پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,232 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,772 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,232,480 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,978,119 |
نقش طراحی برنامه‌های شتابدهنده در نتایج جذب سرمایه توسط استارتاپها | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی توسعه کارآفرینی | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 59، خرداد 1402، صفحه 45-58 اصل مقاله (886.6 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی - کمی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jed.2023.352508.654106 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرشته مشاور1؛ کامبیز طالبی* 2؛ حمیده رشادت‌جو3؛ علی داوری2 | ||
| 1گروه کارآفرینی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه کسب و کار ، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3گروه مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: هدف این پژوهش بررسی دلایل تفاوت در عملکرد فارغ‌التحصیلان برنامه‌های شتابدهی است. روش تحقیق: این پژوهش به صورت توصیفی-همبستگی انجام شده و از داده‌های جمع آوری شده از 157 استارتاپ شرکت‌کننده در شتابدهنده‌های کانادایی در فاصله زمانی مهرماه 1400 تا تیرماه 1401 استفاده شده است. یک مدل تئوریکال ارائه شده و با استفاده از PLS-SEM، مدل مفهومی بررسی شده است. یافته ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که طراحی برنامه‌های شتابدهی، به ویژه میزان دسترسی به سرمایه‌گذاران، فراوانی و کیفیت فرصت‌های فراهم شده برای دسترسی به سرمایه‌گذاران، و قدرت شبکه ارتباطات استارتاپها، تأثیر زیادی بر روی شانس فارغ‌التحصیلان برای دریافت بیشترین دورهای سرمایه‌گذاری در زمان‌های زودتر دارد. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد که افزایش تعهد زمانی، کیفیت رابطه مرشد و کارآفرینان، و حمایت شغلی و روانی در برنامه مرشدی، می‌تواند منجر به افزایش سرعت و تعداد دورهای جذب سرمایه شود. در پژوهش نیز مشخص شد که برنامه مرشدی شتابدهنده برای موسسانی که تحصیلات و سابقه کار آنها با ایده کسب و کار مرتبط است، نتایج مطلوب‌تری دارد. نتیجه گیری:از نتایج پژوهش می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که طراحی برنامه‌های شتابدهی، به ویژه مرشدی و دسترسی به سرمایه‌گذاران، تأثیر زیادی بر روی عملکرد استارتاپها دارد. این نتایج می‌تواند برای تحقیقات آتی و همچنین برای شتابدهنده‌ها در طراحی برنامه‌های خود مفید باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| شتابدهنده"؛ جذب سرمایه"؛ مرشدی"؛ دسترسی‌به‌سرمایه‌گذاران"؛ "؛ سابقه" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The role of accelerator programs design in the result of fundraising by Startups | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fereshteh Moshaver1؛ Kambiz Talebi2؛ Hamideh Reshadatjoo3؛ Ali Davari2 | ||
| 1Faculty of Management and Economics. Islamic Azad University، Science And Research Branch. Tehran | ||
| 2Department of Business Creation, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Faculty of Management and Economics. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. Tehran, Tehran, | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: The objective of this applied research is to investigate the reasons behind the differences in the performance of graduates from accelerator programs. The study aims to identify the influence of two fundamental elements of accelerator programs, namely mentorship and access to investors, on the performance of startups. Additionally, the mediating role of startup background is also taken into consideration. Methods: This is a descriptive-correlational study that uses data collected from 157 startups that participated in Canadian accelerators between September 2021 and June 2022. A theoretical model was presented to explain the relationships between variables, and the conceptual model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings:The results of the study indicate that the design of accelerator programs, particularly the frequency, intensity, and quality of opportunities given to access investors, and the strength of the startups' network during the program, have a significant impact on the chances of graduates to receive more rounds of investment earlier. The study also found that more time commitment, a high quality of relationship between mentors and entrepreneurs, and better professional and mental support in mentorship could lead to an increase in the number of investment rounds and speed of fundraising. Furthermore, the study revealed that accelerator mentorship programs bring better results for founders whose education field and work experience are related to their business idea. Conclusion: The study concludes that the design of accelerator programs, particularly the mentorship and access to investors, has a significant impact on the performance of startups. The findings of the study can provide insights for future research and can be useful for accelerators in designing their programs. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Accelerators", fundraising", Mentorship", Access to investors", ", background" | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alsos, G. A., & Ljunggren, E. (2017). The Role of Gender in Entrepreneur–Investor Relationships: A Signaling Theory Approach. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(4), 567–590. Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1373–1390. Bhatli, D., Borella, P., Jelassi, T., & Saillant, N. (2014). Startup Accelerators: Entrepreneurial Match Makers. In Ideas in Marketing: Finding the New and Polishing the Old (pp. 259–259). Springer International Publishing. Block, J. H., Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. (2018). New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there. Small Business Economics, 50(2), 239–250. Brown, R., Mawson, S., Lee, N., & Peterson, L. (2019). Start-up factories, transnational entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial ecosystems: unpacking the lure of start-up accelerator programmes. European Planning Studies, 27(5), 885–904. Cánovas-Saiz, L., March-Chordà, I., & Yagüe-Perales, R. M. (2020). New evidence on accelerator performance based on funding and location. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 29(3), 217–234. Carlos Nunes, J., Gomes Santana Félix, E., & Pacheco Pires, C. (2014). Which criteria matter most in the evaluation of venture capital investments? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 505–527. Chitsazan, H., & Pourbasir, M. (2022). Factors Affecting Backers’ Funding Intention in Crowdfunding Platforms. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(4), 599-618. doi: 10.22059/jed.2021.320354.653622 (In Persian) Cho, C. S., Ramanan, R. A., & Feldman, M. D. (2011). Defining the ideal qualities of mentorship: A qualitative analysis of the characteristics of outstanding mentors. American Journal of Medicine, 124(5), 453–458. Cohen, S. L., Bingham, C. B., & Hallen, B.L. (2019). The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 810–854. Cohen, S. L., Fehder, D. C., & Hochberg, Y. V. (2014). 2014 Accelerator Rankings. In Seed Accelerator Rankings Project. Cohen, S. L., Fehder, D. C., Hochberg, Y. V., & Murray, F. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48(7), 1781–1797. Cumming, D., Deloof, M., Manigart, S., & Wright, M. (2019). New directions in entrepreneurial finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 252–260. Dams, M. C., Sarria-Allende, V., Pasquini, R., & Robiolo, G. (2016). Accelerators, networks and venture capital financing. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 11047). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Dempwolf, C. S., Auer, J., & D’ippolito, M. (2014). Innovation accelerators: Defining characteristics among startup assistance organizations. Small Business Administration, 10, 1-44. Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G. (2017). A Review and Road Map of Entrepreneurial Equity Financing Research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–-1853. Fowle, M., & Tyne, N. (2017, September). Critical success factors for business accelerators: A theoretical context. In British Academy of Management 2017 Conference (pp. 1-23). Gonzalez-uribe, J., & Leatherbee, M. (2018). The Effects of Business Accelerators on Venture Performance: Evidence from StartUp Chile. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(4), 1566–1603. Goswami, K., Mitchell, J. R., & Bhagavatula, S. (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 117–150. Hallen, B. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2012). Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms Obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 35–70. Hallen, B., Bingham, C., & Cohen, S. (2015). Do Accelerators Accelerate? A Study of Venture Accelerators as a Path to Success?Academy of Management Proceedings,2014(1),12955–12955. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.185 Hallen, B., Bingham, C., & Cohen, S. (2020). Do accelerators accelerate? If so, how? Organization Science, 31(2), 378–414. Hochberg, Y., Cohen, S., & Fehder, D. (2014). The seed accelerator rankings project-2014 Accelerator Rankings. Retrieved 30/10/2015., from http://www. seedrankings. com Hoffman, D. L., & Radojevich-Kelley, N. (2012). Analysis of Accelerator Companies: An Exploratory Case Study of Their Programs, Processes, and Early Results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2), 54–70. Jamali, B., Mohammad Kazemi, R., Farsi, J. Y., & Dehkordi, A. M. (2018). Theories of opportunity creation and effective entrepreneurial actions in opportunity creation context. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 443–454. Janney, J. J., & Folta, T. B. (2006). Moderating effects of investor experience on the signaling value of private equity placements. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 27–44. Kafeshani, A. A., Rezvani, M., Chitsazan, H., & Kazemi, R. M. (2018). The art of fundraising from business angels based on entrepreneurial marketing: A new insight. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(3), 1-10. Kazemi, R. M., Nikraftar, H., Farsi, J. Y., & Dariani, M. A. (2019). The concept of international entrepreneurial orientation in competitive firms: A review and a research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(3), 1-10. Kim, J. H., & Wagman, L. (2012). Early-Stage Financing and Information Gathering: An Analysis of Startup Accelerators. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID, 2142262. Knockaert, M., Spithoven, A., & Clarysse, B. (2014). The impact of intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(1), 376–387. Lall, S. A., Bowles, L., & Baird, R. (2013). Bridging the “Pioneer Gap”: The Role of Accelerators in Launching High-Impact Enterprises. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3–4), 105–-137. Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative science quarterly, 181-199. Mansoori, Y., Karlsson, T., & Lundqvist, M. (2019). The influence of the lean startup methodology on entrepreneur-coach relationships in the context of a startup accelerator. Technovation, 84–85(March 2017), 37–47. Mejia, J., & Gopal, A. (2015). Now and Later ? Mentorship , Investor Ties and Performance in Seed-Accelerators. In DRUID Conference. Rome, Italy. Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The Startup Factories. In NESTA. Moradi,M., Imanipour,N., Arasti, Z.,&Mohammadkazemi, R. (2020). Poverty & entrepreneurship: A systematic review of poverty-related issues discussed in entrepreneurship literature. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 125–152. Roberts, P. W., & Lall, S. A. (2019). Observing Acceleration Uncovering: Uncovering the Effects of Accelerators on Impact-Oriented Entrepreneurs. In Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381. Uhl-bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships. Journal of Management, 29(4), 511–532.. Uhm, C. H., Sung, C. S., & Park, J. Y. (2018). Understanding the accelerator from resources-based perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 258–278. Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Van Weele, M. A., & Eveleens, C. P. (2017). Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 605–629. Winston Smith, S., & Hannigan, T. J. (2014). Home run, strike out, or base hit: How do accelerators impact exit and VC financing in new firms?. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 13811). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.. Winston Smith, S., & Hannigan, T. J. (2015). Swinging for the Fences: How Do Top Accelerators Impact the Trajectories of New Ven tures? In DRUID Conference. Rome, Italy. Winston Smith, S., Hannigan, T. J., & Gasiorowski, L. (2013, July). Accelerators and crowd-funding: Complementarity, competition, or convergence in the earliest stages of financing new ventures?. In University of Colorado-Kauffman Foundation Crowd-Funding Conference. Yadollahi Farsi, Jahangiri. Azizi, Maryam. Mohammmadkazemi, Reza. Ziya, Babak. (2019). Identifying factors of fitness between business model and entrepreneurial opportunity for effective opportunity exploitation, Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2019.v19i5.1775 Yitshaki, R., & Drori, I. (2018). Understanding mentorship processes. In Accelerators (pp. 58-80). Edward Elgar Publishing. Yu, S. (2020). How do accelerators impact the performance of high-technology ventures?. Management Science, 66(2), 530-552. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 449 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 372 |
||