Vitality is the meaning and concept of the level of comfort and convenience in a place and the enjoyment of being in that place, vitality is the quality of the form of urban space and it causes the improvement of the quality of the environment of public urban spaces. Vitality contributes to the physical, mental, social and personal development of residents. The elements of vitality are places and people, the territory and scope of vitality is the use of places, spaces and objects of the environment. People are the core of life. The purpose of this research is to investigate and analyze factors and elements affecting urban vitality in Karaj city. The type of research in terms of its purpose is the type of applied research with a descriptive-analytical nature. The data of the research includes the census data of the statistics centre and the field questionnaire that was investigated in the 10 districts of the Karaj metropolis. To analyze the information, specialized software and multi-criteria decision-making models have been used. The findings indicate that among the regions, region 7 has the first rank of urban vitality with 75% having good condition. The results of subjective indicators showed that Neighbourhood 10 of Region 7 and Neighbourhood 5 of Region 9 have a high level of urban vitality, neighbourhood 2 of Region 4 and Neighbourhood 1 of Region 6 have a medium level and Neighbourhood 5 of Region 10 has a low level of urban vitality.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Responsiveness-based design and planning emphasizing the maximum use of environmental capacities to meet users' needs implicitly cause a targeted improvement of environmental quality. As the environmental awareness of contemporary man has expanded and the platforms have become more diverse, many challenges are raised in the field of environment-oriented in the field of infrastructure quality and service provision. Urban developments and new developments in cities should be interpreted with integrated conceptualization. The conceptualization of interpretive flexibility in the planning and designing of public spaces in the city is used as an interdisciplinary perspective in urban space design to open and discuss its connection and potential as an approach to strengthening social cohesion and inclusion.The general definition of flexibility is that it can create places with new forms of meaning and be used for different groups to strengthen its coherence and multidisciplinary inclusion in terms of design and planning of space and body. On this basis, the concept of flexibility is proposed as a principle in the context of design and planning due to its wide range of effects on background phenomena. The history of such a role can be seen in the diversity of users' needs. In such a way, it is impossible to express the specific time and area of the need to pay attention to this concept. This is in line with Oldenburg's theory of "social public spaces," in which being in public space, communicating with people and the environment through observing the streets, sidewalks, squares, and parks of the city is a necessary step for people as a part of their social life. The meaningfulness of the design of the artificial environment was considered. In any case, in the contemporary era, on the one hand, at the same time as the quantitative and qualitative increase of human environmental awareness, there is no longer any phenomenon in the eyes of contemporary man arising from a unique aspect and range of factors. On the other hand, his life needs in the individual and collective dimensions have seen a high diversity, which has led to the formation of multiple semantic domains of past flexibility.
The meaning of flexibility in such an interdisciplinary platform and basic design refers to the concept of understanding and responding quickly and efficiently to environmental changes. Such a holistic definition for this broad field of environmental design means the implicit acceptance of the role of scale in the meaningful domain of these concepts. On a macro scale, it means making design options to increase the presence, participation, and power of choices of users of the environment in participatory urban planning and design methods, and on a small scale, it means making design options to increase spatial quality and, as a result, the quality of activities. The daily activities of environmental users are through selection against the "dominant space." Flexibility at different scales is crucial for dimensional optimization, shaping, and structuring spatial features, leading to improved performance of space components and spaces.
The development of the concept of "flexibility" from various studies in metropolitan to micro scales, such as interior architecture, allows it to pass the discourse of responsiveness to provide a broad approach to environmental design in which different values, interests, and priorities are prioritized. As a result, the issue of flexibility in environmental design has been raised as a multi-dimensional field in the design and planning of the basic environment. The breadth and complexity of this concept have made the researchers of this field deal with it in one or more ways, and it has been avoided to provide a comprehensive framework about the nature and structuring processes. The current research presents a structured view of flexibility in architecture and urban planning with an environmental approach.
Methodology
The methodology to achieve this goal is to use the macro research method and achieve a comprehensive framework by combining categorized interpretations. In such a way that by sorting and categorizing these concepts and bases in a new way, he has found a new level of theoretical findings, which will be a suitable answer for the gaps in scientific knowledge and scientific methods created in this field. In this context, the research method "thematic analysis" has been used with a qualitative approach and the use of library resources. Also, to overcome the breadth and complexity of these concepts and the multi-layer networking of concepts in this research method, artificial intelligence has been used in MAXQDA research assistance software.
Results and discussion
In the meantime, attention should also be paid to the fields of influence and application of the results of this research because designers refer to flexibility as the creator of environmental qualities, including dynamism. Also, since flexibility, along with the principles of readability and adaptability, affect the lifestyle and behavioral patterns of the audience of environmental design in architecture and urban planning, it will also be effective in dealing with the challenge of complexity in environmental design factors. One of the key questions for achieving research goals on this issue is how flexibility in environmental design impacts the relationship between flexibility and scale.
Conclusion
The most important finding of this research suggests that first, it requires a focus on the conditions under which the processes of perceiving human abilities and discovering the needs of the human audience can manifest. The theoretical framework arises from a comparative approach between design disciplines. These conditions are independent of the final state of the design product, and strengthening the environmental capacities will lead to a direction and an area that includes environmental flexibility. By responding to new situations, the construction of the space and the body within a space building can be adapted to various configurations. Even though the environment may remain constant, the designed place will continue functioning as a strong living system over time.
Funding
There is no funding support.
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific |
- احمدی، فرشته و نیکبخت، بهناز. (1394). طراحی فضاهای عمومی شهری بر اساس تحلیل رابطه بین فرم شهر و سرزندگی، مطالعه موردی: محله همت‌آباد. سومین کنگره بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و توسعه شهری، تهران، دبیرخانه دائمی کنگره بین‌المللی عمران و معماری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
- ارباب زادگان علیرضا و رنجیر، احسان. (1388). بازخوانی مفهوم تضاد در ارتقا تنوع بصری فضاهای عمومی شهری. آرمان‌شهر، 12، 56-49.
- اصلانی فرد، فردین؛ شکور، علی و عبداللهزاده فرد، علیرضا. (1396). راهکارهای تبدیل گذرهای شهری به پیاده راه در راستای ارتقا سرزندگی، مطالعه موردی: محور روگذر زندیه شیراز. فصلنامه مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار، 6 (21)، 56-43.
- انگورانی، میکائیل. (1389). زیبایی، شادابی، سرزندگی. فصلنامه جستارهای شهرسازی، 9 (32)، 34-29.
- ایزدی، پگاه؛ هادیانی، زهره؛ حاجی نژاد، علی و قادری، جعفر. (1396). تبیین و ارائه الگوی بازآفرینی شهری فرهنگ محور با تأکید بر رویکرد نهادی. فصلنامه مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 2 (9)، 187-163.
- پامیر، سای. (1389). آفرینش مرکز شهری سرزنده: اصول طراحی شهری و بازآفرینی. ترجمه: دکتر مصطفی بهزادفر و مهندس امیر شکیبامنش، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.
- پورمحمد، سها و نژادستاری، سعیده. (1390). ضوابط مکان‌مند، در خدمت سرزندگی فضاهای عمومی. ماهنامه دانشنامه، 202، 35-24.
- ترکاشوند، عباس و مجیدی، سحر. (1392). بازشناسی برخی نشانه‌ها در فضاهای شهری. نشریه انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 6، 5-15. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2014.61971
- جیکوبز، جین. (1392). مرگ و زندگی شهرهای بزرگ آمریکایی. ترجمه: حمیدرضا پارسی و آرزو، افلاطونی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
- حبیبیان، بهار و حاتمی نژاد، حسین. (1399). تبیین اثرپذیری سرزندگی محله‌های شهری از ابعاد دل‌بستگی مکانی، نمونه موردمطالعه: شهر اهواز، برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، 24(1)، 151- 183. https://doi 20.1001.1.16059689.1399.24.1.1.9
- حوراسفند، نرگس. (1399). ارائه راهکارهای ارتقاء سطح سرزندگی در فضاهای شهری، محله امامیه مشهد. دوماهنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش در هنر و علوم تخصصی، 5 (6) ، 59-49
- خراسانیزاده، فرنوش؛ صابری، حمید؛ مؤمنی، مهدی و موسوی، میرنجف. (1399). تبیین ساختاری عوامل موثر بر سرزندگی در فضاهای عمومی شهری اصفهان از دیدگاه شهروندان و گردشگران. نشریه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 24 (72)، 181-151. DOI: 10.22034/GP.2020.10852
- خستو، مریم و سعیدی رضوانی، نوید. (1389). عوامل موثر بر سرزندگی فضاهای شهری. نشریه هویت شهر، 4(6)، 63-74. DOR:20.1001.1.17359562.1389.4.6.6.9
- ذکاوت، سینا؛ رضایی، محمدرضا و پیام، حاتم. (1399). ارتقاء سرزندگی در فضاهای شهری با تأکید بر رویکرد ساماندهی منظر شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر یاسوج). فصلنامه آمایش محیط، 50، 197- 216
- رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ خدایی، زهرا؛ دادش پور، هاشم و علی‌اکبر تقوایی. (1395). تحلیل میزان دل‌بستگی نوجوانان از محیط‌های عمومی شهری با تأکید بر ظرفیت اجتماعات محلی (اجتماعی ـ مکانی). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، 20، 187-168.
- زارع، سارا. (1392). سرزندگی، کیفیت گمشده میدان‌های شهری امروز ایران نمونه موردی: میدان توپخانه تهران. همایش معماری و توسعه شهری پایدار بوکان، 15-1.
- زنگی‌آبادی، علی و رحیمی نادر، حسین. (1389). تحلیل فضایی جرم در شهر کرج با استفاده از GIS. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 40 (2)، 198-179. Dor:20.1001.1.25885618.1389.40.2.11.4
- زیاری، کرامت الله؛ محمدی ده چشمه، مصطفی؛ پوراحمد، احمد و قالیباف، محمدباقر. (1393). اولویت‌بخشی به ایمن‌سازی بافت فرسوده ملان شهر کرج با استفاده از مدل ارزیابی چند معیاری. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 44(1)، 14-1.
- سلطانی، علی؛ زرگری مرندی، ابراهیم و نامداریان، احمدعلی. (1392). شکل‌گیری، تقویت و مانایی خاطره در فضاهای شهری، نمونه موردی محور شهید چمران شیراز. مسکن و محیط روستا، 141، 98-87.
- شهبازی، مهرداد؛ یگانه، منصور و بمانیان، محمدرضا. (1399). شناسایی عوامل کالبدی- فضایی مؤثر بر سرزندگی محیطی در فضاهای باز مجموعه مسکونی از دیدگاه طراحان و ساکنین، مورد مطالعاتی: مجتمع‌های مسکونی شهر تهران. مجله معماری و شهرسازی آرمان‌شهر، 30، 137-117. Doi:10.22034/AAUD.2019.189635.1903
- صادقی مقدم، محمدرضا؛ مختاری، پونه و اشهبی، مهشید. (1392). چگونگی شکل‌گیری شهر خلاق با بررسی تأثیر محیط بر انسان نمونه موردی: بوستان حضرت ابراهیم شهر تهران. همایش ملی معماری و شهرسازی انسان‌گرا، دانشگاه آزاد قزوین.
- صرافی، ساقی؛ نقصان محمدی، محمدرضا و شریف‌زاده، مجتبی. (1392). بررسی سرزندگی در خیابان‌های شهری مطالعه موردی: خیابان جامع یزد، 1392. پنجمین کنفرانس مدیریت شهری، مشهد.
- طبیبیان، منوچهر و موسوی میر جلال. (1395). بررسی نقش زیباسازی و ارتقا کیفیت محیط بر سرزندگی شهری (نمونه موردی: باغ شهر تهران مراغه). معماری و شهرسازی آرمان‌شهر، 17، 262-249.
- عباس زاده، شهاب و تمری، سودا. (1391). بررسی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر بهبود کیفیات فضایی پیاده راه‌ها به‌منظور افزایش سطح تعاملات اجتماعی (مطالعه موردی: محورهای تربیت و ولیعصر تبریز). فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 4، 104-95
- علی‌اکبری، اسماعیل و علی‌اکبری، مجید. (1396). مدل‌سازی ساختاری - تفسیری عوامل مؤثر بر زیست پذیری کلان‌شهر تهران. نشریه برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، 1(2)، 31-1.
- فرجی ملائی، امین. (1390). مبلمان شهری. ماهنامه اطلاع‌رسانی آموزشی و پژوهشی شورای عالی استان‌ها.
- فیروزبخت، علی، ابراهیمی، رضا، ربیعی فر، ولی‌الله، حیدری، تقی، 1391، ارزیابی اجتماعی، فرهنگی شهر با رویکرد توسعه پایدار شهری نمونه موردی شهر کرج. مجله پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 3(9)، 78-57. Dor:20.1001.1.22285229.1391.3.9.4.3
- فیضی، سعیده و بصیری، مصطفی. (1399). بررسی اهمیت نورپردازی در ارتقاء سرزندگی شبانه فضاهای شهری: نمونه موردی: محله سنتی مقصودیه تبریز. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 20 (58)، 34-17.
- قربان پور، مریم؛ زالی، نادر؛ یوردخانی، مختار و آزاده، سیدرضا. (1397). ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های مؤثر بر تقویت سرزندگی در مسیرهای پیاده شهری مطالعه موردی: پیاده راه علم الهدی شهر رشت. مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی، 13، 123-105
- گلکار، کوروش. (1386). مفهوم کیفیت سرزندگی در طراحی شهری. نشریه صفحه، 16(44)، 75-66
- لقایی، حسنعلی؛ پاکزاد، مریم و فروزان پور، علی. (۱۳۹۲). ارتقای کیفیت محیطی و سرزندگی عرصه‌های عمومی شهر جدید پردیس از طریق طراحی شهری پایدار. یازدهمین همایش ملی ارزیابی اثرات محیط‌زیستی، تهران: انجمن ارزیابی محیط‌زیست ایران، سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست.
- لینچ، کوین. (1387). سیمای شهر. ترجمه منوچهر مزینی، چاپ سوم، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
- مظفریپور، نجمه. (1393). شناسایی مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار در منظر ورودی کاربری‌های تجاری و مذهبی بر ارتقای حس دعوت‌کنندگی (مطالعه موردی تجریش تهران). دو فصلنامه پژوهش‌های منظر شهر، 1(1)، 24-17
- میکائیلی هاچو، گلناز و آذر، علی. (1396). بررسی و ارزیابی تطبیقی سرزندگی شهری در محله‌های اختصاصی و محلات سنتی با رویکرد توسعه پایدار در جغرافیا (مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تبریز). فصلنامه جغرافیا، برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 7 (3)، 269-284. Dor:20.1001.1.22286462.1396.7.4.17.3
- نصری، سید رضا و حسنخانی، مهنوش. (1396). شهر و سرزندگی، پژوهشی در باب مؤلفه‌های سرزندگی فضاهای شهری. تهران. انتشارات گوهر دانش.
- هدایت نژاد کاشی، سید مصطفی؛ هادیانی، زهره؛ حاجی نژاد، علی و عسگری، علی. (1398) سرزندگی شهری مفهومی میان‌رشته‌ای ) واکاوی اصول، ابعاد و شاخص‌ها). مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 6(20)،107-57. Doi: 10.22080/SHAHR.2019.15754.1723
- Abbaszadeh, S., & Tamri, S. (2013). review and analysis of the factors affecting the improvement of the spatial qualities of the sidewalks in order to increase the level of social interactions (case study: the axes of education and Waliasr of Tabriz). Urban Studies Quarterly, 4, 104-95. [In Persian]
- Abdul Latip, N.S., Shamsudin, Sh., & Liew, M.S. (2009). Functional Dimension at Kuala Lumpur Waterfront. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 147-155. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.013
- Ahmadi, F., & Nikbakht, B. (2014). Designing urban public spaces based on the analysis of the relationship between city form and vitality, case study: Hamlet Abad neighborhood. Third International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, Tehran, Permanent Secretariat of Katgareh Bin International Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]
- Ali Akbari, I., & Ali Akbari, M. (2016). structural-interpretive modeling of factors affecting the liveability of Tehran metropolis. Space planning and planning magazine, 1(2), 1-31. [In Persian]
- American institute of architects (AIA). (2005). what makes a community livable.
- Angurani, M. (2019). beauty, freshness, vitality, urban planning quarterly, 9(32), 29-34. [In Persian]
- Appleyard, B. (2013). Christopher E. Ferrell, Michael A. Carroll, Matthew Taecker, AICP,2013, Toward Livability Ethics: A Framework to Guide Planning, Design and Engineering Decisions. TRB 2014 Annual Meeting, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr. San Diego, CA 92182 22 c 503.810.7249, pp.17-1
- Arbabzadegan, A. (2018). rereading the concept of contrast in promoting the visual diversity of urban public spaces. Armanshahr, 17, 49-56. [In Persian]
- Aslani Fard, F., Shakur, A., & Abdulzadeh Fard, A. (2016). Solutions to convert urban crossings to pedestrians in order to improve vitality, case study: Zandiye overpass axis, Shiraz. Haft Hesar Environmental Studies Quarterly, 6 (21), 43-56. [In Persian]
- Balsas, C.J. (2004). Measuring the livability of an urban centre: an exploratory study of key performance indicators. Planning, Practice & Research, 19(1), 101-110. doi:10.1080/0269745042000246603
- BOIS de, P. (2009). Zoetermeer. Anchor Point research. CIP-data, Royal Library,The Hage.
- Borsekov, K., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. 2017. Smart development, spatial sustainability and environmental quality. The Journal of Habitat International, 68, 1-2. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.08.001
- Buys, L., & Evonne, M. (2012). Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: Role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55, 319–38. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.597592
- Car, S., Mark, F., Leanne, R., & Andrew, S. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge University Press.
- Carmona, M. (2008). Public Spaces: The Management dimention. Routledge
- Chodron, S., Drolma, Y. Q., Xiang, Z., Jing, L., Haibing, J., Jiangang, X., & Tianhua, N. (2020). An investigation of the visual features of urban street vitality using a convolutional neural network. Geo-spatial Information Science, 23 (4), 341-351. doi:10.1080/10095020.2020.1847002
- Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2014). A summary of the livbility ranking and over View. EIU Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, (8), 87-107
- Faizi, S., & Basiri, M. (2019). investigation of the importance of lighting in improving the night life of urban spaces: a case study: the traditional neighborhood of Maqsodieh, Tabriz. Applied Research Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(58), 17-34. [In Persian]
- Faraji Melai, A. (2011). urban furniture. educational and research information monthly of the Supreme Council of Provinces. [In Persian]
- Gurbanpour, M., Zali, N., Yordkhani, M., & Azadeh, S. (2017). evaluation of the factors affecting vitality in urban pedestrian routes, a case study: Ulamalhodi pedestrian walkway in Rasht city. Human Settlements Planning Studies, 13(1), 105-123. [In Persian]
- Habibian, B., & Hataminejad, H. (2019). Explaining the effectiveness of the vitality of urban neighborhoods from the dimensions of spatial attachment, case study: Ahvaz city. Spatial planning and preparation, 24, (1), 151, 183. https://doi 20.1001.1.16059689.1399.24.1.1.9 [In Persian]
- Hedayat Nejad Kashi, S. M., Hadiani, Z., Hajinejad, A., & Asgari, A. (2018). Interdisciplinary Conceptual Urban Vitality (Analysis of Principles, Dimensions and Indicators). Urban Structure and Function Studies, 6(20), 107-57. Doi:10.22080/SHAHR.2019.15754.1723 [In Persian]
- Horasfand, N. (2019). presenting solutions to improve the level of vitality in urban spaces, Emamieh neighborhood of Mashhad. journal of research in art and specialized sciences, 5(6), 49-59. [In Persian]
- Jackson, L., (2003). the relationship of urban design to human health and condition. landscape and urban planning, 64,191-200. doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00230-x
- Jacobs, J. (2012). Death and Life of Great American Cities. translated by: Hamidreza Parsi and Arzoo, Platoni, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
- Jin Xiaobin, L., Ying, S., Wei, L., Yuying, Y., Xuhong, T. (2017). Evaluating cities' vitality and identifying ghost cities in China with emerging geographical data. Cities, 63, 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.002
- Khorasanizadeh, F., Sabri, H., Momeni, M., & Mousavi, M. (2019). structural explanation of the factors affecting vitality in the urban public spaces of Isfahan from the perspective of citizens and tourists. Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, 24(72), 181-151. DOI: 10.22034/GP.2020.10852 [In Persian]
- Khostu, M., & Saeedi Rizvani, N. (2019). factors affecting the vitality of urban spaces. Hoyt Shahr magazine, 4 (6), 63-74. Dor:20.1001.1.17359562.1389.4.6.6.9 [In Persian]
- Lagaei, H.A., Pakzad, M., & Forozanpour, A. (2013). improving the environmental quality and vitality of the public areas of the new city of Pardis through sustainable urban design. 11th National Environmental Impact Assessment Conference, Tehran: Iran Environmental Assessment Association, Environmental Protection Organization. [In Persian]
- Landry, Ch. (2000). Urban Vitality: A New source of Urban Competitiveness. prince claus fund journal, ARCHIS issue Urban Vitality / Urban Heroes
- Lau Leby, J., & Hashim, A. H. (2010). Liveability dimensions and attributes: Their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 67–91.
- Lennard, H. L. (1997). “Principles for the Livable City” in Lennard. S. H., S von Ungern- Sternberg, H. L. Lennard, eds. Making Cities Livable. International Making Cities Livable Conferences. Gondolier Press: California, USA.
- Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–30.
- Litman, T. A. (2004). Economic value of walkability. World Transport Policy & Practice, 3–11.
- Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. The journal of Habitat International, 68, 99-107. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.005
- Liu, Sh., Ling, Z., Yi, L., Yao, L., & Mianhao, X. (2020). A New Urban Vitality Analysis and Evaluation Framework Based on Human Activity Modeling Using Multi-Source Big Data. International Journal o f Geo-Information, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf, 9, 617; doi:10.3390/ijgi9110617
- Lynch, K. (2007). Simai Shahr, translation. Manouchehr Mazini, third edition, Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
- Mercer. (2010). Quality of life survey. Retrieved from https://www.mercer.com.
- Mikaili Hacho, G., & Azar, A. (2016). comparative survey and assessment of urban vitality in specific neighborhoods and traditional neighborhoods with a sustainable development approach in geography (case study: Tabriz metropolis). Journal of Geography, Regional Planning, 7 (3), 269-284. 20.1001.1.22286462.1396.7.4.17.3 [In Persian]
- Mohit, M. Abdul, Mansor Ibrahim, and Young Razidah Rashid. 2010. Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International 34: 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.04.
- Molenda, I. & Sieg, G. 2013. Residential parking in vibrant city districts. Munster: Institute of Transport Economics Münster.
- Mozafaripour, N. (2013). Identifying the influencing factors in the entrance landscape of commercial and religious uses on enhancing the sense of invitation (Case study of Tajrish, Tehran). Journal of City Landscape Research, 5 (1), 17-24. [In Persian]
- Nasri, S.R., & Hasankhani, M. (2016). City and vitality, a study on the vitality components of urban spaces. Tehran: Gohar Danesh Publications. [In Persian]
- Nirfalini Auli, D. (2016). A Framework for Exploring Livable Community in Residential Environment. Case Study: PublicHousing in Medan, Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (234), 336 – 343. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.250
- Olsson, Lars E., Tommy, G., Dick, E., Margareta, F., & Satoshi F. (2015). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Researchm 111, 255–63. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0003-2
- Omuta, G. E. (1988). The quality of urban life and the perception of livability: A case study of neighbourhoods in Benin City, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 417–440. doi:10.1007/bf00302336
- Pamir, S. (2010). Creation of a lively urban center: principles of urban design and regeneration. translated by Dr. Mostafa Behzadfar and engineer Amir Shakibamanesh, Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology Publications, first edition. [In Persian]
- Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2018). Livability assessment within a metropolis based on the impact of integrated urban geographic factors (IUGFs) on clustering urban centers of Kolkata. Cities, 74, 142-150. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.015
- Pourmohammed, S., & Nejad, S. S. (2013). Placemand criteria, serving the vitality of public spaces. Daneshnameh Monthly, 202, 24-35. [In Persian]
- Rafiyan, M., Khodayi, Z., Dadashpour, H., & Taqvai A. A. (2015). analysis of the level of attachment of adolescents to public urban environments with an emphasis on the capacity of local communities (socio-spatial). planning and space planning, 20, 187-168. [In Persian]
- Rehdanz, Katrin, and David Maddison. 2008. Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany. Ecological Economics 64: 787–97. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.016
|
