تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,504 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,121,777 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,229,213 |
همگرایی فرهنگی و بازتعریف هویت مشترک در سازمان همکاری اقتصادی (اکو) | ||
مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
دوره 16، شماره 2، اسفند 1402، صفحه 149-174 اصل مقاله (901.08 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2023.352964.450123 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
حسین رفیع1؛ غلامعباس حسینی* 2 | ||
1دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری روابط بینالملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
اکو خاطرۀ گمشدۀ هزاران سال همزیستی ساکنان «قلب زمین» است. با شکلگیری سازمان همکاری اقتصادی، امیدهای فراوانی برای احیای امپراتوریهای پرشکوه این جغرافیا در طول تاریخ، زنده شد. توان نهفتۀ اکو برای تبدیلشدن به یک سازمان منطقهای بر کسی پوشیده نیست. اما پس از حدود چهار دهه فعالیت، اکو به جایگاه تعیینشده نرسیده است. اینکه «چرا سازمان همکاری اقتصادی (اکو) پس از چهار دهه، به اتحادیهای قدرتمند تبدیل نشده است؟» پرسشی است که در این نوشتار در پی پاسخ به آن هستیم. در پاسخ، این فرضیه مطرح میشود که «اکو برای تبدیلشدن به یک اتحادیه به بازتعریف هویت مشترک با واکاوی در ریشهها، پیوندها و زمینههای فرهنگی خود نیاز دارد». یافتههای نویسندگان نشان میدهد که هویت، ثابت و یکنواخت نیست. هویت اولیۀ سازمانهای منطقهای با هدفهای ویژهای شکل میگیرند. با مرور زمان و در اثر تحولات محیط بینالملل یا تغییرهای منافع ملی و بهدنبال آن سیاست خارجی کشورهای عضو، هویت سازمانها و اتحادیههای منطقهای تغییر میکند. بنیانگذاران اکو پیشتر با هدفهای سیاسی و امنیتی، همکاریهای منطقهای را تجربه کردهبودند. کشورهای عضو در جریان تحولات ساختاری و نهادی همکاریهای خود، هدفهای اقتصادی را بیشتر مورد توجه قرار دادند. این سازمان توان زیادی در گسترش همکاریهای فرهنگی دارد. در این نوشتار با کمک مفهوم فرهنگ، بازتعریف هویت مشترک اکو را بررسی میکنیم. نظریۀ برساختهگرایی بهعنوان چارچوب نظری، هدایتگر روند این پژوهش است. روش این پژوهش کیفی با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی و بر اساس مطالعۀ موردی است. شیوۀ گردآوری دادهها نیز کتابخانهای و با استفاده از اینترنت است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
برساختهگرایی؛ سازمان منطقهای؛ فرهنگ؛ میراث مشترک؛ همگرایی؛ هویت مشترک؛ اکو | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Cultural Convergence and Redefining Common Identity in the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Hosein Rafie1؛ Gholam Abbas Hosseini2 | ||
1Associate Professor, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
2A Ph.D. Candidate, International Relations, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Introduction: During many centuries humans realized the importance of co-existence and friendly interaction with their fellows for their survival against the surrounding dangers. It has long been believed that for peace and development, human societies must move towards integration and unity. In the last century, the first human attempts to create a regional union in Europe worked. The European Union was formed from the European Coal and Steel Organization. EU member states followed two important principles; one is peace and the other is a common identity with European roots. Although this union was economic in nature in the first step, but over the time, it was able to achieve its important goals and make Europe flourish in all areas. What the European Union has brought to the green continent is integration and common identity. After the successful experience of the European Union, other regions of the world were also encouraged to form regional organizations and unions. Since the formation of the European Union, regional organizations and associations have emerged one after another on every continent. ASEAN and SAARK in Asia, OAU and ECOWAS in Africa and MERCOSUR in South America were among the most important ones. Meanwhile, the Regional Cooperation for Development (RCD) was formed in the Middle East, which was dissolved in 1980 due to the revolution in Iran. In 1985, the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) was established at the initiative of Iran with the cooperation of Pakistan and Turkey (the same RCD members). Research question: “Why has the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) not yet become a successful union after four decades of activity?” Research hypothesis: To become Union, ECO needs to creat a common identity by analysing its roots, connections and cultural contexts. Methodology and theoretical framwork: To examine this hypothesis “Constructivism theory” has been chosen as the theoretical framework of the research. It will be a clear guide during the research. The method of this research is qualitative with a descriptive-analytical approach and based on a case study. The method of data collection is library and internet sources. Results and discussion: About four decades have passed since the establishment of the Economic Cooperation Organization. During this time, this organization has gone through many changes. ECO started working with the initiative of Iran in 1985 with the aim of becoming an efficient economic organization in the Middle East. A goal that became more unattainable over time. When seven Central Asian countries joined ECO in 1991, many observers expected it to become a successful union. The addition of the newly independent countries of Central Asia made this organization able to take steps toward realizing its long-standing goals, but now, after three decades, ECO is still not where it should be. The geographical area where ECO was established is a reminder of the thousands of years of co-existence of the people of this region far from today's political borders. With the formation and expansion of ECO, suddenly after the passage of several centuries, there were many hopes to return to the glorious days of the brilliant civilizations of this land. ECO is the epitome of the powerful "Heartland" empires throughout history. The legacy of centuries of co-existence for ECO; It is a rich culture by which it can help its member states to faciliate integration. Conclusion: The question of this research becomes important because by reviewing the experience of the formation of the European Union, we see that this organization, like ECO, it was initially a regional economic organization with the membership of several countries, which gradually became a strong organization and a powerful union. The European Union started the process of redefining a common regional identity. A “common culture” is what brings countries together in a regional organization. In order to find the answer to its question, this research has briefly investigated the background of the formation of ECO. By reviewing the history of the formation of ECO, it is clear that the identity of ECO has always been changing. According to integration theory of constructionism, identity is not a permanent subject and changes according to the conditions throughout history. The establishment of ECO Cultural Institute has been an important step in the direction of cultural convergence in this organization. However, one of the reasons why this organization could not achieve consensus, success and unbreakable bond and appear in the form of a union is the lack of real attention to its cultural points. Undoubtedly, what causes the integration and unification of a group and the formation of a union will be addressing the issue of culture and its recognition. Culture is a “common heritage” of a region and a union. By exploring the common heritage of ECO member countries, one can take a step towards defining a common identity for this organization. Topics such as history, Nowruz, language, art, religion and the Silk Road are the six main legacies of ECO's identity. Each of these great legacies is an important artery in the direction of the formation of dynamic identity and meaning for the ECO organozation. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Constructivism, Regional Organization, Culture, Common Heritage, Integration, Common Identity, ECO | ||
مراجع | ||
Adler, Nancy J and Zeynep Aycan (2018), “Cross-Cultural Interaction: What We Know and What We Need to Know”, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 307-333, (doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104528). Afzali, Rasoul and Ansari, Adel (2022), “Challenges and Opportunities of ECO Regional Integration: A Functionalist Appraoch”, Majlis and Rahbord, Vol. 24, No. 90, pp. 337-358, https://nashr.majles.ir/ article_212.html?lang=en (Accessed on: 29/12/2022). [in Persian]. Aghabakhshi, Ali and Afsharirad, Mimou (2010), A Dictionaey of Political Science, Tehran: Chapar [in Persian]. Bastani Rad, Hassan (2018), “Silk Road’s Chain of Inter-Cultural Bases and World Heritage in ECO Members”, Quarterly of Foreign Relations History, Vol. 17, No. 66, pp. 169-184, (doi: 20.1001.1.17352010.1395. 17.66.6.2) [in Persian]. Chiappa and Others (2018), “Cultural and Religious Tourism Development in Iran: Prospects and Challenges”, An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 204-214, (doi: 10.1080/13032917. 2017.1414439). Dehghani Firouzabadi, Seyed Jalal (2010), “Changes in the Theories of Regionalism”, Central Eurasian Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 99-116, https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_21155.html (Accessed on: 6/12/2022) [in Persian]. Elhami, Amir Hossein and Sajjadpour, Mohammd Kazem (2019), “Formation and Evolution of Regional Organizations: Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) (a case-study)”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 56, pp. 25-51, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1398. 15.56.2.9). Ghahremanpour Bonab, Rahman (2004), “Constructivism; From International Politics to Foreign Policy”, Strategic Studies Journal, Vol. 7, No. 24, pp. 299-318, https://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_1026.html (Accessed on: 8/12/2022) [in Persian]. Goli, Afsaneh (2020), “Analysis of the Role of the Scythians in the History of Ancient Iran”, Kharazmi Chronicle, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 92-106. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/450985 (Accessed on: 5/12/2022) [in Persian]. Haj Yousefi, Amir Mohamad; Shahriar, Fatemeh and Elhami, Amir Hussein (2012), “Elites and Regional Integration in Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO)”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 5, No. 10, pp. 41-60, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2012. 25027) [in Persian]. Hashi, Hossein Mokhtari (2021) “Interstate Rivalries within Regional Organizations Case study: Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO)”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 60, pp. 334-350. (doi: 20.1001.1. 17354331.1399.16.60. 15.7). Hassanzadeh, Mirrahmid (2016), “Why Nowruz was Registered Globally Again”, Available at: https://www.isna.ir/news/95091105812, (Accessed on: 12/12/2022) [in Persian]. Javaid, Umbreen and Siahmardy, Habibollah Javan (2020), “Globalization, Interdependence and Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO)”, South Asian Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 27-38, http://journals.pu.edu. pk/journals/index.php/IJSAS/article/view/3086 (Accessed on: 2/12/2022) Kaynak, Selahattin and Rashid, Yalda (2020), “Clustering of ECO Member Countries According to their Socio-Economic Indicators by Hierarchical Clustering Method”, Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 69-81, (doi: 10. 17218.hititsosbil.713776) Koolaee, Elaheh (1997), “Investigating the Areas of Divergence and Convergence Among ECO Members”, Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3-4, pp. 93-140, https://www.cmess.sinaweb.net/article_ 152054.html (Accessed on: 20/12/2022) [in Persian]. Koolaee, Elaheh (2000), ECO and Regional Integration, Tehran: Middle East Center for Scientific Research and Strategic Studies [in Persian]. Koolaee, Elaheh and Moaddab Mohammad (2009), Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO); Achievements and Prospect, Tehran: University of Tehran Printing and Publishing Institute [in Persian]. Koolaee, Elaheh and Somayeh Zanganeh (2022), “Cultural and Social Integration in Central Eurasia”, Human Geography Research, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 966-988, doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2021.314329.1008210 [in Persian]. Kouzegar Kaleji, Vali (2018), “Common Civilization and Cultural Spheres in the Fight Against Traditional and Modern Extremism in ECO region”, Quarterly of Foreign Relations History, Vol. 17, No. 66, pp. 151-168, (doi: 20.1001.1.17352010.1395.17.66.5.1) [in Persian]. Laursen, Finn (2008), “Theory and Practice of Regional Integration”, Jean Monnet / Robert Schuman Paper Series, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1-22, http://www.aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8219 (Accessed on: 26/12/2022). Li, Bozhong (2020), “The Termination of the Silk Road: A Study of the History of the Silk Road from a New Perspective”, Asian Review of World Histories, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 7-23, (doi: 10.1163/22879811-12340061). Liu, Morgan Y (2011), “Central Asia in the Post–Cold War World”, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 115-131, (doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145906). Mazaheri, Mohamadmahdi (2018), ECO Organization and Cultural Security of Member Countries, Tehran: ECO Cultural Institute [in Persian]. Mazaheri, Mohamadmahdi (2020), “Cultural Security of ECO Member Countries”, Scientific Quarterly of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 14, No. 41, pp. 59-88, (doi: 20.1001.1.17358663.1398.14.41.3.7) [in Persian]. Moradi, Masoud and Somaiah Khanipour (2011), “Baghdad Pact”, Journal of History of Foreign Relations, Vol. 12, No. 45, pp. 139-159, (doi: 20.1001.1.17352010.1389.12.45.7.2) [in Persian]. Mujahid, Noreen and Muhammad Ali (2015), “An Analytical Study of Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO): Challenges and Perspectives”, European Academic Research, Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 14031-14045, https://euacademic.org/ receivedArticle.aspx (Accessed on: 18/12/2022). Najafaqoli Najafgholi Nejaad, Azam and Hassanzadeh, Mohammad (2014) “Factors Enhancing Cooperation Among National Libraries of the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) Member States”, Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 86-109, https://www.sid.ir/paper/ 505965/fa (Accessed on: 14/12/ 2022) [in Persian]. Naqvi, Rashed (2015), “Persian Language and Cultural Communication in the ECO Region”, Quarterly of Foreign Relations History, Vol. 17, No. 66, pp. 43-48, https://www.hfrjournal.ir/issue_6310_8048.html (Accessed on: 9/12/2022) [in Persian]. Nowrozi, Hossein (2016), “Cultural Diplomacy and Historical Innovation in the Spiritual Climate of ECO”, Journal of History of Foreign Relations, Vol. 17, No. 66, pp. 75-100, https://www.hfrjournal.ir/ issue_6310_8048.html (Accessed on: 10/12/2022) [in Persian]. Omidi, Ali (2009), Regionalism in Asia a Look at ASEAN, SAARC and ECO Organizations, Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Printing and Publishing Center [in Persian]. Omidi, Ali and Aslani Aslemarz, Abed (2009), “Lessons from EU Regional Integration for ECO”, Journal of Planning and Budgeting, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 3-38, (doi: 20.1001.1.22519092.1388.14.2.1.2) [in Persian]. Pishdad, Saeed (2004), Convergence in ECO Organization, Tehran: Baz [in Persian]. Pomfret, Richard (1997), “The Economic Cooperation Organization: Current Status and Future Prospects”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 657-667, (doi: 10.1080/09668139708412465). Rahimi, Omid and Simbar, Reza (2022), “Political Components Affecting Iran-Tajikistan Relations (2010-2020): Substrates for the Transition from Divergence to a Stable Convergence Process”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 201-224, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2022.320801.449993) [in Persian]. Rashad, Ali Akbar (2013), “Definition of culture”, Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei Commemoration Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 121-148, https://rashad.ir (Accessed on: 10/12/2022) [in Persian]. Rehman, Abdur, and Mushtaq, Muhammad (2020) “US Sanctions on Iran: Implications for the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO)”, ASIAN Journal of International Peace & Security (AJIPS), Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 96-108, Available at: http://ajips.fairlips.org/index.php/ ajips/article/view/2020-vol-04-us-sanctions-on-iran (Accessed on: 10/12/2022). Romina, Ebrahim and Esfandyari, Abdolrahman (2018), “Patterning the Power Structure among ECO-Countries”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, 339-359, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2019.240264.449723) [in Persian]. Sajjadieh, Mohammad Ali (1989), A Research on the Common Ancestry of Iranians and Turanians, Tehran: Balkh publication [in Persian]. Sazmand, Bahareh (2014), “Identity and Ritual Representations of Nowruz in the Countries of the Iranian Civilization”, National Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 55-80, https://www.sid.ir/paper/88892/fa (Accessed on: 2/12/2022) [in Persian]. Shiva, Omid (2013), “Turan and Turanians in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh”, Great Khorasan Research Journal, Vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 37-45, (doi: 20.1001.1. 22516131.1392.3.12.3.2) [in Persian]. Shokoohi, Saeed and Hajiabadi, Morteza (2019), “Failure of Geopolitical and Geo-Cultural Commonalities to Integrate Iran and Central Asian Countries”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 149-164, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331. 1397.14.52.8.0). Takmil Homayoon, Nasser (2017) “Iran and Historical-Cultural Review of Countries in the ECO Region”, Journal of the History of Foreign Relations, No. 66, pp. 68-74, https://www.hfrjournal.ir/issue_6310_ 8048.html (Accessed on: 9/12/2022) [in Persian]. Taqvi Shawazi, Akbar (1996), “OPEC, ASEAN, SEATO, CENTO (Familiarization with International Organizations)”, Rushd Moalem Journal, No. 117, pp. 58-61, Available at: https://www.roshdmag.ir/fa/ magazine2/issue/accordionarchive/ 1374/7/20 (Accessed on: 13/12/2022) [in Persian]. “Acquaintance with ECO Cultural Institution, History” (2015), Available at: https://www.ecieco.org/fa/introduction/history (Accessed on: 2015/9/14). “Map of the Territory of Iran During the Achaemenid Period; Cyrus and Darius” (2018), Available at: https://www.iran-pedia.org/w/images/a/ac/ jpg (Accessed on: 2022/9/18), [in Persian]. “Supervisory Members of the Organization” (2017), Available at: https://www.eco.int/general_content/85362-Observers.html?t=General-content, (Accessed on: 2022/9/24). “The Map of Iran and Turan by Stieler” (1843), Available at: http://www.vambery.mtak.hu/img/03-019.jpg (Accessed on: 2022/9/29). | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 330 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 226 |