تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,100,770 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,207,669 |
ارزیابی کیفیت زیستگاه حیات وحش بهمنظور شناسایی لکههای زیستگاهی کلیدی با رویکرد بومشناسی سیمای سرزمین | ||
نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی | ||
دوره 76، ویژه نامه مناطق تحت حفاظت، بهمن 1402، صفحه 147-162 اصل مقاله (1.19 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jne.2023.355036.2525 | ||
نویسنده | ||
صدیقه عبداللهی* | ||
گروه محیطزیست، دانشکدة منابع طبیعی و محیطزیست، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، همدان، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
تنوع زیستی بهعنوان یکی از خدمات اکوسیستمی پشتیبان حیات، تأثیر بهسزایی در پایداری بوم سازگان دارد. چالش اصلی مدیریت سرزمین، اختصاص منابع کارآمد برای حفظ منابع طبیعی و بیشینه سازی ارزش تنوع زیستی است. از این رو ارزیابی مکانی ارزش های تنوع زیستی، ابزاری مهم در شناسایی مناطق کلیدی مناسب حفاظت و تعیین اولویت های حفاظتی است. در این مطالعه، کیفیت زیستگاه گونه های دارای ارزش حفاظتی استان همدان شامل قوچ و میش (Ovis orientalis)، کل و بز (Capra aegagrus)، خرس قهوهای (Ursus arctos) و سیاه گوش (Lynx lynx) بهعنوان شاخصی از تنوع زیستی منطقه با بکارگیری داده های کاربری/پوشش زمین و استفاده از نرم افزار InVEST مدل سازی شد. در گام بعد، با استفاده از روش تناسب ناحیه ای سرزمین در محیط نرمافزار ایدریسی، مناسب ترین پهنهها برای حفاظت تعیین گردید. سرانجام، اولویت بندی مناطق حفاظتی با استفاده از معیارهای سیمای سرزمین انجام شد. براساس نتایج، حدود 31 % از سطح استان دارای مطلوبیت بالا برای زیستگاه گونه های هدف است که بهطور عمده قسمت مرکزی و جنوبی استان را شامل می شود. این مناطق بهترتیب در برگیرندة 39، 74، 16 و 15 پهنة زیستگاهی برای گونه های کل و بز، قوچ و میش، خرس قهوه ای و سیاهگوش است. تحلیل سنجه های سیمای سرزمین نیز نشان داد که لکه های دارای پیوستگی، تراکم و چین خوردگی بیشتر از ارزش حفاظتی بالاتری برخوردار هستند. نتایج این مطالعه نشان دهندة قابلیت بالای سنجه های سیمای سرزمین در اولویت بندی لکه های حفاظتی است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
استان همدان؛ تناسب ناحیهای سرزمین؛ طرحریزی حفاظت؛ کیفیت زیستگاه | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Habitat quality assessment of wild life to identify key habitat patches using landscape ecology approach | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Sedighe Abdollahi | ||
Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Biodiversity as one of the life support ecosystem services has a great impact on the ecosystem's sustainability. The main challenge of land management is to allocate efficient resources to conserve natural resources and maximize the value of biodiversity. Therefore, spatial assessment of biodiversity values is a crucial tool in identifying key areas for conservation and setting conservation priorities. In this study, the habitat quality of species having conservation value in Hamedan province including wild sheep (Ovis orientalis), wild goat (Capra aegagrus), brown bear (Ursus arctos) and Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) were modeled by applying land use/cover data and using InVEST software as the study area biodiversity indicators. In the next step, using the Zonal Land Suitability analysis in the IDRISI environment, the most suitable areas for conservation were determined and finally, the conservation zones were prioritized applying landscape criteria. The results showed that approximately, 35% of the province has high suitability for target species habitats, which mainly involves the central and southern part of the province, including 39, 74, 16 and 15 habitat zones for wild goat, wild sheep, brown bear and Eurasian lynx respectively. Landscape metrics analysis also revealed that, patches having more contiguity, density and fractal dimension involve a higher conservation value. The results of this study, indicate the high capability of landscape metrics in conservation patches prioritization. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Conservation planning, Habitat quality, Hamedan Province, Zonal land suitability | ||
مراجع | ||
Ahmadi Mirghaed, F., Souri, B., 2021. Relationships between habitat quality and ecological properties across Ziarat Basin in northern Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23(11), 16192-16207. Allan, J.D., McIntyre, P.B., Smith, S.D., Halpern, B.S., Boyer, G.L., Buchsbaum, A., Burton, G.A., Campbell, L.M., Chadderton, W.L., Ciborowski J.J., Doran, P.J., 2013. Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(1), 372-377. Aneseyee, A. B., Noszczyk, T., Soromessa, T., Elias, E., 2020. The InVEST Habitat Quality Model Associated with Land Use/Cover Changes: A Qualitative Case Study of the Winike Watershed in the Omo-Gibe Basin, Southwest Ethiopia. Remote Sensing 12(7), 1103. Ansari, A., 2022. Assessment of the Conservation Area Network Development in Markazi Province Using Landscape Metrics. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology 10(3), 65-80 Asadolahi, Z., Salmanmahini, A., Sakieh, Y., Mirkarimi, S.H., Baral, H., Azimi, M., 2018. Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: Towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran. Ecological Complexity 36(4), 250-260. Baral, H., Keenan, R.J., Fox, J.C., Stork, N.E., Kasel, S., 2013. Spatial assessment of ecosystem goods and services in complex production landscapes: a case study from south-eastern Australia. Ecological Complexity 13(1), 35-45. Baral, H., Keenan, R.J., Sharma, S.K., Stork, N.E., Kasel, S., 2014. Spatial assessment and mapping of biodiversity and conservation priorities in a heavily modified and fragmented production landscape in north-central Victoria, Australia, Ecological Indicator 36(1), 552-562. Botequila, L.A., Ahern, J., 2002. Applying Landscape Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Sustainable Landscape Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 59 (2), 65-93. Botequila, L.A., Jozeph, M., Ahern, J., McGarigal, K., 2006. Measuring landscapes: A planner's handbook, Island Press, Washington, D.C., 276 p. Burkhard, B.; Kroll, F.; Nedkov, S. Müller, F., 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecological Indicators 21(10), 17-29. Butchart, S.H., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P., Almond, R.E., Baillie, J.E., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., Carpenter, K.E., Carr, G.M., Chanson, J., Chenery, A.M., Csirke, J., Davidson, N.C., Dentener, F., Foster, M., Galli, A., Galloway, J.N., Genovesi, P., Gregory, R.D., Hockings, M., Kapos, V., Lamarque, J.F., Leverington, F., Loh, J., McGeoch, M.A., McRae, L., Minasyan, A., Hernández Morcillo, M., Oldfield, T.E., Pauly, D., Quader, S., Revenga, C., Sauer, J.R., Skolnik, B., Spear, D., Stanwell-Smith, D., Stuart, S.N., Symes, A., Tierney, M., Tyrrell, T.D., Vié, J.C., Watson, R., 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982), 1164-1168. Danehkar, A., Jafari, S., 2017. Degradation assessment of Jajrood protected area using landscape degradation model. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources 8(2), 17-32. (In Persian) Department of Environmental Protection Agency of Hamedan Province. 214a. Determining the educational needs of the eight environmental audiences of Hamadan province. Report number: 26, 118 p. (In Persian) Department of Environmental Protection Agency of Hamedan Province. 214b. A comprehensive study of Armenian wild sheep (keystone species) in Hamadan province. Report number: 71, 142. (In Persian) Duan, H., Yu, X., 2022. Linking landscape characteristics to shorebird habitat quality changes in a key stopover site along the East Asian–Australasian Flyway migratory route, Ecological Indicators, 144(11), 109490 Eastman, J. R. 2012. IDRISI for Windows; User Manual, Clark Labs, Massachusetts, 342 p. Eigenbrod, F., Hecnar S. J., Fahrig, L., 2009. Quantifying the road effect zone: threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario. Ecology and Society 14(1), 24. Ghandali, M., Alizade, A., Karami, M., Kaboli, M., Zohrabi, H., 2014. Application of Criteria of Landscape Ecology in Habitat Evaluation for Wild Sheep (Ovis orientalis) in Kavir National Park. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 16(1), 633-645. (In Persian) Hall, L.S., Krausman, P.R., Morrison, M.L., 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25 (1), 173-182. Han, H., Su, Z., Yang, G., 2023. Variations of Habitat Quality and Ecological Risk and Their Correlations with Landscape Metrics in a Robust Human Disturbed Coastal Region—Case Study: Xinggang Town in Southern China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2837. Han, Y., Kang, W., Thorne, J., Song, Y. 2019. Modeling the effects of landscape patterns of current forests on the habitat quality of historical remnants in a highly urbanized area, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 41(5), 354-363. Jafari, A., 2013. 10 essential strategies for protecting biodiversity at productive landscape scale (agriculture & forestry). Environment & Development 4(8), 5-12. (In Persian) Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B. Müller, F. 2013. Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators 28(5), 54–78. Karami, M., Ghadierian, T., Faizolahi, K., 2016. Atlas of Iranian Mammals, Jahad Daneshgahi, Kharazmi, Karaj, 292 p. Karami, P., Shayesteh, K., Rastegar Pouyani, N., 2020. Evaluation the Distribution of Effective Factors on Habitat Diversity in Kermanshah Protected Areas. Geography and Environmental Sustainability 10(2), 105-123. (In Persian) Li, M., Zhou, Y., Xiao, P., Tian, Y., Huang, H. Xiao, L., 2021. Evolution of Habitat Quality and Its Topographic Gradient Effect in Northwest Hubei Province from 2000 to 2020 Based on the InVEST Model. Land 10(8), 857. Makki, T., Fakheran, S., Moradi, H., Iravani, M., Senn. J., 2013. Landscape–scale impacts of transportation infrastructure on spatial dynamics of two vulnerable ungulate species in Ghamishloo Wildlife Refuge, Iran. Ecological Indicators 31(8), 6-14. Malavasi, M., Bartak, V., Carranza, M.L., Simova, P., Acosta, A.T.R., 2018. Landscape pattern and plant biodiversity in Mediterranean coastal dune ecosystems: Do habitat loss and fragmentation really matter?. Journal of Biogeography 45(6), 1367- 1377. Management and Planning Organization of Hamedan Province. 2016. Statistical Yearbook of Hamedan Province, Deputy of statistics and information, Hamedan, 186 p. (In Persian) McAlpine, C.A., Eyre, T.J., 2002. Testing landscape metrics as indicators of habitat loss and fragmentation in continuous eucalypt forests (Queensland, Australia). Landscape Ecology 17(8), 711-728. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Ene, E., 2012. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available from http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. (Accessed on 21 December 2022) Mehri, A., Salmanmahiny, A., Mirkarimi, S., Rezaei, H., 2014. A Performance Comparison of Three Computer Algorithms in the Selection of Best Protected Areas (Case Study: Mazandaran Province of Iran). Journal of Environmental Studies 40(1), 1-16. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 155 p. Nematollahi, S., Fakheran, S., Jafari, A., Raeisi, T., Pourmanafi, S., 2020a. Landscape Planning for Conservation, based on the InVEST Model of Habitat Quality and Ecological Impact Assessment of Road Network in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology 8(4), 67-81 Nematollahi, S., Fakheran, S., Kienast, F., Jafari. A., 2020b. Application of InVEST habitat quality module in spatially vulnerability assessment of natural habitats (Case Study: Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province, Iran). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192(8), 1-17. Parris, K. M., Schneider. A., 2009. Impacts of traffic noise and traffic volume on birds of roadside habitats. Ecology and Society,14(1), 1-29. Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Camm, J., Csuti, B., Fackler, P., Lonsdorf, E., Montgomery, C., White, D., Arthur, J., Garberyonts, B., 2008. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation 141(6), 1505-1524. Rands, M.R.W., Adams, W.M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S.H.M., Clements, A., Coomes, D., Entwistle, A., Hodge, I., Kapos, V., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Sutherland, W.J., Vira, B., 2010. Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329(5997), 1298-1303. Rezazadeh, S., Jahani, A., Makhdoum, M. Goshtasb Meigooni, H., 2017. Evaluation of the Strategic Factors of the Management of Protected Areas Using SWOT Analysis-Case Study: Bashgol Protected Area-Qazvin Province. Scientific Research Publishing 7(1), 55. Sadegh oghli, R., Jahani, A., Alizadeh Shabani, A., Goshtasb, H., 2019. Quantifying the Fragmentation of Landscape as an Index for the Assessment of the Wildlife Habitat (Case Study: Protected Area of Jajroud). Journal of Animal Environment 11(1), 13-20. Sala, J., Gascón, S. Cunillera-Montcusí, D., Alonso, M., Amet, F., Cancela da Fonseca, L., Cristo, M., Florencio, M., García-de-Lomas, J., Machado, M., Miracle, M.R., Miró, A., Pérez-Bote, J.L., Lluís Pretus, J., Prunier, F., Ripoll, J., Rueda, J., Sahuquillo, M., Serrano, L., Ventura, M., Verdiell-Cubedo, D., Boix, D., 2017. Defining the importance of landscape metrics for large branchiopod biodiversity and conservation: the case of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Hydrobiologia, 801(1), 81-98. Sallustio, L., De Toni, A., Strollo, A., Di Febbraro, M., Gissi, E., Casella, L., Geneletti, D., Munafò, M., Vizzarri, M., Marchetti. M., 2017. Assessing habitat quality in relation to the spatial distribution of protected areas in Italy. Environmental Management 201(10), 129-137. Salmanmahini, A. Kamyab, H.R., 2010. Applied Remote Sensing and GIS with Idrisi, Mehre Mahdis Press, Tehran, 582 p. (In Persian) Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K. Wrbka, T. 2008. Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: A case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecological Indicators 8(5), 502- 514. Sharp, R., Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., 2016. InVEST 3.6.0 User’s Guide; Collaborative Publication by The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, USA, 371 p. Steffen, W., Burbidge, A. A., Hughes, L., Kitching, R., Lindenmayer, D., Musgrave, W., Smith, M.S., Werner, P.A., 2009. Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. 236 p. TEEB Foundations, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. In: Kumar, P. (Ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Washington, USA, pp. 1-42. Terrado, M., Sabater, S., Chaplin-Kramer, B., Mandle, L., Ziv G. Acuña, V., 2016. Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Science of the Total Environment 540(1), 63-70. Tulloch, V.J., Tulloch, A.I., Visconti, P., Halpern, B.S., Watson, J.E., Evans, M.C., Auerbach, N.A., Barnes, M., Beger, M., Chadès, I., Giakoumi. S., 2015. Why do we map threats? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13(2), 91-99. Wang, H., Tang, L., Qiu, Q., Chen, H., 2020. Assessing the Impacts of Urban Expansion on Habitat Quality by Combining the Concepts of Land Use, Landscape, and Habitat in Two Urban Agglomerations in China, Sustainability 12(11), 4346. Zarandian, A., Yavari, A., Jafari, H., Amirnejad, H., 2016. Modeling of Land Cover Change Impacts on Habitat Quality of a Forested Landscape in the Sarvelat and Javaherdasht. Environmental Researches 6(12), 183-194. (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 528 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 277 |