
Compare the Effect of Different Mental and Physical Training Methods on the Motor Function of Girls and Boys | ||
رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی | ||
Volume 15, Issue 4, December 2023, Pages 55-70 PDF (1.34 M) | ||
Document Type: Research Paper I Open Access I Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license | ||
DOI: 10.22059/jsmdl.2023.358984.1720 | ||
Authors | ||
Hamid Abbasi Bafghi1; Farahnaz Ayatizadeh Tafti* 2; mohamad Reza sadeghian shahi3; Mohsen Vakilzadeh4 | ||
1Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd , Iran | ||
2Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. | ||
3Department of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd , Iran. | ||
4Department of Sports Sciences , Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran | ||
Abstract | ||
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different mental and physical training methods on the motor function of girls and boys. Methods: This study was quasi-experimental research. The statistical sample consisted of 80 male and female students of Boshruyeh City in equal numbers and with a mean age of 14±0.9 years old who were randomly assigned into four groups of 20 participants (Physical Training, Traditional Imagery, PETTLEP, and Control groups). The participants took part in the pre-test and then practiced for six weeks. After training, they participated in the acquisition test To analyze the data, one-way analysis of variance, two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and LSD post hoc tests were used. A significance level of 0.05 was considered. Results: The results showed that there is a significant difference in motor function between boys and girls based on the different training methods. The motor function of both genders has improved significantly in the Physical Training and PETTLEP groups. Also, the level of motor function of girls and boys was significantly better in the PETTLEP group than in other groups. In addition, Boys in PETTLEP have better motor function than girls. Conclusion: The findings of the study highlight the importance and necessity of paying attention to the methods of physical training and PETTLEP in improving the motor function of students according to their gender. An increase in the motor function of students can be expected especially for boys, by adding the PETTLEP in their training plan. | ||
Keywords | ||
Mental training; Physical Training; Motor Performance | ||
References | ||
Campos, A. (2014). Gender differences in imagery. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.010
Cumming, J., & Williams, S. E. (2013). Introducing the revised applied model of deliberate imagery use for sport, dance, exercise, and rehabilitation. Movement & Sport Sciences-Science & Motricité(82), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2013098
Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of applied sport psychology, 13(1), 60-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200109339004
Liu, K. P., Lai, M., Fong, S. S., & Bissett, M. (2019). Imagery ability and imagery perspective preference: a study of their relationship and age-and gender-related changes. Behavioural Neurology, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7536957
Sackett, R. S. (1934). The influence of symbolic rehearsal upon the retention of a maze habit. The Journal of General Psychology, 10(2), 376-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1934.9917742
Smith, D., Wright, C. J., & Cantwell, C. (2008). Beating the bunker: The effect of PETTLEP imagery on golf bunker shot performance. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 79(3), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599502
Tahmasebi, S., & Ghods Mirheydari, S. (2012). The Effect of Different Imagery Methods on Balance in Female Students of University of Tehran. Journal of Sports and Motor Development and Learning, 4(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmlm.2012.25078 (In Persian)
Thomas, J. R., & French, K. E. (1985). Gender differences across age in motor performance: A meta- analysis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.260
Varlet, M., Bucci, C., Richardson, J, M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2015). Informational constraints on spontaneous visuomotor entrainment. Human movement science, 41, 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.humov.2015.03.011
| ||
Statistics Article View: 914 PDF Download: 636 |