پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,097,894 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,205,514 |
تصویر برساخته از ایران در منابع آموزشی اتحاد شوروی و فدراسیون روسیه | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 2، اسفند 1401، صفحه 223-240 اصل مقاله (555.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2023.346508.450089 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهنا سیدآقایی رضایی* 1؛ محمدکاظم شجاعی2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه زبان روسی دانشکدۀ ادبیات فارسی و زبان‌های خارجی، دانشگاه مازندران | ||
| 2دکتری مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ایران در طول تاریخ روابط خارجی گسترده و پرفرازونشیبی با روسیه داشته است. این رابطه در دویست سال گذشته به یکی از مهم‌ترین روابط خارجی ایران تبدیل شده و به‌طور مستقیم یا غیرمستقیم بر سرنوشت ایران تأثیر گذاشته است. در نتیجۀ این رابطه، تصویرهای مختلفی از روسیه در ذهن نخبگان و مردم عادی ایران برساخته شده است. در زبان فارسیآثار زیادی دربارۀ نقش روسیه و اتحاد شوروی در تاریخ ایران نوشته شده است. در حالی که پژوهشگران ایرانی توجه چندانی به تصویر و جایگاه ایران در روسیه نداشته‌اند. در این مقالۀ به‌دنبال پاسخ این پرسش هستیم که چه تصویری از ایران در اتحاد شوروی و روسیه وجود داشته و دارد و تحولات رخ‌داده در دو کشور چه تأثیری بر آن داشته است؟ در پاسخ این فرضیه مطرح می‌شود که با وجود رخ‌دادن تغییرهای مهم هویتی در هر دو کشور روسیه و ایران، تغییری در تصویر برساخته از ایران در منابع آموزشی روسیه ایجاد نشده است. با استفاده از روش مطالعۀ موردی و تحلیل مضمون منابع آموزشی تاریخ در مدرسه‌های اتحاد شوروی و فدراسیون روسیه، تلاش می‌کنیم به درک روشن‌تری از جایگاه و تصویر ایران در ذهن همسایۀ شمالی دست یابیم. نتیجۀ تحلیل منابع، نشان میدهد که با وجود شکل‌گرفتن تغییرهای بنیادین هویتی در هر دو کشور روسیه و ایران، در تصویر برساخته از ایران در روسیه تغییر چندانی رخ نداده و ایران همواره در جایگاهی حاشیه‌ای و کم‌اهمیت قرار داشته است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ایران؛ اتحاد شوروی؛ آموزش تاریخ؛ برساخته‌گرایی؛ روسیه؛ هویت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Image Made of Iran in the Educational Resources of the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohanna Seiedaghaei Rezaei1؛ Mohammad kazem Shojaee2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Russian Language Department, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Mazandaran. | ||
| 2Ph.D. in Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: Relations between Iran and Russia have a long history. The relationship between the people living in the regions known today as the Russian Federation and the Iranians goes back thousands of years. But it was in the last two hundred years that the relations between the two sides reached their peak. In tsarist Russia, geopolitics and Russia's desire to develop its territory in the south was the most important factor in bilateral relations. With the rise of the Soviet Union, the ideological element was also added to this trend. The Soviet Union considered Iran as one of the countries leaning towards the West and based on this, it adjusted its foreign policy toward Iran. As a result of this historical relationship, different images of Russia have been constructed in the minds of Iranian elites and ordinary people. Many works have been written in Iran about the history of Iran and Soviet / Russian relations, and there is a lot of information about the image of Russians by Iranians. However, Iranian researchers have not paid much attention to the image and position of Iran in the Soviet Union/Russia. This is despite the fact that, according to constructivists, the identity of players of the international system has a vital role in their relations. They believe, identity is a relational phenomenon. This means that regardless of the image that each actor has of himself, the image of other actors will also be of great importance in determining bilateral relations. There are different ways to identify the constructed image of a country in other countries. One of the best sources is to check educational resources. Especially in the Soviet Union, which had a very ideological view of education, examining educational sources can be very useful. Based on this and considering the significant identity changes that occurred with the collapse of the Soviet Union, it is expected that the constructed image of Iran in the educational resources of the Soviet Union/ Russian Federation has faced significant changes. Accordingly, in this article, we examine the image of Iran in the Soviet Union/Russian Federation and determine the impact of identity changes that occurred in Iran and Russia on this image. In this regard, in qualitative research, using the case study method, we examine the constructed image of Iran in history textbooks in the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation. Research Question: During the last one-hundred years, what image of Iran has been created in Russia and how have the developments of the two countries affected it? Research Hypothesis: In the past one-hundred years, a marginal image of Iran has been constructed in Russia, and despite the identity changes that have occurred in Iran and Russia, there has been no change in this constructed image. Methodology (and Theoretical Framework if there are): According to constructivists, the identity of players has a vital role in forming relationships between them. Constructivists consider identity a relational and variable phenomenon formed in different periods. Another essential characteristic of identity, according to them, is that it is relational. In this sense, regardless of each player's image of themselves, the image that other players make of them also plays a vital role in defining their identity. In this regard, by using the theory of constructivism, we will try to identify the constructed image of Iran in Russia and open a path to identify the effect of this constructed image on the relations between the two countries. This article is the result of qualitative research. We use the case study method to conduct this research. A case study analyzes a specific research plan and examines a problem. Its purpose is to use the available information to predict future trends. Considering that the main sources of our research were the textbooks of the Soviet Union/Russian Federation, we have used the thematic analysis method to conduct our research. Results and Discussion: Based on the information obtained, we concluded that the image of Iran in the Soviet Union/Russian Federation is marginal and unimportant. The identity changes in both countries have not changed this image. Conclusion: The study of the history of relations between Iran and Russia highlights two important features: first, the disconnection and instability of bilateral relations; Second, the dependence of these relations on the position of two countries, especially Russia, in the international system. Another critical point revealed in this article's result is that despite the changes in both countries in the last 100 years, there has been no significant change in the mentality of Russians towards Iran. Based on the travelogues of Russian travelers and textbooks of the era of the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation, it can be said that relations with Iran were not very important for the Russians. In addition, the Russians' narrative of the relations between the two countries is distorted and different from the Iranians' narrative of history. Another noteworthy point is the lack of attention from Russian history education sources to the occurrence of the Islamic Revolution and the fundamental changes that took place in the Islamic Republic of Iran. As a result, considering the demarcations formed by the decision-makers of the Islamic Republic in recent years in the "Looking to the East" policy and expanding relations with Russia, it is appropriate to take measures to portray Iran more accurately in Russian society. With the creation of a more accurate image of Iran in Russia, we can hope for the expansion of mutual relations and more cultural exchanges and strengthen bilateral relations. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Identity, Constructivism, History, Education, Soviet Union, Russia, Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afonin, Sergey, Yuri Girenko, Pavel Kuzmichev and Levin Genrikh (1983), Recent History (1939-1982) Textbook for Grade 10 Available at: https://sheba.spb.ru/ shkola/ist10-new-1983.htm (Accessed on: 01/05/2023) [in Russian]. Alekseev, Sergey and Vladimir Kartsov (1961), History of the USSR, Text Book for Grade 4. Available at: https://sovietime.ru/istoriya/istoriya-sssr-dlya-4-go-klassa-1961, (Accessed on: 01/05/2023) [in Russian]. Counts, George (1949), “Education Is a Weapon whose Effect Depends-’ Educate for Democracy!” The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 30, No. 6: pp.194–223. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20331788, (Accessed on: 01/07/2023), Danilov, Alexandr and Ludmila Kosulina (1995), History of Russia in 20th Century, Text Book for Grade 9. Available at: https://at.alleng.org/d/hist/ hist159.htm, (Accessed on: 01/07/2023) [in Russian]. Danilov, Alexander and Ludmila Kosulina (2015), History of Russia 19th Century, Textbook for Grade 8. Available at: https://pdf.11klasov.net/119-istoriya-rossii-xix-vek-uchebnik-dlya-8-klassa-danilov-aa-kosulina-lg.html (Accessed on: 01/07/2023), [in Russian]. Danilov, Dimitri and Alexander Prokorov (2016), History from Ancient Times to the Middle of the XIX Century, Text Book for Grade 10 • Part 2. Available at: https://obuchalka.org/2016082490661/istoriya-s-drevneishih-vremen-do-seredini-xix-veka-10-klass-chast-1-danilov-d-d-kuznecov-a-v-liseicev-d-v-petrovich-v-g-belichenko-d-u-2016.html,(Accessed on: 01/07/2023) [in Russian] Danilov, Dimitri and Lena Kozik (2016), History Mid. 19th - Early 21th Century, Text Book for Grade 11 Part 2, Available at: https://obuchalka.org/ 2016082590669/istoriya-seredina-xix-nachalo-xxi-veka-11-klass-chast-1-danilov-d-d-petrovich-v-g-belichenko-d-u-selinov-p-i-2016.html (Accessed on: 01/05/2023) [in Russian]. Dorotich, Daniel (1967), “A Turning Point in the Soviet School: The Seventeenth Party Congress and the Teaching of History.” History of Education Quarterly Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 295–311, (doi: 10.2307/367174). Efimov, Alexey (1969), Modern History, PART I, 1650-1870. Text Book for Grade 8, Available at: https://sheba.spb.ru/shkola/istoria-08-nov-1969.htm (Accessed on: 01/05/2023) [in Russian]. Epifanov, Pyotr and Olga Epifanova (1991), Reader on the History of the USSR, 19th Century, Available at: https://sheba.spb.ru/shkola/istor-hrestom-1991.htm, (Accessed on: 01/05/2023) [in Russian]. Gaworek, Norbert (1977), “Education, Ideology, and Politics: History in Soviet Primary and Secondary Schools.” The History Teacher Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 55–74.(doi:10.2307/492726). (Accessed on: 01/07/2023). Kiger, Michelle E. and Lara Varpio (2020), Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data: AMEE Guide No. 131, Medical Teacher, pp.1-9. (doi: 10.1080/ 0142159X.2020.1755030). (Accessed on: 01/07/2023). Koolaee, Elaheh (1998), Soviet Union from Formation to Collapse, Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publishing Department [in Persian]. Levandovsky, Anderei and Yulia Shchetinov (1997), Russia in the 20th Century, Text Book for Grade 10-11, Moscow. Available at: https://obuchalka.org/ 2012042064671/rossiya-v-xx-veke-10-11-klass-levandovskii-a-a-schetinov-u-a-1997.html (Accessed on: 01/05/2023) [In Russian]. Matthee, Rudi and Elena Andreeva (2019), Russians in Iran: Diplomacy and Power in the Qajar Era and Beyond, London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd. Matthews, Mervyn (1982), Education in the Soviet Union, Policies and Institutions since Stalin, London and New York: Routledge. Mills, Albert, Gabrielle Durepos and Elden Wiebe [Eds.] (2010), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Vols I and II. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Available at: https://bayanbox.ir/view/2229366504315040052/ENCYCLOPEDIA-OF-CASE-STUDY-RESEARCH-2.pdf (Accessed on: 01/07/2023), Penkratova, Anna (1952), History of the USSR Part 3 (1894-1951), Textbook for Grade 10, Available at: https://sovietime.ru/istoriya/istoriya-sssr-10-klass-1952-god-skachat-sovetskij-uchebnik (Accessed on: 01/07/2023) [in Russian] Rashidi, Ahmad (2017), "Recognition of “Other” in the Civilizational Debates and the Foundations of Foreign Policy in Russia", Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 307-324. (doi:10.22059/jcep.2018.134120.449608). [In Persian]. Rumelili, Bahar(2004), “Constructing Identity and Relating to Difference: Understanding the EU’s Mode of Differentiation.” Review of International Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 27–47. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 20097897 (Accessed on: 01/07/2023). Slezkine, Yuri (1992), “From Savages to Citizens: The Cultural Revolution in the Soviet Far North, 1928-1938.” Slavic Review Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 52–76. (Doi: 10.2307/2500261). Shamsutdinova, Rimma, Elena Shuvalova and Albina Mamutdiniva (2017), "History Teaching in the Soviet Schools of the 1920-1930s: (for Example Schools in the City of Kazan)", Revista San Gregori, No. 20, Special Edition, pp. 72-79., Available at: https://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/ REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/517 (Accessed on: 01/07/2023). Valizadeh, Akbar, and Somayeh Kazemi (2022), "The Influence of Strategic Culture Components on Bilateral and Regional Relations between Iran and Russia", Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 387-410. (doi: 10.22059/ jcep.2022.337629.450051) [In Persian]. Zehfuss, Maja (2002), Constructivism in International Relations, the Politics of Reality, London, Cambridge University Pre | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 360 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 258 |
||