پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,479 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,032 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 122,997,736 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 96,228,330 |
"روش‌شناسی فرمالیسم نظام‌مند" "الگویی پیشگام در تدوین مبانی نظری تاریخ‌ادبیات‌نویسی قرن بیستم" | ||
| پژوهش ادبیات معاصر جهان | ||
| دوره 27، شماره 1، مرداد 1401، صفحه 174-206 اصل مقاله (604.03 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jor.2020.297651.1948 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| راضیه حجتی زاده* | ||
| استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با وجود تناقض اولیه میان رویکرد فرمالیستی و نگاه تاریخی، فرمالیسم نظام‌مند توانست با تدوین چارچوبه روش‌شناختی معین و طرح مفاهیمی چون تحول، پویش تاریخی، کانون‌مندی، عنصر مسلط و نظام، به عنوان جریانی پیشرو در تاریخ‌ادبیات‌نگاریِ نظری و قاعده‌مند در قرن بیستم شناخته شود و بر بسیاری از جریان‌های بعد از خود تاثیر گذارد. این جریان به رغم انتقادهایی که بر آن وارد آورده‌ا‌ند، اولین گام‌ها را در پل زدن میان مطالعات در-زمانی و هم‌زمانی برداشت و ادبیات را به کانون اصلی مطالعات تاریخی تبدیل کرد. این مقاله با نگاهی انتقادی به این جریان درصدد پاسخ به این پرسش است که اولاٌ سرچشمه‌های نظری الگوی فرمالیسم نظام‌مند کدام است و ثانیاً امکانات و محدودیت‌های آن برای تدوین تاریخ‌ادبیات چیست. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| فرمالیسم نظام‌مند؛ هم‌زمانی؛ در زمانی؛ نظام نظام‌ها؛ کانون | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| "Methodology of Systemic Formalism" A Pioneering Model in The Formulation of Literary History Writing In the 20th Century | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Raziyeh Hojatizadeh | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department Of Persian Language & Literature, Faculty Of Literature & Humanities, University Of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Today, it has been evident that without having a theory or a definite approach either to literature & history, writing a history of literature becomes totally impossible. Despite the initial contradiction between formalistic & historical methodologies, systemic formalism could be recognized as a pioneer movement which could formulate a definite methodological framework for history writing of literature. With such a perspective in mind, systemic formalism projected some terms as: evolution, change, historical dynamism, canonicity, dominant trait, system & so on. This approach, in spite of the criticisms made against it, took the first steps in bridging the gap between synchronic & diachronic studies in literature. Moreover, Literature which has been served until then as a covering to prove the assumptions of historians to interpret the flow of history became the main focus of historical studies. Following a critical approach, this paper seeks to answer these questions: first, what are the theoretical origins of systemic formalism? Secondly, what are its possibilities & limitations in compiling a history of literature? | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| systemic formalism, synchrony, diachrony, system of systems, canon | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
References:
Ahmadi, Baabak. Text-structure & Textual Interpretation. 13th edition, Tehran: Nashre Markaz, 2011 / 1390.
Allan, Michael. “How Adab Became Literary”. Journal of Arabic Literature, vol. 43, no. 2/3 (2012): 172- 196.
Crostius, Jan Brandt. "Literary history & The Study of Literature". A Symposium on Literary History, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1970): 65 - 71.
Depretto, Catherine. "Formalism Russe et Ses Sources". Cahier du Monde Russe, 51/4 (2010):1-15.
Farsian, Mohammadreza, and Fatemeh Ghaderi. “Khaanesh ebdaai-ye- Camus dar Iran” [“Albert Camus’s Innovative Reading in Iran”]. Research in Contemporary World Literature [Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji], vol. 25, no.1 (summer 2020/1399): 292-316.
Frow, J.A. "System & History: A Critique of Russian Formalism". Oxford Literary Review, 4 (2) (1980): 56-72.
Ghanoonparvar, Mohammadreza. Prophets of Doom (Literature as a Socio-Political Phenomenon in Modern Iran). First edition, translated by Maryam Tarzi, Tehran: Aagah, 2016 / 1395.
Jameson, Frederic. The Prison of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism & Russian Formalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.
Lamarc, Peter. Philosophy of Literature. Translated by Meysam Mohammad Amini. Tehran: Nashr-e-No with collaboration of Aasim, 2017/1396.
Margolin, Uri. "On the Object of Study in Literary History". Neohelicon, vol. 3, no. 1-2 (1975): 287-328.
Medvedev, Pavel. La Méthode Formelle en Literature. Translated by Par B.Vauthier et Roger Comtet. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 2008.
Noori, Sonia, and Foroogh Sahba. “A Study of the Effect of Change of Genre in the Direction of the Audience's Expectation Horizon as One of the Creative Symptoms of Misprision in Two Novels: The Sound and the Fury and Symphony of the Dead” [“Barrasi-ye-Ta’sir-e-Taghir-e-Janr dar Jahat Dehi-ye-Ofogh-e-Entezaar-e-Mokhaatab be Onvan-e-yeki az Nemoodhaa-ye-Bad Khaani-ye-khallagh Dar do Roman”]. Research in Contemporary World Literature [Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji], vol. 25, no.1 (summer 2019/1399): 101-124.
Nozari, Hosseinali. Falsafe-ye- Taarikh [Philosophy of History: Methodology and Histriography]. Tehran: Tarh-e-No, 2000 / 1379.
Paakatchi, Ahmad. “Taarikhnegaari-ye- Adabi dar Mahaafele Roosi [“Historiography of Literature in Russian Circles”]. About Literary History. Tehran: Samt, 2005 / 1384.
Polan, Dana. "The Prison of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism & Russian Formalism by Jameson ", Journal of University of Film Association, vol. 30. no. 1(1978): 39- 42.
Romand, David, and Serguei Tchougounnokov. "Quelques Sources Psychologiques Allemandes du Formalisme Russe: le Cas des Theories de la Conscience". Cahiers de l'ILSL, no. 24(2008): 223- 236.
Shaahkooi, Mohammad Hossein. Formalism roosi va tanaaghozhaa-ye- falsafi-ye-aan (Russian Formalism & Its Philosophical Paradoxes). Tehran: Rasaanesh-e- No, 2014 / 1393.
Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammadreza. Rastaakhiz-e-Kalamaat [Resurrection of the Words]. First edition. Tehran: Sokhan, 2012 / 1391.
Steiner, Peter. "Three Metaphors of Russian Formalism". Poetics Today, vol. 2, no. 1b (1980-1981): 59-116.
Todorov, Tzevatan. Literary Theory. Translated by Aatefe Taahaaei. Tehran: Nashre Akhtaraan, 2006 / 1385.
Tomashevsky, Borris, et al. "The New School of Literary History in Russia", PMLA, vol. 119, no. 1 (2004):120-132.
Wellek, Rene. History of New Criticism. Translated by Saeed Arbaab Shiraani, Tehran: Niloofar, 1994 / 1373b.
---."Six Types of Literary History". English Institute Essays. New York: Colombia University Press, 1946.
Wellek, Rene, and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. Translated by Mehraan Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi. Tehran: Nashr-e-Elmi-Farhangi, 1994/ 1373a.
Wendell, W. Harris. "What Is Literary History?" College English, vol. 56, no. 4 (1994): 434-451.
Zarghani, Mehdi, Mahmoodreza Ghorbaan Sabbaagh. Theory of Genre; A Historical-Analytic Analysis. Tehran: Hermes, 2016 /1395.
Zima, Peter. V. The Philosophy of Literary Theory. Translated by Rahman Veysihesaar and Abdollaah Amini. Tehran: Rokhdaade No, 2011 / 1390.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 382 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 260 |
||
