News

Shiri, A., Ameri Sani, A. (2023). Criminal Policy-making: a Problem-Oriented Perspective. , 9(2), 68-82. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.93608
Abbas Shiri; Amirkia Ameri Sani. "Criminal Policy-making: a Problem-Oriented Perspective". , 9, 2, 2023, 68-82. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.93608
Shiri, A., Ameri Sani, A. (2023). 'Criminal Policy-making: a Problem-Oriented Perspective', , 9(2), pp. 68-82. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.93608
Shiri, A., Ameri Sani, A. Criminal Policy-making: a Problem-Oriented Perspective. , 2023; 9(2): 68-82. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.93608

Criminal Policy-making: a Problem-Oriented Perspective

سیاستگذاری عمومی
Volume 9, Issue 2, 2023, Pages 68-82    PDF (1.71 M)
Document Type: Research Article
DOI: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.93608
Authors
Abbas Shiri* 1; Amirkia Ameri Sani2
1Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2PhD Student of Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
States use criminal policymaking to solve various public issues. Criminal policymaking without problem identification will end up in failure. If a solution is designed before conducting problem analysis, considerable waste of financial and human resources can incur for solving a nonsignificant problem or a non-problem. Regardless of the criminal policy system model, by using some criteria we can analyze the criminal policy-making system’s condition in terms of problem-oriented consideration to understand the system’s weaknesses for policy change. Problem-oriented criminal policymaking requires a commitment to substantive and procedural essentials. In this article, through a descriptive-prescriptive approach and based on library resources a general framework for a criminal policy-making system is proposed. Substantively, the type of evidence used in the policy process based on the “hierarchy of evidence”, and procedurally, the separation between policy analysis and drafting stages in the policy cycle are considered essential for a problem-oriented criminal policymaking, used here to present a framework for criminal policy analysis from a problem-oriented perspective.
Keywords
Criminal Policy-making; Criminal Policy; Problem-Oriented Policy; Hierarchy of Evidence; Policy Analysis
References
  1. Ahmadi Movahed, Asghar, (2001), Elmination of Prosecuters’s Office {dadsara}; Causes and Consequenses, Legal Journal of Judiciary, Vol (65), Issue (36), 125-134. {In persian}
  2. Andrews, Matt, Lant Pritchett, and Michael Woolcock, (2020), Building state capability, Translated by: Jafar Kheirkhahan & Masoud Dorudi, second publish, Tehran, Iran, Rozaneh Publication. {In Persian}
  3. Ansari, Bagheri, (2020), Principles and Techniques for legislation, 1st pub, Tehran, Iran, Dadgostar publication.
  4. Irvanian, Amir, (2014), General Theory of Criminal Policy making, 1st pub, Terhan, Shahre Danesh Publication. {In Persian}
  5. Ashtarian, Kiomars, (2018), Guideline for policy making, first publish, 1St pub, Tehran, Bazargani Publication. {In Persian}
  6. Birkland, Thomas A., and Sarah E. DeYoung. (2012), "Focusing events and policy windows." In Routledge handbook of public policy, pp. 175-188. Routledge.
  7. Brereton, David. (2019), "Does criminology matter? Crime, politics and the policy process, New Horizons in Criminal Law, First publish, Tehran, Mizan Publication, 674- 686. {In Persian}
  8. Brooks, David, (2012), The social animal: The hidden sources of love, character, and achievement. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
  9. Cairney, Paul, (2012), "Complexity theory in political science and public policy." Political studies review 10, no. 3, 346-358
  10. Cairney, Paul, (2016), The politics of evidence-based policy making. Springer.
  11. Cairney, Paul, (2019), Understanding public policy: theories and issues. Vol. 2. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  12. Cairney, Paul, (2022), "The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’in a decentred state." Public Policy and Administration 37, no. 1, 46-66.
  13. Cairney, Paul, and Emily St Denny., (2020), Why isn't government policy more preventive?. Oxford University Press.
  14. Cairney, Paul, and Richard Kwiatkowski, (2017), "How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine insights from psychology and policy studies." Palgrave Communications, no. 1, 1-8.
  15. Capano, Giliberto, (2012), "Policy dynamics and change: the never-ending puzzle." In Routledge handbook of public policy, pp. 469-479. Routledge.
  16. Cranston, Ross F, (1978), "Reform through legislation: the dimension of legislative technique." Nw. UL Rev. 73, 873.
  17. Deleon, Peter, (2015), The Historical Roots of the Field, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 66- 89. {In Persian}
  18. (2020). What is an evidence hierarchy, https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/789163/What-is-an-Evidence-Hierarchy.pdf
  19. Freeman, Richard, (2015), Learning in Public Policy, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 457- 484. {In Persian}
  20. Goodin, Robert E; Rein, Martin; Moran ,Michael, (2015), The Public and Its Politics, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 20-65. {In Persian}
  21. Hahn, Robert W., and Patrick M. Dudley, (2003), "The disconnect between law and policy analysis: A case study of drivers and cell phones." Admin. L. Rev. 55, 127.
  22. Hertin, J., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., & Nykvist, B, (2009). Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1185–1200.
  23. Howlett, Michael, and Sarah Giest, (2012), "The policy-making process." In Routledge handbook of public policy, pp. 17-28. Routledge.
  24. Ingram, Helen; Schneider Anne. L, (2015), Policy Analysis for Democracy, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 219-244. {In Persian}
  25. Jones, Bryan D., and Herschel F. Thomas. "The cognitive underpinnings of policy process studies: Introduction to a special issue of Cognitive Systems Research." Cognitive Systems Research 45 (2017): 48-51.
  26. Lasswell, Harold Dwight. The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. Bureau of Governmental Research, College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland, 1956.
  27. Majone, Giandomenico, (2015), Agenda Setting, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First pub, Tehran, 291-318. {In Persian}
  28. Malekmohammadi, Hamidreza, (2020), Policies to Tackle Crime and Corruption, 2st pub, Tehran, Samt Publication. {In Persian}
  29. ---, ---, (2017), Basics and Principles of Public Policy Making, Second pub, Tehran, Samt Publication. {In Persian}
  30. Nafisi, Alireza; Ashaari, Mohsen, Tahmasbi, Saeed, (2021), Nudge for Iran, Second pub, Tehran, Milkan Publication. {In persian}
  31. Parsons, Wayne. (2021), An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, Translated by: Hamidreza Malekmohammadi, Volume (1), Tehran, Strategic studies research center {Motaleat Rahbordi} publication. {In Persian}
  32. ------, -----. (2002) "From muddling through to muddling up-evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British Government." Public policy and administration 17, no. 3, 43-60.
  33. Poocharoen, Ora-orn, (2012), "Bureaucracy and the policy process." In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 331-346. Routledge.
  34. Rein, Martin; (2015), Reframing Problematic Policies, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, 1st pub, Tehran, 485-505. {In Persian}
  35. Roll, Michael, ed., (2014), The politics of public sector performance: Pockets of effectiveness in developing countries. Routledge.
  36. Sakiani, Zahra; Vaezi, Seyed Abbas, (2022), The Effect of Cognitive Biases on the Justice Quality in Criminal Court’s Judges Decision making, Legal Journal of Judiciary, Vol (86), Issue (119). 245- 269. {In Persian}
  37. Schneider, Anne, (2012), "Policy design and transfer." Routledge handbook of public policy, 235-246.
  38. Shafrits J.M., Borick, C.P, (2011), Introducing Public Policy, Translated by: Hamidreza Malekmohammadi, First pub, Tehran, Imam Sadegh (A.S) publication. {In persian}
  39. Shiri, Abass (2019), Restorative Justice, Tehran, Iran, Mizan. {In Persian}
  40. ---, ---, (2018), Criminal policy-making about Victims’ Rights, Iranian Journal of Public Policy, Vol (4), Issue (1), 161-175. {In Persian}
  41. ---, ---, (2018), Criminal policy-making; from internal control to external control, Iranian Journal of Public Policy, Vol (4), Issue (3), 103-121. {In Persian}
  42. Sadeghi, Azadeh, (2021), Feasibility Study of Implementing Legalization of Illegal Drugs in the Iranian Criminal Justice System with Comparative Approach, Comparative Law Studies, Vol (12), Issue (2), 567- 589. {In Persian}
  43. Stout, Brian, Brian Williams, and Joe Yates, (2015), Applied Criminology, Translated by: Hamidreza Malek Mohammadi, First pub, Tehran, Mizan publication. {In Persian}
  44. Welsh, Wayne N., and Philip W. Harris. Criminal justice policy and planning: Planned change. Routledge, 2016.
  45. Xanthaki, Helen, (2021), Drafting Legislation, Arts and Technology of Rules, First pub, Tehran, Samt publication and The Islamic Consultative Assembly’s Center for research and Development in Humanities. {In Persian}
  46. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploas/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62668/WWPC_6_Dec_2011.pdf, accessed date: 7/10/2022.
  47. https://www.isna.ir/news/96101507586, accessed date: 2/2/2023.
  48. https://libguides.winona.edu/ebptoolkit/Levels-Evidence, accessed date: 12/12/2022.
Statistics
Article View: 653
PDF Download: 666


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb