پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,101,788 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,208,366 |
تحلیل تطبیقی بهره برداری از انرژی های تجدید پذیری در توسعه پایداری روستایی در کشورهای ایران، آلمان، لهستان، پاکستان و تایلند | ||
| پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی | ||
| دوره 56، شماره 2، اردیبهشت 1403، صفحه 231-253 اصل مقاله (1.26 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مستخرج از پایان نامه | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2023.356743.1008586 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مرضیه هادی پور* ؛ حسنعلی فرجی سبکبار؛ سیدعلی بدری | ||
| گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در سال‌های اخیر توجه به بهره‌برداری از انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر، یکی از مهم‌ترین مسائل توسعه پایدار مناطق روستایی است. هدف از این پژوهش، تحلیل تطبیقی بهره‌برداری از انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر در توسعه پایداری روستایی در کشورهای ایران، آلمان، لهستان، پاکستان و تایلند است تا از تجربیات این کشورها در جهت کاهش نقاط ضعف و ارتقای بهره‌برداری از انرژی تجدید پذیر در مناطق روستایی کشور بهره گرفته شود. نوع تحقیق بنیادی، روش مورداستفاده تطبیقی با شیوه تحلیل محتوا می‌باشد. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات موردنیاز از روش‌های اسنادی استفاده‌شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که موفقیت کشورهای آلمان، لهستان، پاکستان و تایلند از طریق برنامه‌های تعاملی و مشارکت ذی‌نفعان و دادن اختیار به آن‌ها در سطوح ملی، منطقه‌ای و محلی بوده است. اما کشور ایران در سطح ملی و منطقه‌ای، با دیدگاه ساختار متمرکز و نگرش بخشی به برنامه‌ها، عدم استقلال و سیاسی بودن مدیران مواجه و در سطح محلی با عدم اختیارهای قانونی به نهادهای محلی و عدم مشارکت‌های تعاملی در زمینه بهره‌برداری از انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر روبرو است. از جمله کاربرد این پژوهش می‌توان به آگاهی از نقاط قوت و ضعف کشورهای موردمطالعه در زمینه بهره‌برداری از انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر و مقایسه آن با کشور ایران و بسترسازی آن در جهت بهره‌برداری از انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر در مناطق روستایی کشور اشاره کرد. این دیدگاه کمک می‌کند تا زمینه تشویق نهادهای مردمی و محلی در سطوح گوناگون مناطق روستایی فراهم شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| توسعه؛ روستایی؛ انرژی های تجدید پذیر؛ کشورهای منتخب؛ ایران | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparative analysis of the use of renewable energies in the development of rural sustainability in Iran, Germany, Poland, Pakistan and Thailand | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Marzia Hadipour؛ Hassanali Faraji sabokbar؛ seyed Ali Badri | ||
| Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Extended Abstract Introduction Rural development is one of the goals of countries and governments, especially developing countries, because despite having natural and agricultural resources, villages face many problems and issues such as poverty, unemployment, weak infrastructures. economic suitability, the lack of endogenous service activities, the low productivity rate in the agricultural sector of rural production and the lack of sustainable energy on the one hand and the destruction of natural resources on the other hand, which have made rural development somewhat impossible (Akbari) et al., 2016: 2). Attitude towards sustainable environmental development since the 1970s with international meetings and discussions. These issues presented the importance of paying attention to the sustainable development of rural areas and the need for renewable energy approaches and providing realistic strategies with spatial-spatial dimensions. Methodology This research is a comparative research, in terms of purpose, development and in terms of qualitative nature. In terms of methodology, it is a type of content analysis. Considering that the final goal of this research is to compare the structure of renewable energy exploitation, the studied examples with Iran in identifying weaknesses and strengths, a fundamental look at the eploitation of renewable energy. It is acceptable and in the end it is to provide suggestions in order to strengthen this structure, therefore, in order to achieve these goals, the structure of renewable energy utilization in rural areas of Iran has been compared with four countries: Germany, Poland, Pakistan, and Thailand. The comparative approach is carried out in the analysis and monitoring of the functional comparison of the use of renewable energies in the rural areas of the countries and their similarities and differences are presented. So, using comparative and qualitative methods, the situation of rural areas in Iran was analyzed with other countries and its strengths and weaknesses were determined. Also, by identifying the difference in the indicators used, it is possible to improve the performance of renewable energies. Therefore, in the first step, the role of participation of local institutions in the structure of exploitation of renewable energies in Iran, Germany, Poland, Pakistan and Thailand has been discussed. In the second step; The comparative comparison of the government's role in the planning structure was mentioned and then the place of credit allocation in the use of renewable energy at the national, regional and local (rural) levels was discussed. Basically, it can be stated that this research is an applied research and the success and efficiency of comparative research in the field of renewable energy exploitation requires the adoption of a generalist approach in qualitative research. Results and discussion Examining the experiences of Germany, Poland, Pakistan and Thailand in the field of using renewable energy at different levels of a country showed that the success of the programs in Germany and Poland is the result of the cooperation of the European Union with these countries and the transfer of policies National decision-making has been realized at the local level. Therefore, in these countries, the government system has pursued a guiding role by creating convergence and partnership between the planning department, and by creating partnerships, they have performed self-welding and giving authority to each of the responsible provinces as a basic strategy. In the country of Thailand, the role of the government as a strategic institution performs its duties in the country's plans, and the basic principle of the plans is in the opinion of the prime minister and lower levels. In this country, the major departments of planning and decision-making regarding the development of the use of renewable energy have made large investments in rural areas with multi-party cooperation in regional and local programs. While the macro-planning structure of Iran and Pakistan practically does not provide the possibility of handing over authority. The power has been transferred from the center of the provincial governments to the level below it. It seems that in these countries, the government seeks to maintain a centralized structure in decision-making, especially large-scale energy and renewable energy programs. Although in these countries in the last decade, the participation of all stakeholders has led to the exploitation of renewable energies. With the comparison between the countries, it can be stated that the policies, policies and plans for the use of renewable energy in Iran have not been effective and currently the policy making of the use of renewable energy is nascent. And it is new. On the other hand, the country's planning system is facing weaknesses at the national level - from the point of view of centralized structure and sectoral plans. At the regional level with weaknesses such as the lack of independence and legal and political authority in the exploitation of renewable energy and at the local level with weaknesses such as not giving the right of legal authority to the local representative and weak public participation in The topics of using renewable energy are facing. Conclusion The results of the research showed that the success of the countries of Germany, Poland, Pakistan and Thailand was through interactive programs and the participation of stakeholders and giving them authority at the national, regional and local levels. However, at the national and regional level, Iran faces the view of a centralized structure and a partial approach to programs, the lack of independence and politicization of managers, and at the local level, the lack of legal powers to local institutions and the lack of interactive participation in the field of interest. The removal of renewable energies is facing. One of the applications of this research is to know the strengths and weaknesses of the studied countries in the field of renewable energy exploitation and compare it with Iran and lay the groundwork for the exploitation of renewable energy in rural areas. The country pointed out.. This point of view helps to provide the ground for encouraging popular and local institutions at various levels in rural areas. Funding There is no funding support. Authors’ Contribution Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none. Conflict of Interest Authors declared no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Development, rural, renewable energy, selected countries, Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اداره کل بهسازی و مسکن معاونت عمرانی جهاد سازندگی. (1369). نگاهی به برنامه‌های توسعه روستایی در کشور تایلند. نشریه جهاد مهر، 10(133)،36-47. افراخته، حسن؛ احمدی‌ابادی، فرشته و احمدآبادی، حسن. (1393). بهره‌برداری از انرژی خورشیدی در مناطق روستایی، مطالعه موردی: دهستان عشق‌آباد، شهرستان نیشابور). پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی،46،30-15. تهامی پور، مرتضی؛ عابدی، سمانه؛ کریمی بابا احمدی، رضا و ابراهیمی زاده، مرتضی. (1395). بررسی تأثیر انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر بر سرانه رشد اقتصادی واقعی ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، 5(19)،77-53. سادات زمردیان، زهرا و تحصیلدوست، محمد. (1389). ظرفیت‌ها، موانع و مشوق‌های توسعه انرژی‌های پاک در روستاهای ایران. مجله مسکن و محیط روستا، 165، 32-17. سجادی اصل، مریم؛ توکلی نیا، جمیله؛ قورچی، مرتضی و صرافی، مظفر. (1399). تحلیل تطبیقی سیاست‌های مسکن کم‌درآمد شهری در کشورهای ایران، چین، استرالیا، انگلستان و ایالات‌متحده آمریکا. پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی، 54(1)،315-289. عنابستانی، علی‌اکبر. (1393). تحلیل اثرگذاری عوامل ساختاری- نهادی مؤثر بر مشارکت روستاییان در فرایند اجرای طرح‌های هادی روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان خواف). فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای،4(13)،59-45. غفران فرید، مرجان و رضائی، روح‌الله. (1396). عوامل تأثیرگذار بر استفاده از انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر در مناطق روستایی شهرستان زابل. فصلنامه آموزش محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار، 5(2)، 47-35. قنادیان، محمد و ادهمی، محمد. (1394). نقش دولت در توسعه انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر. سومین همایش ملی اقلیم، ساختمان و بهینه‌سازی مصرف انرژی با رویکرد توسعه پایدار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد جاسب، 1-9. گودرزی، علی و عباسی، عباس. (1396). سیاست‌گذاری جمهوری اسلامی ایران در بهره‌برداری بهینه از منابع انرژی تجدید پذیر. فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری عمومی، 7(23)،74-160. محمدی، نعیمه و دانایی‌فرد، حسن. (1398). الگوی حکمرانی مشارکتی توسعه انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر در ایران، رویکرد نهادی. نشریه پژوهشهای سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی انرژی،5(16)،95-86. ممقانی ادبی ، محمد؛ رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ پورطاهری، مهدی و صادقی سقدل، حسین. (1399). تحلیل سطح پذیرش فناوری انرژی خورشیدی در مناطق روستایی، مطالعه موردی: مناطق روستایی شهرستان کلیبر و شهرستان خدا آفرین- استان آذربایجان شرقی). پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی،52(1)،301-283. منوریان، عباس؛ وطنخواه مقدم، سیروس؛ شاه‌حسینی، محمدعلی؛ واعظی، سید کمال و نورالهی، یونس. (1399). طراحی مدل خط‌مشی گذاری توسعه انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر در ایران. فصلنامه، سیاست‌گذاری عمومی،6(2)،134-115. یگانگی، سید کامران و قاسلمو، محمد رضا. (1401). مدیریت سرمایه‌گذاری بر روی انرژی‌های تجدید پذیر. فصلنامه نگرش‌های نوین بازرگانی،3(2)،61-54.
References Afarakhte, H., Ahmadi-Abadi, F., & Ahmed-Abadi, H. (2013). Utilization of solar energy in rural areas, case study: Ashgabat village, Neishabur city). Human Geography Research, 30, 46-15.Doi 10.22059/JHGR.2014.50591 [In Persian]. Anabestani, A. A. (2013). Analysis of the impact of structural-institutional factors affecting villagers' participation in the implementation process of rural leadership projects (case study: villages of Khaf city). Regional Planning Quarterly, 4(13), 45-59. [In Persian]. Batista, A. G., Betini, R. C., Bareta, M. L. E., Sandim, Á. A., & Pepplow, L. A. (2019). Public Policies to Be Implemented to Encourage the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in the Rural Area of Paraná. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 62. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4324-smart-2019190020. Chaichana, C., Wongsapai, W., Damrongsak, D., Ishihara, K. N., & Luangchosiri, N. (2017). Promotin g community renewable energy as a tool for sustainable development in rural areas of Thailand. Energy Procedia, 141, 114-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.022. Chaichana, C., Wongsapai, W., Damrongsak, D., Ishihara, K. N., & Luangchosiri, N. (2017). Promoting community renewable energy as a tool for sustainable development in rural areas of Thailand. Energy Procedia, 141, 114-118. DOI: 10.1051/rees/2021045 Churski, P. (2005). Problem areas in Poland in terms of the objectives of the European Union's regional policy. European Planning Studies, 13(1), 45-72. DOI: 10.1080/0965431042000312406. Dohse, D. (2007). Cluster‐Based Technology Policy—The German Experience. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 69-94. DOI: 10.1080/13662710601130848. D'Orazio, P., & Löwenstein, P. (2022). Mobilising investments in renewable energy in Germany: which role for public investment banks?. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(2), 451-474. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1777062. General Department of Improvement and Housing, Jihad Sazendagi Civil Deputy (1369). A Look at Rural Development Programs in Thailand, Jihad Mehr Publication, 10(133), 36-47. [In Persian]. Ghafran Farid, M., & Rezaei, R. (2016), Factors influencing the use of renewable energy in rural areas of Zabul city. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development Quarterly, 5(2), 35-47.Doi. 20.1001.1.23223057.1395.5.2.3.0 [In Persian]. Grossauer, F., & Stoeglehner, G. (2020). Bioeconomy—Spatial requirements for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(5), 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051877 Gudarzi Abbasi, A., & Maleki, A. (2016), Islamic Republic of Iran's policy-making in the optimal use of renewable energy sources. Strategic Studies of Public Policy Quarterly, 7(23), 160-74. [In Persian]. Kamyk, J., Kot-Niewiadomska, A., & Galos, K. (2021). The criticality of crude oil for energy security: A case of Poland. Energy, 220, 119707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119707. Kazak, J. K., Kamińska, J. A., Madej, R., & Bochenkiewicz, M. (2020). Where renewable energy sources funds are invested? spatial analysis of energy production potential and public support. Energies, 13(21), 5551. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215551. Khan, T., & Khanam, S. (2017). Prospect of Sustainable Rural Development through Solar Electrification in Bangladesh. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(8), 35-42. Klepacki, B., Kusto, B., Bórawski, P., Bełdycka-Bórawska, A., Michalski, K., Perkowska, A., & Rokicki, T. (2021). Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in Basic Units of Local Government in Rural Areas. Energies, 14(11), 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113170 Kosiński, E., & Trupkiewicz, M. (2016). Gmina jako podmiot systemu wspierania wytwarzania energii elektrycznej z odnawialnych źródeł energii. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 78(3), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2016.78.3.8. Li, F., Cheng, S., Yu, H., & Yang, D. (2016). Waste from livestock and poultry breeding and its potential assessment of biogas energy in rural China. Journal of cleaner production, 126, 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.104. Madriz-Vargas, R., Bruce, A., Watt, M., Mogollón, L. G., & Álvarez, H. R. (2017). Community renewable energy in Panama: a sustainability assessment of the “Boca de Lura” PV-Wind-Battery hybrid power system. Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability, 2, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.015 Majid, M. A. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 1-36. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1 Manourian, A., Watankhah Moghadam, S., Shah Hosseini, M. A., Vaezi, S. K., & Nooralhi, Y. (2019). Designing a policy model for the development of renewable energy in Iran, Quarterly. General Policy, 6(2), 115-134. Doi:10.22059/JPPOLICY.2020.77616. [In Persian]. Marks-Bielska, R., Bielski, S., Pik, K., & Kurowska, K. (2020). The importance of renewable energy sources in Poland’s energy mix. Energies, 13(18), 4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184624. Mazurek-Czarnecka, A., Rosiek, K., Salamaga, M., Wąsowicz, K., & Żaba-Nieroda, R. (2022). Study on Support Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Sources in Poland. Energies, 15(12), 4196. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124196. Mohammadi, N., & Khabbazan, M. M. (2022). The Influential Mechanisms of Power Actor Groups on Policy Mix Adoption: Lessons Learned from Feed-In Tariffs in the Renewable Energy Transition in Iran and Germany. Sustainability, 14(7), 3973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073973. Mohammadi, N., & Danaei Fard, H. (2018), the participatory governance model of renewable energy development in Iran, institutional approach. Journal of Energy Planning and Policy Research, 5(16), 95-86 [In Persian]. Momghani, M. A., Roknuddin al-Fatakhari, A., Portahari, M., & Sadeghi Saqdel, H. (2019). analysis of the acceptance level of solar energy technology in rural areas, case study: rural areas of Kalibar and Shahresenan Khoda Afarin - East Azerbaijan Province). Human Geography Research, 52(1), 283-301. Doi:10.22059/JHGR.2018.243382.1007561. [In Persian]. Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research?–Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia ruralis, 52(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x Nunes, A. M. M., Coelho Junior, L. M., Abrahão, R., Santos Júnior, E. P., Simioni, F. J., Rotella Junior, P., & Rocha, L. C. S. (2023). Public Policies for Renewable Energy: A Review of the Perspectives for a Circular Economy. Energies, 16(1), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010485. Omer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 12(9), 2265-2300. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001 Omer, A. M. (2013). Renewable energy technologies and sustainable development. African Journal of Engineering Research, 1(4), 102-116. DOI: 10.23880/JENR-16000123. Qanadian, M., & Adhami, M. (2014). the role of the government in the development of renewable energies. the third national conference on climate, building and optimization of energy consumption with a sustainable development approach, Islamic Azad University Jaseb Branch, 1-9. [In Persian]. Raza, M. Y., Wasim, M., & Sarwar, M. S. (2020). Development of Renewable Energy Technologies in rural areas of Pakistan. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 42(6), 740-760. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1588428. Sadat Zamardian, Z., & Tahsildoost, M. (2009). Capacities, obstacles and incentives for the development of clean energy in the villages of Iran. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 165, 17-32. [In Persian]. Sajjadi Asal, M., Tawakliniya, J., Ghorchi, M., & Sarafi, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of urban low-income housing policies in Iran, China, Australia, England and the United States of America. human geography research, 54(1), 289-315. Doi:10.22059/JHGR.2021.311053.1008181 [In Persian]. Sitdhiwej, C. (2005). Laws in Thailand promoting renewable energy. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 23(2), 205-222. DOI: 10.1080/02646811.2005.11433401. Soltero, V. M., R. Chacartegui, C. Ortiz, and R. Velázquez. 2018. Potential of biomass district heating systems in rural areas. Energy 156:132–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.051 Standar, A., Kozera, A., & Satoła, Ł. (2021). The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland. Energies, 14(2), 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020450. Tahamipour, M., Abedi, S., Karimi Baba Ahmadi, R., & Ebrahimizadeh, M. (2015). Investigating the impact of renewable energies on the real economic growth of Iran per capita. Iran Energy Economics Research Journal, 5(19), 77- 53. https://doi.org/10.22054/jiee.2017.7304 [In Persian]. Ünal, E., & Shao, J. (2019). A taxonomy of circular economy implementation strategies for manufacturing firms: Analysis of 391 cradle-to-cradle products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 754-765. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.291 Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy policy, 38(6), 2655-2663. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 Wesseh Jr, P. K., & Lin, B. (2016). Can African countries efficiently build their economies on renewable energy?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.082 Wirawan, H., & Gultom, Y. M. (2021). The effects of renewable energy-based village grid electrification on poverty reduction in remote areas: The case of Indonesia. Energy for Sustainable Development, 62, 186-194. DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2021.04.006. Yegangi, S. K., & Ghasalmo, M. R. (2021). Investment Management on Renewable Energy. Quarterly of New Business Attitudes, 3(2), 61-54. [In Persian]. Zahnd, A., & Kimber, H. M. (2009). Benefits from a renewable energy village electrification system. Renewable Energy, 34(2), 362-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.011 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 263 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 174 |
||