پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,114,278 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,218,059 |
ارزیابی چرخهحیات گیاه نیشکر با رویکرد مدیریت برخی نهاده‌های کشاورزی (مطالعه موردی: شرکت کشت و صنعت نیشکر حکیم فارابی) | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| دوره 52، شماره 8، آبان 1400، صفحه 2125-2141 اصل مقاله (1.36 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2021.323968.668977 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سارا میسائی1؛ منا گلابی* 2؛ عبدعلی ناصری3؛ سعید برومندنسب3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه آبیاری و زهکشی، دانشکده مهندسی آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه آبیاری و زهکشی، دانشکده مهندسی آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران | ||
| 3استاد، گروه آبیاری و زهکشی، دانشکده مهندسی آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی اثرات محیطزیستی تولید نیشکر در شرکت کشت و صنعت حکیم فارابی با روش ارزیابی چرخهحیات در سال زراعی 1398 انجام شد. واحد کارکردی در این پژوهش معادل تولید یک تن محصول نیشکر در نظر گرفته شد. اطلاعات مورد نیاز به روش مصاحبه رو در رو با مدیران و کارشناسان گردآوری شد. نتایج نشان داد که در گروههای اثر مورد مطالعه سوخت دیزل، الکتریسیته، کود اوره و انتشارات مستقیم مزرعهای ناشی از تهیه قلمه نیشکر در تمام بخشها بیشترین تاثیر را داشتند. نتایج ارزیابی نشان داد که طبقه اثر مسمومیت آبهای آزاد، 86/103447 معادل کیلوگرم دیکلروبنزن برای هر تن نیشکر به محیط منتشر میکند که دارای پتانسیل بیشتری برای آسیب به محیطزیست است. پس برای بررسی اثرات کشت نیشکر بر طبقات اثر سه سناریو بهمنظور کاهش مصرف آب، کاهش مصرف کودها و سموم شیمیایی و کاهش مصرف الکتریسیته و سوخت دیزل تعریف شد. میزان انتشار این گروه اثر بعد از اعمال سناریوهای اول، دوم و سوم به ترتیب 6/99714، 02/95628 و 77/91894 کیلوگرم دیکلروبنزن تخمین زده شده است. میزان انتشار گازهای گلخانهای N2O، CO2 و CH4 به ازای هر تن نیشکر تولیدی به ترتیب 915/0، 261 و 506/0 کیلوگرم برآورد شد. میزان انتشار N2O بعد از اعمالسناریوها به ترتیب به 871/0، 827/0 و 784/0کیلوگرم، میزان انتشار CO2بعد از اعمال سناریوها به ترتیب به 251، 240 و 230 کیلوگرم و میزان انتشار CH4 بعد از اعمالسناریوها به ترتیب به 491/0، 475/0 و 460/0 کیلوگرم کاهش یافتند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اثرات محیطزیستی؛ نیشکر؛ انتشار گازهای گلخانهای؛ ارزیابی چرخهحیات | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Life Cycle Assessment of Sugarcane with Approach of Management Some Agricultural Inputs (Case study; Hakim Farabi Sugarcane Cultivation and Industry Company) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sara Misaee1؛ Mona Golabi2؛ Abd Ali Naseri3؛ Saeed BoroomandNasab3 | ||
| 1Master student, Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 2Assistance Professor, Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Ahvaz. Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,. Ahvaz. Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study was to investigate the environmental impacts of sugarcane production in Hakim Farabi Agro-Industry Company through life cycle assessment method in the 2019 crop year. The production of one ton of sugarcane considered as the functional unit. The required data was collected through face-to-face interviews with managers and experts. The results indicated that diesel fuel, electricity, urea fertilizer and direct field emissions from sugarcane cuttings had the greatest effect on all sectors in the studied effect groups. The evaluation showed that Marine aquatic Ecotoxicity released 103447.86 kg 1, 4-DB per one ton of sugarcane which has the highest potential for environmental damage. Therefore, three scenarios were defined to evaluate the effects of sugarcane cultivation on the impact categories in order to reduce water consumption, reduce fertilizers and chemical pesticides consumption and reduce electricity and diesel fuel consumption. The emission rate of this impact category after applying the first, second and third scenarios is estimated to be 99714.6, 95628.02 and 91894.77 kg 1, 4-DB per one ton of sugarcane, respectively. N2O, CO2 and CH4 greenhouse gas emissions were estimated to be 0.915, 261 and 0.506 kg, respectively. After applying the scenarios, CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions were estimated as follows: N2O emissions were 0.871, 0.827 and 0.784 kg, respectively, CO2 emissions were 251, 240 and 230 kg, respectively and CH4 emissions were 0.491, 0.475 and 0.460 kg, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Environmental effects, sugarcane, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H. and Lammel, J., )2004a(. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3), pp.247-264. Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J. and Kuhlmann, H., )2000(. Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 5(6), pp.349-357. Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J. and Kuhlmann, H., )2002a(. Impact assessment of abiotic resource consumption conceptual considerations. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(5), pp.301-307. Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Barraclough, P. and Kuhlmann, H., )2004b(. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3), pp.265-279. Buratti, C., Barbanera, M. and Fantozzi, F., )2009(. Environmental impact assessment of fiber sorghum (Sudan-Grass) production systems for biomass energy production in a central region of Italy. Consoli, F., Allen, D., Boustead, I., Fava, J., Franklin, W., Jensen, A.A., De Oude, N., Parrish, R., Perriman, R., Postlethwaite, D. and Quay, B., )1993( March. Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a “Code of practice”. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). In SETAC Workshop, Sesimbra, Portugal (Vol. 31). Cooper, J.M., Butler, G. and Leifert, C. )2011(. Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional food production systems, with and without bio-energy options. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 58(3-4), pp.185-192. Dalgaard, R., Schmidt, J., Halberg, N., Christensen, P., Thrane, M. and Pengue, W.A., (2007). LCA of soybean meal. International Journal of LCA, 15, pp.1-15. Erickson, J.E., Cisar, J.L., Volin, J.C. and Snyder, G.H., (2001). Comparing nitrogen runoff and leaching between newly established St. Augustinegrass turf and an alternative residential landscape. Crop Science, 41(6), pp.1889-1895. Eskom. (2010). Eskom Integrated Report. from https://www.eskom.co.za Farahani, S.S. and Asoodar, M.A., (2017). Life cycle environmental impacts of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses in Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(28), pp.22547-22556. Gasol, C.M., Gabarrell, X., Anton, A., Rigola, M., Carrasco, J., Ciria, P., Solano, M.L. and Rieradevall, J., (2007). Life cycle assessment of a Brassica carinata bioenergy cropping system in southern Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31(8), pp.543-555. Goebes, M.D., Strader, R. and Davidson, C., (2003). An ammonia emission inventory for fertilizer application in the United States. Atmospheric Environment, 37(18), pp.2539-2550. Green, M.R., 1987. Energy in pesticide manufacture, distribution and use. Energy in world agriculture, (2), pp.166-177. Guinée, J.B. and Lindeijer, E. eds., (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media. Haroni, S., Sheykhdavodi, M.J. and Kiani Deh Kiani, M., (2018). Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting the Yield and GHG Emissions of Sugarcane Production. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 8(2), pp.389-401. Holka, M., Jankowiak, J., Bieńkowski, J. and Dąbrowicz, R., (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of winter wheat in an intensive crop production system in Wielkopolska region (Poland). Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res, 14(535), p.e545. Iriarte, A., Rieradevall, J. and Gabarrell, X., (2010). Life cycle assessment of sunflower and rapeseed as energy crops under Chilean conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(4), pp.336-345. Kaab, A., Sharifi, M. and Mobli, H., (2019). Analysis and optimization of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in sugarcane production using data envelopment analysis. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering, 50(1), pp.19-30. Kazemizadeh, M., Hooshmand, A., Naseri, A., Golabi, M. and Meskarbashee, M., (2019). Study of life cycle assessment in corn production under two spring and autumn cultivars (case study of Khuzestan province). Journal of Natural Environment, 72(4), pp.485-498. Marashi, F., HAGHIGHIFARD, N.J., Khorasani, N. and MONAROUEI, S.M., (2019). Life Cycle Assessment of the sugar industry: a case study of Amir Kabir sugar cane industry. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 49(4), pp.597-608. Milutinović, B., Stefanović, G., Đekić, P.S., Mijailović, I. and Tomić, M., (2017). Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis. Energy, 137, pp.917-926. MOE, Ministry Of Energy. (2012). Energy balance in Iran. From http://www.moe.gov.ir Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Dalgaard, T., Knudsen, M.T., Keyhani, A., Mousavi-Avval, S.H. and Hermansen, J.E., (2013). Potential greenhouse gas emission reductions in soybean farming: a combined use of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, pp.89-100. Najam, A., Poling, J.M., Yamagishi, N., Straub, D.G., Sarno, J., De Ritter, S.M. and Kim, E.M., (2002). From Rio to Johannesburg Progress and Prospects. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 44(7), pp.26-38. Nemecek, T., Kägi, T. and Blaser, S., (2007). Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent v2. 0 No, 15. Nikkhah, A., Khojastehpour, M., Emadi, B., Taheri-Rad, A. and Khorramdel, S., (2015). Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, pp.84-90. Renouf, M.A., Wegener, M.K. and Pagan, R.J., (2010). Life cycle assessment of Australian sugarcane production with a focus on sugarcane growing. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(9), pp.927-937. Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N. and Shiina, T., (2009). A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of food engineering, 90(1), pp.1-10. Sahle, A. and Potting, J., (2013). Environmental life cycle assessment of Ethiopian rose cultivation. Science of the total environment, 443, pp.163-172. Shiri, M., Ataei, R. and Golzardi, F., (2018). Life cycle assessment (LCA) for maize production system under Moghan climatic conditions. Environmental Sciences, 16(1), pp.191-206. Snyder, C.S., Bruulsema, T.W., Jensen, T.L. and Fixen, P.E., (2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(3-4), pp.247-266. Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D.J., May, M., Lewis, K.A. and Jaggard, K., (2005). An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK. Agricultural Systems, 85(2), pp.101-119.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 382 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 338 |
||