نمای پایا در برابر زلزله برای ساختمان‌های میان‌مرتبه: مرور دامنه

ابراهیمی, الهام; وفامهر, محسن; اخلاصی, احمد; ایپکچی, سیامک

doi:10.22059/jhsci.2023.360314.783

فهرست نشریات

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

فهرست مجلات علمی- پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران

نحوه ارسال مقاله برای مجله- ثبت نام در سامانه- فراموش کردن رمز عبور

تعداد نشریات	162
تعداد شماره‌ها	6,694
تعداد مقالات	72,245
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	129,260,950
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	102,101,932

	نمای پایا در برابر زلزله برای ساختمان‌های میان‌مرتبه: مرور دامنه
مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی
دوره 10، شماره 2، تیر 1402، صفحه 107-119 اصل مقاله (1.9 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی کاربردی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhsci.2023.360314.783
نویسندگان
الهام ابراهیمی¹؛ محسن وفامهر²؛ احمد اخلاصی^* ¹؛ سیامک ایپکچی³
¹گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
²گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران و گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
³گروه سازه و زلزله، دانشکدۀ مهندسی عمران و محیط زیست، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، تهران، ایران
چکیده
زمینه: نماها از آسیب‌پذیرین اجزاء ساختمان‌ها در برابر زلزله در ایران هستند. هدف: هدف پژوهش شناسایی پارامترهای طراحی مؤثر بر پایایی لرزه‌ای نماهای ساختمان‌های میان‌مرتبه است. روش‌: پژوهش بر اساس اصول مرور دامنه آرکسی و اومالی در 12 ماه انجام شده است. داده‌ها با نرم‌افزار اکسل و توسط چهار نویسنده تحلیل شده‌اند. یافته‌ها: 1/57 درصد مطالعات پس از سال 2015 منتشر شده‌اند. کشورهای آمریکا، استرالیا، ایتالیا و نیوزلند بیشترین تولیدات علمی را داشته‌اند. ایران در 7/5 درصد و دانشکده‌های معماری در 2/17 درصد سهیم هستند. 5/11 درصد پژوهش‌ها با همکاری دانشگاه‌های مختلف صورت گرفته‌اند. بیشترین پژوهش‌ها به بررسی نماهای پرده‌ای (57 درصد)، نماهای با اتصالات خشک (60 درصد) و نماهای شیشه‌ای و آجری پرداخته‌اند. روش‌های تجربی (51 درصد)، مدل‌سازی عددی (26 درصد)، روش‌های ترکیبی (20 درصد) و کیفی (سه درصد) برای انجام مطالعات استفاده شده‌اند. هفت گروه متغیر شناسایی و در سه سطح مربوط به مراحل طراحی نما طبقه‌بندی ‌شدند. ابعاد و تناسبات ابعادی عناصر نما و مشخصات مربوط به اتصالات، مصالح و درزهای حرکتی در پایداری لرزه‌ای انواع نما مؤثر شناخته شدند. نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها حاکی از افزایش تلاش جامعۀ علمی در کشورهای لرزه‌خیز و مشارکت دانشگاه‌هایشان در سال‌های اخیر برای دستیابی به نمای پایا در برابر زلزله است. ماهیت برخی پارامترهای تأثیرگذار بر عملکرد لرزه‌ای نما، نشان‌دهنده لزوم توجّه معماران از مراحل اولیه طراحی نما در مناطق لرزه‌خیز به این موضوع است. بهره‌مندی از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره در این فرآیند که فراوانی و ماهیت پارامترها حاکی از بین‌رشته‌ای بودن و پیچیدگی آن است، می‌تواند راه‌گشا باشد
کلیدواژه‌ها
بنای‌میان‌مرتبه؛ پایداری سازه‌ای؛ زلزله؛ مرور دامنه؛ نما
عنوان مقاله [English]
Earthquake-Resistant Façades for Mid-Rise Buildings: A Scoping Review
نویسندگان [English]
Elham Ebrahimi¹؛ Mohsen Vafamehr²؛ Ahmad Ekhlasi¹؛ Siamak Epackachi³
¹Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
²Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran and Department of Architecture, faculty of Art & Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad branch, Mashhad, Iran
³Department of Structural and Earthquake Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction Recent earthquakes in Iran have caused considerable damage to building façades. This has resulted in economic, social, and building function losses. Moreover, this occurrence poses a threat to human life [1]. Given the progress made in the field of improving the seismic performance of structural systems and the trend of new design approaches toward damage control levels rather than life safety [1], the role of architectural components such as façades in maintaining building performance and reducing damages and casualties is more crucial than ever. The structural stability of facades must be considered as a top priority in their design in in earthquake-prone areas. However, their design is complex, and it is difficult to achieve earthquake resistance because too many variables affect their performance during seismic events [2]. This study aims to identify the design parameters that affect mid-rise building façade seismic stability. This study examined all English-language studies published in this field until 2023, utilizing a scoping review method to answer the following exploratory questions. What years had the most studies? Which countries conduct the most research? How many architecture schools have conducted studies? Most studied façade types? What research methods were used? What design parameters improve façade seismic performance? What factors are the most frequently cited in the literature? Materials and methods This study followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review model. From March 2022 to February 2023, three bibliographic databases—Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest—and two search engines—Google and Google Scholar—retrieved English-language sources published until 2023. 'Façade or Cladding or Enclosure or 'Building skin' or Envelope' and 'Seismic design' or 'Lateral load' or 'Earthquake' yielded 526 sources. Thirty-five studies were eligible for analysis. Discussion and results The majority of research—57.1 %—was published after 2015. Most studies were conducted in the United States (13), Australia, Italy, and New Zealand (each of them; 4 studies). Furthermore, 11.5% were completed in collaboration between universities in different countries. Studies in Iran accounted for 5.7% of the research. Participation from architecture schools was 17.2% of the total. There were 51% experimental setups, 26% numerical modeling, 20% combined methods, and 3% case studies. Most research has centered on curtain façades (57%), dry connection façades (60%) and glass and brick façades. The studies were divided into two groups based on the façade examined. Seven categories of variables were identified based on the data from each group. They are organized into three levels at the stage of façade design. The most frequent factors stated in the literature involved connections and their characteristics. The proportions of materials, connections, movement joints, and facade component dimensions, aspect ratio, and slenderness were shared in the seismic vulnerability of midrise building facades. Conclusion The findings indicate that the scientific community has paid more attention to this issue in recent years than in the past. Iran's high seismicity and the need to consider certain parameters during the preliminary design phase to achieve a seismically resistant façade for mid-rise buildings highlight the need for collaboration between architects and engineers and between Iranian and leading international universities. Due to the complexity and interdisciplinarity of the façade design, it may be advantageous to employ multi-criteria decision-making techniques.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Earthquake, Façade, Mid-rise building, Scoping review, Structural stability

مراجع
اصلانی، فرشته؛ امینی حسینی، کامبد؛ و فلاحی، علیرضا (1397). چارچوب تاب‌آوری کالبدی و اجتماعی محله در برابر زلزله (مطالعۀ موردی: محلۀ کشاورز واقع در منطقۀ 6 تهران. مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی، 5‌(4). 417-433. شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری (1398). مصوبۀ شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری پیرامون ضوابط عام بلندمرتبه‌سازی. تهران: شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری. Aiello, C., Caterino, N., Maddaloni, G., Bonati, A., Franco, A., & Occhiuzzi, A. (2018). Experimental and numerical investigation of cyclic response of a glass curtain wall for seismic performance assessment. Construction and Building Materials, 187, 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.237. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616. Attaria, K.A., Zargaran, M., Khalili Jahromi, K., Bayat, M.R., & Jahanmohammadi, A. (2020). Seismic evaluation of cladded exterior walls considering the effects of façade installation details and out-of-plane behavior of walls. Structures, 24, 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.040. Baird, A., Palermo, A., & Pampanin, S. (2013, April). Controlling seismic response using passive energy dissipating cladding connections. Paper presented at the 2013 NZSEE Conference, wellington, New Zealand. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55959310?utm_source=wikipedia. Baniotopoulos, C. C., Nikolaidis, T. N., & Moutsanidis, G. (2016). Optimal structural design of glass curtain-wall systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 169(6), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.13.00088. Behr, R. A. (1998). Seismic performance of architectural glass in mid-rise curtain wall. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 4(3), 94–98. , https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:3(94). Behr, R. A., Belarbi, A., & Culp, J. H. (1995). Dynamic racking tests of curtain wall glass elements with in‐plane and out‐of‐plane motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 24(1), 1–14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4290240102. Bhatta, J., Dhakal, R. P., Sullivan, T. J., & Lanyon, M. (2022). Low-damage rocking precast concrete cladding panels: Design approach and experimental validation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(9), 4387–4420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1830201. Bianchi, S., Ciurlanti, J., & Pampanin, S. (2021). Comparison of traditional vs low-damage structural and non-structural building systems through a cost/performance-based evaluation. Earthquake Spectra, 37(1), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020952445. Bianchi, S., Ciurlanti, J., & Pampanin, S. (2019, September). Seismic vulnerability of non-structural components: from traditional solutions to innovative low-damage systems. Paper presented at the SECED 2019 Conference, London, England. http://seced.org.uk/images/newsletters/4.5.pdf. Bianchi, S., & Pampanin, S. (2022). Fragility Functions for Architectural Nonstructural Components. Journal of structural engineering, 148(10), 3122005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003352. Caterino, N., Del Zoppo, M., Maddaloni, G., Bonati, A., Cavanna, G., & Occhiuzzi, A. (2017). Seismic assessment and finite element modelling of glazed curtain walls. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 61(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.1.077. Desai, N. (2011). A study of the behavior of veneer wall systems in medium rise buildings under seismic loads. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Louisville, Kentucky). Retrieved from https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/337/. Gorenc, B., & Beg, D. (2016). Curtain wall façade system under lateral actions with regard to limit states. Steel Construction, 9(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201400001. Haese, A. (2019). Revolving entrance doors: Machines or structural elements?. Glass Structures and Engineering, 4(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-018-0081-x. Huang, S., Samali, B., & Li, J. (2021). Numerical and experimental investigations of a thermal break composite façade mullion under four-point bending. Journal of Building Engineering, 34, 101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101590. Lee, H., Oh, M., Seo, J., & Kim, W. (2021). Seismic and energy performance evaluation of large-scale curtain walls subjected to displacement control fasteners. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(15), 6725. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156725. Martins, A. P. G. (2018). Seismic behaviour of masonry veneer walls. (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho, Portugal). Retrieved from https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/59015/1/PhDthesis_Andreia_Martins.pdf. Memari, A. M., Behr, R. A., & Kremer, P. A. (2004). Dynamic racking crescendo tests on architectural glass fitted with anchored pet film. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2004)10:1(5). Memari, A. M., Kremer, P. A., & Behr, R. A. (2006). Architectural glass panels with rounded corners to mitigate earthquake damage. Earthquake Spectra, 22(1), 129–150. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1193/1.2164875?journalCode=eqsa. Miranda, E., Kazantzi, A. K., & Vamvatsikos, D. (2018, June). New approach to the design of acceleration-sensitive non-structural elements in buildings. Paper presented at the 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325988163_New_approach_to_the_design_of_acceleration-sensitive_non-structural_elements_in_buildings. Misir, I. S., Ozcelik, O., Girgin, S. C., & Yucel, U. (2016). The behavior of infill walls in RC frames under combined bidirectional loading. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 20(4), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1104748. O'Brien Jr, W. C., Memari, A. M., Kremer, P. A., & Behr, R. A. (2012). Fragility curves for architectural glass in stick-built glazing systems. Earthquake Spectra, 28(2), 639–665. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1193/1.4000011. Okail, H. O., Shing, P. B., Klingner, R. E., McGinley, W. M., & McLean, D. I. (2010, July). Shaking-table testing of single-story clay masonry veneer wood-frame building. Paper presented at the 9th US national and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering: reaching beyond borders, Toronto, Ontario. https://www.caee.ca/10CCEEpdf/2010EQConf-000084.pdf. Okail, H. O., Shing, P. B., Klingner, R. E., & McGinley, W. M. (2008, October). Seismic performance of clay masonry veneer. Paper presented at the 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pui-Shum-Shing-2/publication/228676436_SEISMIC_PERFORMANCE_OF_CLAY_MASONRY_VENEER/links/54a17b250cf257a6360371b1/SEISMIC-PERFORMANCE-OF-CLAY-MASONRY-VENEER.pdf. Pantoli, E. (2016). Seismic Behavior of Architectural Precast Concrete Cladding Panels and Connections (Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8x06n6mc. Pao, K. (2002). Performance-based seismic design of buildings considering architectural elements (Doctoral Dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago) Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/1af7a2805d0ff3e6430671f10d38307b/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y. Pereira, M. F. P., Pereira, M. F., Ferreira, J. E., & Lourenço, P. B. (2011, June). Behavior of masonry infill panels in RC frames subjected to in plane and out of plane loads. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference AMCM 2011, Kraków, Poland. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/14880. Reneckis, D., & LaFave, J. M. (2010, July). Seismic fragility assessment of residential anchored brick veneer walls. Paper presented at the 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2010, Including Papers from the 4th International Tsunami Symposium, Toronto, Ontario. https://www.caee.ca/10CCEEpdf/2010EQConf-001144.pdf. Reyes, J. C., Correal, J. F., Gonzalez-Mancera, A., Echeverry, J. S., Gómez, I. D., Sandoval, J. D., & Ángel, C. C. (2020). Experimental evaluation of permeable cable-supported façades subjected to wind and earthquake loads. Engineering Structures, 214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110679. Sigmund, V., & Penava, D. (2012, September). Experimental study of masonry infilled R/C frames with opening. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_2322.pdf. Sivanerupan, S., Wilson, J. L., Gad, E. F., & Lam, N.T.K. (2016). Analytical study of point fixed glass facxade systems under monotonic in-plane loading. Advances in Structural Engineering, 19(4), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216630192. Sivanerupan, S., Wilson, J., Gad, E., & Lam, N. (2014). Drift performance of point fixed glass façade systems. Advances in Structural Engineering, 17(10), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.10.1481. Tasligedik, A. S., & Pampanin, S. (2017). Rocking cantilever clay brick infill wall panels: A novel low damage infill wall system. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 21(7), 1023–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1190797. Tasnimi, A. A., & Mohebkhah, A. (2011). Investigation on the behavior of brick-infilled steel frames with openings, experimental and analytical approaches. Engineering Structures, 33(3), 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.018. Torres, J., Guitart, N., & Teixidor, C. (2017). Glass fins with embedded titanium inserts for the façades of the new Medical School of Montpellier. Glass Structures and Engineering, 2(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-017-0049-2. Villazón, R. E., Medina, J. M., Parra, N., Ramos, D., & Murillo, L. D. (2020). A Detailed Look at Ceramic Façade Systems in Bogotá Searching Innovation Opportunities. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 8(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2020.2.4210. Xiang, Y., Zhang, Y.-J., Guo, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Effect of the primary structure on the seismic response of the cable-net façade. Engineering Structures, 220, 110989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110989.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 465 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 338

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

نمای پایا در برابر زلزله برای ساختمان‌های میان‌مرتبه: مرور دامنه