سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,239
تعداد مقالات67,849
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,372,544
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,136,077
بهمن میرزا, محبوبه, سیدامیری, نادر, حاجی حیدری, نسترن. (1401). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر روابط فرااجتماعی تأثیرگذاران اینستاگرام بر بازاریابی تأثیرگذار: رویکرد بیبلیومتریک. , 1(4), 460-488. doi: 10.22059/mmr.2023.356637.1044
محبوبه بهمن میرزا; نادر سیدامیری; نسترن حاجی حیدری. "شناسایی عوامل مؤثر روابط فرااجتماعی تأثیرگذاران اینستاگرام بر بازاریابی تأثیرگذار: رویکرد بیبلیومتریک". , 1, 4, 1401, 460-488. doi: 10.22059/mmr.2023.356637.1044
بهمن میرزا, محبوبه, سیدامیری, نادر, حاجی حیدری, نسترن. (1401). 'شناسایی عوامل مؤثر روابط فرااجتماعی تأثیرگذاران اینستاگرام بر بازاریابی تأثیرگذار: رویکرد بیبلیومتریک', , 1(4), pp. 460-488. doi: 10.22059/mmr.2023.356637.1044
بهمن میرزا, محبوبه, سیدامیری, نادر, حاجی حیدری, نسترن. شناسایی عوامل مؤثر روابط فرااجتماعی تأثیرگذاران اینستاگرام بر بازاریابی تأثیرگذار: رویکرد بیبلیومتریک. , 1401; 1(4): 460-488. doi: 10.22059/mmr.2023.356637.1044

شناسایی عوامل مؤثر روابط فرااجتماعی تأثیرگذاران اینستاگرام بر بازاریابی تأثیرگذار: رویکرد بیبلیومتریک

بررسی‌های مدیریت رسانه
مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 4، 1401، صفحه 460-488    اصل مقاله (2.1 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/mmr.2023.356637.1044
نویسندگان
محبوبه بهمن میرزا1؛ نادر سیدامیری* 2؛ نسترن حاجی حیدری3
1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت رسانه و ارتباطات کسب‌وکار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2دانشیار، گروه کارآفرینی سازمانی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3دانشیار، گروه مدیریت رسانه و ارتباطات کسب‌وکار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
هدف: به‌لحاظ گسترش روزافزون رسانه‌های اجتماعی و اهمیت بازاریابی تأثیرگذار و با توجه به پراکندگی پژوهش‌های قبلی، هدف اصلی این پژوهش، شناسایی عوامل مؤثر روابط فرااجتماعی بر بازاریابی تأثیرگذار و دسته‌بندی آن‌ها، اعم از سازه‌های پیشین، تصمیم‌ها، نتیجه‌ها، روش‌ها، بافتارها، نظریه‌ها و شکاف‌های پژوهشی این حوزه است.
روش: روش اجرای پژوهش کیفی و از نوع مرور نظام‌مند بیبلیومتریک با استفاده از نرم‌افزار وس‌ویور و زبان برنامه‌نویسی آر است.
یافته‌ها: در بخش تحلیل، عملکرد کشورها و نویسندگان پُراستناد شناسایی شد و در بخش ترسیم علم، چهار خوشه به‌دست آمد که عبارت‌اند از: 1. بازاریابی تأثیرگذار؛ 2. تحلیل عوامل روان‌شناختی (درک جذابیت فیزیکی، اعتبار منبع و...) مؤثر بر تأثیرپذیری مخاطب؛ 3. تعامل فرااجتماعی و روابط فرااجتماعی؛ 4. متقاعدسازی. همچنین، سه واژه پُرتکرار «بازاریابی تأثیرگذار»، «رسانه اجتماعی» و «اثر» در تحلیل هم‌رخدادی واژگان شناسایی شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان می‌دهد که پنج سازه بسیار مهم پیشین بازاریابی تأثیرگذار عبارت‌اند از: ویژگی‌های فرد تأثیرگذار، ویژگی‌های مخاطب، ویژگی‌های رسانه اجتماعی، ویژگی‌های محتوا و ویژگی‌های روابط فرااجتماعی. همچنین، بسترهای مهم این فرایند از نظر بافتار عبارت‌اند از: فرهنگ، نوع ارتباط، شخصیت، تطابق فرد تأثیرگذار ـ محتوا و هوش مصنوعی. افزون بر این، ایجاد و توسعه روابط فرااجتماعی، مهم‌ترین تصمیم رفتاری و افزایش اثربخشی بازاریابی تأثیرگذار، مهم‌ترین خروجی فرایند بازاریابی تأثیرگذار است. بر اساس آنچه بیان شد، مدیران می‌توانند با در نظر گرفتن سه موضوع، فرایند بازاریابی تأثیرگذار را بهبود بخشند: 1. ویژگی‌های منبع، برای مثال انتخاب اینفلوئنسر مناسب؛ 2. توجه به کانال مناسب و ویژگی‌‌های رسانه اجتماعی، به‌عنوان راه ارتباطی و دریافت بازخور و متناسب با بازار هدف؛ 3. توجه به نیاز مصرف‌کننده و ارائه محتوای متناسب با نیاز آن‌ها.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بازاریابی تأثیرگذار؛ روابط فرااجتماعی؛ بیبلیومتریک؛ چارچوب TCM-ADO
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing a Para-social Relationships Framework of Instagram Influencers Based on Influencer Marketing: A Bibliometric Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Mahboobeh Bahmanmirza1؛ Nader Seyyedamiri2؛ Nastaran Hajiheydari3
1Ph.D Candidate, Department of Media Management and Business Communication, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2Associate Prof., Department of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3Assistant Prof., Department of Media Management and Business Communication, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Objective
Today's social media and social networking sites (SNS) have had a significant impact on how people receive information and news. A recent report from the Pew Research Center shows that most adults in the United States rely heavily on social media for news, and that number has been increasing in recent years. These new sources of information also mean that people are now exposed to a large number of commercials on a daily basis, most of which are embedded in social networks. In the meantime, we are facing the phenomenon of social influence. Social influence is a concept that includes a wide range of phenomena such as socialization, obedience, compliance, conformity and persuasion. This concept refers to the process of changing opinions, attitudes and behaviors as a result of interacting with people around us. Currently, a large part of social interactions takes place in online environments where social influence processes occur. The convergence of collective and interpersonal communication, which is characteristic of online communication and especially social media, helps to increase the complexity of social influence processes. Technological capabilities have dramatically changed the traditional communication approach in terms of message control, audience scale, source ambiguity, receiver ambiguity, and temporal ambiguity, and as a result, have affected the process of social influence. In addition, today, the emergence and popularity of social networks has led to a change in consumers' media consumption and the means of communication between customers and brands have undergone fundamental changes. Currently, many brands, including retail brands and consumer goods, clothing, tourism, beauty products, etc., use different social media platforms, and many of them have added social media to their marketing strategies. Social media are considered to be an effective way to attract new customers and retain customers, because they rely on the users’ generated data, which are considered more reliable than the content available on the official websites of companies. These social networks are able to create real connections between users and brands, which has a positive effect on the performance results of brands. The ability to use these social networks in marketing actions has made them one of the research priorities of the marketing field. Among the most popular social network platforms is Instagram, which has the fastest growing number of users among social networks. This social network has succeeded in attracting the attention of social network users by continuously providing new and attractive features. One of Instagram's recent actions has been providing special capabilities for businesses so that these businesses can easily use this social network to achieve their business goals.Social media influencers act as digital opinion leaders, observers, and strategic communication actors on various social media platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and TikTok. Influencers' embedded advertising messages are often seen as honest opinions, so they are highly persuasive. In addition, influencers and their groups of followers are involved in a mediated relationship, and there is evidence that the quality of this relationship affects the effectiveness of influencers' advertising messages. Horton and Wohl have called this relationship a para-social relationship, which is intended to be an illusory close relationship between the audience and the media personality. Given the significance of influencer marketing, and the diffused knowledge in the body of literature, this study attempts to take a comprehensive look at the agents influencing the para-social relationships process to enhance the effectiveness of influencer marketing on social media. With the help of the Bibliometrix® package of R and VOSviewer software, the science performance and the scientific network were discussed and mapped. By showing four main clusters in the co-citation analysis, theories, contexts, and main constructs of the field were identified, and by co-occurrence analysis, the recent trends were identified, which all eventually presented in the conceptual framework. The most common antecedents and consequences of influencer marketing were presented together with contexts.
Research Methodology
Bibliometric systematic review has been applied to identify and analyze thematic trends in para-social relationships and influencer marketing scopes. Bibliometric analysis is a specific scientific field that examines the evolution of knowledge, scientific quality, and the impact of resources in this field from an objective and quantitative perspective. The bibliometric method generally has two main parts: (1) performance analysis and (2) intellectual mapping of science. In the section on performance analysis, the actions of authors, countries, and scientific institutes and their contribution to scientific development in a field are inquired, while knowledge maps are used to recognize the intellectual structure of a field and examine time trends and current issues in each period.
Findings
By using co-citation analysis, not only the most influential publications are identified, but also researchers can find thematic clusters. Here, thematic clusters were extracted based on the mentioned publications. With at least 15 Citations, total number of 13258 cited references was considered which results in 84 items (34 in cluster 1, 19 in cluster 2, 16 in cluster3, 15 in cluster 4), 4 clusters, 3388 links and total links strength 18086. In the performance analysis section, the most-cited countries, authors, and articles were identified. The United States, China, and Germany were the most prominent countries in this field. In the co-citation analysis, four main clusters were identified and the main constructs of each cluster were drawn out along with substantial theories, contexts, and methods. With the help of these constructs, the antecedents and consequences of the influencer marketing process were presented. Co-occurrence analysis considered new trends in this field that help to complete the framework.
Discussion & Conclusion
Based on the ADO-TCM framework, five important antecedents of the influencer marketing process were introduced: influencers’ characteristics, audience characteristics, social media characteristics, content characteristics, and para-social relationships characteristics. Creating and developing para-social relationships is the most important behavioral decision and increasing the effectiveness of influencer marketing is the most important output of the influencer marketing process. Finally, culture and artificial intelligence were introduced as important contexts to facilitate this process that was not seen in the literature. So, the current literature has the ability to develop and grow, at least from a theoretical perspective, because the lack of a comprehensive framework that does not focus on only one element or part of the process and identifies various influential factors of influencer marketing is felt.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Influencer marketing, Para-social relationships, Bibliometric, ADO-TCM framework
مراجع
منابع

ذوالفقاری، ثریا؛ توکلی‌زاده راوری، محمد؛ میرزایی، احمد؛ سهیلی، فرامرز و سجادیان، محمد (1395). کاربرد نقشه‌های به‌دست‌آمده از تحلیل هم‌رخدادی واژگان پروانه‌های ثبت اختراع در آشکارسازی دانش فنی. مطالعات ملی و کتابداری سازمان اطلاعات، 23(3)، 147- 159.

سیدامیری، نادر؛ جلالی، محمد؛ غمخوار، ساره و داوری، علی (1400). بررسی تأثیر هویت اجتماعی، جاذبه‌های ارتباطی و دسته‌بندی محصول بر وفاداری به برند. مدیریت بازرگانی، 13(3)، 633- 654.

لبافی، سمیه؛ کیا، علی اصغر و ملکی، مصطفی (1399). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر درگیرسازی و مشارکت کاربر در شبکه اجتماعی ـ علمی ریسرچ‌گیت. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 36(1)، 33-62.

 

References

Ahmad, I. (2019). The Influencer Marketing Revolution. Social Media Today. Available in: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/the-influencer-marketing-revolution-infographic/517146/

Akhter, S., Pauyo, T. & Khan, M. (2019). What is the difference between a systematic review and a meta-analysis? Basic methods handbook for clinical orthopaedic research: a practical guide and case based research approach, 331-342.

Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R. & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86-101.

Aw, E.C.X., Tan, G.W.H., Chuah, S.H.W., Ooi, K.B. & Hajli, N. (2022). Be my friend! Cultivating parasocial relationships with social media influencers: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 66-94.

Balaban, D. C., Szambolics, J. & Chirică, M. (2022). Parasocial relations and social media influencers' persuasive power. Exploring the moderating role of product involvement. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103731.

Boerman, S. C. (2020). The effects of the standardized Instagram disclosure for micro-and meso-influencers. Computers in human behavior, 103, 199-207.

Bond, B. J. (2018). Parasocial relationships with media personae: Why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psychology, 21(3), 457-485.

Borchers, N. S. & Enke, N. (2022). I've never seen a client say:‘Tell the influencer not to label this as sponsored: An exploration into influencer industry ethics. Public relations review, 48(5), 102235.

Breves, P., Liebers, N., Motschenbacher, B. & Reus, L. (2021). Reducing resistance: the impact of nonfollowers’ and followers’ parasocial relationships with social media influencers on persuasive resistance and advertising effectiveness. Human Communication Research, 47(4), 418-443.

Breves, P. L., Liebers, N., Abt, M. & Kunze, A. (2019). The perceived fit between instagram influencers and the endorsed brand: How influencer–brand fit affects source credibility and persuasive effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 59(4), 440-454.

Burnasheva, R. & Suh, Y. G. (2022). The moderating role of parasocial relationships in the associations between celebrity endorser’s credibility and emotion-based responses. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(4), 343-359.

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C. & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510-519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005

Chapple, C. & Cownie, F. (2017). An investigation into viewers’ trust in and response towards disclosed paid-for endorsements by YouTube lifestyle Vloggers. Journal of promotional communications, 5(2).

Cheung, M. L., Leung, W. K., Aw, E. C.-X. & Koay, K. Y. (2022). I follow what you post!: The role of social media influencers’ content characteristics in consumers' online brand-related activities (COBRAs). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102940.

Childers, C. C., Lemon, L. L. & Hoy, M. G. (2019). # Sponsored# Ad: Agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(3), 258-274.

Choi, S. M. & Rifon, N. J. (2012). It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 639-650.

Chung, S. & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481-495.

Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual review of psychology, 55(1), 591-621.

Cialdini, R. B. & James, L. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (Vol. 4). Pearson education Boston.

Coates, A. E., Hardman, C. A., Halford, J. C., Christiansen, P. & Boyland, E. J. (2019). Food and beverage cues featured in YouTube videos of social media influencers popular with children: an exploratory study. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2142.

De Bérail, P. & Bungener, C. (2022). Parasocial relationships and YouTube addiction: The role of viewer and YouTuber video characteristics. Psychology of Language and Communication, 26(1), 169-206.

De Cicco, R., Iacobucci, S. & Pagliaro, S. (2021). The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising, 40(5), 733-759.

De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V. & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035

De Vries, L., Gensler, S. & Leeflang, P.S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of interactive marketing, 26(2), 83-91.

Dhanesh, G.S. & Duthler, G. (2019). Relationship management through social media influencers: Effects of followers’ awareness of paid endorsement. Public relations review, 45(3), 101765.

Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T. & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44.

Djafarova, E. & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in human behavior, 68, 1-7.

Djafarova, E. & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’–credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, communication & society, 22(10), 1432-1446.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Pandey, N. & Mishra, A. (2021). Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 135, 758-773.

Dutot, V., Lichy, J. & Mohamed, A. (2022). New insights into psychological needs fulfilment on social media: How Social media usage shapes the way we feel about ourselves.

Erdogan, B.Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of marketing management, 15(4), 291-314.

Farivar, S., Wang, F. & Yuan, Y. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102371.

Feezell, J. T. & Ortiz, B. (2021). ‘I saw it on Facebook’: an experimental analysis of political learning through social media. Information, communication & society, 24(9), 1283-1302.

Femenia-Serra, F. & Gretzel, U. (2022). Destination Influencer Marketing Encyclopedia of Tourism Management and Marketing (pp. 867-870): Edward Elgar Publishing.

Feng, Y., Chen, H. & Kong, Q. (2021). An expert with whom I can identify: The role of narratives in influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 40(7), 972- 993.

Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K. & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public relations review, 37(1), 90-92.

Ganguly, S. (2015). Why social media advertising is set to explode in the next 3 years. Marketing Land.

Gavilanes, J. M., Flatten, T. C. & Brettel, M. (2018). Content strategies for digital consumer engagement in social networks: Why advertising is an antecedent of engagement. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 4-23.

Goldsmith, R. E. & Clark, R. A. (2008). An analysis of factors affecting fashion opinion leadership and fashion opinion seeking. Journal of fashion marketing and management: an international journal, 12(3), 308-322.

Gottfried, J. & Shearer, E. (2019). News use across social media platforms 2016. Available in: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2016/05/PJ_2016. 05.26_social-media-and-news_FINAL-1.pdf

Gross, J. & Wangenheim, F. V. (2018). The big four of influencer marketing. A typology of influencers. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 2, 30-38.

Gupta, S., Dash, S. B. & Mahajan, R. (2021). The role of social influencers for effective public health communication. Online Information Review.

Hall, J. (2015). Build authentic audience experiences through influencer marketing. Forbes, December, 17.

Hall, K. (2016). The importance of authenticity in influencer marketing. Retrieved from the Business, 2.

Hayes, N. (2008). Influencer Marketing: Who Really Influences Your Customers? Taylor & Francis.

Hoffner, C.A. & Bond, B.J. (2022). Parasocial relationships, social media & well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101306.

Horton, D. & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.

Hudders, L. & De Jans, S. (2022). Gender effects in influencer marketing: an experimental study on the efficacy of endorsements by same-vs. other-gender social media influencers on Instagram. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 128-149.

Hwang, K. & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in human behavior, 87, 155-173.

Hyun, H., Thavisay, T. & Lee, S. H. (2022). Enhancing the role of flow experience in social media usage and its impact on shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102492.

Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P. & Croes, E. A. (2022). Influencer advertising on Instagram: product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 101-127.

Jiménez-Castillo, D. & Sánchez-Fernández, R. (2019). The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 366-376.

Jin, S.A.A. & Phua, J. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181-195.

Jin, S.V., Muqaddam, A. & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567-579.

Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4-13.

Kay, S., Mulcahy, R. & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: the impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of marketing management, 36(3-4), 248-278.

Ki, C. W. C. & Kim, Y. K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing, 36(10), 905-922.

Ki, C.W. C., Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M. & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133.

Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C. & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71-89.

Labafi, S., Kia, A. & malaki, M. (2022). Engaging User in academic social network: Identifying effective factors (Case study: Research Gate). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 36(1), 33-62. (in Persian)

Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of interactive marketing, 28(2), 134-148.

Lee, J. E. & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753-5760.  

Leite, F. P. & Baptista, P. D. P. (2022). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(3), 295-311.

Lim, W. M., Yap, S.-F. & Makkar, M. (2021). Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? Journal of Business Research, 122, 534-566.

Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E. & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism management, 29(3), 458-468.

Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 3(1), 8.

López, M. & Sicilia, M. (2014). eWOM as source of influence: the impact of participation in eWOM and perceived source trustworthiness on decision making. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(2), 86- 97.

Lou, C. & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58-73.

Lou, C. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 4-21.

Masuda, H., Han, S. H. & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246.

McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of consumer research, 16(3), 310-321.

McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. The handbook of social psychology, 233-346.

McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest (Vol. 144). Sage London.

Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.

Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46–54.

Oliveira, J. S., Ifie, K., Sykora, M., Tsougkou, E., Castro, V. & Elayan, S. (2022). The effect of emotional positivity of brand-generated social media messages on consumer attention and information sharing. Journal of Business Research, 140, 49-61.

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W. & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1-O16.

Primasiwi, C., Irawan, M. I. & Ambarwati, R. (2021). Key Performance Indicators for Influencer Marketing on Instagram. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Business and Management of Technology (ICONBMT 2020).

Rafaeli, S. (2019). Interacting with media: Para-social interaction and real interaction Mediation, information, and communication (pp. 125-181), Routledge.

Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D. & Luoma-Aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of marketing management, 36(3-4), 279-298.

Riley, M. W. (1954). Communication and persuasion: psychological studies of opinion change. American Sociological Review, 19(3),  355-357.

Schach, A. & Lommatzsch, T. (2018). Influencer relations, Springer.

Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L. & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258-281.

Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L. & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258-281.

Scott, D. M. (2015). The new rules of marketing and PR: How to use social media, online video, mobile applications, blogs, news releases, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly: John Wiley & Sons.

Seyyedamiri, N., Jalali, M., Ghamkhar, S. & Davari, A. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Social Identity, Communication Appeals, and Product Classification on Brand Loyalty. Journal of Business Management, 13(3), 633-654. (in Persian)

Shan, Y., Chen, K.J. & Lin, J.S. (2020). When social media influencers endorse brands: The effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 590-610.

Sheng, X., Zeng, Z., Zhang, W. & Hu, Y. (2022). Vlogger's persuasive strategy and consumers' purchase intention: The dual mediating role of para-social interactions and perceived value. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 7791.

Sirgy, M. J. & Danes, J. E. (1982). Self-image/product-image congruence models: Testing selected models. in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 09, eds. Andrew Mitchell, Ann Abor, MI : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 556-561.

Spry, A., Pappu, R. & Cornwell, T. B. (2011). Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. European journal of marketing, 45(6), 882-909.

Stubb, C. & Colliander, J. (2019). “This is not sponsored content”–The effects of impartiality disclosure and e-commerce landing pages on consumer responses to social media influencer posts. Computers in human behavior, 98, 210-222.

Stubb, C., Nyström, A.G. & Colliander, J. (2019). Influencer marketing: The impact of disclosing sponsorship compensation justification on sponsored content effectiveness. Journal of Communication Management, 23(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2018-0119

Su, N., Mariadoss, B.J. & Reynolds, D. (2015). Friendship on social networking sites: Improving relationships between hotel brands and consumers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 76-86.

Swant, M. (2016). Twitter says users now trust influencers nearly as much as their friends. Retrieved from the Adweek website: https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/ twitter-says-users-now-trust-influencers-nearly-much-their-friends-171367

Tafesse, W. & Wood, B. P. (2021). Followers' engagement with instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102303.

Tafheem, N., El-Gohary, H. & Sobh, R. (2022). Social media user-influencer congruity: An analysis of social media platforms parasocial relationships. International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management (IJCRMM), 13(1), 1-26.

Torres, P., Augusto, M. & Matos, M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: An exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1267-1276.

Tsai, W.H.S. & Men, L.R. (2013). Motivations and antecedents of consumer engagement with brand pages on social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(2), 76-87.

Veissi, I. (2017). Influencer marketing on Instagram.

Williams, D. (2006). On and off the’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(2), 593-628.

Wei, X., Chen, H., Ramirez, A., Jeon, Y. & Sun, Y. (2022). Influencers As Endorsers and Followers As Consumers: Exploring the Role of Parasocial Relationship, Congruence, and Followers’ Identifications on Consumer–Brand Engagement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1-20.

Xu, X. & Pratt, S. (2018). Social media influencers as endorsers to promote travel destinations: an application of self-congruence theory to the Chinese Generation Y. Journal of travel & tourism marketing, 35(7), 958-972.

Zolfaghari, S., Tavakkolizadeh Ravari, M., Mirzaei, A., Soheili, F. & Sajjadian, M. (2016). The Application of Patent Co-Word Map Analysis in Technical Knowledge Disclosure', Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 27(3), 147-159.
(in Persian)

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 331
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 412


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب