سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,502
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,117,807
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,223,538
آراسته, مجتبی, زارعی, ملیکا, حاجی پور, خلیل. (1402). شناسایی و تحلیل متغیرهای کلیدی موثر بر توسعه ساختار فضایی روابط بندر-شهر مطالعه موردی: بندر-شهر دبی. , 11(2), 61-74. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.358642.1816
مجتبی آراسته; ملیکا زارعی; خلیل حاجی پور. "شناسایی و تحلیل متغیرهای کلیدی موثر بر توسعه ساختار فضایی روابط بندر-شهر مطالعه موردی: بندر-شهر دبی". , 11, 2, 1402, 61-74. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.358642.1816
آراسته, مجتبی, زارعی, ملیکا, حاجی پور, خلیل. (1402). 'شناسایی و تحلیل متغیرهای کلیدی موثر بر توسعه ساختار فضایی روابط بندر-شهر مطالعه موردی: بندر-شهر دبی', , 11(2), pp. 61-74. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.358642.1816
آراسته, مجتبی, زارعی, ملیکا, حاجی پور, خلیل. شناسایی و تحلیل متغیرهای کلیدی موثر بر توسعه ساختار فضایی روابط بندر-شهر مطالعه موردی: بندر-شهر دبی. , 1402; 11(2): 61-74. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.358642.1816

شناسایی و تحلیل متغیرهای کلیدی موثر بر توسعه ساختار فضایی روابط بندر-شهر مطالعه موردی: بندر-شهر دبی

پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری
مقاله 4، دوره 11، شماره 2، مرداد 1402، صفحه 61-74    اصل مقاله (1.13 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی - کاربردی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.358642.1816
نویسندگان
مجتبی آراسته* ؛ ملیکا زارعی؛ خلیل حاجی پور
گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
امروزه به دلیل تفاوت و تنوع عملکرد بنادر، نقش بنادر تغییر نموده و همین موضوع موجب ایجاد تغییرات قابل‌توجه در نحوه توسعه فضاهای شهری و همچنین تغییرات ساختاری در روابط میان بنادر و شهرها شده است. هدف از انجام این پژوهش، شناسایی و تبیین متغیرهای کلیدی موثر بر توسعه ساختار فضایی روابط بندر-شهر دبی است. روش پژوهش مبتنی بر الگوی تحلیلی-توصیفی و با بهره‌گیری از تکنیک روش تحلیل اثرات متقاطع است. شیوه نمونه‌گیری، هدفمند بوده و از نرم‌افزار Micmac برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده‌شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد مدل مفهومی پژوهش در چهار عامل اصلی قابل دسته‌بندی است: عوامل پیشران یا تأثیرگذار، عوامل دووجهی، عوامل وابسته یا تأثیرپذیر، و عوامل مستقل. متغیری همچون " درآمد، هزینه و سرمایه-گذاری در شهر-بندر " ذیل عامل پیشران، متغیری همچون "وجود تجهیزات و زیرساخت‌های پیشرفته حمل‌ونقل چندوجهی در بندر" ذیل عامل دووجهی، متغیری همچون " کیفیت محیط زندگی و شهرسازی مطلوب" ذیل عامل تأثیرپذیر، و متغیری همچون " حفاظت از محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار شهر–بندر" ذیل عامل مستقل طبقه‌بندی می‌شوند. مجموعه این عوامل ساختار فضایی روابط بندر و شهر دبی را شکل داده و الگوی توسعه سریع این منطقه کلان‌شهری را با توزیع هدفمند درآمدهای ناشی از تجارت و گردشگری رقم‌زده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بندر-شهر دبی؛ تحلیل اثرات متقاطع؛ ساختار فضایی؛ نرم‌افزار Micmac
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analysis of Key Variables Affecting the Spatial Structure of Port-City Relations in Dubai
نویسندگان [English]
Mojtaba Arasteh؛ Melika Zarei؛ Khalil Hajipoor
Department of Urban Planning & Design, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]
ABSTRACT
During the last century, ports of Persian Gulf become the most important storage, refining and transportation of crude oil, oil derivation, petrochemical products and also, business activities. Nowadays, due to functional diversity between ports, the impact of port activities on the development of urban spaces will be different, and this issue leads to structural differences of port cities. The purpose of this research is to identify the key variables affecting the relations and spatial structure of port-city in Dubai as the most thriving and successful port-city in the Persian Gulf. This research is based on deductive reasoning and carried out by analysis of cross effects with secondary data (results of other prominent articles) and also primary data (questionnaire). sampling method is based on purposive sampling and Micmac software was used to analyze the data. Output of Micmac software shows the position of the instability of the system. Therefore, the position of each variables in the conceptual model can be categorized to driver, linkage, dependent, and autonomous factors. The research findings indicate 4 variables (like as “income, cost and investmnets in port-city”) can be introduced as a driver factor, 5 variables (like as “advanced multimodal transportation in the port”) can be introduced as a linkage factor, 6 variables (like as “quality of living environment and desirable city”) can be introduced as a dependent factor, 3 variables (like as “environmental protection and sustainable development of the city-port”) can be introduced as an autonomous factor. The rapid development of Dubai can be explained by the purposeful distribution of revenues from trade and tourism
Extended Abstract
Introduction
During the last century, ports of Persian Gulf become the most important storage, refining and transportation of crude oil, oil derivation, petrochemical products and also, business activities. The global increase in oil demand since the 1950s led to the creation of discovery of new oil wells and large industrial areas. With the construction of new oil or gas facilities in the port areas, increasing oil revenues contributed to the countries of the Persian Gulf region and form a new geographical relationship between ports and coastal cities which had an impact on the spatial structure and relation of them. Nowadays, due to functional diversity between ports, the impact of port activities on the development of urban spaces will be different, and this issue leads to structural differences of port cities. In the 1950s, Containerization (container loading technology) was based in some of the world's ports and created a huge transformation in the shipping industry, which had a significant impact on the development of ports. Although the ports of the Persian Gulf have made a significant contribution to the economic growth and physical development of other ports in the world, but few researches have been done on the variables and factors affecting the development of the spatial structure of the important ports of the Persian Gulf. This region, due to its unique geographical location, has always been considered as a most important corridor in the field of economic and transportation throughout history. Some of the most important energy and commercial ports in this region are: Dubai, Manama, Kuwait, Dammam, Doha, Bushehr, Bandar-Abbas and Assaluyeh. In this regard, the purpose of this research is to identify the key variables affecting the relations and spatial structure of port-city in Dubai as the most thriving and successful port-city in the Persian Gulf.
 
Methodology
This research is based on deductive reasoning and carried out by analysis of cross effects with secondary data (results of other prominent articles) and also primary data (questionnaire). The method used in this research is quantitative and the sampling method is based on purposive sampling. the variables affecting the spatial structure of port-city relations were identified in the form of a review of 31 prominent articles. 25 experts (who had comprehensive knowledge and information about the development process of the city-port of Dubai) participated to determine the effectiveness or influence of variables. Finally, the output of data analysis was done by the Micmac software.
 
Results and discussion
Output of Micmac software shows the position of the variables in the diagram that it indicates their status in the system and their role in the dynamics and changes of the system. The method of distribution and dispersion of the variables in the spatial structure of port-city relations indicates the instability of the system. Therefore, based on the output of the system, the position of each variables in the conceptual model can be identified in five categories (driver, linkage, dependent, autonomous and regulatory variables). According to the results, some variables such as “the changes in the strategic positions” and “geopolitics of port-city”, “the modification of the management method” and “regional planning of the ports”, “the promotion of local governance in the relations between port-city” and “the way of national and international management of ports have been introduced as driver variables. On the other hand, five variables consist of “advanced multimodal transportation in the port” and “income, cost and investment in the port-city”, “the contrast and physical integration of the port - city space”, “the development of various industrial and production activities in the ports and their local hinterland” and “their qualities Financial and commercial policies of ports” have been introduced as linkage variables. Findings of research also shows that some variables consist of “quality of living environment and desirable city”, “quantity and quality of transit corridors (rail, road and air) to hinterland”, “construction and launching the new port (sea port or dry port)”, “terminal facilities and infrastructure and warehousing”, “conflict or convergence between the city and the port” and “increase in population growth rate and migration to the port - city” categorized as dependent variables. Three variables including “cultural and historical background of ports”, “use of cheaper energy, Less-polluted, clean and renewable energies in the city-port” and “environmental protection and sustainable development of the city-port” categorized as autonomous variables. Finally, a variable with the title of “improvement in management and information technology and development in loading, unloading and storage of commodities” have been introduced as regulatory variables. The findings of this research have a remarkable similarity with other researches carried out in the field of city-port relation and clearly emphasize the direct impact of the "investment in port-city" in the development of them. For example, Grossmann (2008) emphasized that city-port of Hamburg has become one of the largest ports in Northern Europe during the last few decades due to huge domestic and foreign investment.
 
Conclusion
This research carried out in order to introduce and explain the key variables affecting the development of the spatial structure of the port-city of Dubai. On this basis, 21 variables have been extracted by systematic reviews of prominent articles. In the following, 25 experts were selected with the purposive sampling method. Among the 21 variables extracted, 4 variables (like as “geopolitics of port-city”) introduced as a driver factor, 5 variables (like as “advanced multimodal transportation in the port”) introduced as a linkage factor, 6 variables (like as “quality of living environment and desirable city”) introduced as a dependent factor, 3 variables (like as “environmental protection and sustainable development of the city-port”) introduced as an autonomous factor. The rapid development of Dubai can be explained by the purposeful distribution of revenues from trade and tourism. A part of these revenues has been directed towards investment in important transportation infrastructures such as airports and ports of this city. These strategies have a wide impact on improving the economic growth of the city and the development of the port in order to adapt with the global trade and advanced technologies.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Port-City of Dubai, Analysis of Cross Effects, Spatial Structure, Micmac Software
مراجع
  1. Abaza, W., Shalaby, A. F., & Yehia, M. (2022). Constructing a Theoretical Framework of the Urban Transformation Processes of the Port City Interface towards Resilient Egyptian Port Cities. Architecture, 10(5A), 71-92. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2022.101404
  2. Akhavan, M. (2017). Development dynamics of port-cities interface in the Arab Middle Eastern world-The case of Dubai global hub port-city. Cities, 60, 343-352.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.009
  3. Andrade, M. J., Costa, J. P., & Blasco López, J. (2020). 3DPortCityMeasure: Methodology for the comparative study of good practices in port–city integration. Sustainability, 12(3), 880.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030880
  4. Calatayud, A., Sanchez Gonzalez, S., & Marquez, J. M. (2022). Using big data to estimate the impact of cruise activity on congestion in port cities. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1-18.
  5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-021-00198-3
  6. Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(1), 75-92.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.11.003
  7. Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2011). Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011407095
  8. Chen, C., & Lam, J. S. L. (2018). Sustainability and interactivity between cities and ports: A two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(7), 944-961.‌ https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1450528
  9. Dadashpoor, H., & Taheri, E. (2023). The evolution of port-city relations in the era of technological development: case study of Bandar-Abbas County, Iran. GeoJournal, 88(3), 2423-2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10752-y
  10. Debrie, J., & Raimbault, N. (2016). The port–city relationships in two European inland ports: A geographical perspective on urban governance. Cities, 50, 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.004
  11. De Langen, P. W. (2006). Stakeholders, conflicting interests and governance in port clusters. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17020-1
  12. Garcia, P. R. (2008). The role of the port authority and the municipality in port transformation: Barcelona, San Francisco and Lisbon. Planning Perspectives, 23(1), 49-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430701738032
  13. Grossmann, I. (2008). Perspectives for Hamburg as a port city in the context of a changing global environment. Geoforum, 39(6), 2062-2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.011
  14. Guo, J., & Qin, Y. (2022). Coupling characteristics of coastal ports and urban network systems based on flow space theory: Empirical evidence from China. Habitat International, 126, 102624.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102624
  15. Guo, J., Qin, Y., Du, X., & Han, Z. (2020). Dynamic measurements and mechanisms of coastal port–city relationships based on the DCI model: Empirical evidence from China. Cities, 96, 102440.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102440
  16. Hesse, M. (2018). Approaching the relational nature of the port‐city interface in Europe: Ties and tensions between seaports and the urban. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109(2), 210-223.‌ https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12282
  17. Hoyle, B. S. (1989). The port—City interface: Trends, problems and examples. Geoforum, 20(4), 429-435.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(89)90026-2
  18. Jugović, A., Sirotić, M., & Peronja, I. (2021). Sustainable Development of Port Cities from the Perspective of Transition Management. Transactions on Maritime Science, 10(02), 466-476.‌
  19. Liu, J., Kong, Y., Li, S., & Wu, J. (2021). Sustainability assessment of port cities with a hybrid model-empirical evidence from China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103301
  20. Liu, J., Zhou, J., Liu, F., Yue, X., Kong, Y., & Wang, X. (2019). Interaction analysis and sustainable development strategy between port and city: The case of Liaoning. Sustainability, 11(19), 5366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195366
  21. Ma, Q., Jia, P., She, X., Haralambides, H., & Kuang, H. (2021). Port integration and regional economic development: Lessons from China. Transport Policy, 110, 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.019
  22. Merk, O. (2013). The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2013/13, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k40hdhp6t8s-en.
  23. Merkel, A. (2017). Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 61, 40-47.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.008
  24. Monios, J., Bergqvist, R., & Woxenius, J. (2018). Port-centric cities: The role of freight distribution in defining the port-city relationship. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 53-64.‌
  25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.012
  26. Nugraha, A. T., Waterson, B. J., Blainey, S. P., & Nash, F. J. (2022). Unravelling the dynamics behind the urban morphology of port-cities using a LUTI model based on cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 92, 101733.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101733
  27. Ramos, S. J. (2014). Planning for competitive port expansion on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard: the case of the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project. Journal of Transport Geography, 36, 32-41.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.007
  29. Ru, S. H. (2022). Historical geographies of Korea's incorporation: The rise of underdeveloped and modernized colonial port cities. Journal of Historical Geography, 76, 42-55.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2022.03.005
  30. Schubert, D. (2020). Spatial restructuring of port cities: Periods from inclusion to fragmentation and re-integration of city and port in Hamburg. European Port Cities in Transition: Moving Towards More Sustainable Sea Transport Hubs, 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36464-9_7
  31. Shan, J., Yu, M., & Lee, C. Y. (2014). An empirical investigation of the seaport’s economic impact: Evidence from major ports in China. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 69, 41-53.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.05.010
  32. Sydorenko, A. (2021). Crimean port-cities and their hinterland connections: The dynamics of change, 1800–1917. International Journal of Maritime History, 33(4), 668-689.‌ https://doi.org/10.1177/08438714211064722
  33. Van Der Burg, A. J., & Dieleman, F. M. (2004). Dutch urbanisation policies: from ‘compact city’to ‘urban network’. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 95(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.00297.x
  34. Wiegmans, B. W., & Louw, E. (2011). Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface?. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 575-583.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.007
  35. Yu, W., Gang, L., & Mingwu, L. (2021). Synergy of ports and cities in the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle and the influencing factors. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 9(1), 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2021.1971577
  36. Zain, R. M., Salleh, N. H. M., Zaideen, I. M. M., Menhat, M. N. S., & Jeevan, J. (2022). Dry ports: Redefining the concept of seaport-city integrations. Transportation Engineering, 8, 100112.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2022.100112
  37. Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., & Shao, G. (2020). Port city sustainability: a review of its research trends. Sustainability, 12(20), 8355.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208355
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 209
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 330


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب