پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,107,135 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,212,120 |
تحلیل مولفه های تاثیر گذار در مدیریت بحران در نواحی روستایی از دیدگاه کارشناسان و خبرگان | ||
| پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی | ||
| دوره 56، شماره 3، تیر 1403، صفحه 133-148 اصل مقاله (1.4 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2023.334796.1008418 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| احمد حجاریان* | ||
| گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تداوم مخاطرات طبیعی و آسیب‌پذیری نواحی روستایی موجب شده تا این مخاطرات به بحران‌هایی بدل گردند که هرساله خسارات فراوانی را برجای می‌گذارند، با توجه به اینکه وضعیت مدیریت بحران، نقش بسزایی در کنترل و تبدیل مخاطرات طبیعی دارد، در این راستا نیاز است که وضعیت نواحی روستایی مورد مداقه و تحلیل قرار گیرد. لذا ارائه مدلی متناسب در پایش و مدیریت بحران به حل مشکلات عدیده در زمینه بلاهای طبیعی می‌تواند کمک کند. مناطق روستایی استان اصفهان دارای روستاهای بسیار زیادی می‌باشد که نبود قوانین و برنامه‌ای متناسب در زمینه کنترل و مدیریت مخاطرات طبیعی، منابع زیادی را نابود خواهد کرد که این امر بررسی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های مؤثر در مدیریت ریسک و تبیین الگوی برنامه‌ریزی متناسب آن را طلب می‌کند. لذا هدف از این مطالعه تحلیل مؤلفه‌های مؤثر در مدیریت بحران نواحی روستایی استان اصفهان می‌باشد. روش تحقیق توصیفی- تحلیلی است و جهت گردآوری داده‌ها از مطالعات میدانی استفاده‌شده است. ابزار مورداستفاده برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه بود که با توجه به‌مرور زمینه تحقیق و انجام مصاحبه‌های فردی با کارشناسان اداره کل مدیریت بحران منطقه طراحی گردید. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل 22 نفر از مدیران مرتبط هستند که در حوزه مدیریت بحران فعالیت داشتند. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از معادلات ساختاری استفاده‌شده است. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده حاکی از آن است که شاخص برنامه‌ریزی (30/0)، آموزش و ترویج (18/0)، قوانین و مقررات (66/0)، اطلاع‌رسانی (46/0) و عامل زیربنایی (22/0) از بارهای عاملی را تبیین می‌نماید. دیدگاه ساختاری و جامع، جهت شناخت عوامل مؤثر بر وضعیت مدیریت بحران نواحی روستایی وجه تمایز این پژوهش با سایر پژوهش‌ها می‌باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مدیریت؛ بحران؛ معادلات ساختاری؛ نواحی روستایی؛ استان اصفهان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of effective components in crisis management in rural areas from the perspective of experts | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ahmad Hajarian | ||
| Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Extended Abstract Introduction the lack of an appropriate model in crisis monitoring and management has added to many problems in this area. The province isfahan has lost a lot of resources due to the lack of integrated management and planning, infrastructure and structural problems, cumbersome laws and regulations in the field of control and management of crises caused by natural hazards, which leads to a comprehensive approach to management. And requires monitoring of land, water, soil, manpower, and the evaluation and explanation of the appropriate planning model. Given the recent situation in Isfahan province and the increasing trend of unprecedented natural and unnatural disasters in this province, as well as unstable villages, having a general analysis of various indicators of the crisis is now considered an undeniable necessity. For this reason, it is important to study the effective components in crisis management and provide a model appropriate to the conditions of rural areas of Isfahan province. Methodology The present study was conducted by analytical-descriptive method with the aim of presenting a crisis management model in rural areas of Isfahan province. The statistical population includes 22 experts of the General Directorate of Crisis Management of Isfahan Province. The tool used to collect information was a questionnaire that was designed with regard to reviewing the research field and conducting individual interviews with experts of the General Directorate of Crisis Management. It has two parts. The first part was related to the respondents' personal characteristics including gender, age, level of education, occupation, number of households and income. The second part was questions related to natural hazard management and was used in the form of a five-level Likert scale (very low = 1 to very high = 5). The face and content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed with the corrective opinion of university professors and experts and after making the necessary corrections in several stages. In the present study, Cronbach's alpha method was used to assess the validity of the measuring instrument. Results and discussion The strength of the relationship between the factor (hidden variable) and the observable variable is indicated by the factor load. The factor load is a value between zero and one. If the factor load is less than 0.3, a weak relationship is considered and ignored. A factor load of between 0.3 and 0.6 is acceptable, and if greater than 0.6 it is highly desirable. It can be seen that all the observed variables had positive and significant regression effect coefficients with their scales and the magnitude of these coefficients is relatively high for all cases, of all factor loads at the level of / 001. They are meaningful. As can be seen, in this table no significant level is reported for the factor loads or the standard regression coefficients of the five observed variables. This is because these variables are considered as reference variables for planning, education and promotion, rules and regulations, information and infrastructure, respectively, so that these variables are hidden without scale, in other words. That is why the initial path diagrams on the arrows corresponding to the paths between these observed variables are considered to be the hidden variable corresponding to the values of 1, the AVE criterion showing the mean variance to it is shared between each structure with its own characteristics. Simply put, AVE (average variance extracted) is used to validate convergence and shows a high correlation between the indices of one structure compared to the correlation of indices of other structures. The value of this coefficient is from zero to one variable that values higher than 0.5 are accepted. Convergent validity or extracted mean variance (AVE) for the planning index / 766., Education and Extension Index was 0.711, Rules and Regulations Index was 0.799, Information Index was 0.526 and Infrastructure Index was 0.626. Also, the value of structural reliability coefficient or combined reliability (CR) varies from zero to one. Values above 0.7 are accepted, which is / 755 for the planning index., Education and Extension Index was 0.737, Rules and Regulations Index was 0.802, Information Index was 0.514 and Infrastructure Index was 0.526, which indicates the appropriateness of these subscales. All path coefficients show high values, the intensity of which was observed in relation to the factor loads of the variables. These are: planning (0.30), education and extension (0.18), rules and regulations (0.66), information (0.46) and infrastructure (0.22). Conclusion Findings showed that the first factor, called "planning", is the result of the thinking of individuals and the participation of that community. Therefore, it is necessary to look at them in accordance with the environmental conditions and the potentials and capabilities of the region. Therefore, this factor is one of the important factors for crisis managers that requires careful attention and strategic and practical thinking. This factor can be compared with the research findings and which in the research believe that crisis management requires planning of all stakeholders in society. The second factor, referred to as "education and promotion", showed that this factor, according to personal needs and changing sciences and special circumstances, will provide the basis for reducing vulnerability, so it is necessary to Providing integrated management of education and promotion of villagers should be at the top of crisis management priorities. The third factor, called "weakness of rules and regulations", has been approved as one of the main structures in crisis management. In fact, this structure is considered as one of the most important and challenging factors in crisis management. Therefore, this factor showed that the enforcement of laws and regulations can play an important role in improving crisis management and therefore it is necessary to pay major attention to it at the national, regional and local (rural) level. This factor can also be compared with the research findings which emphasized this index in their research, and mentioned it as the basis for improving rangeland management. The fourth factor, called "information", can help manage crisis through the use of knowledge and up-to-date information. This factor can be compared with research findings and they believe that receiving knowledge and information, especially indigenous knowledge from various sources is effective. Also, the role of formal and non-formal education should not be overlooked. The fifth factor, called the "infrastructure factor", indicates that structural facilities can provide the basis for better management. This factor can be reconciled with the research findings. He states that infrastructure and structural indicators are one of the important factors in improving crisis management. Funding There is no funding support. Authors’ Contribution Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none. Conflict of Interest Authors declared no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Crisis, management, structural equations, rural areas, Isfahan province | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
ازکیا، مصطفی؛ شیرزاد، حسین و صادقی، محمد. (1384). اصول ایمنی و مقابله با حوادث پیش‌بینی‌نشده در مناطق روستایی. انتشارات سازمان شهرداری‌ها و دهیاری‌های کشور، چاپ اول آهنچی، محمد. (1376). مدیریت سوانح: مفاهیم، اصول و تئوری‌ها. کتاب یکم، مرکز آموزش و تحقیقات جمعیت هلال‌احمر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، تهران. بیرودیان، نادر. (1395). مدیریت بحران و اصول ایمنی در حوادث غیرمنتظره. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی، مشهد، چاپ دوم سعدآبادی، علی‌اصغر و عظیمی، محدثه. (1393). شناسایی اقدامات اساسی در مراحل مدیریت بحران به کمک روش فازی (موردمطالعه: شناسایی اقدامات اساسی در مراحل مدیریت بحران زلزله). مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 2(6)، 31-54. جهانگیری، کتایون. (1389). اصول و مبانی مدیریت بحران. انتشارات هلال ایران، چاپ اول حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1391). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. انتشارات سمت، چاپ پنجم رزاقی بورخانی، فاطمه، رضوانفر، احمد؛ موحد محمدی، سید حمید و حجازی، سید یوسف. (1396). راهکارهای کاهش مخاطرات طبیعی و مدیریت ریسک در توسعه پایدار باغات مرکبات استان مازندران. تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، ۴ (۳)، ۳۵-۵۲ رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا و وزین، نرگس. (1394). مطالعه تعیین تفاوت اثربخشی دو دانش بومی و نوین در کاهش آسیب‌پذیری جوامع روستایی در برابر بلایای طبیعی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای بخش خورش‌رستم شهرستان خلخال). پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی، 47(4)، 727-742. . doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2015.52627 کریمی، خدیجه؛ ریاحی، وحید؛ عزیزپور، فرهاد و تقی لو، علی‌اکبر. (1396). تحلیلی بر ناکارآمدی نظام مدیریت بحران در دگرگونی فضایی مناسب نواحی روستایی موردمطالعه: شهرستان ارومیه. تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، ۴ (۲)،87-۱۰۶ کشاورز، مرضیه و کرمی، رویا. (1401). آسیب‌پذیری ساختاری و سازگاری موقعیتی خانوارهای کشاورز با تغییر اقلیم: واکاوی تجربی استان زنجان. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 18(2)، 123-143. doi/full/10.5555/20230121203 فرجی سبکبار، حسنعلی؛ بدری، سیدعلی؛ عباسی ورکی، رضا و عباسی ورکی، الهام. (1393). تحلیل فضایی اثرات مخاطرات طبیعی در نواحی روستایی با استفاده از مدل مؤلفه‌های اصلی وزن جغرافیایی (مطالعه موردی: حوضه الموت قزوین). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 3(2)، 111-128. . doi: 10.22067/geo.v3i2.27223 قاسمی، وحید. (1389)، مدل‌سازی معادله ساختاری با کاربرد Amos Graphics. تهران: نشر جامعه شناسان. عباسی، حامد؛ شرفی، سیامک و مریانجی، زهره. (1396). تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات ژئومورفیک تهدیدکننده مجتمع‌های زیستی شهری در استان لرستان. نشریه تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، 4 (2)، 107-125. عبدی، علی؛ رحمانی، بیژن و تاج، شهره. (1398). ارائه الگوی مدیریت بحران در مناطق روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان قرچک). فصلنامه جغرافیا (برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای)، 9(37)، 203-226. علیجانی، بهلول. (1393). مبانی فلسفی مخاطرات محیطی. تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، ۱ (۱)، ۱-۱۵ غلامی، مصیب؛ علی بیگی، امیرحسین و سواری، مسلم. (1394). پدیدارشناسی ادراک کشاورزان از خشک‌سالی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان سرپل ذهاب). تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 46(3)، 439-456. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.55518 نگارش، حسین و یاری، یاسمن. (1392). تحلیل مدیریت ریسک و بحران مخاطرات محیطی و طبیعی استان لرستان. نشریه جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 7(5)، 126-107. هادی زاده بزاز، مریم. (1386). مدیریت بحران: کاهش آسیب‌پذیری در برابر بلایای طبیعی. انتشارات آذر برزین، چاپ اول Reference Abbasi H, sharafi S, maryakji Z. (2017). Geomorphological hazards threatening the spatial analysis of urban living complex in Lorestan province. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards. 4 (2),107-125. [In Persian]. Abdi, A., Rahmani, B., & Taj, S. (2020). Presentation of crisis management model in rural areas (case study: villages of Qarchak city). Geography (Regional Planning), 9(37), 203-226. [In Persian]. Ahanchi, M. (1997). Disaster Management: Concepts, Principles and Theories. Book 1, Red Crescent Education and Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran. [In Persian]. Alijani, B. (2014). Philosophical Foundation of environmental hazards. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards, 1 (1),1-15 Azkia, M., Shirzad, H., Sadeghi, M. (2004). Principles of Safety and Dealing with Unforeseen Accidents in Rural Areas. Publications of the Organization of Municipalities and Villages of the Country, First Edition. [In Persian]. Biroudian, N. (2016). Crisis Management and Safety Principles in Unexpected Events. Jihad University Press, Mashhad, second edition. [In Persian]. Bommer, J. J., Abrahamson, N. A., Strasser, F. O., Pecker, A., Bard, P. Y., Bungum, H., ... & Studer, J. (2004). The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions. Seismological Research Letters, 75(1), 82-95. Burby, R. J., Deyle, R. E., Godschalk, D. R., & Olshansky, R. B. (2000). Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Natural hazards review, 1(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988 Davies, T. R., & Davies, A. J. (2018). Increasing communities’ resilience to disasters: An impact-based approach. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 31, 742-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.026 Faraji Sabokbar, H., Badri, S. A., Abbasi Verki, R., & Verki, A. (2014). Spatial Analysis of Natural Hazards Effects in Rural Areas Using Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis (GWPCA) (Case study: Alamut in Qazvin). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 3(2), 111-128. doi: 10.22067/geo.v3i2.27223[In Persian]. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. doi/abs/10.1177/002224378101800104 Ghasemi, V. (2012). structural equation modeling using Amos Graphics. Tehran, Sociologists Publishing. [In Persian]. Gholami, M., Alibaygi, A. H., & Savari, M. (2015). Phenomenology of perception's farmers from drought (Case study: Sarepol-e-Zahab city). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research (IJAEDR), 46(3). doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2015.55518 [In Persian]. Hadizadeh Bazaz, M. (2006). Crisis management: reducing vulnerability to natural disasters. Azar Barzin Publications, first edition. [In Persian]. Hafez Nia, M. R. (2013). An Introduction to Research Methodology in Essay Sciences. Semat Publications, 5th Edition. [In Persian]. Hetu, S. N., Gupta, S., Vu, V. A., & Tan, G. (2018). A simulation framework for crisis management: Design and use. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 85, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.03.001 Jahangiri, K. (2009). principles and basics of crisis management. Hilal Iran Publications, first edition. [In Persian]. Jigyasu, R. (2004). Sustainable post disaster reconstruction through integrated risk management–the case of rural communities in South Asia. Journal of research in architecture and planning, 3, 32-43. Karimi, K., Riahi, V., Azizpour F., & Taghilou, A. (2016). An analysis on the inefficiency of the crisis management system in the appropriate spatial transformation of the rural areas under study: Urmia city. Spatial analysis of environmental hazards, 4 (2), 87-106. [In Persian]. Keshavarz, M., & Karami, R. (2023). Structural vulnerability and situated adaptation of farm families to climate change: an empirical investigation of Zanjan Province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 18(2), 123-143. doi/full/10.5555/20230121203 [In Persian]. Montz, B. E., & Tobin, G. A. (2011). Natural hazards: An evolving tradition in applied geography. Applied Geography, 31(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.005 Negaresh, H., & Yari, Y. (2013). Analysis of Environmental and Natural Hazards and Risk Management of Lorestan Province. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 2(1), 107-126. doi: 10.22067/geo.v2i1.21240 [In Persian]. Ostrowska, M., & Mazur, S. (2015). Risk in A Crisis situation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1054-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00373-1 Rahman, M. H., & Yamao, M. (2007). Community based organic farming and social capital in different network structures: Studies in two farming communities in Bangladesh. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2(2), 62-68. DIO:106317728/ajabssp.2007.62 Razzaghi Burkhani, F., Rizvanfar, A., Mohammadi, S. H., Hejazi, Y. (2017). Strategies to reduce natural hazards and risk management in the sustainable development of citrus orchards in Mazandaran province. Spatial analysis of environmental hazards, 4 (3), 52-35. [In Persian]. Ruknuddin Eftekhari, R., & Vazin, N. (2014). A study to determine the difference in the effectiveness of both native and modern knowledge in reducing the vulnerability of rural communities against natural disasters (case study: villages in Khorsrostam district of Khalkhal). Human Geography Research, 47(4), 727-742. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2015.52627[In Persian]. Saadabadi, A. A., & Azimi, M. (2014). Identifying the basic actions in phases of disaster management using fuzzy technique. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 2(6), 31-54. [In Persian]. Shook, C. L., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic management journal, 25(4), 397-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.385 Tokakis, V., Polychroniou, P., & Boustras, G. (2019). Crisis management in public administration: The three phases model for safety incidents. Safety science, 113, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.013 Traoré, B. B., Kamsu-Foguem, B., Tangara, F., & Tiako, P. (2018). Software services for supporting remote crisis management. Sustainable cities and society, 39, 814-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.029 UNISDR )United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction(. (2016). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 234 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 150 |
||