پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,117,006 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,221,832 |
مطالعه جامعه‌شناختی خشونت خانگی علیه زنان (مورد مطالعه: شهر ایلام) | ||
| زن در توسعه و سیاست | ||
| دوره 20، شماره 4، دی 1401، صفحه 529-556 اصل مقاله (1010.85 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jwdp.2022.341883.1008200 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| علی فیض اللهی* | ||
| گروه جامعه‌شناسی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| خشونت خانگی در تمامی جوامع، در تمامی گروه‌ها و طبقات اجتماعی مشاهده می‌شود و گزارش‌های متعددی بر مسئله‌بودن آن در ایران صحه گذاشته‌اند. هدف این پژوهش، شناخت نحوۀ درک زنان از شرایط، زمینه‌ها و پیامدهای خشونت خانگی در زندگی آنان است. این پژوهش کیفی و مبتنی بر روش نظریۀ زمینه‌ای است. پاسخگویان از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند با معیار اشباع نظری از بین زنان مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مثبت زندگی سازمان بهزیستی شهر ایلام انتخاب شده‌اند. از معیار مقبولیت برای اعتباریابی و برای اطمینان‌پذیری از روش ممیزی استفاده شد. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته با 30 زن متأهل خشونت‌دیده، گردآوری شده و کدگذاری داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Nvivo12 انجام شده است. یافته‌ها حاکی از نقش عوامل خانوادگی همچون برهم‌کنش تنش‌آلود و ناهمترازی پایگاهی، عوامل اجتماعی نظیر مواجهۀ شبه‌کارناوالی با ازدواج و عوامل فرهنگی مانند تصورات مردسالارانه است. واکنش‌های زنان عمدتاً انفعالی است و عادی‌انگاری نقش قربانی منفعل برای زنان، پیامد آن است. از برآیند مقوله‌ها، مقولۀ هستۀ «خشونت خانگی علیه زنان محصول هم‌آیندی درماندگی تجربه‌شدۀ زنان و تصورات مردسالارانه» حاصل شد که حاصل مدیریت خانواده در بستر حفظ کارکردهای سنت مردسالارانه در کنار انتقال ساختاری خشونت در سازوکاری فرهنگی و مبتنی بر جامعه‌پذیری جنسیتی است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ایلام؛ خشونت خانگی؛ زنان خشونت‌دیده؛ سنت مردسالاری؛ عادی‌انگاری؛ خشونت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Sociological Study of Domestic Violence against Women (Case Study: City of Ilam) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ali feizolahi | ||
| Department of Sociology and Cultural Studies, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Domestic violence is observed in all societies, in all social groups and classes, and numerous reports have confirmed that it is a problem in Iran. Some sociologists have tried to explain such a situation from the perspective of gender socialization, and some have considered it as a product of the patriarchal system and oppression against women. Some people consider problematizing of this problem to be more due to the perception and understanding of the society and important social groups. Therefore, knowing the quality and quantity of the problem, requires conducting research from the perspective of the people involved in that problematized situation. However, the necessity of conducting this research consists of the following: First, the social researches of the last few decades in Iran regarding the phenomenon of domestic violence have mainly been conducted with quantitative approaches, and this research has been conducted with a qualitative approach based on the grounded theory method, which is an appropriate method. Second, presenting a local analysis of the phenomenon of domestic violence from the perspective of the women themselves who have experienced violence. Meanwhile, the purpose of this research is to know how women understand the conditions, contexts, and consequences of domestic violence in their lives. Method: The research is qualitative and based on the method of grounded theory. Respondents were selected using purposive sampling method with the criterion of theoretical saturation among violent married women who referred to positive life centers of the Behzisti Organization in Ilam. The Acceptance criteria were used for accreditation and reliability was achieved through auditing method. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 30 of the battered married women and coding were performed using Nvivo12 software. Findings: In the data analysis and in the process of open coding, 288 meaningful statements and 160 primary concepts were obtained, by combining the concepts, 48 subcategories and 21 main categories were extracted, and by using the categories derived from the research, and by discovering lied meanings. In the interviews, the results have been analyzed and presented based on the paradigm model. Findings indicate the role of family factors such as stressful interaction, status imbalance; Social factors such as carnival-like encounters with marriage; Cultural factors such as patriarchal perceptions. Women's reactions have been largely passive, and the consequences have been the normalization of the role of passive victim for women. Discussion: Comparing the research findings with the theories of thinkers containing similarities and convergences, including in areas such as: "violence as a learned thing" and "learned helplessness of women causing women's passive reactions" (social learning theory), "violence against women is a product of long traditions The domain of male domination and patriarchy" (feminist perspective), "violence as a consequence of ignoring and justifying violence against women" (theory of condescending attitudes) and also the theory of the integrated ecological model are in theoretical comparison. In the selective coding of this research, it has led to the selection of two core research categories, which means that in the first degree. Domestic violence against women is the product of women's experienced helplessness, which, in conjunction with the second core category, which is patriarchal ideas, and the combination and convergence of these two, leads to the establishment, stabilization, reproduction and continuation of a subculture of domestic violence against women, and passive reactions. Against this, women help the normalization process of this particular kind of abnormality. In other words, this special type of "learned helplessness" as well as normalizing the role of "passive victim" for women, is pregnant with the mechanisms that foster semantic justifications and prepare cultural bases for the acceptance of domestic violence against women, and it deepens ideological justifications charged with the components of patriarchal culture. It helps in the studied society. The final result of this process can be analyzed under the core category of the research entitled "Domestic violence against women is a product of the combination of women's experienced helplessness and patriarchal ideas", which is the result of family management in the context of preserving the functions of patriarchal tradition along with the structural transmission of violence in It is a cultural mechanism based on gender socialization. In other words, domestic violence is the result of family management in the context of preserving the functions of the patriarchal tradition, along with the structural transmission of violence in the cultural mechanism and based on gender socialization, which fosters forms of subculture of violence that have extensive negative consequences for women, their children and society. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Battered Women, Domestic Violence, Ilam, Normalization of Violence, Patriarchal Tradition | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adjah, E. S. O. & Agbemafle, I. (2016). Determinants of domestic violence against women in Ghana. BMC Public Health, 16(3), 1-9. https://doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3041-x Alivardinia, A. Razzi, D., & Aeeini, S. (2013). Sociological explanation of violence against women: empirical test of theories of resources available to women and radical feminism. Social Welfare, 13(49), 358-329. (In Persian) Bagrazaei, P. (2019). Sociological study of the causes and contexts of domestic violence against women with emphasis on social capital. Scientific and Cultural Educational Journal of Women and Family, 14(49), 176-147. (In Persian) Bagrazaei, P. (2014). Sociological analysis of factors affecting men's violence against women in the family (case study: Ilam city). Social Security Studies, 5(39), 104-75. (In Persian) Basar, F. & Demirci N. (2018). Domestic violence against women in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 34(3), 1-6. https://doi: doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.15139 Battacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks Collection. Book 3. Best, J. (2017). Social Problems. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3th edition. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. Danesh, P., Sharbatian, M. H., & Tavafi, P. (2016). Sociological analysis of domestic violence against women and its relationship with the feeling of security at home. Strategic Researches of Security and Social Order, 6(1), 47-72. (In Persian) Danis, F. (2003). Domestic violence and crime victim compensation. Violence against Women, 9(3), 374-390. https://doi: doi.org/10.1177/1077801202250086 Gelles, R. J. (2005). Violence in the family, in: Edited by Heitmeyer, W. and Hagan, H. (2005). International Handbook of Violence Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gracia, E., & Tomás, J. M. (2014). Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the spanish general population. Violence against Women, 20(1), 26–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520577 Granpayeh, B., & Javanmardi, P. (2017). Iranian women’s problems. Vice President of Women and Family Affairs of the Presidential Institution. (In Persian) Grose, R. G. & Grabe, S. (2014). The explanatory role of relationship power and control in domestic violence against women in Nicaragua: A feminist psychology analysis. Violence against Women, 20 (8), 972-993. https://doi: 10.1177/1077801213520577 Hashemian, M., Solhi, M., Garmaroudi, Gh., Mehri, A., Joveini, H., & Shahrabadi, R. (2017). Married men’s experiences of domestic violence against their wives: a qualitative study. Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 7(2), 185-197. (In Persian) Heise L. L. (1998). Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework. Violence against women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002 Horst, Ch. E. (2017). Social inequality; Types, causes and consequences. Translated by A. Shakouri, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (In Persian) Hosseini, S. H., Mohseni, R. A., & Firouzjaeyan, A. A. (2018). Sociological explanation of violence against women: an empirical study. Social Studies and Research in Iran, 8(2), 411-432. (In Persian) Jasinski, J. L. (2001). Theoretical explanations for violence against women; in: Renzetti, C.M., Edleson, J. L. & Bergen, R.K. (2001) Sourcebook on violence against women, USA: Sage Publishers. Khanifar, H., & Moslemi, N. (2018). Qualitative research methods: new and practical approach (4th Ed.). Vol. 1. Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications. (In Persian) Kerman, K. T. & Betrus, P. (2020). Violence against women in turkey: a social ecological framework of determinants and prevention strategies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 510-526. https://doi: 10.1177/1524838018781104 Mirzaei, I., Mohammadi, F., & Feizolahi, A. (2020). Sociological study of the level of violence against women in the family and factors affecting it (case study: Kermanshah city). Women and Society, 11(3), 279-322. (In Persian) Mohammadi, F., & Mirzaei, R. (2012). Investigation of social factors affecting violence against women (case study Ravansar city). Iranian Social Studies, 6(1), 101-129. (In Persian) Mohammad Oghli, S. (2015). Violence against women in the family (case study of Ardabil city). Family Studies, 11(42), 163-149. (In Persian) Navidnia, M., & Shamlou, E. (2017). Social factors affecting spouse abuse in the family with emphasis on the role of patriarchy system of the family. Women in Development and Politics, 16(1), 131-147. (In Persian) Nwosu, L. N. (2020). The experience of domestic violence among Nigerian-Canadian women in Toronto. Canadian Woman Studies, 25(1-2), 99-106. Okolie, I. S., Mohammed, Z. K. & Ononye, U. (2021). Domestic violence against women in Maiduguri Borno State Nigeria. Journal of Humanities and Social Policy, 7(1), 23-35. Razaqi, N., Parvizi, S., Ramezani, M., & Tabatabaeinezhad, S. M. (2012). Consequences of violence against women in the family: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Women, Midwifery and Infertility, 16(44), 11-20. (In Persian) Renzetti, C.M., Edleson, J.L. & Bergen, R.K. (2001) Sourcebook on violence against women, USA: Sage Publishers. Sánchez-D., Lucia T. (2018). Street harassment perception and it relations with self-objectification of women. interdisciplina, 7(17), 153-170. https://doi: 10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2019.17.67534 Semahegn, A. & Mengistie, B. (2015). Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; systematic review. Reproductive Health, 12(78), 1-12. https://doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0072-1 Shokri, O., Khodaei, A., & Moezzodini, S. (2021). Phenomenological analysis of women’s lived experience of domestic violence during the quarantine of Covid-19. Applied Psychology, 15(3), 402-381. https://doi: 10.52547/APSY.2022.224383.1198. (In Persian) Sohrabzadeh, M., & Mansourian Rawandi, F. (2017). Women’s lived experience of verbal violence in the family (case study: Kashan women). Women in Culture and Politics, 9(2), 264-245. (In Persian) Song, Y., Zhang, J. & Zhang, X. (2021). Cultural or institutional? Contextual effects on domestic violence against women in rural China. Journal of Family Violence, 36, 643–655. https://doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00198-6 Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: how men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press. United Nations. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women, United Nations: New York, NY. Ventura, L., & Davis, G. (2005). Domestic violence: court case conviction and recidivism. Violence against Women, 11(2), 255-277. https://doi: 10.1177/1077801204271722 Walker, L. E. A. (2017). The battered woman syndrome (4th Ed.). Springer Publishing Company. Woodlock, D. (2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence against Women, 23(5), 584-602. https://10.1177/1077801216646277 Yilmaz, E. B. & Oz, F. (2019). Experiences and perceptions of abused turkish women regarding violence against women. Community Mental Health Journal, 55, 686-692. https://doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0350-9. Zamani Moghadam, M., & Hassanvandi, S. (2019). A qualitative study of domestic violence against housewives in Khorramabad city. Women and Society, 10(3), 145-170. (In Persian) Zare Shahabadi, A., & Naderpour, Y. (2015). The relationship between patriarchy and domestic violence against women in the city of Kohdasht. Social Welfare, 16(60), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijsp.2013.52145. (In Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,175 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 623 |
||