سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,232
تعداد مقالات67,779
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,255,112
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,000,417
علی اکبری, سمیرا, قاضی نوری نائینی, سید سپهر, پورعزت, علی‌اصغر. (1402). فساد، پیشران نوآوری است یا مانع آن؟! یک رویکرد فراترکیب.. , 9(3), 114-130. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.95726
سمیرا علی اکبری; سید سپهر قاضی نوری نائینی; علی‌اصغر پورعزت. "فساد، پیشران نوآوری است یا مانع آن؟! یک رویکرد فراترکیب.". , 9, 3, 1402, 114-130. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.95726
علی اکبری, سمیرا, قاضی نوری نائینی, سید سپهر, پورعزت, علی‌اصغر. (1402). 'فساد، پیشران نوآوری است یا مانع آن؟! یک رویکرد فراترکیب.', , 9(3), pp. 114-130. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.95726
علی اکبری, سمیرا, قاضی نوری نائینی, سید سپهر, پورعزت, علی‌اصغر. فساد، پیشران نوآوری است یا مانع آن؟! یک رویکرد فراترکیب.. , 1402; 9(3): 114-130. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.95726

فساد، پیشران نوآوری است یا مانع آن؟! یک رویکرد فراترکیب.

سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 9، شماره 3، 1402، صفحه 114-130    اصل مقاله (2.09 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله مروری
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jppolicy.2023.95726
نویسندگان
سمیرا علی اکبری1؛ سید سپهر قاضی نوری نائینی* 2؛ علی‌اصغر پورعزت3
1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2دانشیار، گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
3استاد مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش به­دنبال تبیین اثر فساد بر نوآوری در منابع علمی کنونی می­باشد و به مفهوم­پردازی اجزا و ابعاد اثرات فساد بر نوآوری برای انجام پژوهش ­های آتی در این زمینه پرداخته است. در این پژوهش از روش فراترکیب با راهبرد تحلیل محتوای ­کیفی با رویکرد قیاسی در چارچوب پژوهشی اسنادی استفاده شده و با به‌کارگیری رویکرد مرور سیستماتیک و فراترکیب کیفی، به تحلیل نتایج و یافته‌های محققین قبلی پرداخته و مدل مفهومی اثرات فساد بر نوآوری را ارائه است. بر اساس کدگذاری انجام گرفته، عوامل مؤثر بر جهت­ گیری اثرات فساد بر نوآوری در 44 مقوله اصلی و 2 کد محوری تحلیل و دسته‌بندی شدند. پیامدهای مثبت فساد بر نوآوری شامل 23 عامل و پیامدهای منفی آن شامل 21 عامل بودند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد فساد در کشورها بر نوآوری و رشد اقتصادی تأثیر دارد. جهت این تأثیرات گاهی مثبت و گاهی منفی است، اما در درازمدت این اثر منفی می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
فساد؛ نوآوری؛ اقتصاد؛ تحقیق‌وتوسعه؛ فراترکیب
عنوان مقاله [English]
Is Corruption a Driver of Innovation or an Obstacle to It?! A Meta Synthesis Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Samira Aliakbari1؛ Sepehr Ghazinoory2؛ Ali Aesghar Pourezzat3
1Ph.D. Candidate of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Iran. 1. دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3Professor, College of Management & Faculty of governance, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
This study seeks to explain the effect of corruption on innovation in current scientific sources and conceptualizes the components and aspects of the effects of corruption on innovation for future research in this field.In this research, a meta-Synthesis method with qualitative content analysis strategy was used in the research-documentary framework, and by applying systematic review and qualitative meta-Synthesis approach, the results and findings of previous researchers were analyzed, and a conceptual model of the effects of corruption on innovation was presented.Based on the coding, the effective factors in the direction of the effects of corruption on innovation were analyzed and categorized into 44 main categories and 2 core codes. The positive consequences of corruption on innovation include 23 factors and its negative consequences include 21 factors. The results show that corruption in countries affects innovation and economic growth. The direction of these effects is sometimes positive and negative, but in the long run, this effect is negative.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Corruption, Innovation, Economics, Research and Development, Synthesis
مراجع
  1. Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International journal of management reviews, 8 (1), 21-47.
  2. Aghazada, E., & Ashyrov, G. (2022). Role of institutions in the corruption and firm innovation nexus: evidence from former Soviet Union countries. Post-Communist Economies, 34(6), 779-806.
  3. Aidt, T. S., & Leon, G. (2020). Corruption, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(2), 105930.
  4. Avnimelech, G., Zelekha Y., and Sharabi, E., (2013). The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in developed vs non-developed countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research Vol. 20 No. 3, 2014 pp. 237-262.
  5. Barasa, L. (2018): Corruption, transaction costs, and innovation in Africa, African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2018.1519061
  6. Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: a review of issues. Journal of economic literature, 35 (3), 1320-1346.
  7. Bukari, C., & Anaman, E. A. A. (2021). Corruption and firm innovation: a grease or sand in the wheels of commerce? Evidence from lower-middle and upper-middle income economies. Eurasian Business Review, 11, 267-302.
  8. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideals. The American Journal of Sociology, Cambridge, 349-399.
  9. DiRienzo, C., & Das, J. (2015). Innovation and role of corruption and diversity: A cross-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 15(1), 51-72.
  10. Cerdeira, J., & Lourenço, D. (2022). Does Corruption Impact Firm Innovation? Evidence from Portugal. Economies, 10 (7), 173.
  11. Chadee, D., Roxas, B., & Kouznetsov, A. (2021). Corruption, bribery and innovation in cee: Where is the link? Journal of Business Ethics, 174 (4), 747-762.
  12. Chien-Chiang Lee a, Chih-Wei Wang b, Shan-Ju Ho (2020). Country governance, corruption, and the likelihood of firms’ innovation. Economic Modelling, DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.01.013
  13. Chung, Y. L., Tan, H. C. P., How, C. X., & Tan, C. E. (2022). The impact of corruption on innovation activities: the case of Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, UTAR).
  14. Dempster, G., & Isaacs, J. (2017). Entrepreneurship, corruption and economic freedom. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 6(2), 181-192.
  15. Diaby, A., & Sylwester, K. (2015). Corruption and market competition: Evidence from post-communist countries. World Development, 66, 487-499.
  16. Dincer, O. (2019). Does corruption slow down innovation? Evidence from a cointegrated panel of US states. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 1-10.
  17. Doan, H. Q., Vu, N. H., Tran-Nam, B., & Nguyen, N. A. (2022). Effects of tax administration corruption on innovation inputs and outputs: evidence from small and medium sized enterprises in Vietnam. Empirical Economics, 62 (4), 1773-1800.
  18. Drine, I., (2012). Institutions, governance and technology catch-up in North Africa. Econ. Modell. 29 (6), 2155–2162.
  19. Drugov, M., (2010). Competition in bureaucracy and corruption. J. Dev. Econ. 92 (2), 107–114. Enterprise Survey
  20. Dzhumashev, R. (2016). The Role of Income Uncertainty in the Corruption–Growth Nexus. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16 (2).
  21. Ellis, J., Smith, J., & White, R. (2020). Corruption and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55 (7), 2124-2149.
  22. Eveleens, C. (2010). Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications. Science, 800 (2010), 900.
  23. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (Free, New York).
  24. Ghazinoory, S., Amiri, M., Ghazinoori, S., & Alizadeh, P. (2019). Designing innovation policy mix: a multi-objective decision-making approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(4), 365-385. DOI:10.1080/10438599.2018.1500115
  25. Ghazinoory, S., & Hashemi, Z. (2021). Do tax incentives and direct funding enhance innovation input and                    output in high-tech firms?. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 32(1), 100394.
  26. Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D., & Sacerdote, B. (2002). An economic approach to social capital. Economic Journal, 112(483), 437-458 DOI:10.1111/1468-0297.00078
  27. Goedhuys, M., Mohnen, P., Taha T. (2016). Corruption, innovation and firm growth: firm-level evidence from Egypt and Tunisia. Eurasia Business and Economics Society. DOI 10.1007/s40821-016-0062-4
  28. Habiyaremye, A., & Raymond, W. (2017). How do foreign firms’ corruption practices affect innovation performance in host countries? Industry-level evidence from transition economies. Innovation: Organization & Management, DOI:10.1080/14479338.2017.1367626
  29. Heo, Y., Hou, F., & Park, S. G.  )2020): Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of investment or innovation? Different effects in advanced and emerging economies, Applied Economics, DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1791313
  30. Q., & Yuan. T. (2019). Does Political Corruption Impede Firm Innovation? Evidence from the United States. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. DOI:10.1017/S0022109019000966
  31. Imran, M., Rehman, H. U., & Khan, R. E. A. (2020). Effect of corruption on firm level innovation: Evidence from Pakistan. Economics and Business Letters, 9(1), 41-47.
  32. Imrana, S. M., Asgharb, N., & Rasulc, F. (2021). Does Firm Level Corruption Increase Innovation: A Case of Lower-Middle Income Economies. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15 (7), 287-297.
  33. Iorio, R., & Segnana, M. L. (2022). Is paying bribes worthwhile? Corruption and innovation in middle-income countries. Eurasian Business Review, 12 (3), 475-504.
  34. Kabadurmus, F. N. K., & Sylwester, K. (2020). Corruption and innovation: the importance of competition. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17 (3), 766-788.
  35. Kamali, Yahya. (2017). The Methodology of Meta Synthesis And Implications For Public Policy [Persian]. Politics Quarterly: Journal of Faculty of Law And Political Science, 47(3), 721-736. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/109986/en.
  36. Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Zopiatis, A. (2020). The role of innovation in promoting transparency and accountability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 238-243.
  37. Kakeh Baraie, Esmaeil, Delangizan, Sohrab, & Sohaili, Kiomars. (2018). Administrative Corruption and Its Impact on Entrepreneurship Velopment: Evidence From Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Institute [Persian]. JournalAL of Public Organizations Management, 6(1), 131-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/261470/en.
  38. Lee, C. C., Wang, C. W., & Ho, S. J. (2020). Country governance, corruption, and the likelihood of firms’ innovation. Economic Modelling, 92, 326-338.
  39. Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American behavioral scientist, 8(3), 8-14.
  40. Lima, M. M., & Hossain, M. I. (2021). “Is It Sanding or Greasing the Wheels”? Corruption and Innovation in South Asia.
  41. Lopes, C., Cerqueira, P., & Brandão, A. (2021). Innovation and corruption: Are there a vicious cycle? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120704
  42. Márquez-Ramos, L., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2010). The effect of technological innovation on international trade. Economics, 4(1), 20100011.
  43. Martins, L., Cerdeira, J., & AC Teixeira, A. (2020). Does corruption boost or harm firms’ performance in developing and emerging economies? A firm‐level study. The World Economy, 43(8), 2119-2152.
  44. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 110(3), 681-712.
  45. Méon, P.-G., Sekkat, K. (2005). Does Corruption Grease or Sand the Wheels of Growth. Public Choice, January, 122 (1), 69–97.
  46. Mohammad, S., & Husted, B. W. (2021). Innovation, new ventures, and corruption: Evidence from India. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 16, e00256.
  47. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Johnston, M. (2021). The quality of government and corruption: A twenty-year review. Annual Review of Political Science, 24, 363-382.
  48. Nadeem, M. A., Liu, Z., Zulfiqar, S., Younis, A., & Xu, Y. (2021). Does corruption impede innovation in developing economies? Insights from Pakistan: a call for policies reforms. Crime, Law and Social Change, 75, 93-117.
  49. Nguyen, N. A., Doan, Q. H., Nguyen, N. M., & Tran-Nam, B. (2016). The impact of petty corruption on firm innovation in Vietnam. Crime, Law and Social Change, 65 (4), 377-394.
  50. Nguyen, T. H. (2021). Corruption and Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Cross-country Analysis. Available at SSRN 385147
  51. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3rd edition, Paris: OECD
  52. Pluskota, A. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Economic Growth and Innovation in an Economy in Developed European Countries. Annales Universitatis Maria Curie-Sokolowski, Section H Economía, 54 (2), 77-87.
  53. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value: A fundamental shift in thinking about the role of business in society. Harvard Business Review, 97(6), 62-77.
  54. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value: A fundamental shift in thinking about the role of business in society. Harvard Business Review, 97 (6), 62-77
  55. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.
  56. Riaz, M. F., & Cantner, U. (2019). Revisiting the relationship between corruption and innovation in developing and emerging economies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 73, 395-416.
  57. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102.
  58. Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2021). What is quality of government? A theory-driven conceptualization. Governance, 34(4), 763-780.
  59. Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128, with a new preface by the author. Harvard University Press.
  60. Shaw, P., Katsaiti, M. S., Jurgilas, M. (2011). Corruption and Growth under Weak Identification. Economic Inquiry, 49 (1), 264–275.
  61. Shaghaghi Shari, Vahid, & Karim, Mohammad Hossein. (2016). Corruption And Endogenous Economy, In Accordance With Resistive Economy (Case Study: Iran)  [Persian]. Journal Of The Marco And Strategic Policies, 4(Resistive Economy Special), 63-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244390/en.
  62. Shi, X. (2022). Corruption and innovation in China. Available at SSRN 4108921.
  63. Smith, N., Thomas, E., & Antoniou, C. (2014). Multi-national firms, corruption and innovation in Russia. In Multinational Enterprises, Markets and Institutional Diversity (pp. 347-371). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  64. Tirole, J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). The Review of Economic Studies, 63 (1), 1-22.
  65. Tomaszewski, M. (2018). Corruption-a dark side of entrepreneurship. Corruption and innovations. Prague Economic Papers, 27(3), 251-269.
  66. Tong, J. L., Ran, Z. H., Shen, J., Zhang, C. X., & Xiao, S. D. (2007). Meta‐analysis: the effect of supplementation with probiotics on eradication rates and adverse events during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 25(2), 155-168.
  67. Twiss, B. C., & Goodridge, M. (1989). Managing technology for competitive advantage: integrating technological and organizational development: from strategy to action. (No Title).
  68. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative science quarterly, 35-67.
  69. Wang, Y., Lee, Y., & Lin, H. (2019). Innovation and corruption in emerging economies: The moderating roleof governance quality. Journal of Business Research, 103, 542-554.
  70. Wei, S. J. (2000). How taxing is corruption on international investors? Review of economics and statistics, 82(1), 1-11.
  71. Winters, L. A., Han, E., & Charette, M. F. (2019). The relationship between innovation and good governance in developing countries. World Development, 122, 22-34.
  72. Xie, X., Qi, G., & Zhu, K. X. (2019). Corruption and new product innovation: Examining firms’ ethical dilemmas in transition economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 160 (1), 107-125.
  73. Yao, Q., Huang, L., & Li, M. (2019). The effects of tech and non-tech innovation on brand equity in China: The role of institutional environments. Plops one, 14 (5), e0215634
  74. Yu, F., Guo, Y., Lettic†, F., and J Barnes, S., (2018). Regional Anti-Corruption Effort, Political Connections And Firm Innovation Effort: Evidence From China.
  75. Zahed Gharavi, Mehdi, Karimi Potanlar, Saeed, Elmi, Zahra (Mila), & Gilak Hakimabadi, Mohammad Taghi. (2020). The Effect of Corruption on the Growth of the Iranian Economy: A Talent Allocation Approach [Persian]. Journal Of Economic Essays, 16(32), 269-296. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/401747/en.
  76. Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311 – 318.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 62
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 80


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب