News

Jalalinia, S., Fatehi, F., Dehghan banadaky, M., Rokhforoz, H. (2022). Interaction effects of season and dietary forage particle size on milk yield and composition in early lactating Holstein dairy cows. , 24(1), 23-33. doi: 10.22059/jap.2022.294366.623485
Somayeh Jalalinia; Farhang Fatehi; Mehdi Dehghan banadaky; Hossein Rokhforoz. "Interaction effects of season and dietary forage particle size on milk yield and composition in early lactating Holstein dairy cows". , 24, 1, 2022, 23-33. doi: 10.22059/jap.2022.294366.623485
Jalalinia, S., Fatehi, F., Dehghan banadaky, M., Rokhforoz, H. (2022). 'Interaction effects of season and dietary forage particle size on milk yield and composition in early lactating Holstein dairy cows', , 24(1), pp. 23-33. doi: 10.22059/jap.2022.294366.623485
Jalalinia, S., Fatehi, F., Dehghan banadaky, M., Rokhforoz, H. Interaction effects of season and dietary forage particle size on milk yield and composition in early lactating Holstein dairy cows. , 2022; 24(1): 23-33. doi: 10.22059/jap.2022.294366.623485

Interaction effects of season and dietary forage particle size on milk yield and composition in early lactating Holstein dairy cows

تولیدات دامی
Article 3, Volume 24, Issue 1, April 2022, Pages 23-33    PDF (465.77 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22059/jap.2022.294366.623485
Authors
Somayeh Jalalinia1; Farhang Fatehi* 2; Mehdi Dehghan banadaky3; Hossein Rokhforoz4
1MSc. Student in Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. PC:+983158777871
2Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. PC:+983158777871
3faculty member
4Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural and Natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. PC: 3158777871
Abstract
To investigate the interaction effects between season and dietary forage particle size on milk yield and composition, one hundred early lactating Holstein were allocated. Dietary forage particle size included long (7.7 mm) and fine (4.4 mm), were adjusted as an experimental treatment per season. The results showed that raw milk yield, protein, lactose and total solid percentage of milk were higher within spring compared to summer (p< 0.01). Milk yield and milk lactose percentage for cows fed fine forage particle size trended to be higher than cows fed long forage particle size. Also, the amount of dry matter consumed within two hours after feeding for summer was higher than spring. Totally results revealed that cows fed with fine forage particle size had more homogeneous feeding behavior pattern within both studied season than cows fed long forage particle size.
Keywords
Early lactating Holstein cows; forage particle size; heat stress; milk yield; milk composition
References

1. Allen JD, Hall LW, Collier RJ and Smith JF (2015) Effect of core body temperature, time of day, and climate conditions on behavioral patterns of lactating dairy cows experiencing mild to moderate heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science, 98: 118-127. 
2. Armstrong DV (1994) Heat Stress Interaction with Shade and Cooling. Journal of Dairy Science, 77: 2044-2050. 
3. Bailey AI, Fcrdman HA, Smith LW, and Sharma BK. (1990) Particle size reduction during initial mastications of forages by dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science,68:2084-2094. 
4. Baumgard, LH and Rhoads RP (2012) Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: Ruminant production and metabolic responses to heat stress. Journal of Animal Science, 90: 1855-1865. 
5. Beede DK and Collier RJ (1986) Potential nutritional strategies for intensively managed cattle during thermal stress.Journal of Animal Science, 62: 543-554. 
6. Bequette BJ and Backwell FRC (1997) Amino acid supply and metabolism by the ruminant mammary gland.Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 56: 593-605. 
7. Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA and Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic Response Indicators of Heat Stress in Shaded and NonShaded Feedlot Cattle, Part 1: Analyses of Indicators. Biosystems engineering, 90:451-462. 
8. Colditz PJ and Kellaway RC. (1972) The effect of diet and heat stress on feed intake, growth, and nitrogen metabolism in Friesian, F1 Brahman X Friesian, and Brahman heifers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 23: 717-725. 
9. Cowley FC, Barber DG, Houlihan AV and Poppi DP (2015) Immediate and residual effects of heat stress and restricted intake on milk protein and casein composition and energy metabolis-. Journal of Dairy Science, 98: 2356-2368. 
10. Fuquay JW (1981) Heat stress as it affects animal-roduction. Journal of Animal Science, 52: 164-174. 
11. Gao ST, Quan GJS, Sanz Fernandez XM, Baumgard LH and Bu DP (2017) The effects of heat stress on protein metabolism in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 100: 5040-5049. 
12. Greter AM, DeVries TJ and Von Keyserlingk MAG (2008) Nutrient intake and feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers: Effects of dietary dilution. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 2786-2795. 
13. Greter AM, Leslie KE, Mason GJ, McBride BW and DeVries TJ (2010) Feed delivery method affects the learning of feeding and competitive behavior in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 93: 3730-3737. 
14. Hall MB, Hoover WH, Jennings JP, and MillerWebster TK (1999) A method for partitioning neutral detergent soluble carbohydrates. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79: 2079-2086. 
15. Hutjens MF. (2008) Feed Efficiency Opportunities with 2008 Feed Cost. Proceedings 45th Florida Dairy Production Conference, Gainesville, April 29, 2008. 
16. Johnson HD, Ragsdale AC, Berry IL and Shanklin MD (1963) Temperature humidity effects including influence of acclimation in feed and water consumption of Holstein cattle. Missouri Agricultural experiment station Bullten 846, Columbia.17. Kadzere CT, Murphy MR, Silanikove N and Maltz E (2002) Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: A review. Livestock Production Science, 77: 59-91. 
18. Kononoff PJ and Heinrichs AJ (2003) The Effect of Reducing Alfalfa Haylage Particle Size on Cows in Early Lactation. In Journal of dairy science, 86 (4): 1445-1457. 
19. Luginbuhl JM, Pond KR, Burns JC and Russ JC (1989) Effects of Ingestive Mastication on Particle Dimensions and Weight Distribution of Coastal Bermudagrass Hay Fed to Steers at Four Levels 1, 2. Journal of Animal Science, 67: 538-546. 
20. Mertens DR (1997) Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 80(7): 1463-1481. 
21. Mertens DR (1987) Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. Journal of animal science, 64(5): 1548-1558. 
22. Mishra MF, Martz A, Stanley RW, Johnson HD, Campbell JR and Hilderbrand E (1970)Effect of diet and ambient temperaturehumidity on ruminal pH, oxidation reduction potential, ammonia and lactic acid in lactating cows. Journal of Animal Science, 30: 65-69. 
23. Mohammadi A, Fatehi F, Zali A and Ganjkhanlou M (2018) The investigation of interaction effects of feed bunk space and forage particle size on performance and feed consumption intensity within hours after feed delivery in Holstein female calves. Journal of Animal Science Researches,28:83-98(in Persian) 
24. National Research Council (1971) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 4th rev. ed. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. 
25. Polsky L and Von Keyserlingk MAG (2017) Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. Journal of Dairy Science, 100: 8645-8657. 
26. Ray DE and Roubicek CB (1971) Behavior of feedlot cattle during two seasons. Journal of Animal Science, 33:72-76.

Statistics
Article View: 95
PDF Download: 109


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb