دانش همیشه قدرت نیست! تحلیل جامعه شناختی سلطه گفتمان روانشناسی گرایی در ایران

 

Amzadt, J., Femi, O., and Abdullahi, A. (2015). "Realist and Nominalist Traditions in Sociological Theorizing." Pp. 137-47 in Foundations of the Social Sciences, edited by Ilufoye Ogundiya and Jimoh Amzadt. Lagos: Malthouse.

Bagheri, Kh. (2007). Neopragmatism and the philosophy of education: examining the views of Willard Quine and Richard Rorty in education. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [in Persian]

Bashgah-e Khabarnegaran-e Javan. (2020). Available at www.yjc.news/00VTo8. [in Persian]

Bhaskar, R. (2005). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences: Routledge.

Clarke, S., & Walsh, A. (2009). Scientific imperialism and the proper relations between the sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 23(2), 195-207.

Coser, L. (1994). Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. Translated by Mohsen Solasi. Tehran: Elmi Press. [in Persian]

Dana News Agency. (2013). Available at http://danakhabar.com/fa/news/1160713. [in Persian]

Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York. Touchstone, Simon and Schuster.

Dupré, J. (1995). Against scientific imperialism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association,

Dupré, J. (2001). Human nature and the limits of science. Clarendon Press.

Foucault, M. (2010). The Order of Things: Archeology of the Humanities. Translated by Yahya Emami. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies, Ministry of Science. [in Persian]

Heydari, A. (2016). Psychology, Governance and Neoliberalism. Sociological Review, 24(1): 9-39. [in Persian]

Imna News Agency. (2016). Available at www.imna.ir/news. [in Persian]

Mäki, U. (2002). Explanatory ecumenism and economics imperialism. Economics and Philosophy, 18(2), 237-259.

Mäki, U. (2013). Scientific imperialism: Difficulties in definition, identification, and assessment. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 325-339.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1. Penguin Books.

McDonald, M., & O'Callaghan, J. (2008). Positive psychology: A Foucauldian critique. The Humanistic psychologists, 36 (2), 127-142.

Mehr News Agency. (2015). Available at mehrnews.com/xGx3Y. [in Persian]

Parsania, H., and Talei Ardakani, M. (2012). Fundamental methodology and applied methodology in social sciences with emphasis on realism and nominalism. Cultural and Social Knowledge Quarterly, 14(2): 73-96. [in Persian]

Pinto, M. F. (2017). Imperializing epistemology: Shortcomings of the naturalistic turn. In U. Mäki, A. Walsh, & M. Fernández Pinto (Eds.), Scientific Imperialism (pp. 274-290). Routledge.

Popper, K. (2017). Open Society and its Enemies. Translated by Rahmatollah Jabbari. Tehran: Publishing Company. [in Persian]

Quine, W. V. (1969). Epistemology Naturalized. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.

Ritzer, George. 2011. "Sociological theory, eight edition." New York, America: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Rosling, Hans. (2019). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong about the World--And Why Things Are Better than You Think. Translated by Ali Kazemian. Second edition. Tehran: Kargdan Publishing. [in Persian]

Stigler, G. J. (1984). Economics: The imperial science? the scandinavian Journal of economics, 86(3), 301-313.

Therese, L., B. (2002). Doing Social Research. Translated by Houshang Naebi. Tehran: Soroush Press. [in Persian]

Zairi, Q., and Narimani, A. (2019). Negation of the social: the emergence of individualistic discourses in post-war Iran (psychology of success, mysticism and economic man). Journal of Sociological Review, (56): 9-49. [in Persian]