Evaluation of visual quality of ecological services of forest parks (Case study: Chaldareh Forest Park) | ||
| محیط شناسی | ||
| Article 5, Volume 49, Issue 4, January 2024, Pages 457-470 PDF (1.05 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jes.2023.361395.1008424 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Parasto Pahlavan1; Seyed Mohsen Hosseini* 2; Sareh Hosseini3 | ||
| 11- M.Sc. Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Mazandaran, Iran | ||
| 2Prof., Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran | ||
| 3Ph.D. Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari,, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Forest parks are one of the most important natural ecosystems of any country, which provide various functions and services for mankind. Therefore, their preservation is considered as one of the main goals of human activities. Nowadays, due to the role of forest park ecosystems in attracting tourists, the evaluation of their visual quality has become very important. Aesthetic quality is defined as the relative beauty of the landscape, which depends on the visual features including physical, biological and man-made elements present in a place. Knowing the effective factors and criteria in the visual quality of the image of the land, as a suitable tool for evaluating and locating areas with aesthetic-cognitive value, can help managers and planners in the selection and effective management of images with visual value. Therefore, the goal of this study is assessing the visual quality of the landscape of Chaldereh forest park of Tonkaben city located in Mazandaran province. In this research, the visual quality classification method (Q-Sort) was used to evaluate the visual quality of the forest park. The research data was gathered in the form of a field survey, random sampling and the completion of the Q-Sort questionnaire by 60 visitors to the forest park. The finding of assessing the visual quality of the landscape of Chaldereh-Tenkabon forest park with the method of visual quality classification showed that the main criteria for improving the visual quality of Chaldereh-Tonekabon forest park include the existence of natural features (mountains and hills), the relaxing atmosphere, open and panoramic views of the surrounding landscapes, and criteria like the lack of integration of buildings and vegetation and the lack of balance, visual disturbance, and man-made elements are the main reasons for decreased landscape quality of this park. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Secondary nature; Ecosystem services; Aesthetic; Visual quality classification; Chaldareh | ||
| References | ||
|
Barzehkar, A. (2005). Parks and forest parks (location and design). Publications of Sari agricultural engineering and natural resources organization, 231 p. (In Presion)
Environmental Protection Organization (2012). Report of the detailed plan of Chaldare forest park, studies and preparation of the detailed plan of Chaldare forest park in Mazandaran province., 115 p. (In Presion)
Fathi, M., Derini, I. & Naravi, B. (2007). Plant landscape preferences of forest parks, case study: Chitgar forest park, Tehran. Municipalities Monthly, 86, 220-229. (In Presion)
Golchin, P., Naroei, B. & Behbahani, H. (2014). Study of user's preferences based on visual quality evaluation: The Case of Zahedan Mellat urban forest park. Journal of Environmental Studies (JES), 39(4): 203-193. (In Presion)
Hosseini, S., Oladi, J. & Amirnejad, H. (2021). The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 9052-9075.
Malhosseini Darani, K., Hosseini, S.M. & Falahatkar, S. (2019). Evaluation of visual quality of landscapes of Hyrcani forests using remote sensing and landscape metrics. Quarterly Journal of Tourism Research, 1(3), 77. (In Presion)
Mirkarimi, H., Saeidi, S., Mohammadzadeh, M. & Salmanmahini, A. (2014). PCA method in landscape visual quality assessment, case study: Ziarat watershed of Golestan province. Journal of Environmental Studies (JES), 40(4),451-462. (In Presion)
Nijnik, M. & Alexander, M. (2008). Analyzing public preferences concerning woodland development in rural landscapes in Scotland. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 86.
Ozkan, Y. (2014). Assessment of visual landscape quality using IKONOS imagery. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 4067- 4080.
Palmer, J. F. & Hoffman, R. E. (2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 54
Rafeeani, P., Mohammadzadeh, M. & Mirkarime H. (2015). Scenic visual quality assessment according to the perception-based approach; a pattern for better management of natural recreational areas (Case study: walking Tracks in Ziyarat Basin, Jahannama protected area). Environmental Researches, 5(9), 14-3. (In Presion)
Saeidi, S., Mohammadzade, M., Salman Mahiny, A. R. & Mirkarimi, S.H. (2013). Survey of Different Methods of Evaluating landscape aesthetic quality. Environment and Development Journal, 4(8), 70-59. (In Presion)
Saghebi, M., Mafi, E. & Watanparast, M. (2022). Evaluation and measurement of urban viability and factors affecting it (case study of Bojnourd city), Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 22(67), 335-350. (In Presion)
Sedaghati, A. & Dartoomi, Sh. (2019). Assessment of visual quality in the second nature based on the preferences of the users and its role in identifying Bojnord city (Case study: Parks within the city). Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 8(30), 58-39. (In Presion)
Shamshiri, S. (2015). Evaluation of the visual quality of the mirage of Goznehle Sanghar. Journal of Human and Environment, 35(4), 27-41.
Teymoorian, K. & Mir, S.M. (2019). Assessing the visual-spatial quality of the urban landscape over time (Case study: region 8, district 1 of Tehran). Journal of Urban Management Studies, 12(43), 15-26. (In Presion)
The website of the organization of forests, pastures and watershed of the country. (2022). (In Presion) | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 295 PDF Download: 303 |
||