Five Modes and Nine Variations of Integration between HCD and Futures Design | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| دوره 3، شماره 1، شهریور 2022، صفحه 73-92 اصل مقاله (748 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2022.349164.1084 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Victor Udoewa* | ||
| Small Business Innovation Research & Small Business Technology Transfer Research Programs, NASA, Washington, D.C., United States. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Human-centered Design and Futures Design both offer different routes to alternative, new designs. Human-centered Design employs a need-based, problem-based, or deficit-based approach. Through the use of a shared, preferred future vision, Futures Design utilizes an asset-based approach, potentially leading to different, present-day design choices than a Human-centered Design process. Without knowing which methodology offers a preferred present-day design for the current needs of customers using existing services, designers may choose to integrate the two methodologies, gaining the benefits of both, a type of mixed-methods approach. Instead of mixed methods implying the combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, in this context, mixed methods means combining asset-based and need, problem, or deficit-based approaches. However, combining Human-centered Design and Futures Design can be confusing, especially with the multiple roles design can play in the Futures process (for example design futures versus Futures Design). I attempt to clarify how the methodologies can be integrated by sharing five modes and nine variations of integration along with their relative advantages and disadvantages. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Human-centered Design؛ futures design؛ service design؛ integration؛ design thinking | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 736 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 881 |
||