Integrating FMEA and BWM Methods to Evaluate and Prioritize Risks with Greater Differentiation (A Case Study of Operational Risks of Electricity Distribution Network)

Fallah Baghemoortini, Elham; Shishebori, Davood

doi:10.22059/aie.2023.353587.1857

فهرست نشریات

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

فهرست مجلات علمی- پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران

نحوه ارسال مقاله برای مجله- ثبت نام در سامانه- فراموش کردن رمز عبور

تعداد نشریات	158
تعداد شماره‌ها	6,236
تعداد مقالات	67,810
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	115,294,079
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	90,039,904

	Integrating FMEA and BWM Methods to Evaluate and Prioritize Risks with Greater Differentiation (A Case Study of Operational Risks of Electricity Distribution Network)
Advances in Industrial Engineering
دوره 57، شماره 1، شهریور 2023، صفحه 111-125 اصل مقاله (372.07 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/aie.2023.353587.1857
نویسندگان
Elham Fallah Baghemoortini؛ Davood Shishebori^*
Department of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده
One of the most important factors of socio-economic development in any country is the quality of electricity sources. Considering the sensitivity of electronic devices and the dependence of most activities on electricity, providing sustainable energy in the urban system is very important. Therefore, a comprehensive view of the factors causing disturbances in the electricity distribution network is very valuable in order to prevent any electricity losses. The goal of the current research is to identify, evaluate and prioritize operational risks in the aerial electricity distribution network. Any operational risk is a potential cause of the incident that leads to an unplanned outage. In this study, by reviewing the research literature, incidents recorded in the electricity distribution network incident registration system (known as the 121 system), and conducting interviews, 21 operational risk cases have been listed and approved by experts. On the other hand, to solve the limitations of the FMEA method, by combining the BWM method and using the knowledge of experts (completion of the questionnaire), evaluation and prioritization were done with more differentiation. The results showed that from the point of view of experts, the intensity index is critical (0.475). Also, three operational risks with high priority in the electricity distribution network of Yazd province include; Failure in concrete foundations, the impact of foreign objects, and failure in transformers. Statistics emphasize that high-priority risks are responsible for 27% of unplanned outages in the last ten years. Operators and managers of electricity distribution companies can consider high-priority risks and provide solutions to reduce, eliminate or transfer risks. In this case, in addition to minimizing unplanned outages in the network and selling more electricity, customer satisfaction is achieved.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Risk Assessment and Prioritization؛ Operational risk؛ Power Distribution Network؛ FMEA؛ BWM

مراجع
[1] Marcelino, C.G., Torres, V., Carvalho, L., Matos, M. and Miranda, V., 2022. Multi-objective identification of critical distribution network assets in large interruption datasets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 137, p.107747. [2] Khalili, S., Abbasi, E., Behnia, B. and Amirkhan, M., 2022. Proposing a New Mathematical Model for Optimizing the Purchase of Electricity Required by Large Consumers Based on Modern Portfolio Theory: A Case Study of the Iranian Electricity Market. Advances in Industrial Engineering, 56(1), pp.87-113. [3] Mosleh-Shirazi, Alineghi, Talenejad, Ahmad and Zamani, 2013. Reviewing the necessity of continuing restructuring strategies of Iran's electricity industry. Iranian Energy Economy Research Journal, 2(8), pp.129-161 [4] Alidadipour, A. and Khoshkalam Kh, 2021. Improving the efficiency of household electricity consumption and its return effect in Iran in terms of asymmetry in electricity prices. Economic Modeling Scientific Quarterly, 15(54), pp.47-66 [5] Qarapetian, G. Shahidepour, M. Zakir, B. 2017. Smart networks and microgrids. Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic) [6] Vahdani, B., Salimi, M. and Charkhchian, M., 2015. A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(1), pp.357-368. [7] Cao, X. and Deng, Y., 2019. A new geometric mean FMEA method based on information quality. Ieee Access, 7, pp.95547-95554. [8] Yousefi, S., Alizadeh, A., Hayati, J. and Baghery, M., 2018. HSE risk prioritization using robust DEA-FMEA approach with undesirable outputs: a study of automotive parts industry in Iran. Safety science, 102, pp.144-158. [9] Goodarzian, F., Bahrami, F. and Shishebori, D., 2022. A new location-allocation-problem for mobile telecommunication rigs model under crises and natural disasters: a real case study. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, pp.1-19. [10] Shishebori, D., Yousefi Babadi, A. and Noormohammadzadeh, Z., 2018. A Lagrangian relaxation approach to fuzzy robust multi-objective facility location network design problem. Scientia Iranica, 25(3), pp.1750-1767. [11] Moosa, I.A., 2007. Operational risk: a survey. Financial markets, institutions & instruments, 16(4), pp.167-200. [12] Gurtu, A. and Johny, J., 2021. Supply chain risk management: Literature review. Risks, 9(1), p.16. [13] Chernobai, A., Ozdagli, A. and Wang, J., 2021. Business complexity and risk management: Evidence from operational risk events in US bank holding companies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 117, pp.418-440. [14] Bai, X., Cheng, L. and Iris, Ç., 2022. Data-driven financial and operational risk management: Empirical evidence from the global tramp shipping industry. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 158, p.102617. [15] Nguyen, S., Chen, P.S.L. and Du, Y., 2022. Container shipping operational risks: an overview of assessment and analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(2), pp.279-299. [16] Wang, W., Liu, X., Chen, X. and Qin, Y., 2019. Risk assessment based on hybrid FMEA framework by considering decision maker’s psychological behavior character. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, pp.516-527. [17] Guimarães, A.C.F. and Lapa, C.M.F., 2004. Fuzzy FMEA applied to PWR chemical and volume control system. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 44(3), pp.191-213. [18] Kh., H. Edwardji, Haqifam. M. and Sheikh Al-Islami. M. 2016. Protection of electrical energy distribution networks. Hormozgan University, Research Committee of Hormozgan Regional Electricity Joint Stock Company [19] Ghasemzadeh, Z., Sadeghieh, A. and Shishebori, D., 2021. A stochastic multi-objective closed-loop global supply chain concerning waste management: A case study of the tire industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, pp.5794-5821. [20] Quiroga, O.A., Meléndez, J. and Herraiz, S., 2011, May. Fault causes analysis in feeders of power distribution networks. In International Conference in Renewables Energies and Quality Power, ICREP(Vol. 11, p. 11). [21] Sarwar Taherabadi, M. and Qarapetian, G. and Feridounian, A., 2013, Classification and analysis of error factors based on clustering technique in power distribution network, 19th Iran Optics and Photonics Conference and 5th Iran Photonics Engineering Conference, Zahedan, https:// civilica.com/doc/756061 [22] [22] Azar, Adel, Shahbazi, Yazdani, Mahmoudian and Omid, 2019. Assessing the resilience of the supply chain of the electricity industry in Iran: a fuzzy approach. Journal of Energy Planning and Policy Research, 5(1), pp. 28-7 [23] [23] Honarmand, M.E., Haghifam, M.R. and Ghazizadeh, M.S., 2015. Effect of Processes of Component Entry in Reliability of Electrical Distribution Networks. Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity, 4(1), pp.14-23. [24] Xie, K., Zhang, H. and Singh, C., 2016. Reliability forecasting models for electrical distribution systems considering component failures and planned outages. International journal of electrical power & energy systems, 79, pp.228-234. [25] Karim Abadi, A., Haji Abadi, M.E. and Kamyab, E., 2017. A review of the maintenance and equipment failure of transmission and Super distribution substations. Journal of Novel Researches on Electrical Power, 5(2), pp.20-31. [26] Souto, L., Meléndez, J. and Herraiz, S., 2021. Monitoring of low voltage grids with multilayer principal component analysis. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 125, p.106471. [27] Akbari, 2020. Optimum rearrangement of distribution networks with the aim of reducing losses, increasing reliability and improving voltage profile using wild mouse colony algorithm. New research in electricity, 9(1), pp.35-45 [28] Asadzadeh, S., 2019. Optimal Modeling and Forecasting of Equipment Failure Rate for the Electricity Distribution Network. Iranian Electric Industry Journal of Quality and Productivity, 8(1), pp.53-61. [29] Rezaee, M.J., Yousefi, S. and Babaei, M., 2017. Multi-stage cognitive map for failures assessment of production processes: an extension in structure and algorithm. Neurocomputing, 232, pp.69-82. [30] Rezaee, M.J., Yousefi, S., Valipour, M. and Dehdar, M.M., 2018. Risk analysis of sequential processes in food industry integrating multi-stage fuzzy cognitive map and process failure mode and effects analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 123, pp.325-337. [31] Abdel-Basset, M. and Mohamed, R., 2020. A novel plithogenic TOPSIS-CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, p.119586. [32] Tavana, M., Shaabani, A., Mansouri Mohammadabadi, S. and Varzgani, N., 2021. An integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy MULTIMOORA model for supply chain risk-benefit assessment and supplier selection. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 8(3), pp.238-261. [33] Gómez, J.C.O. and España, K.T., 2020. Operational risk management in the pharmaceutical supply chain using ontologies and fuzzy QFD. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, pp.1673-1679. [34] Dias, G.C., Hernandez, C.T. and Oliveira, U.R.D., 2020. Supply chain risk management and risk ranking in the automotive industry. Gestão & Produção, 27. [35] Rathore, R., Thakkar, J.J. and Jha, J.K., 2020. Evaluation of risks in foodgrains supply chain using failure mode effect analysis and fuzzy VIKOR. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. [36] El Baz, J. and Ruel, S., 2021. Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, p.107972. [37] Khan, S., Haleem, A. and Khan, M.I., 2021, January. Assessment of risk in the management of Halal supply chain using fuzzy BWM method. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal(Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 57-73). Taylor & Francis. [38] Khan, S., Haleem, A. and Khan, M.I., 2020. Risk management in Halal supply chain: an integrated fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach. Journal of Modelling in Management. Shishebori, D., Akhgari, M.J., Noorossana, R. and Khaleghi, G.H., 2015. An efficient integrated approach to reduce scraps of industrial manufacturing processes: a case study from gauge measurement tool production firm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76, pp.831-855.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 108 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 82

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

Integrating FMEA and BWM Methods to Evaluate and Prioritize Risks with Greater Differentiation (A Case Study of Operational Risks of Electricity Distribution Network)