سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,255
تعداد مقالات68,023
تعداد مشاهده مقاله116,166,773
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,934,362
براتی, شادی, عظمتی, حمیدرضا, صالح صدق پور, بهرام. (1402). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش استرس در پارکهای کوچک محلی در مناطق ۱ و ۴ کلانشهر تهران. , 11(3), 99-118. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.359378.1823
شادی براتی; حمیدرضا عظمتی; بهرام صالح صدق پور. "شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش استرس در پارکهای کوچک محلی در مناطق ۱ و ۴ کلانشهر تهران". , 11, 3, 1402, 99-118. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.359378.1823
براتی, شادی, عظمتی, حمیدرضا, صالح صدق پور, بهرام. (1402). 'شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش استرس در پارکهای کوچک محلی در مناطق ۱ و ۴ کلانشهر تهران', , 11(3), pp. 99-118. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.359378.1823
براتی, شادی, عظمتی, حمیدرضا, صالح صدق پور, بهرام. شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش استرس در پارکهای کوچک محلی در مناطق ۱ و ۴ کلانشهر تهران. , 1402; 11(3): 99-118. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.359378.1823

شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش استرس در پارکهای کوچک محلی در مناطق ۱ و ۴ کلانشهر تهران

پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری
مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 3، آبان 1402، صفحه 99-118    اصل مقاله (1.42 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی - کاربردی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.359378.1823
نویسندگان
شادی براتی1؛ حمیدرضا عظمتی* 2؛ بهرام صالح صدق پور3
1گروه معماری دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی،تهران، ایران.
2گروه معماری، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران.
3گروه معماری، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران
چکیده
زندگی پرمشغله شهری منجر به بالا رفتن استرس در افراد شده است. استرس می‌تواند زمینه‌ساز ابتلا به انواع مختلفی از بیماری‌های جسمی و روحی-روانی شود. فضای سبز شهری در بهبود کیفیت زندگی افراد تأثیر قابل‌توجهی دارد. علاوه بر فواید زیست‌محیطی، فضای سبز مزایای قابل‌ملاحظه‌ای برای سلامتی شهروندان همچون کاهش استرس و فشارهای روانی دارد. تحقیق حاضر قصد دارد عوامل موثر بر کاهش استرس در پارک‌های کوچک محلی را مشخص کند. ابزار این تحقیق پرسشنامه‌ای شامل ۴۵ گویه است که بر اساس جدول هدف-محتوا و با مطالعات اسنادی به‌دست‌آمده است. حجم نمونه ۲۱۰ نفر است و با روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تصادفی اقدام به جمع‌آوری داده‌ها شده است. روایی پرسش‌نامه با تحلیل عاملی و اعتبار یابی با محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ صورت گرفته است. نتایج آزمون کایزر– مایر–الکین کفایت حجم نمونه و آزمون کرویت بارتلت توانایی عاملی شدن داده‌ها را تأیید نمود.  تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی از بین سیزده عامل هشت عامل اصلی را شناسایی نمود که عبارت‌اند از: اجتماع‌پذیری، مشارکت‌پذیری، خوانایی، پاسخ‌ده بودن، تنوع، جذابیت، حس تعلق و حس امنیت. در این میان عوامل اجتماع‌پذیری، مشارکت‌پذیری و خوانایی با بیشترین درصد واریانس، اهمیت بیشتری از جنبه کاهش استرس از دیدگاه پاسخ‌دهندگان دارند. بدین ترتیب در نظر گرفتن عوامل مستخرج از این پژوهش توسط طراحان و برنامه‌ریزان شهری، می‌تواند شهرها را با فضاهایی که نقش پررنگ‌تری در زمینه کاهش استرس افراد دارند، تجهیز کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
کاهش استرس؛ پارک‌های کوچک محلی؛ تحلیل عاملی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Finding effective stress reduction factors in small local parks in districts 1 and 4 of Tehran metropolis
نویسندگان [English]
Shadi Barati1؛ Hamidreza azemati2؛ bahram Saleh Sedghpour3
1Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University Name, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
ABSTRACT
In today's fast-paced urban lifestyle, individuals are increasingly exposed to heightened stress. Stress can give rise to a multitude of physical and mental health issues. The presence of green spaces within urban environments significantly impacts residents' overall quality of life. Beyond environmental advantages, green spaces offer citizens substantial health benefits, particularly in reducing stress and alleviating mental strain. This research pursues a practical objective and adopts an exploratory and descriptive-analytical approach. The primary aim of this study is to investigate various factors contributing to stress reduction in small-scale district parks. The research instrument employed is a 45-item questionnaire structured in accordance with the content objective table derived from theoretical and documentary research. Factor analysis was utilized to validate the data, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test results indicated the sample size's adequacy, while Bartlett's Test of Sphericity affirmed that the data could be subjected to factor analysis. Employing the principal component analysis extraction method, an exploratory factor analysis revealed eight distinct factors as sociability, participation, readability, responsiveness, sense of belonging, attractiveness, variety, and security. Notably, the sociability factor explained more than 12% of the factors influencing park stress reduction. Landscape designers should consider these factors, and urban open space decision-makers should evaluate them in their plans, ultimately equipping cities with landscapes that play a more substantial role in mitigating the stress experienced by their inhabitants. Future studies should explore the intricate connections between these factors, paving the way for the creation of urban landscapes with greater role in improving the quality of life
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The global population has been experiencing rapid growth, especially in developing countries, leading to an increased disconnect from natural environments. The fast-paced urban lifestyle has contributed to elevated stress levels, which can result in various physical and mental health ailments. Air pollution, noise, and a lack of restorative environments are more profound in cities than rural areas. This condition leads to stress symptoms in a significant portion of urban populations. Because urbanization is predicted to double over the next 30 years, stress will most probably increase in city dwellers.
Urban greenery is crucial in enhancing the overall quality of life, contributing to improved city climates, and offering spaces for social activities and leisure. In addition to their environmental benefits, green spaces provide substantial health advantages, such as stress reduction, and offer opportunities for daily interaction with nature. Studies have demonstrated that when people are psychologically stressed or fatigued, they recover faster in natural areas than in urban environments. Although consensus exists about the positive health benefits of urban green spaces, more knowledge is needed about the mechanisms behind why and how green spaces reduce stress. The present study focuses on small urban public parks, specifically on how they should be designed to promote a potential for psychological restoration. This study aims to identify the key factors responsible for reducing stress in small-scale urban parks, which have been established by transforming underused and abandoned site parks to meet the growing demand for green and recreational spaces in response to urbanization.
 
Methodology
This research has a practical objective and employs an exploratory and descriptive-analytical approach. The primary research tool is a 45-item questionnaire based on a content objective table derived from theoretical and document studies. The study's sample comprises students from Shahid Beheshti University and Shahid Rajaee Tarbiat University who frequent small local parks around their campuses, including Negin Park, Golrizan Park, Golestan 1 Park, and Shabanlu Park in Tehran's Districts 1 and 4. The study's sample size encompasses 210 participants, and data collection was facilitated through the distribution of online surveys via social networks. Data validation was performed through factor analysis, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed.
 
Results and discussion
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test affirmed the adequacy of the sample size (KMO=0.814), and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity indicated that the data was suitable for factor analysis. After rotation, the data analysis revealed 13 significant factors contributing to stress reduction in small urban parks, accounting for approximately 70.10% of the overall variance. Following Varimax rotation, eight primary factors were identified. Sociability, with an eigenvalue of 5.569 and a variance percentage of 12.376, emerged as the most influential component in stress reduction. Sociability denotes versatile spaces that support multiple daily activities and social interactions. The second factor, participation, characterized by a specific value of 2.861 and a variance percentage of 6.357, reflects people's engagement in park spaces and their environmental impact. The third factor, readability, displayed a variance percentage of 5.773 and a specific value of 2.647, encompassing physical environmental qualities and human perception. The fourth factor, environmental responsiveness, with a variance percentage of 5.709 and an eigenvalue of 2.569, provides settings to meet physiological and psychological needs. The fifth factor, sense of belonging, with a variance percentage of 4.838 and a specific value of 2.177, highlights the relationship between humans and their environment, influenced by physical attributes and social activities. Attractiveness, diversity, and security had variance percentages of 4.827, 4.255, and 4.219, with specific values of 2.172, 1.915, and 1.899, respectively. These factors encompass spatial appeal, variation, and safety, all contributing to an enhanced quality of life in urban areas. The spatial structure and elements, such as adequate nighttime lighting, readability, and sociability, can foster a sense of security and stress reduction.
 
Conclusion
Urban parks have many functions and benefits. These functions and benefits are essential for improving life quality in urban areas. With the ongoing growth of urbanization and the resulting rise in stress levels, it is crucial to address the factors that alleviate stress in urban parks, especially small-scale ones. This study has identified the principal elements contributing to stress reduction in small parks, providing valuable insights for landscape architects and designers to enhance the effectiveness of green open spaces in mitigating stress. The research findings, including factors like readability and attractiveness, are consistent with those of other researchers like Kaplan. Future studies should explore the intricate connections between these factors in greater depth, paving the way for creating urban landscapes with a more pronounced role in stress reduction and improved quality of life.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Stress reduction, Small local parks, Factor analysis
مراجع
  1. اخوت، هانیه و تقوایی، علی‌اکبر. (1387). ارزیابی اثرات فرهنگی و روان‌شناختی پارک‌های شهری بر شهروندان (مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران). شهر نگار، 9(50)، 53-46.
  2. دانشگرمقدم، گلرخ و اسلامپور، مرمر. (1391). تحلیل نظریه قابلیت محیط از دیدگاه گیبسون و بازخورد آن در مطالعات انسان و محیط انسان‌ساخت. نشریه معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، 5(9)،86-73.
  3.  حیدری، محمدتقی؛ مجیدی هروی، آنیتا و رحمانی، مریم. (1401). خلق پارک جیبی (پاکت پارک) و بازتولید هم‌حضوری اجتماعی در شهر؛ نمونه موردی: شهر خرمدره. معماری و شهرسازی ایران 13(2)، 21-39. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2021.264783.1605
  4. جلیلی، محمد؛ عینی فر، علیرضا و طلیسچی، غلامرضا. (1392). فضای باز مجموعه‌های مسکونی و پاسخ‌دهی محیطی: مطالعه تطبیقی سه مجموعه مسکونی در شهر همدان. معماری و شهرسازی (هنرهای زیبا)، 18(4)، 57-68.
  5. جعفری، پریوش و طالب‌زاده، فاطمه. (1389). ارائه مدلی برای نشاط و شادی در مدارس ابتدایی شهر تهران. رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی، 4(4)، 9-32.
  6. جوان فروزنده، علی و مطلبی، قاسم. (1390). مفهوم حس تعلق به مکان و عوامل تشکیل‌دهنده آن. هویت شهر، 5(8)، 27-37.
  7. حسینی، سید باقر؛ باقری، ملیحه؛ حسن‌پور، کسری و حیدرزاده، مریم. (1401). مبانی روانشناسی محیطی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی.
  8. سیف، علی‌اکبر. (۱۴۰۱). روانشناسی پرورشی نوین (روانشناسی یادگیری و آموزش). تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
  9. شکیبایی، سیامک و سعیدی مفرد، ساناز. (1400). تأثیر خرد اقلیم‌های شهری بر آسایش محیطی در فضای باز عمومی- نمونه موردمطالعه: میدان شهدا شهر مشهد، نشریه علمی مطالعات شهری، 10(40)، 72-59.  doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.434
  10. علیزاده اصل، جبار؛ سعیدپور، شراره و عاشری، امام علی. (1395). ارزیابی عوامل موثر بر مکان‌یابی پارک‌های شهری و مکان‌یابی بهینه آن (منطقه مطالعاتی شهر سقز). برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، 6(1 (پیاپی 20))، 59-77.
  11. قلی پور، سودابه؛ مهدی نژاد، جمال‌الدین و صالح صدق پور، بهرام. (1400). ساخت، هنجاریابی، اعتبارسنجی مقیاس امنیت محیطی پارک‌های شهری مبتنی بر ترجیح کاربران (نمونه موردی: پارک ملت تهران). فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 11(41)، 59-72.  doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.513
  12. مغانی رحیمی، خاطره؛ بهزادفر، جلیلی صدرآباد، سمانه. (1401). تبیین مدل مفهومی برنامه‌ریزی شهری درمانگر استرس. اقتصاد و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، (4)13، 75-52. doi:10.22034/UEP.2023.383058.1321
  13. مهدی­نژاد، جمال‌الدین؛ صالح صدق­پور، بهرام و نجاری، رعنا. (1398). ساخت و رواسازی و پایاسازی و هنجاریابی مقیاس اجتماع‌پذیری در بازار سنتی ایران به‌منظور ارتقا آموزش معماری. فناوری آموزش، 13(3)، 536–549. doi:10.22061/jte.2019.3761.1936
  14. نظم فر، حسین؛ علوی، سعیده و عشقی، علی. (1397). ارزیابی امنیت در فضاهای عمومی شهری (نمونه موردی: پارک‌های شهر تهران). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا. ۲۲ (۲)، ۱۳۳-165.
  15. نقیبی، مریم؛ اخلاصی، احمد و فیضی، محسن. (1400). بررسی ترجیحات کاربران در ارائه راهبردهای مداخله در فضای رهاشده به‌عنوان یک پارک جیبی. معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر،14(37)، 269-282. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.240898.2269
  16. Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. 2nd ed (pp. xvi, 432). Guilford Press.
  17. Aletta, F., Oberman, T., & Kang, J. (2018). Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (11), 1-12.
  18. Alizade Asl, J., Saidpour, Sh.& Ashery, A. (2016). Evaluation of affecting factors on urban parks and its optimal site selection (case study: city of saqqez). Journal of spatial planning, 6(1 (20)), 59-77 [In Persian].
  19. Alvarsson, J. J., Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2010). Stress Recovery during Exposure to Nature Sound and Environmental Noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7 (3), 1036–46.
  20. Armato, F. (2017). Pocket Park: Product Urban design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1869–S1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352705
  21. Arnberger, A., & Eder, R. (2015). Are urban visitors’ general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005
  22. Balai Kerishnan, P., & Maruthaveeran, S. (2021). Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks―A review of the evidence. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126985
  23. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
  24. Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L.M., & Knight, T.M. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10, 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
  25. Chiesura, A. (2004). The Role of Urban Parks for the Sustainable City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129-38.
  26. Chong, S. A., Abdin, E., Vaingankar, J. A., Heng, D., Sherbourne, C., Yap M., Lim, Y. W., Wong, H.B., Ghosh-Dastidhar, B., & Kwok, K. W. (2017). A population-based survey of mental disorders in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap, 41(2), 49.
  27. Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Han, B., Derose, K. P., Golinelli, D., & McKenzie, T. L. (2014). The Potential for Pocket Parks to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Promotion : AJHP, 28(30), S19–S26. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130430-QUAN-213
  28. Conniff, A., & Craig, T. (2016). A methodological approach to understanding the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated with greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 19, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.019
  29. Coutts, A. M., Tapper, N. J., Beringer, J., Loughnan, M., & Demuzere, M. (2013). Watering our cities: The capacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 37(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312461032
  30. Daneshgarmoghaddam, G., & Eslampour, M. (2013). Study of the Affordance Theory Based on Gibson’s Point of View and Its Effects on Studies of Human-Built Environment. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(9), 73-86. [In Persian].
  31. Danford, R. S., Strohbach, M. W., Warren, P. S., & Ryan, R. L. (2018). Active Greening or Rewilding the city: How does the intention behind small pockets of urban green affect use?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.014
  32. Dijkstra, K., Pieterse, M. E., & Pruyn, A. (2008). Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in the built healthcare environment: The mediating role of perceived attractiveness. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.013
  33. Gholipour, S., Mahdinezhad, J., & Saleh Sedghpour, B. (2022). Construction, Normalisation and Validation of Urban Park Environmental Security Scale based on users’ preference (Case study: Mellat Park, Tehran, Iran). Motaleate Shahri, 11(41), 59-72. doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.513[In Persian].
  34. Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00019
  35. Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012
  36. Hansen, K. B., & Nielsen, T. A. S. (2006). Nearby nature and green areas encourage outdoor activities and decrease mental stress. CAB Abstracts Archive.
  37. Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 215-226
  38. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
  39. Hassan, A., Qibing, C., Tao, J., Bing-Yang, L., Nian, L., Li, S., Tng, L. Y., Li, J. Z., Ziyue, S. G., & Tahir, M. S. (2018). Effects of Plant Activity on Mental Stress in Young Adults. Hort Science, 53(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12447-17
  40. Hosseini, S.B,. Bagheri, M., Hassanpour, K., Heidarzadeh, M. (2012). Environmental psychology: an introduction. Tehran: Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University [In Persian].
  41. Jafari, P. & Talebzadeh, F. (2010). Presenting a model for vitality and happiness in elementary schools in Tehran. Educational Leadership and Management, 4(4), 9-32 [In Persian].
  42. Jalili, M., Einifar, A. & Talischi, Gh. (2014). Open space of residential complexes and environmental responsiveness: a comparative study of three residential complexes in hamadan. Memari-va-shahrsazi (honar-ha-ye-ziba), 18(4), 57-68 [In Persian]
  43. Javan forouzande, A., & motalebi, G. (2011). The concept of place attachment and its elements. Hoviateshahr, 4(8), 27-37 [In Persian].
  44. Javan forouzande, Ali, & Motalebi, G. (2011). The concept of place attachment and its elements. Hoviateshahr, 4(8), 27-37 [In Persian].
  45. Jiang, B., Chang, C.-Y., & Sullivan, W. C. (2014). A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.005
  46. Jiang, S., Deng, L., Luo, H., Li, X., Guo, B., Jiang, M., Jia, Y., Ma, J., Sun, L., & Huang, Z. (2021). Effect of Fragrant Primula Flowers on Physiology and Psychology in Female College Students: An Empirical Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607876
  47. Kaplan, R. (1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7
  48. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
  49. Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T., & Branas, C. C. (2018). Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), Article 3.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030445
  50. Korpela, K., Borodulin, K., Neuvonen, M., Paronen, O., & Tyrväinen, L. (2014). Analyzing the mediators between nature-based outdoor recreation and emotional well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.003
  51. Labuz, R. (2019). Pocket Park – A New Type of Green Public Space in Kraków (Poland). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(11), 112018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/11/112018
  52. Lee, K. E., Williams, K. J. H., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S. G., & Johnson, K. A. (2015). 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003
  53. Lee, M., Lee, J., Park, B.-J., & Miyazaki, Y. (2015). Interaction with indoor plants may reduce psychological and physiological stress by suppressing autonomic nervous system activity in young adults: A randomized crossover study. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 34(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-015-0060-8
  54. Lin, W., Chen, Q., Jiang, M., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Tao, J., Wu, L., Xu, S., Kang, Y., & Zeng, Q. (2019). The effect of green space behaviour and per capita area in small urban green spaces on psychophysiological responses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 192, 103637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103637
  55. Mahdinezhad, J., Saleh Sedghpour, B., & Najjari, R. (2019). Construction and Validation and Standardization of the Questionnaire for Socialization in the traditional Iranian Bazaar with approaching to learn of traditional architecture. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 13(3), 536-549. doi: 10.22061/jte.2019.3761.1936  [In Persian].
  56. Mesimäki, M., Hauru, K., & Lehvävirta, S. (2019). Do small green roofs have the possibility to offer recreational and experiential benefits in a dense urban area? A case study in Helsinki, Finland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.005
  57. Moghani Rahimi, K., Behzadfar, M., & Jalilisadrabad, S. (2023). Explaining the Conceptual Model of Stress Relief Urban Planning. Urban Economics and Planning, 4(1), 52-75. doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.383058.1321 [In Persian].
  58. Naghibi, M., Ekhlassi, A. & Faizi, M. (2022). Provision of Intervention Strategies to Convert Leftover Spaces to Pocket Parks, with an Emphasis on User Preferences. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(37), 269-282. doi: 10.22034/aaud.2020.240898.2269 [In Persian].
  59. Najafi, M., & Shariff, M. K. B. M. (2011). The Concept of Place and Sense of Place In Architectural Studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(8), 1054–1060.
  60. Nazmfar, H., Alavi S., & Eshghi, A. (2018). The assessment of security in urban public spaces (Case Study: Tehran city parks). MJSP, 22 (2),133-165. [In Persian].
  61. Neuvonen, M., Sievänen, T., Tönnes, S., & Koskela, T. (2007). Access to green areas and the frequency of visits – A case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.003
  62. Nielsen, T. S., & Hansen, K. B. (2007). Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health & Place, 13(4), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001
  63. Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2011). Assessing Restorative Components of Small Urban Parks Using Conjoint Methodology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10(2), 95–103.
  64. Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
  65. Okhovat, H. &Taqhvaii, A. A. (1387). Evaluating the cultural and psychological effects of urban parks on citizens (case study: Tehran). Shahr Nagar, 9(50), 53-46 [In Persian].
  66. Ottosson, J., & Grahn, P. (2005). A Comparison of Leisure Time Spent in a Garden with Leisure Time Spent Indoors: On Measures of Restoration in Residents in Geriatric Care. Landscape Research, 30(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142639042000324758
  67. Peschardt, K. K., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013
  68. Peschardt, K. K., Schipperijn, J., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2012). Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002
  69. Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963
  70. Qiu, L., Chen, Q., & Gao, T. (2021). The Effects of Urban Natural Environments on Preference and Self-Reported Psychological Restoration of the Elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020509
  71. Rogge, E., Nevens, F., & Gulinck, H. (2007). Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(4), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006
  72. Saif, A.A. (2004). Modern Educational Psychology: Psychology of Learning and Education. Tehran: Agah [In Persian].
  73. Shakibaei, S. & Saeedi, S. (2021). The Impact of Urban microclimates on the Environmental Comfort in Public open spaces (Shohada sq. in Mashhad). Motaleate Shahri, 10(40), 59-72 doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.434  [In Persian].
  74. Shashua-Bar, L., & Hoffman, M. E. (2000). Vegetation as a climatic component in the design of an urban street: An empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees. Energy and Buildings, 31(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
  75. Siddiqui, A., Maithani, S., Jha, A., Kumar, P.,&Srivastav, S. (2018). Urban growth dynamics of an indian metropolitan using CA Makov and Logistic Regression. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 21(3), 229-236.
  76. Tian, Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2012). Development potential of sky gardens in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.03.003
  77. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
  78. Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
  79. Villeneuve, P. J., Jerrett, M., G. Su, J., Burnett, R. T., Chen, H., Wheeler, A. J., & Goldberg, M. S. (2012). A cohort study relating urban green space with mortality in Ontario, Canada. Environmental Research, 115, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.003
  80. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., & Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005
  81. Wang, X., Rodiek, S., Wu, C., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 197
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 116


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب