پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,232 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,790 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,263,526 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,005,479 |
شناسایی و واکاوی مکانیزم های توسعه رفتار کارآفرینانه در سازمان های دولتی (مورد مطالعه: وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی) | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی توسعه کارآفرینی | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 59، خرداد 1402، صفحه 15-30 اصل مقاله (1.39 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی آمیخته | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jed.2023.346522.654019 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمیدرضا عباسی1؛ غلامحسین حسینی نیا* 2؛ علی داوری2 | ||
| 1گروه کارآفرینی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه کسب و کار جدید، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: هدف این پژوهش، بررسی مکانیزمهای توسعه رفتار کارآفرینانه در سازمان‌های دولتی ایران با تمرکز بر وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی است. روش: این پژوهش از روش آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) استفاده کرده است. بخش کیفی شامل مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختار یافته با خبرگان و مدیران وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی بوده است. جامعه آماری با استفاده از روش هدفمند و گلوله برفی انتخاب شده و تا رسیدن به حد اشباع نظری، مصاحبه ادامه یافته است. برای تحلیل داده‌ها، از روش تحلیل محتوا با سه مرحله کدگذاری و با استفاده از نرم افزار MAXQDA2020 استفاده شده است. در بخش کمی، از روش معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم افزارهای SPSS و SMART PLS استفاده شده است. برای بررسی روایی در بخش کیفی از "بازبینی توسط همکاران و تأیید صاحبنظران" و برای بررسی پایایی، از روش "توافق بین دو‌کدگذار" استفاده شده است. برای بررسی اعتبار هر گویه در بخش کمی از "آلفای کرونباخ" و برای تأیید روایی نیز از "روایی همگرا و روایی تشخیصی" استفاده شده است. یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مکانیزمهای نهادی و قانونی، مکانیزمهای سازمانی، مکانیزمهای محیطی، مکانیزمهای گروهی و تیم کاری، و مکانیزمهای فردی و شخصیتی، مکانیزمهای فرهنگی و اعتقادی، بر توسعه رفتار کارآفرینانه در سازمان‌های دولتی تأثیرگذار هستند. نتیجه‌گیری: این پژوهش الگویی برای توسعه رفتار کارآفرینانه در سازمان‌های دولتی ایران با تأکید بر وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی ارائه می‌دهد. یافته‌های پژوهش می‌توانند برای سیاستگذاران و رهبران سازمان‌های دولتی مفید باشند که به دنبال تقویت کارآفرینی در سازمان‌های خود هستند. رویکرد آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) استفاده شده در این پژوهش، فهم جامعی از مکانیزمهای لازم برای توسعه رفتار کارآفرینانه در سازمان‌های دولتی را فراهم می‌کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رفتار کارآفرینانه؛ سازمان‌های دولتی؛ مکانیزمهای توسعه رفتار کارآفرینانه؛ وزارت تعاون؛ کار و رفاه اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identification and analysis of the mechanisms of development of entrepreneurial behavior in government organizations (case study: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamidreza Abbasi1؛ Gholam Hossein Hosseininia2؛ Ali Davari2 | ||
| 1Department of Entrepreneurship, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| 2New Business Department, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of developing entrepreneurial behavior in Iran's government organizations, with a focus on the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare. Methods: This study used a mixed method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The qualitative part involved semi-structured interviews with experts and managers of the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare, who were selected using snowball sampling purposively method. The content analysis method was used for qualitative data analysis, which continued until theoretical saturation was reached. The quantitative part involved the use of structural equation modeling method with SPSS and SMART PLS software. For the research validity, the method of "Peers Debriefing and Members Checking" has been used in the qualitative part. To check the reliability of the research in the qualitative aspect, the "Inter-coder Agreement (ICA)" method has been used. Cronbach's alpha was used to check the reliability of each item in the quantitative section, and convergent validity and Discriminant validity were used to confirm the validity of the research in this section. Findings: The study found that institutional and legal mechanisms, organizational mechanisms, environmental mechanisms, group and teamwork mechanisms, individual and personality mechanisms, and cultural and belief mechanisms, all played a role in the development of entrepreneurial behavior in government organizations. The findings suggest that the development of entrepreneurial behavior in government organizations requires a combination of these mechanisms. Conclusion: The study provides insights into the mechanisms that can be used to develop entrepreneurial behavior in Iran's government organizations, with a focus on the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare. The findings may have important implications for policymakers and organizational leaders who seek to foster entrepreneurship in government organizations. The mixed method approach used in this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that are necessary for developing entrepreneurial behavior in government organizations. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Entrepreneurial Behavior, Government Organizations, mechanisms of Development entrepreneurial behavior, Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akemi Takeoka Chatfielda, Christopher G. Reddick. (2017). The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation diffusion: An analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments, Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.004 Akhavan Kharazian, M, Shahbazi, M. (2017). Evaluation of cultural dimensions affecting strategic change towards entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 8(29), 65-92(In Persian). Benoit Decreton, Phillip C. Nella, b, Diego Steab. (2018). Headquarters involvement, socialization, and entrepreneurial behaviors in MNC subsidiaries, Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.005 Bird, B., & Schjoedt, L. (2017). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. Revisiting the entrepreneurial mind, 379-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45544-0_23 Bratnicki, M. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: Theoretical background, some empirical tests, and directions for future research. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 15(1), 15-33. Brownhilder Ngek Neneh. (2019). from entrepreneurial alertness to entrepreneurial behavior: The role of trait competitiveness and proactive personality, Personality and Individual Differences 138. (2019). 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.020 Futterer, F., Schmidt, J., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 64-81. Ganjali, Z, Bagheri Majd, R. (2020). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on entrepreneurial behavior mediated by entrepreneurial intention in graduate students of engineering. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 13(4), 521-540, doi: 10.22059/JED.2020.305787.653405 , (In Persian). Handfield, R., Sroufe, R., & Walton, S. (2005). Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Business strategy and the environment, 14(1), 1-19. Hinz, V., & Ingerfurth, S. (2013). Does ownership matter under challenging conditions?: On the relationship between organizational entrepreneurship and performance in the healthcare sector. Public Management Review, 15(7), 969-991. Jamali, G. (2016). Identification and Measurement of Relationships between Factors Affecting Corporate Entrepreneurship using DEMATEL Technique in Bushehr Cooperative Companies. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 5(18), 29-58. (In Persian). Jason C. Gawke, Marjan J. Gorgievski b, Arnold B. Bakker. (2017). Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach, Journal of Vocational Behavior 100. (2017). 88–100 Jorge Velilla, José Alberto Molinaa, Raquel Ortega (2018) why older workers become entrepreneurs? International evidence using fuzzy set methods, The Journal of the Economics of Ageing 12. (2018). 88–95 Karina Bogatyrevaa, Linda F. Edelmanb, Tatiana S. Manolovab, Oleksiy Osiyevskyyc, Galina Shirokovaa. (2019). When do entrepreneurial intentions lead to actions? The role of nationalculture, Journal of Business Research 96. (2019). 309–321 Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna. (2015). Leadership and organizational culture as the normative influence of top management on employee's behaviour in the innovation process, Procedia Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01646-9 Leković, B. & Marić, S. (2016).Economic Crisis and the Nature of Entrepreneurial and Management Activities. Economic Themes, 54(1) 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2016-0002 Li CAI, Xiuqing Peng, Ling Wanga. (2018). the characteristics and influencing factors of ntrepreneurial behaviour: The case of new state-owned firms in the new energy automobile industry in an emerging economy, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 135 (2018) 112–120. Mafi, B, Mohammadi Eliassy, GH, Rezaeizadeh, M. (2020). The effect of coaching methods on the entrepreneurial behavior of start-up entrepreneurs in acceleration centers. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 13(1), 81-100, doi: 10.22059 / jed.2020.297934.653273, (In Persian). Markopoulos, E., Aggarwal, V., & Vanharanta, H. (2019, September). Democratization of intrapreneurship and corporate entrepreneurship within the mckinsey’s three horizons innovation space. In International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design: Future Trends and Applications (pp. 1007-1017). Springer, Cham. Matviuk, S.G. (2010). "A Study of Peruvian Entrepreneurs Leadership Expectations", Journal of American Academy of Business, 16(1), 65-70 McAdam, M., & Cunningham, J. A. (2019). Entrepreneurial behaviour: A research outlook. In Entrepreneurial behaviour (pp. 1-13). McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14359-000 Mohammadi Elyasi, G, Notash, H. (2011). Identifying the failure factors of entrepreneurs with Iranian experience: A discursive narrative perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 4(3), 31-50(In Persian). Moradi, M. (2015). Business environment, of Tehran Press. (In Persian). Obschonka, M., Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2017). Entrepreneurship as a twenty-first century skill: Entrepreneurial alertness and intention in the transition to adulthood. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 487–501. Quan V, Mai Nguyen-Lisovich b, Peter V. Raven. (2016). Regional differences in behaviors, attitudes, and motivations related to, World Development Perspectives 2 (2016) 17–24 Roque do Carmo Amorim Neto, Vinícius Picanço Rodrigues, and Shannon Panzer. (2017). Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial behavior and teachers' job satisfaction, Teaching and Teacher Education 63 (2017) 254-262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.001 Sakhdari, K. (2016). Corporate entrepreneurship: A review and future research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8).5-18 Urban, B., & Moloi, J. (2022). Organizational justice and employee entrepreneurial intentions in South Africa. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.28 (1), 182-202 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 526 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 478 |
||