News

Salehi, S., Habibi, S. (2023). The impact of Social Development Programs on Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Rural Areas of Gilan Province). , 15(1), 87-115. doi: 10.22059/jrd.2023.363253.668807
Sadegh Salehi; Sona Habibi. "The impact of Social Development Programs on Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Rural Areas of Gilan Province)". , 15, 1, 2023, 87-115. doi: 10.22059/jrd.2023.363253.668807
Salehi, S., Habibi, S. (2023). 'The impact of Social Development Programs on Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Rural Areas of Gilan Province)', , 15(1), pp. 87-115. doi: 10.22059/jrd.2023.363253.668807
Salehi, S., Habibi, S. The impact of Social Development Programs on Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Rural Areas of Gilan Province). , 2023; 15(1): 87-115. doi: 10.22059/jrd.2023.363253.668807

The impact of Social Development Programs on Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Rural Areas of Gilan Province)

توسعه محلی (روستائی-شهری)
Article 5, Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 28, October 2023, Pages 87-115    PDF (1.18 M)
DOI: 10.22059/jrd.2023.363253.668807
Authors
Sadegh Salehi; Sona Habibi*
Department of Social Sciences. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Mazandaran University. Babolsar. Iran
Abstract
Development programs rely on the exploitation of natural resources; consequently, the devastation of the natural world is inevitable. However, development can contribute to the preservation of the environment. In the context of social conditions, environmentally deleterious behaviors manifest as a manifestation of the disparity between development and degradation.
Using qualitative research methods, the purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of social development on the environmental behaviors of the villagers in the province of Gilan.Purposive sampling was used to conduct semi-structured interviews with 42 villagers and experts, who comprise the study population. Using qualitative content analysis, Directed Deductive, and the concept of “objective indicators of advantaged social development” as a modified concept of Inglehart’s theory of material/post-material values, and by coding, categorizing, and identifying regular relationships between categories and concepts, the data was analyzed. The research’s credibility was attained through the use of two methods: selective credibility and credibility evaluation via communication method.
Objective and infrastructural indicators of development are prevalent in rural areas, but social development programs have not been effective in promoting the protection behaviors and environmental culturalization of villagers. The overall proposition derived from the findings is as follows: “in rural areas, environmental protection culture has not been institutionalized concurrently with social development programs.”
Results indicate the underdevelopment and lack of institutionalization of environmental culture as the missing development link to safeguard the environment in the villages studied.
Keywords
Content Analysis; Environmental Degradation; Social Development; Tavalesh Villages; Underdevelopment of Environmental Culture
References
  • AGENDA 21(1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio. Brazil, 1992. United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21
  • Azam, M. (2016) Does environmental degradation shackle economic growth? A panel data investigation on 11 Asian countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 175-182.
  • Azkia, M., Ahmadresh, R., & Partazian, K. (2017). Qualitative research methods from theory to practice. Tehran: Aghat. (In Persian)
  • Azkia, M., & Ghaffari, Gh. (2017). Sociology of development (13th Edition). Tehran: Keyhan. (In Persian)
  • Azkia M., & Imani, A. (2008). Sustainable rural development (1st Tehran: Ettelaat Publications. (In Persian)
  • Bagheri Bonjar, A. R., Zahedi, M. J., & Mousavi, H. (2015) Approachs of social development in the faculty of social science. Social Studies and Research in Iran, 4(1), 59-91. (In Persian)
  • Baker, T. L. (2013). Doing Social Research. Translated by H. Nayebi. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Dong, Y., & Hauschilda, M. Z. (2017). Indicators for environmental sustainability. The 24th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. 697-702. DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.173
  • Duan, W., Su, N., Jiang, Y., & Shen, J. (2022). Impacts of Social Trust on Rural Households’ Attitudes Towards Ecological Conservation, Example of the Giant Panda Nature Reserves in China. Forests, 13(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010053
  • Environmental Performance Index 2020 (EPI). Global metrics for the environment: Ranking country performance on sustainability issues.
  • EPI Results (2022). Environmental Performance Index-Yale University(EPI). Ranking country performance on sustainability issues. https://epi.yale.edu/epi-results/2022/component/epi
  • Faizabadi, Y., & Zahedi, Sh. (2018). Analysis of socio-economic inequalities of development in rural areas of Iran. Space Economy and Rural Development, 7(2), 19-40. (In Persian)
  • Flick, U. (2020). An introduction to qualitative research. Translated by H. Jalili. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Ghaseminezhad, A., Vesali, S. S., & Alizadeh, B. (2014). The Attitude of Government-Based Development among Villagers and its Effects in Forming the Migration of Villagers to Cities (Case Study: of Cheshm-e Ali Akbar Village in Range of Selseleh City). Social Development, 8(3), 145-172. (In Persian)
  • Habibi, S., & Salehi, S. (2021). Understanding environmental concerns and contexts: Application of grounded theory in rural areas of the West of Gilan. Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 3(4), 73-86. (In Persian)
  • Habibi, S., & Salehi, S. (2023). Obstacles to the sustainability of the rural environment with emphasis on economic contexts in Tavalesh villages. Space Economy and Rural Development, 11(4), 47-76. (In Persian)
  • Hassani, M., & Vodjani, F. (2016). Qualitative content analysis of elementary school social studies books from the perspective of moral education. Islamic Education, 12(25), 29-54. (In Persian)
  • Hemmati, A. R., & Mobhara, A. R. (2017). Sustainable rural development in Iran in the studies of internal researchers. The second international conference on water and environmental engineering. August 18, Tehran. Iran, 1-9. (In Persian)
  • Hosseini, M. R. (2022). Meta-Analysis of Sociological Factors Effective to Social Development with Emphasis on the Role of Urban and Rural Origin in Iran. Social Development, 16(3), 123-150. (In Persian)
  • Iman, M. T., & Noushadi, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis. Pazhuhesh, 3(2), 15-44. (In Persian)
  • Inglehart, R. (2017). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Translated by M. Vatar. Tehran: Kavir Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, Ch. (2015). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Translated by Y. Ahmadi. Tehran: Kavir Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (2002). Culture and democracy. Translated by A. Mortazavian. Arganon, 20, 93-116. (In Persian)
  • Inglehart, R.F., Ponarin, E. & Inglehart, R.C. (2017). Cultural Change, Slow and Fast: The Distinctive Trajectory of Norms Governing Gender Equality and Sexual Orientation. Social Forces, 95(4): 1313-1340.
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization, Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
  • Iran climbs up in UNDP human development index(2022). https://en.irna.ir/news/84882870/Iran-climbs-up-in-UNDP-human development-index. Viewed on 2022/09/10
  • Iran GDP-Gross Domestic Product (2021). GDP improves in Iran. https://countryeconomy.com/gdp/iran.
  • Iran-Human Development Index–HDI. https://countryeconomy.com/hdi/iran.
  • Human Development Report 2021/2022. Uncertain times, unsettled lives Shaping our future in a transforming world. By the United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2021-22pdf_1.pdf
  • Jackson, J. (2017). Environment and Society. In Major Themes in Sociology: An Introductory Text. edited by Abasiekong, E.M, Sibiri, E.A. & Ekpenyong, N.S.. Benin City: Mase Perfect Prints. 579-602
  • Kordzangenh, M., Vahida, F. & Mohajerani, A.A. (2020). Discourse Analysis of Economic Development of Rural Communities in Five-Year Plans of Iran's Post-Revolutionary Governments. Social Development, 15(2), 247-280. (In Persian)
  • Krajhanzl, J. (2010). Environmental and Pro-environmental behaviors. In School and Health, Health Education: International Experiences. Publisher: Masarykova univerzita, MSD. BrnoEditors: Evžen Řehulka, 21, 251-274.
  • Management and planning organization of Gilan province, Deputy of statistics and information, detailed results of population and housing census of 1395 (2017). population and households of the country by province and city and by points, statistical information system of Gilan province. Viewed on 2020/09/30. https://mpogl.ir/amar/(In Persian)
  • Mansouri Moghadam, M., Nosrati, R., & Sepidnameh, B. (2023). Evaluation of development plans with the approach of critical ethnography (Case study: Dam construction projects in Ilam province). Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities), 14(2), 333-351. (In Persian)
  • Mirmohammad Tabar, S.A., Khorasani, M.M., Noghani M. & Toosi, A. (2018). The effect of social learning on environmentally destructive behaviors in farmers with an emphasis on the role of extension training (Persian). Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 10(4), 69-78. (In Persian)
  • Mohseni Tabrizi, A. & Salimi, A. (2012). Deductive Qualitative Content Analysis and the Usage of Islamic Doctrines in Social Sciences. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(72), 135-159. (In Persian)
  • Molaey Hashjin, N. & Alinaghipour, M. (2020). On the Evaluation of Development Levels by Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques in the Parts of Guilan Province. Human Geography Research, 52(1), 75-87. (In Persian)
  • Motiee Langroudi S.H., Dadvar Khani F., Yaghoot Hardani H., & Ghadiri Masom, M. (2021). Evaluating the effects and consequences of strategic initiatives for rural economic development Case: Khuzestan Province. Space Economy and Rural Development, 10(35), 1-22. (In Persian)
  • Peng, B., Sheng, X., & Wei, G. (2020). Does environmental protection promote economic development? From the perspective of coupling coordination between environmental protection and economic development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39135–39148.
  • Pourmohammadi, M., & Khaleghi, A. (2022). Analysis of Existing Deficiencies of Rural Local Planning Based on Communicative Planning Theory in East Azarbaijan Province. Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities), 14(1), 141-169. (In Persian)
  • Rahimi, R., & Ghaderzadeh, H. (2023). Evaluation of Socio-Economics’ Impact of Azad Dam Constructions in on Margin’s Townships in view of Operations Using Benefit-Cost Method (A Case of Kalatarzan District). Space Economy and Rural Development, 11(42), 252-235. (In Persian)
  • Ramezani Kiasejmahaleh, R., Amiri, M. J., & Zebardast, l. (2019). Social Impact Assessment of Development Projects on the Local Communities (Case Study: Chamkhaleh Port Construction Project). Geography and Development, 56, 215-232. (In Persian)
  • Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future(1987). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
  • Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Kroll, Ch., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable Development Report 2022, From Crisis to Sustainable Development: the SDGs as Roadmap to 2030 and Beyond, Includes the SDG Index and Dashboards. Cambridge University Press. org/10.1017/9781009210058. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/rankings
  • Saadi, H., & Awatfi-Akmal, F. (2017). Factors affecting agricultural land use change in the villages of Hamadan city. Space Economy and Rural Development, 7(2), 211-226. (In Persian)
  • Salehi, S., Habibi, S., Rezaei, A., & Firozjayan, A. A. (2021). An Analysis of Socio-Cultural Context of Environmental Issues: Applying Grounded Theory (Case Study: Rural Areas of Tavalesh). Rural Research, 12(3), 536-551. (In Persian)
  • Shahbazi, Z., & Mobaraki, M. (2021). Analysis of Social Development Indicators in Markazi Province. Economic and Developmental Sociology, 10(2), 227-258. (In Persian)
  • Shibanifar, M. (2022). Human Development Index in 2022; Canada 13th and Iran 65th. Iranian Canadian Journal. Viewed on 08/05/1402. https://icjournal.ca/post/human-development-index-hdi-by-country-2022/ (In Persian)
  • Shrinkhal, R. (2019). Economics, Technology, and Environmental Protection: A Critical Analysis of Phytomanagement (Chapter 22). In Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites, Market Opportunities in Sustainable Phytoremediation. Edited by: Pandey, V.Ch. and Bauddh, K. India. Elsevier press. 569-580
  • The culture of settlements in Gilan province (2012). Talesh, Rezvanshahr, Masal. Management and Planning Organization of Gilan Province. (In Persian)
  • The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Article 50, Research Institute of the Guardian Council, viewed on 08/05/1402. https://www.shora-gc.ir/fa/news/4707 (In Persian)
  • The World Bank (2021). GDP growth (annual%) -Iran, Islamic Rep. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=IR&most_recent_year_desc=false
  • Tian, M., Gao, Q., Wang, N., Yang, X., Xu, X., & Zhang, L. (2018). Strategic Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Development. Asia Conference on Energy and Environment. Engineering. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 133, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/133/1/012029
  • United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework for the Islamic Republic of IRAN 2023–2027. UNSDCF_Iran Republic of-2023-2027_0.pdf.
  • Minelli, S. (2016, June). Land Degradation Neutrality Target Setting Programme-Land Degradation Neutrality Target Setting–. UN CCD: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification.
  • United Nations (1996). Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies. New York.
  • Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., Hoving, K., Ospina, C. D., ... & Schreck, M. (2020). Environmental performance index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law And Policy. epi. yale. edu.
  • Winter, D. N., & Koger, S. M. (2014). The Psychology of Environmental Problems (2nd Edition). New York and London: Psychology Press.
  • Wolf, M. J., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., Sherbinin, A. D., & Wendling, Z. A. (2022). 2022 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) results. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
Statistics
Article View: 414
PDF Download: 369


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb