پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,572 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,027 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,499,065 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,761,265 |
عوامل موثر بر پذیرش روش‌های مکانیکی و غیرمکانیکی حفاظت آب و خاک توسط کشاورزان دشت همدان-بهار (کاربرد الگوی لاجیت چندگانه) | ||
| تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران | ||
| دوره 55، شماره 2، تیر 1403، صفحه 271-287 اصل مقاله (1.04 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2023.347708.669172 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مصطفی بنی اسدی* 1؛ نسرین رضایی2 | ||
| 1گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تخریب منابع پایه کشاورزی یکی از بزرگترین چالش‌های پیش‌روی تامین امنیت غذایی پایدار است. هدف از این مطالعه بررسی عوامل موثر بر پذیرش شیوه‌های مکانیکی و غیرمکانیکی حفاظت از منابع پایه خاک و آب در دشت همدان-بهار می‌باشد. داده‌های این مطالعه از طریق تکمیل پرسشنامه و مصاحبه با 191 کشاورز در سال زراعی 1401-1400 بدست آمد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها، از الگوهای لاجیت ساده و لاجیت چندگانه استفاده گردید. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که عوامل اثرگذار بر پذیرش روش‌های غیرمکانیکی و مکانیکی حفاظتی به لحاظ آماری از یکدیگر قابل تفکیک هستند. متغیرهای داشتن شغل غیرکشاورزی، ارزش هر هکتار زمین، تعهد نسبت به حفظ منابع پایه برای نسل آینده بر احتمال پذیرش روش‌های غیرمکانیکی و متغیرهای ارزش هر هکتار زمین، مبلغ تسهیلات دریافتی، اطلاع از منافع بلندمدت کشاورزی حفاظتی، تعهد نسبت به حفظ منابع پایه برای نسل آینده و عدم اعتماد به توصیه کارشناسان کشاورزی بر احتمال پذیرش روش‌های حفاظتی مکانیکی از سوی کشاورزان اثرگذار هستند. با توجه به نتایج بدست آمده، اقداماتی نظیر اعطای تسهیلات بلندمدت، کم‌بهره و هدفمند در جهت به‌کارگیری اقدامات حفاظتی، افزایش فعالیت‌های آموزشی-ترویجی توسط سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان، استفاده از رسانه‌های عمومی و شبکه‌های مجازی جهت آگاهی بخشی به کشاورزان، ایجاد زمینه‌های شغلی غیرکشاورزی و تنوع بخشی اقتصادی در مناطق روستایی از جمله سیاست‌های پیشنهادی موثر بر پذیرش روش‌های کشت حفاظتی است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کشاورزی حفاظتی؛ مدل لاجیت چندگانه؛ روش‌های حفاظتی مکانیکی؛ روش‌های حفاظتی غیرمکانیکی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The factors affecting the acceptance of mechanical and non-mechanical methods of water and soil conservation by farmers of Hamedan-Bahar plain (application of the multinominal logit model) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mostafa Baniasadi1؛ Nasrin Rezae2 | ||
| 1Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Destruction of basic agricultural resources is one of the biggest challenges facing sustainable food security. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors influencing the adoption of mechanical and non-mechanical methods of soil and water resources conservation in Hamedan-Bahar plain. The data of this study was obtained by completing the questionnaire and interviewing 191 farmers in the crop year of 2021-2022. For data analysis, general logit and multinominal logit models were used. The results of this study showed that the factors affecting the acceptance of non-mechanical and mechanical conservation methods can be statistically separated from each other. The variables of having a non-agricultural job, the value of each hectare of land, the commitment to preserve basic resources for the future generation on the probability of accepting non- mechanical methods, and the variables of the value of each hectare of land, the amount of credits received, knowledge of the long-term benefits of conservation agriculture, the commitment to preserve basic resources for The future generation and lack of trust in the advice of agricultural experts have significant effect on the probability of acceptance of mechanical protection methods by farmers. According to the results, measures such as granting long-term, low-interest and targeted facilities for the use of protective measures, increasing educational-promotional activities by the provincial agricultural organization, using public media and virtual networks to inform farmers, creating non-agricultural job fields and diversification of the economic sector in rural areas is one of the proposed policies effective on the acceptance of conservation cultivation methods. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Conservation agriculture, Multinominal logit model, Mechanical conservation methods, Non-mechanical conservation methods | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahzadeh, G., Farahi, N. & Sharifzadeh, M.S. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of conservation measures in soil erosion control: A case of orchard lands of Chehel-Chay watershed. Journal of Environmental Erosion Research, 7(1), 50-68. (In Persian) Abedi, S., Yazdani, S., Saleh, I., salami, H. & Jahansuz, M.R. (2014). Analysis of factors affecting adoption of agriculture conservation in Fars provinces. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 45-2(2), 247-255. (In Persian) Akter, Sh., Gathala, M.K., Timsina, J., Islam, S., Rahman, M., Hassan, M.K. & Ghosh, A.K. (2021). Adoption of conservation agriculture-based tillage practices in the rice-maize systems in Bangladesh. World Development Perspectives, 21, 100297. Asfaw, D. & Neka, M. (2017). Factors affecting adoption of soil and water conservation practices: The case of Wereillu Woreda (District), South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. International Soiland Water Conservation Research, 5, 273-279. Belayneh, M. (2023). Factors affecting the adoption and effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures among small-holder rural farmers: The case of Gumara watershed. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 18, 200159. Bikal, K., Jay, D. & Shiva, D. (2015). Level op adoption and factor affecting the level of adoption of sustainable soil management practices in Ramechhhap district, Nepal. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(2), 21-24. Corbeels, M., de Craaff, J., Ndah, T. H., Penot, E., Baudron, F., Naudin, K., Nadine A., Chirat, G., Schuler, J., Nyagumbo, I., Rusinamhodzi, L., Traore, K., Mzoba, H.D. & Adolwa, I.S. (2014). Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: A multi-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187(C): 155-70. D’Souza, A. & Ashok, K.M. (2018). Adoption and abandonment of partial conservation technologies in developing economies: The case of South Asia. Land Use Policy, 70(C), 212-223. Darkwah, K.A., Kwawu, J.D., Agyire-Tettey, F. & Sarpong, D.B. (2019). Assessment of the determinants that influence the adoption of sustainable soil and water conservation practices in Techiman Municipality of Ghana. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 7(3), 248-257. Derajew, F., Bekabil, F. & Wagayehu, B., (2013). Determinants of the use of soil conservation technological small holder farmers: The case of Hulet Eju Enesie district, east Gojjam zone, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 24, 123-139. Erfanifar, S. Zibaei, M. & Kasraei, M. (2014). Identifying socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption of modern conservation tillage technologies in Darab region (Multinomial logit model approach). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(3), 197-203. (In Persian) Fantappiè, M., Lorenzetti, R., De Meo, I. & Costantini, E.A.C. (2020). How to improve the adoption of soil conservation practices? Suggestions from farmers' perception in western Sicily. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 186-202. Fikru, A. (2009). Assessment of adoption of soil and water conservation practice in Koga watershed, high lands of Ethiopia. Unpublished Master Thesis, Faculty of Graduate School, Cornell University, Ithaca, US. Gathala, M. K., Jat, M. L., Saharawat, Y. S., Sharma, S. K., Singh, Y. & Ladha, J. K. (2017). Physical and chemical properties of a sandy loam soil under irrigated rice-wheat sequence in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia. Journal of Ecosystem and Echography, 7, 246. Gathala, M. K., Laing, A. M., Tiwari, T. P., Timsina, J., Islam, S., Bhattacharya, P. M., Dhar, T., Ghosh, A., Sinh, A.K., Chowdhury, A.K., Hossain, S., Hossain, I., Molla, S., Rashid, M., Kumar, S., Kumar, R., Dutta, S.K., Srivastwa, P.K., … & Gérard, G. (2020a). Energy-efficient, sustainable crop production practices benefit smallholder farmers and the environment of the Eastern Gangetic Plains, South Asia. Journal Cleaner Production, 246, 118982. Gathala, M. K., Laing, A. M., Tiwari, T. P., Timsina, J., Islam, M. S., Chowdhury, A. K., Chattopadhyay, C., Singh, A. K., Bhatt, B. P., Shrestha, R., Barma, N. C. D., Rana, D. S., Jackson, T. M. & Gerard, B. (2020b). Enabling smallholder farmers to sustainably improve their food, energy and water nexus while achieving environmental and economic benefits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109645. Gathala, M.K., Timsina, J., Islam, M. S., Rahman, M. M., Hossain, M. I., Harun-Ar-Rashid, M.d., Ghosh, A. K., Krupnik, T. J., Tiwari, T. P. & McDonald, A. (2015). Conservation agriculture-based tillage and crop establishment options can maintain farmers’ yields and increase profits in South Asia’s rice–maize systems: Evidence from Bangladesh. Field Crops Research, 172, 85–98. Greene, W.H. (2012). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 7th edition. Harding, A., & Greenwell, H. (2001). Trends in Income and Expenditure Inequality in the 1980s and 1990s. Paper Presented to the 30th Annual Conference of Economists. Perth, Western Australia, pp: 118-127. Jat, M.L., Chakraborty, D., Ladha, J.K., Rana, D.S., Gathala, M.K., McDonald, A. & Gerard, B. (2020). Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 336-343. Jozi, S.A., Roniasi, N. & Ataee, S. (2017). Evaluating the environmental vulnerability of the groundwater of Hamedan’s Dasht-e Bahar through DRASTIC, GODS and AVI integrated methods. Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources, 6(2), 65-82. (In Persian). Judg, G., Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W.E., Lutkepol, H. & Lee, T.C. (1988). Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. John Wiley and Sona Inc. 2nd Edition. Kassam, A., Derpsch, R. & Friedrich, T. (2014). Global achievements in soil and water conservation: The case of Conservation Agriculture. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2(1), 5-13. Kassam, A., Friedrich, T. & Derpsch, R. (2018). Global spread of Conservation Agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(1), 29-51. Kolstoe, S., Vander Naald, B. & Cohan, A. (2022). A tale of two samples: Understanding WTP differences in the age of social media. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101420. Krishna, R., Bicol Ingrid, I.P. & Giridhari, S. (2008). Determinants of farmers' adoption of improved soil conservation technology: In a middle mountain watershed of central Nepal. Environmental Management, 42, 210-222. Mazvimavi, K. & Twomlow, S. (2009). Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 101(1-2), 20-29. Moghaddasi, M., Khodaverdizadeh, M., Hashemi Bonab, S. & Sokouti Oskoee, R. (2018). Evaluation of factors affecting the adoption of soil conservation non-mechanical methods in order to maintain the sustainability (Case study: Urmia County). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(4), 229-245. (In Persian) Momeni, D., Hayati, B., Dashti, G. & Rezaei, A. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of soil mechanical conservation practices in dry Llands of the Izeh township. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 42-2(4), 513-524. (In Persian) Morello, T.F., Marie-Gabrielle, P., Gardner, T., Parry, L., Barlow, J., Ferreira, J. & Tancredi, N.S. (2018). Fertilizer Adoption by Smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: Farm-level Evidence. Ecological Economics, 144, 278-291. Mozaffari, M.M. (2016). Factors influencing on farmers' participation in using soil and water conservation practices (Case study: Alamout region). Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 8(3), 75-89. (In Persian) Mulugeta, D. & Stahar, K. (2010). Assessment of integrated soil and water conservation measures on key soil properties in South Gonder, North West highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 1(7), 164-176. Noori, S.H., Jamshidi, A.R., Jamshidi, M., Hedayati Moghadam, Z. & Fathi, E. (2014). Survey on factors affecting the acceptance of soil conservation measures, a step towards sustainable agriculture; Case study: township of Shirvan and Chardavol. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 45(1), 195-205. (In Persian) Parhizkari, A., Mozaffari, M.M., Hosseini Khdodadi, M. & Parhizkari, R. (2016). Study of effective factors on farmers' participation of Shahroud watershed (Qazvin province) in applying soil and water conservation practices using multinomial logit model. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7(13), 253-241. (In Persian) Savari, M., Yazdanpanah, M. & Rouzaneh, D. (2022). Factors affecting the implementation of soil conservation practices among Iranian farmers. Scientific Reports, 12, 8396. Sinden, J.A. & King, D.A. (1990). Articles and totes adoption of soil conservation measures in Irland shire, New South Wales. Review Marketing and Agricultural Economics, 58(2-3), 179-192. Tabaraee, M. & Hassannejad, M. (2009). Factors affecting the acceptance of agricultural extension programs with regards to process of agricultural development: Case study of wheat farmers in Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(1), 59-68. (In Persian) Tiwari, K.R., Sitaula, B.K., Nyborg, I.L.P. & Paudel, G.S. (2008). Determinant of farmer adoption of introduced soil and water conservation technology in middle mountain watershed of central Nepal. Environmental Management, 42, 210-222. Yacouba Karidjo, B., Wang, Zh., Boubacar, Y. & Wei, C. (2018). Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil and water control technology (SWCT) in Keita valley, a semi-arid area of Niger. Sustainability, 10, 288. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 249 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 258 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب