پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,118,142 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,224,002 |
فرایند اسپین‌آف و توسعة سرمایة اجتماعی کارآفرینان دانشگاهی | ||
| مجله علمی "مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی" | ||
| دوره 11، شماره 2، تیر 1403، صفحه 115-132 اصل مقاله (1.09 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jscm.2023.363879.2437 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| مصطفی حیدری هراتمه* | ||
| گروه اقتصاد، دانشکدة اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نراق، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مطالعة حاضر با هدف بررسی چگونگی کمک فرایند اسپین‌آف‌ها به توسعة سرمایة اجتماعی کارآفرینان دانشگاهی انجام شده است. پژوهش حاضر ماهیت استقرایی، اکتشافی، و کیفی دارد. روش تحقیق از نوع تحلیل موردی چندگانه است. در این ارتباط هشت ونتور دانشگاهی دو تا چهار ساله، دارای حداکثر تنوع در مؤلفه‌های کلیدی، شامل کارآفرینان و سازمان‌های مادر و فناوری، مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. انتخاب این تعداد خاص نتیجة اشباع نظری در طول مرحلة کدگذاری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها بود. داده‌ها از طریق 35 مصاحبة نیمه‌ساختار‌یافته با زمان متوسط دو ساعت شامل 22 مصاحبه با کارآفرینان و 13 مصاحبه با مدیران و سایر کارکنان مراکز رشد جمع‌آوری شد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل و تفسیر داده‌ها از طریق رونویسی مصاحبه‌ها، کدنویسی، و تحلیل مصاحبه با کمک نرم‌افزار NVivo 2.0، فایل توضیحات برای هر مورد، جداول تحلیلی، مقایسه‌های درون‌موردی و بین‌موردی، و نهایتاً مقایسه با پیشینه و مبانی نظری صورت گرفت. نتایج نشان داد: سه مکانیسم وابستگی به دانشگاه، غوطه‌ور شدن در شبکة روابط دانشگاهی، و بسترسازی جهت ایجاد سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر برای کارآفرینان جهت توضیح سهم فرایند اسپین‌آف‌ها در توسعة سرمایة اجتماعی کارآفرینان دانشگاهی تأثیرگذار خواهد بود. وابستگی باعث اعتبار پروژة کارآفرینان و دسترسی ترجیحی به مخاطبان و منابع خاص می‌شود. مکانیسم غوطه‌وری فرصت‌هایی را برای جلسات فراهم می‌کند و کارآفرینان را به شبکة مخاطبان و ساختار دانشگاه نزدیک می‌کند تا شبکة پشتیبانی خود را توسعه دهند. مکانسیم بسترسازی از طریق ایجاد فرصت‌های ملاقات برای کارآفرینان و واسطه‌گری بین کارآفرینان و سایر مخاطبان باعث توسعة مهارت‌های اجتماعی و تجاری و مالی می‌شود و به توسعة شبکه‌های تجاری می‌انجامد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اسپین‌آف دانشگاهی؛ سرمایة اجتماعی؛ سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر؛ کارآفرینی فناورانه؛ مراکز رشد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Spin-off Process and the Development of Academic Entrepreneur’s Social Capital | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mostafa Heidari Haratemeh | ||
| Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Islamic Azad, Naragh, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating how the process of spin-offs contributes to the development of the social capital of university entrepreneurs. The current research is inductive, exploratory, and qualitative. The research method is Multiple case analysis. The selection of this particular number was the result of theoretical saturation during the coding and data analysis phase). In this connection, eight ventures of University spin-offs two to four years old, with Maximum variation in the key components of spin-offs, including entrepreneur, mother organization, and technology, were examined. Data were collected through 35 semi-structured interviews with an average time of 2 hours, including 22 interviews with entrepreneurs and 13 with managers and other incubator staff. Data analysis and interpretation werefinally done through Transcription of interviews, Interview codification and analysis with the help of the NVivo 2.0 software, Description file for each case, Analytical tables, Intra- and inter-case comparisons, and finally, Comparison with the literature. The result showed thatthe relationships, that three mechanisms of the Entrepreneur´s affiliation with the university, Entrepreneurs´ immersion in the university´s network of relationships, and creating a Preparation for creating venture capital for entrepreneurs will be effective in explaining the contribution of the spin-off process in the development of the social capital of university entrepreneurs. MechanismsMechanisms of Entrepreneur´s affiliation with the university causes; Entrepreneurs project credit, preferential access to specific contacts and resources. Immersion mechanism; Provide opportunities for meetings and entrepreneurs to develop their support network with the network of contacts and structure of the nearby university. Preparation mechanisms through creating meeting opportunities for entrepreneurs, mechanisms through creating meeting opportunities for entrepreneurs, and mediating between entrepreneurs and other contacts will develop social business and financial support skills that will lead to the development of business networks. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Venture, Incubators, Social Capital, Technological Entrepreneurship, University Spin-off | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Albornoz, C. (2008). Toward a Set of Trainable Content on Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Entrepreneurship Research from an Educational Perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(2), 86-98.
Aldrich, H. & Carter, N. M. (2004). Social networks. In: Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Carter, N. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: the process of business creation. Sage, Thousand Oaks. 324-335.
Aldrich, H., Rosen, B., & Woodward, W. (1987). The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: a longitudinal study. In: Churchill, N. C., Hornaday, J.A., Kirchhoff, B., A., Krasner, J., & Vesper, K. H. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1987. Babson College, Wellesley. 154-168.
Aldrich, H. & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton, D. L. & Smilor, R.W. (Eds.), The Art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge. 3-23.
Anderson, A., Park, J., & Jack, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial Social Capital: Conceptualizing Social Capital in New High-tech Firms. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 245-269.
Audretsch, D., Aldridge, T., & Sanders, M. (2011). Social Capital Building and New Business Formation: A Case Study in Silicon Valley. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 152-169.
Baron, R.A. (2004). Social skills. In: Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Carter, N. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: the process of business creation. Sage, Thousand Oaks. 220-233.
Baron, R. A. & Markman, G. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: the role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 41-60.
Barrioluengo, M. S., Uyarra, E., & Kitagawa, F. (2019). Understanding the Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University. The Case of English Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education Quarterly, 73, 469–495.
Birley, S. (1985).The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107-117.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, Westport. 241-258.
Carayannis, E. G. & von Zedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting gloCal (global-local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25(2), 95-110.
Chabaud, D., Ehlinger, S., & Perret, V. (2003). Les incubateurs d’entreprises innovantes: un réseau entrepreneurial reconfiguré? Paper presented at the XIIème Conférence de l’Association International de Management Stratégique, 2003, Les côtes de Carthage.
Chandra, A. & Silva, M. (2012). Business Incubation in Chile: Development, Financing and Financial Services. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(2), 1-13.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & de Velde, E. (2011). Entrepreneurial Origin, Technological Knowledge, and the Growth of Spin-Off Companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1420-1442.
Compagnucci, L. & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the University: A Systematic Literature Review on Potentials and Constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284.
Cooper, A. C. & Dailly, C. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Teams. In: Sexton, D., Smilor, R. W. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000. Upstart, Chicago. 167-188.
Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
Delmar, F. & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures?. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165-1185.
Dubini, P. & Aldrich, H. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305-313.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Ferraro, F. (2003). Raising capital: Relational practices and social capital in Silicon Valley entrepreneurship. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Stanford University. United States. California.
Filion, L. J., Luc, D., & Fortin, P.A. (2003). L’essaimage d’entreprises - Vers de nouvelles pratiques entrepreneuriales. Les Éditions Transcontinental. Montreal.
Franklin, S. & Wright, M. (2000). University spin-out companies: academic and surrogate entrepreneurs. In: During, W., Oakey, R. P., & Kipling, M. (Eds.), New Technology-Based Firms at the Turn of the Century. Pergamon, Amsterdam. 35-49.
Freitas, J., Gonçalves, C., Cheng, L., & Muniz, R. (2011). Parsimonious Determinants of Pre-Incubated Academic Spin-Offs Initial Performance: a Configurational Perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(2), 50-65.
Grandi, A. & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329-341.
Grimaldi, R. & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111-121.
Hansen, E. L. (2000). Resource acquisition as a startup process: initial stocks of social capital and organizational foundings. In: Reynolds, P. D., Autio, E., Brush, C. G., Bygrave, W. D., Manigart, S., Sapienza, H. J., & Shaver, K. G. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2000. Babson College, Wellesley.
Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators: Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74-84.
Hill, J., McGowan, P., & Drummond, P. (1999). The development and application of a qualitative approach to researching the marketing networks of small firm entrepreneurs. Qualitative Market Research, 2(2), 71-81.
Hite, J. M. (2003). Patterns of multidimensionality among embedded network ties: a typology of relational embeddedness in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 9-49.
Hughes, M., Ireland, R. D., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Stimulating Dynamic Value: Social Capital and Business Incubation as a Pathway to Competitive Success. Long Range Planning, 40(2), 154-177.
Hussler, C. & Ronde, P. (2009). Investing in Networking Competences or Establishing in Hot Spots?. The Innovation Dilemna. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(4), 1-13.
Johannisson, B. (1996). The dynamics of entrepreneurial networks. In: Reynolds, P. D., Birley, S. J., Butler, E., Bygrave,W. D., Davidsson, P., Gartner, W. B., & McDougall, P. P. (Eds.), Fron- tiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1996. Babson College, Wellesley. 253-267.
-------------------. (1998). Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: Spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 10(4), 297-312.
Johannisson, B., Ramirez-Pasillas, M., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14(4), 297-315.
Julien, P. A. (2000). L’entrepreneuriat au Québec - Pour une révolution tranquille entrepreneurial 1980-2005. Les Éditions Transcontinental, Montreal.
Karim, M. & Sammut, S. (2007). Processus entrepreneurial et pépinières d’entreprises: quand l’accompagnement conduit à l’isolement. Paper presented at the XVIème Conférence de l’Association Internationale de Management Stratégique, 2007, Montréal.
Kim, P. H. & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Social capital and entrepreneurship. Now, Boston.
Lechner, C. & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(1), 1-26.
Lemieux, V. & Ouimet, M. (2004). L’analyse structurale des réseaux sociaux. Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec.
Liao, J. & Welsch, H. (2002). The temporal patterns of venture creation process: an exploratory study In: Bygrave, W. D., Brush, C. G., Davidsson, P., Fiet, J., Greene, P. G., Harrison, R. T., Lerner, M., Meyer, G. D., Sohl, J., & Zacharakis, A. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2002. Babson College, Wellesley.
Mathisen, M. T. & Rasmussen, E. (2019). The Development, Growth, and Performance of University Spin-offs: A Critical Review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1891–1938.
Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R & D Management, 33(2), 107-115.
Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325-335.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33(4), 643-659.
Neergaard, H. (2005). Networking activities in technology-based entrepreneurial teams. International Small Business Journal, 23(3), 257-278.
Neergaard, H. & Madsen, H. (2004). Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship in a social capital perspective. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12(2), 105-125.
Nicolaou, N. & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333-359.
Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques - OCDE. (2001). Special issue on fostering high-tech spin-offs: a public strategy for Innovation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Perez, M. P. & Sanchez, A. M. (2003). The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23(10), 823-831.
Pirnay, F. (2001). La valorisation économique des résultats de recherche universitaire par création d’activités nouvelles (spin-offs universitaires): Propostion d’un cadre procedural d’essaimage. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Université du Driot et de la Santé - Lille 2.
Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B., & Nlemvo, F. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 355-369.
Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7/8), 879-893.
Rasmussen, E. (2011). Understanding Academic entrepreneurship: exploring the emergence of university spin-off ventures using process theories. International Small Business Journal, 29(5), 448–471
Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. Elgar, Cheltenham.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Torrès, O. (2007). Approche explicative du comportement caractéristique des PME: le principe proxémique. In: Filion, L. J. (Ed.), Management des PME - De la création à la croissance. ERPI, Saint-Laurent. 35-46.
Totterman, H. & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups: business incubation and social capital. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 487511.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
Uzunca, B. (2011). Comparative Advantages of Spinoff Firms: An Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 80-92.
Versiani, A. & Guimaraes, L. (2006). Creation of technologically-based firms in Brazil: the influence of incubators on the set-up of new business. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 12(3), 1-23.
Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541-567.
WolffenbütteL, A., Fracasso, E., & Bignetti, L. (2004). The university-firms interaction process in a university incubator: the case of the Vale do Rio dos Sinos University’s incubator Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 10(1), 1-19.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10,464 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,706 |
||