پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,113,877 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,217,601 |
ارزیابی عملکرد حکمرانی آب در زیرحوضه‌های زاینده‌رود: تحلیل مقایسه‌ای زیرحوضه‌های اصفهان و چهارمحال و بختیاری | ||
| تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 54، شماره 1، فروردین 1402، صفحه 131-148 اصل مقاله (1.44 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.316510.668999 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سمیرا نبی افجدی؛ مریم شریف زاده* | ||
| گروه مدیریت توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پیچیدگی‌های مدیریت منابع آب محدود، مقوله حکمرانی را از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار ساخته است. بسیاری از چالشهای مدیریتی این منبع حیات مربوط به شرایط کم‌آبی نیست و بیشتر متاثر از پیامد حکمرانی نامطلوب می‌باشد. حوضهی زاینده‌رود در دهه‌های اخیر به دنبال قانون استقلال استان‌ها دچار بحران‌های اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی، اقتصادی و مدیریتی زیادی در دو زیرحوضه خود، اصفهان و چهارمحال و بختیاری، شده که پیامد آن بروز تعارضات، تضادها و درگیری‌های میان ذینفعان زیرحوضه‌های آن است. لذا، پژوهش حاضر به دنبال مقایسه عملکرد حکمرانی آب در دو زیرحوضه‌ی اصفهان و چهارمحال و بختیاری در حوضهی زاینده‌رود بود. این تحقیق از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ روش‌شناسی، کیفی و از نوع مطالعه موردی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل مدیران و کارشناسان ارشد حکمرانی آب در دو زیرحوضه‌ی اصفهان و چهارمحال و بختیاری بود. برای انتخاب نمونه از روش گلوله برفی بهره گرفته شد که تا مرحله اشباع تئوریک ادامه یافت و در نهایت در زیرحوضه‌ی اصفهان 9 نفر مدیر و کارشناس ارشد و در حوضهی چهارمحال و بختیاری 6 نفر و 4 نفر در سطح فراحوضه مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. جمع‌آوری دادهها با استفاده از مصاحبه ساختارمند و ابزار پرسشنامه انجام شد. تحلیل دادهها با بهرهگیری از تحلیل مقایسه‌ای کیفی مجموعه‌های فازی و با استفاده از نرم‌افزارfsQCA صورت گرفت. نتایج حاکی از آن بود که ظرفیت انطباق‌پذیری در حوضهی زاینده‌رود و دو زیرحوضه‌ی آن پایین است. عملکرد حکمرانی آب را در حوضهی زاینده‌رود از نوع بهرینه‌جویی متمرکز و دو زیرحوضه‌ی اصفهان و چهارمحال و بختیاری، از نوع هماهنگ بود. این بدان معناست که حوضه و زیرحوضهها عملکرد ضعیفی در رابطه با ظرفیت تاب‌آوری و انطباق دارند و توانایی آن‌ها برای مقابله با چالش‌ها پایین است. دلیل تفاوت نوع عملکرد حکمرانی آب در سطح حوضهی زاینده‌رود و زیرحوضهها هماهنگی ضعیف بین سازمان‌های مرتبط آب می‌باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| حکمرانی آب؛ هماهنگی؛ توزیع قدرت؛ منطق فازی؛ حوضهی زاینده‌رود | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating Water Governance Performance in the Zayandeh-Rud Sub-basins: The Comparative Analysis of Isfahan and Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari sub-basins | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Samira Nabiafjadi؛ Maryam Sharifzadeh | ||
| Department of Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Recently, water governance has become important due to the increasing complexities associated with water management. So that it is widely acknowledged that the world water crisis is more a crisis of governance than of water scarcity. In recent decades adopting the ‘Water Independence of Provinces’ law has created many social, environmental, economic and managerial crises in the Zayandeh-Rud basin and its two sub-basins (Isfahan and Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari) which have resulted in conflicts between the sub-basin stakeholders. The current applied study was qualitative regarding its methodology and followed a case study approach. The statistical population of the study included managers and senior experts of water governance in two sub-basins (Isfahan and Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari) and finally nine managers and experts in Isfahan sub-basin, four cases in extra-basin level, and six cases in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari sub-basin were selected as the sample population by means of snowball sampling method till theoretical saturation. Data collection was done by structured questionnaire and interview protocol. Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), the empirical analysis of water governance systems in two sub-basins showed that a set of factors associated with low performance regarding climate change adaptation. Regarding performance aspect, water governance in Zayandeh-Rud basin and its two sub-basins were Centralized Rent-seeking and Centralized Coordinated, respectively. This means that both basin and sub-basins have low performance regarding climate change adaptation and ability to resilience and adaptation challenges. The reason for the difference in the type of water governance performance at the level of the Zayandeh-Rud basin and its sub-basins was the poor coordination between water related organizations in sub-basins. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Water governance, Coordination, Distribution of power, Fuzzy logic, Zayandeh-Rud basin | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akhmouch, A., & Clavreul, D. (2017). Towards inclusive water governance: OECD evidence and key principles of stakeholder engagement in the water sector. In Freshwater Governance for the 21st Century (pp. 29-49). Springer, Cham. Alizadeh-Choobari, O., & Najafi, M. S. (2018). Extreme weather events in Iran under a changing climate. Climate Dynamics, 50(1-2), 249-260. Anderson, T. L., Scarborough, B., & Watson, L. R. (2013). Water Crises, Water Rights, and Water Markets. Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, 2, 248-254. Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65-76. Chikozho, C. (2005). Policy and institutional dimensions of integrated river basin management: Broadening stakeholder participatory processes in the Inkomati River Basin of South Africa and the Pangani River Basin of Tanzania. Cooley, H., Ajami, N., Ha, M. L., Srinivasan, V., Morrison, J., Donnelly, K., & Christian-Smith, J. (2013). Global water governance in the 21st century. Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA. Gil-Barragan, J. M., & Palacios-Chacon, L. A. (2018). EXPORT INTENSITY OF SMEs FROM EMERGING MARKETS: A CONFIGURATIONAL ANALYSIS. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 19(3), 1-15. Gohari, A., Eslamian, S., Abedi-Koupaei, J., Bavani, A. M., Wang, D., & Madani, K. (2013). Climate change impacts on crop production in Iran's Zayandeh-Rud River Basin. Science of the Total Environment, 442, 405-419. Gorjian, S., & Ghobadian, B. (2015). Solar desalination: A sustainable solution to water crisis in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 571-584. Hall, J. S. (2002). Reconsidering the connection between capacity and governance. Public Organization Review, 2(1), 23-43. Hellegers, P., Immerzeel, W., & Droogers, P. (2013). Economic concepts to address future water supply–demand imbalances in Iran, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. Journal of Hydrology, 502, 62-67. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 233-243. Hosayni Abari, S. H. (2000). Zayandeh rud from its source to the mouth. Golha. Esfahan. (In Persian) Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran (ISPRCIRI), 2019. The act of equitable water distribution (In Persian). Jasebi, J. & Nafari, N. (2010). Designing a model of good governance based on open system theory. Quarterly Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 4(16), 85-117. (In Persian) Khatoonabadi, A. 2009. Exploration of the history of Zayandeh-rud river. Danesh Nama Monthly, 174, 12-21. (In Persian) Kuzdas, C., Wiek, A., Warner, B., Vignola, R., & Morataya, R. (2015). Integrated and participatory analysis of water governance regimes: The case of the Costa Rican dry tropics. World Development, 66, 254-268. Lalika, M. C., Meire, P., & Ngaga, Y. M. (2015). Exploring watershed conservation and water governance along Pangani River Basin, Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 48, 351-361. Lieberman, E. S. (2011). The perils of polycentric governance of infectious disease in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 73(5), 676-684. Loucks, D. P. (2000). Sustainable water resources management. Water International, 25(1), 3-10. Maaren, H., & Dent, M. (1995). Broadening participation in integrated catchment management for sustainable water resources development. Water Science and Technology, 32(5-6), 161-167. Madani, K. (2014). Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis?. Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 4(4), 315-328. Mendel, J. M., & Korjani, M. M. (2012). Charles Ragin’s fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) used for linguistic summarizations. Information Sciences, 202, 1-23. Molle, F., Ghazi, I., Murray-Rust, H., (2009). Buying respite: Esfahan and the Zayandeh Rud river basin, Iran, in: Molle, F., Wester, F. (Eds.), River Basin Trajectories: Societies, Environments and Development. International Water Management Institute, London, pp 196-213. Montgomery, J., Xu, W., Bjornlund, H., & Edwards, J. (2016). A table for five: Stakeholder perceptions of water governance in Alberta. Agricultural Water Management, 174, 11-21. Moriarty, P., Batchelor, C., Laban, P., & Fahmy, H. (2007). The EMPOWERS approach to water governance: Background and key concepts. Jordan: INWRDAM. Mosavi, S. Gh., & Sadeghian, R. (2017). Investigation of fuzzy logic and its application in complex problems. International Journal of Nations Research, 2 (15), 77-90. (In Persian) Ostrom, E. (2002). Common-pool resources and institutions: Toward a revised theory. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 2, 1315-1339. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Empirical Analyses—From Single Case Studies to Comparative Analyses. In Water Governance in the Face of Global Change (pp. 203-248). Springer, Cham. Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2014). The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes. Global Environmental Change, 29, 139-154. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2008). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (Vol. 51). Sage Publications. Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance (Vol. 7). Stockholm: Global water partnership. Rustah, I., & ʿAlī Aḥmad, A. (1967). Kitāb al-a ‘lāq al-nafīsa, ed. MJ De Goeje, Leiden, 96. Salemi, H. & Heydarian, R. 2006. Assessment of water supply and use in the Zayandeh-Rud river basin, Iran. Quarterly Iran-water Resources Research, 2(1), 72-76. (In Persian) Sampford, C. (2007). Water rights and water governance: A cautionary tale and the case for interdisciplinary governance. Water Ethics, 45. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. Stein, C., Barron, J., & Ernstson, H. (2011a). A social network approach to analyze multi-stakeholders governance arrangement in water resources management: Three case studies from catchments in Burkina Faso, Tanzania and Zambia, In: XIVth World Water Congress. Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil. Stein, C., Ernstson, H., & Barron, J. (2011b). A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36(14-15), 1085-1092. Spencer, T., & Altman, P. (2010). Climate change, water and risk: Current water demands are not sustainable. Water Facts. Natural Resources Defense Council. www. nrdc. org/globalWarming/watersustainability (Accessed July 18, 2016). Tomasino, A. P. (2015). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis summary. Working paper. Bentley University. Tullock, G. (2008). Public goods, redistribution and rent seeking. Edward Elgar Publishing. Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2012). Understanding robustness to distubance through the theory of the commons: Irrigation water governance and socio-ecological robustness in the Gallego and Cinca River Watersheds, Spain. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Indiana, United States of America. Wiek, A., & Larson, K. L. (2012). Water, people, and sustainability—a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resources Management, 26(11), 3153-3171. Wyborn, C. (2013). Collaboration across scales: the governance challenges of linking landscapes. Linking Australia’s landscapes: lessons andoOpportunities from large-scale conservation networks. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, 267-276. Yousefi, A., Amini, A. M. & Fathi, O. (2013a). Adaptive Water Governance: the Key to Solving Water Crisis in Zayande-Rud River, National Congress on Water Crisis, Isfahan, Iran. (In Persian) Yousefi, A., Amini, M., Yadegari, A., & Fathi, A. (2013b). Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Water Governance in Zayandehrud River Management, 5th Iranian Water Resources Management Conference, Tehran, Iranian Water Resources Science and Engineering Association, Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 308 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 294 |
||