پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,479 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,032 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,003,317 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,235,532 |
Requirements of Qur’ānic Theorizing: A Thematic Interpretation Approach | ||
| Classical and Contemporary Islamic Studies (formerly known as Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies) | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 97-109 اصل مقاله (482.9 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Scholary | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcis.2023.85560 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Umid Qurbankhani* 1؛ Zahra Alimoradi2؛ Ali Fathi3 | ||
| 1Department of Comparative Interpretation of the Qur’ān, Faculty of Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Islamic Studies Teaching, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Thought, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Qur’ānic Studies, Research Institute of Ḥawza and University, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Given that many schools of thought in today’s world theorize on different aspects of human life, undoubtedly one of the most important tasks of modern exegetes is to extract theories of the Qur’ān in various fields. This paper deals with one of the most important fundamental issues in this regard, i.e., the criteria and norms that a standard qur’ānic theory should have. For this purpose, first the research literature is explained, and then the characteristics of theory in the general sense (i.e., scientific theory) are enumerated. Afterwards, the requirements of qur’ānic theorizing are mentioned and explicated. Since the best way to discover the qur’ānic view of a subject is the method of thematic interpretation, this paper believes that the process of discovering the theory of the Qur’ān about an issue (that is, qur’ānic theorizing) follows the same method. Accordingly, some of the requirements of qur’ānic theorizing found in this study include avoiding the interference of any prejudice, conducting the systematization of qur’ānic teachings, being up-to-date and forward-looking, having fluency and clarity of expression, and having congruence with other definite facts and theories. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Theory؛ Qur’ān؛ Thematic interpretation؛ Qur’ānic theorizing؛ fundamentals of theorizing | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| بایسته های نظریه پردازی قرآنی: رویکرد تفسیر موضوعی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| امید قربانخانی1؛ زهرا علیمرادی2؛ علی فتحی3 | ||
| 1گروه تفسیر تطبیقی دانشگده الهیات دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مدرسی معارف اسلامی دانشکده معارف و اندیشه اسلامی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3گروه قرآن پژوهی پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه، قم، ایران | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Given that many schools of thought in today's world theorize on different aspects of human life, undoubtedly, one of the most important tasks of modern commentators is to extract theories of the Qur’ān in various fields. This paper deals with one of the most important fundamental issues in this regard, i.e. the criteria and norms that a standard Qur’ānic theory should have. For this purpose, first the research literature is explained, and then the characteristics of theory in the general sense (scientific theory) are enumerated. Afterwards, the requirements of Qur’ānic theorizing are mentioned and explicated. Since the best way to discover the Qur’ānic view of a subject is the method of thematic interpretation, this paper believes that the process of discovering the theory of the Qur’ān on an issue (Qur’ānic theorizing) is the same method. Accordingly, the following are achieved as the requirements of Qur’ānic theorizing: avoiding the interference of any prejudice, systematization of Qur’ānic teachings, updating and futurism, fluency and clarity of expression, consistency with other definite facts and theories, etc. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| نظریه, قرآن, تفسیر موضوعی, نظریه پردازی قرآنی, مبانی نظریه پردازی | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
The noble Qur’ān. Nahj al-Balāgha (2007), translated by M. Dashtī, n.p. n.p. Ākhūnd Khurāsānī, M.M.K. (1993), Kifāya al-’uṣūl, Qom, Islamic Publishing Institute. ‘Alawīmihr, H. (2010), Ravesh-hā va gerāyesh-hāye tafsīrī (2nd ed.), Qom, Uswa. Bābā’ī, A.A., G.A. ‘Azīzī Kiyā, & M. Ruwḥānī Nizhād (2000), Rawish Shināsī-ye Qur’ān (1st ed.). Under the supervision of M. Rajabī, Tehran, Research Institute and University and Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books (SAMT). Bābā’ī Mujarrad, H. & M. ‘Abdul-Ḥusaynzāde (2018), “Niẓām Sāzī Qur’ān-bunyān, Chīstī wa Chirā’ī.” Interdisciplinary Qur’ānic Studies, vol. 9, No.1, 29-44. Bahjatpūr, A. (2013), Tafsīr tazīlī. Tehran, Publications of the Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. Barqī, A. (1952), Al-Maḥāsin. Qom, Islamic Books House. Bates, M.J. & J. Marcia (2005), «An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models». In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez and L. McKechine (Eds.), Theory of information behavior (pp. 1-24). Medford, New Jersey, Information Today. Churchman, C.W. (1961), Prediction and optimal decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall. Fatḥī, A. (2006), «Tafsīr mawḍū’ī wa marāhil ān». Ma’rifat, No. 107, 97-104. Id. (2017), Mi’yārpazīrī tafsīr Qur’ān; Rahyāfthā wa Chālishhā. Qom, Research Institute of Ḥawza and University. Fatḥullāh, M. (2018), «Murūrī bar ‘uṣūl wa mabānī-ye naẓarīyyi pardāzī wa teory sāzī». Fourth International Conference on Industrial and Systems Engineering, Mashhad. Hādawī Tihrānī, M.M. (1998), «Naẓarīyyi andīsha mudawwan (1, 2, 3)». Qabsāt Quarterly, No. 7, 98-108. Handfield, R.B. & S.A. Melnyk (1998), «The Scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM». Journal of Operations Management, No. 16, 321–339. Hāshimī Khu’ī, M.H. (1980), Minhāj al-barā’a fī sharḥ Nahj al-balāghah (4th ed.). Translated by Ḥ. Ḥasanzāda Āmulī & M. B. Kamari’ī, edited by I. Mīyānajī, Tehran, Islamic Library. Hātifī, M. (n.d.), Ta’ārīf wa mi’yārhāyi naẓarīyyi ‘ilmī. Accessed April 29, https://rasekhoon.net/article/410/. Ibn Bābiwayh, M. (1975), Kamāl al-dīn wa tamām al-ni’ma (2nd ed). Edited by ‘Alī Akbar Ghaffārī, Tehran, Islāmiyya. Jawādī Āmulī, A. (2007), Manzilat ‘aql dar hindisayi ma’rifat dīnī. Qom, Isrā’ Publications. Jūrābchī, K. (2019), «Ravish, naẓarīyyi wa nisbat-i bayn ān du: Wākāvī-ye mafhūmī-ye rawish wa naẓarīyyi az du manẓari Kammī wa Kayfī». Journal of Humanities Methodology, No 98, 1-28. Karīmī, M. (2010), «Māhīyyat tafsīr mawḍū’ī». Qur’ān Shenākht, No. 6, 105-130. Id. (2019), «Farāyand naẓarīyyi pardāzī Qur’ānī dar Ḥawza-ye tafsīr mawḍū’ī». Mutāli’āt Qur’ān wa Hadīth, No. 25, 189-217. Kerlinger, F.N. (1986), Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Id. (1995), Foundations of behavioral research. Translated by Ḥ.P. Sharīfī & J. Najafī Zand, Tehran, Āwāy-i Nūr. Makārim Shīrāzī, N. (1995), Tafsīr Payām Qur’ān (5th ed.). Qom, Imām ‘Alī Ibn Abī Tālib (a) School Publications. Id. (2007), Payām Qur’ān. Tehran, Islamic Books House. Ma’rifat, M.H. (1996), Al-Tamhīd fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. n.p., Islamic Publishing Institute. Id. (2000), Tafsīr wa mufassirān. Qom, Al-Tamhīd Publishing-Cultural Institute. McKenna, H. (1997), «Theory and research: A linkage to benefit practice».International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 34, No. 6, 431-437. Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, M.T. (2014), Ma’ārif Qur’ān: Khudā Shināsī (7th ed.). Imām Khumaynī Educational and Research Institute. Muḥammadī, A.T. (1996), «Manābi’ wa rawishhā-yi tafsīr mawḍū’ī dar sadi-yi Chāhārdahum». Pajūhishhā-yi Qur’ānī, No. 7, 150- 177. Montagu, A. (1984), Science and creationism (1st ed.). n.p., Oxford University Press. Muṭahharī, M. (2002), The collection of the works of master Muṭahharī. Tehran, Ṣadrā Publications. Muṣṭafawī, H. (1992), Al-Taḥqīq fī kalimāt al-Qur’ān (1st ed.). Tehran, Ministry of Guidance of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Namāzī, M. (2010), «Thematic approach to Qur’ān exegesis». Message of Thaqlayn, vol. 10, No. 4, 1-14. Popper, C.R. (1991), Manṭiq-i iktishāfi ‘ilm. Translated by A. Ārām, Tehran, Surūsh. Rahnamā’ī, S.A. (2017), ‘Uṣūl naẓarīyyi pardāzī dar qalamru ‘ulūm insānī. Qom, Imām Khumeinī Educational and Research Institute. Rajabī, M. (2009), «Tafsīr Mawḍū’ī Qur’ān az manẓar Ustād Muḥammad Taqī Miṣbāḥ». Qur’ān Shenakht, No. 2, 111-146. Rashīd Riḍā, M. (1994), Al-Minār. Beirut, Thought House. Riḍā’ī Iṣfahānī, M.A. (2004), Darāmadī bar tafsīr ‘ilmī Qur’ān (2nd ed.). Qom, Uswa. Id. (2011), Manṭiq tafsīr Qur’ān (2nd ed.) Qom, Al-Mustafa International Translation and Publishing Center. Root-Bernstein, R. & D.L. McEachron (1982), «Teaching theories: The evolution-creation controversy». The American Biology Teacher, vol. 44, No. 7, 405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4447552 Ṣadr, M.B. (1980a), Muqaddāmāt fī al-tafsīr al-mawḍū’ī lil-Qur’ān. Beirut, Dar al-Tawjīh al-Islamī. Id. (1980b), Al-Madrasa al-Qur’ānīyya. Beirut, Dar al-Ta’āruf Publications. Id. (1999), Al-Madrasa al-Qur’ānīyya. Qom, Publication of the Scientific Complex for Martyr Ṣadr (electronic version). Sa’īdī Rawshan, M.B. (2012), Zabān Qur’ān wa masā’il ān (2nd ed.). Qom, Ḥawza and University Research Institute. Stewart, J., V. Harte & S. Sambrook (2011), «What is theory?» Journal of European Industrial Training, 221-229. DOI: 10.1108/03090591111120386 Tabāṭabā’ī, S.M.Ḥ. (2011), ‘Uṣūl falsafi wa ravish ri’ālīsm. Tehran, Ṣadrā Publications. Wacker, J.G. (1998), «A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management». Journal of Operations Management, vol. 16, 361-385. Wāsiṭī, A. (2009), Negareshi systemī bi dīn (1st ed.). Mashhad, Institute for Strategic Studies of Islamic Sciences and Education. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 298 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 182 |
||