، 1387، ژئوپلیتیک نظام جهانی، ترجمة عباس کاردان، تهران: ابرار معاصر.
  26. مجتهدزاده، پیروز، 1381، جغرافیای سیاسی و سیاست جغرافیایی، تهران: سمت.
  27. مجتهدزاده، پیروز، 1379، ایده‏های ژئوپلیتیک و واقعیت‏های ایران، تهران: نشر نی.
  28. مختاری هشی، حسین و نصرتی، حمیدرضا، 1389، امنیت انرژی و موقعیت ژئوانرژی ایران، فصل‏نامة ژئوپلیتیک، دورة 6، ش 18، صص 95-124.
  29. مختاری هشی، حسین، 1397، تبیین مفهوم ژئواکونومی (اقتصاد ژئوپلیتیکی) و توصیه‏هایی برای ایران، فصل‏نامة ژئوپلیتیک، دورة 14، ش 50، شمارة پیاپی 50، صص 56-82.
  30. مشیرزاده، حمیرا و تیشه‏یار، ماندانا، 1390، بررسی نظری رهیافت امنیت انرژی هند در آسیای مرکزی، فصل‏نامة روابط خارجی، س ۳، ش ۲، صص 161-184.
  31. یزدان‏پناه، کیومرث و کامران، حسن، 1394، هند و آیندة ژئوپلیتیکی آن در آسیا با تأکید بر نقش ترسیمی ایران، فصل‏نامة جغرافیا، دورة جدید، س ۱۳، ش 46، صص 339-353.
  32. Bradnock, Bob and Williams, Glynn, 2014, South Asia in a Globalising World, London: Routledge.
  33. Burchill, Scott, 2000, Realism and Neo-Liberalism, In: Theories of International Relations, New York: Palgrave McMillan, Financial Daily, April
  34. Buzan, Barry, 1999, People, States and Fear, translate by Institute for Strategic Studies, Tehran, Institute for Strategic Studies [In Persian].
  35. Chaudhury, Dipanjan, 2007, Boosting Maritime Capabilities in the India Ocean, New Delhi, August
  36. Cohen, Saul B., 1994, Geopolitics in the New World Era, Chapter 2 from recording the world, Edited by: George J. Demko and William B. Wood, USA: West View Press.
  37. Cohen, Saul B., 2009, Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations, New York and London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  38. Cohen, Stephan, 2005, The Us and South Asia in Access at: broking.edu/views/brookingsinstitute.
  39. Degong, Ma et al., 2020, An empirical nexus between exchange rate and China's outward foreign direct investment: Implications for Pakistan under the China Pakistan economic corridor project. The Quarterly Review if Economics and Finance. In Access at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.12.001.
  40. Fidelity, 2015, Stock Market Outlook; a sample outlook report by a brokerage house. In Access at: https://www.fidelity.com.
  41. Flint, Colin, 2011, Introduction to Geopolitics, New York and London: Routledge.
  42. https://orientalreview.org/2020/10/19/gwadar-the-port-of-future.
  43. International Monetary Fund, 2020, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October/weoreport?c=512,513,514,534,556,558,564,524,&s=NGDPD,&sy=2019&ey=2025&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1. Visited in: 09/08/2020.
  44. Jaschock, Maria and Chan, H.M. Vicky, 2009, Education, gender and Islam in China: The place of religious education in challenging and sustaining ‘undisputed traditions’ among Chinese Muslim women, International Journal of Educational Development, 29(5): 487-494.
  45. Jawli, Nandini, 2016, South China Sea and India's Geopolitical Interests, Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, Vol. 29, No. 1, PP. 85-101.
  46. Kirchner, Emil and Sperling, James, 2018, EU Security Governance, Manchester: Hive.
  47. Malik, Mohan, 2006, China‘s Strategy of Containing India.http://www.pinr.com/reprot.phpzac=view-report&report-id=434.
  48. Nepal, R. and Paija, N., 2019, Energy security, electricity, population and economic growth: The case of a developing South Asian resource-rich economy, Energy Policy, 132, 771-781.
  49. Rashidi, Yunes; Ahmadi Pour, Zahra; Alemi, Akbar and Bayat, Moloud, 2021, The Role of Geographical Imagination and Geopolitical Representation in Dividing Space/Place into "our" and "their", Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 4, PP. 79-100.
  50. Rothschild, Emma, 1995, What is Security? Daedalus, Vol. 124, No. 3, PP. 53-98.
  51. Scholten, Daniel et al., 2020, The geopolitics of renewables: New board, new game. Energy Policy, 138. March 2020. In access at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111059.
  52. Scholvin, Soren and Wigell, Mikael, 2018, Power politics by economic means: Geo-economics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice, Comparative Strategy, Vol. 37, PP. 73-84.
  53. Sieminski, Adam et al., 2015, 21ST Century Energy Markets: How The Changing Dynamics Of World Energy Markets Impact Our Economy and Energy Securit, Washington: Naval Postgraduate School, Center for Homeland Defense and Security.
  54. Smith, Stive, 2006, The Concept of Security in a Globalizing World. London: Routledge.
  55. Thompson, Walter, 1995, Principal Rivalries, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 39, No. 2, PP. 197-211.
  56. Twining, Daniel, 2007, American ‘s Grand Design in Asia, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3.
  57. Ullman, Richard, 1983, Redefining Security, International Security, Vol. 8, No. 1, PP. 129-153.
  58. Vasquez, John, A., 1993, The War Puzzle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  59. info, 2020, Southern Asia Population. In Access at:https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/southern-asia-population/. Visited in 12/09/2020.
  60. Yuan, M.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Huang, L.; Fang, K. and Liang, Y., 2020, Downstream oil supply security in China: Policy implications from quantifying the impact of oil import disruption, Energy Policy, 136, 111077.
Statistics
Article View: 1,106
PDF Download: 896


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb