تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,572 |
تعداد مقالات | 71,020 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,496,048 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,758,005 |
صورتبندی سوژۀ زن مدرن در گفتمانهای دورۀ مشروطه | ||
زن در توسعه و سیاست | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 22، شماره 2، تیر 1403، صفحه 319-352 اصل مقاله (678.4 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jwdp.2024.367444.1008399 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
زهره امیدی پور1؛ علی رجبلو* 2؛ سوسن باستانی3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری جامعهشناسی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران. | ||
2دانشیار گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران. | ||
3استاد گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
همزمان با رویارویی ایران با مدرنیتۀ غربی و شکلگیری تقابلات گفتمانی متأثر از آن، زنان، هویت و شرایط زندگی آنها بهعنوان یکی از مهمترین سوژهها مورد توجه قرار گرفت. به دنبال آن، دامنۀ وسیعی از گفتار پیرامون آنها در این گفتمانها شکل گرفت و زنان به یکی از محورهای تنازع تبدیل شدند. مقالۀ حاضر با بررسی گفتارهای شکلگرفته حول محور زنان در نوشتههای دورۀ مشروطه، با بهرهگیری از روش تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی به واکاوی نحوۀ صورتبندی سوژۀ زن مدرن در گفتمانهای برجستۀ این دوره میپردازد. هدف این پژوهش آن است که معنای سوژۀ زن مدرن در هر کدام از گفتمانهای دوره مشروطه و ایدئولوژیهای حاکم بر آنها را درک کنیم. همچنین به بررسی جایگاه هر کدام از گفتمانها و احراز موقعیت آنها در گفتمان مسلط بپردازیم. نتایج تحقیق نشان میدهد زن مدرنی که در تقابل با سنت شکل گرفت، در گفتمان تجددگرا بهمثابۀ سوژۀ مطالبهگر نقاد، در گفتمان سنتی، بهمثابۀ زن اروپاییمآب و بیقید است. گفتمان تلفیقی نیز در میانۀ این تنازع، به برساخت سوژۀ زنی میپردازد که بهمثابۀ زن آگاه شریعتمدار و تکلیفمحور در این کشاکش معنایی شناخته میشود. معنای برساختۀ گفتمان تلفیقی بهدلیل عدم تنازع آشکار با سنتهای مذهبی جایگاه بهتری بهدست آورده و توانسته است در ادوار دیگر نیز تداوم یابد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی؛ زن سنتی؛ زن مدرن؛ گفتمان؛ مدرنیته | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Discourse Formulation of the Modern Woman Subject in the Discourses of Constitutional Era | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Zohreh Omidipour1؛ Ali Rajabloo2؛ Susan Bastani3 | ||
1PhD Student of Sociology, Department of Social Science, Faculty of Social and Economic Science, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Social Science, Faculty of Social and Economic Science, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
3Full Professor, Department of Social Science, Faculty of Social and Economic Science, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Amidst Iran's confrontation with Western modernity and the subsequent discursive conflicts, women's lives, identities, and living conditions came to the forefront as prominent topics of discourse. This resulted in an extensive array of discussions concerning them, thereby transforming women into a subject of tension. This article analyzes the discourses that emerged concerning women in the writings of the Constitutional era. It employs critical discourse analysis to investigate how the modern woman subject was formulated in the most prominent discourses of this era. The objective of this study is to comprehend the ideologies that govern each discourse of the Constitutional era as they pertain to the modern woman subject. Additionally, the position and status of each discourse within the hegemonic discourse are examined. The results suggest that the progressive discourse presents the modern woman as a demanding and critical subject, having been formed in opposition to tradition. Conversely, the traditional discourse depicts her as a liberated and European-like figure. In the midst of these semantic disputes, the integrative discourse constructs the subject of a woman who is acknowledged as a conscientious, Sharia-compliant, and duty-oriented individual. The integrative discourse's construction of meaning, which avoided explicit conflict with religious traditions, attained a more advantageous position and has maintained its existence throughout subsequent eras. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse, Modernity, Modern Woman, Traditional Woman | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
Abadian, H. (2009). Old concepts and new ideas: A theoretical introduction to Iran's constitution. Tehran: Kavir. (In persian) Adamiyat, F. (1976). Ideology of Constitutional Revolution, Tehran: Payam. Aghagolzade, F. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Science and Cultural Publisher. (In Persian) Akbari, A. (2018). The Construction of Women Identity in Iranian Modernity and Its Reflection in Constitutional Revolution. Doctoral Dissertation. Kashan University: Department of social sciences. (In Persian) Arjmandi, M. (2010). The effectiveness of the discourse analysis model in the translated novel Sisters. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tarbiat Modarres: Tehran, Department of human science. (In Persian) Azadarmaki, T. (2001). Iranian Modernity; Intellectual and Taught Paradigms in Iran. Tehran: Publishing Office of Community. (In Persian) Bahrampour, Sh. (2000). Discourse and Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Discourse Culture (In Persian) Behnam, J. (2004). Iranian and Modernity Thought (3rd Ed.). Tehran: Farzan Rooz. (In Persian) Delavari, A. & Sadegh, A. (2019). Idea and Action in Gender Politics: An Investigation in Iran’s experience from 1891 to 1941. Journal of woman in Development and Politics, 17(2), 223-255. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2019.262472.1007460. (In Persian) Dijk, T. (2010). Studies in Discourse Analysis: from Text Grammar to Critical Discourse Analysis, Translated by translators team. Tehran: Media studies and Development office. (In Persian) Faircloughn, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (2002). Critical Discourse Analysis and Marketization of public discourse In Tolan, M., Critical Discourse Analysis, Vol. 2, London: Routledge Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Routledge. Farvardin, F. (2009). Gender Ideology in Constitutional Discourse. MCS Thesis. University of Allame Tababaee: Depatrement of social sciences. (In Persian) Feirahi, D. (1999). Power, knowledge and legitimacy in Islam, Tehran: Ney Publisher. (In Persian) Gholamreza-Kashi, M. J. (2000). The magic of speech: culture mentality and thinking system in second of Khordad elections, Tehran: Ayandeh Pooyan Cultural Institute. (In Persian) Jolliff, D. (2001). Discourse in Victor Tailor and Charles Winquist, Encyclopedia of Postmodernism. London: Routledge. Jorgensen, M., & Philips, L. (2010). Theory and Method in the Analysis of the Discourse. Translated by Hadi Jalili. Tehran: Ney Publisher. (In Persian) Kasraee, M. S. (2000). The Challenge of Tradition and Modernism in Iran. Tehran: Markaz. (In Persian) Khaniki, H. (2008). In the World of Dialogue: investigation about Discourse Evolution at the end of 20th century. Tehran: Hermes. (In Persian) Khosropanah, M. H. (2003). Goals and the fight of the Iranian woman from the Constitutional Revolution to the Pahlavi dynasty. Tehran: Payam-e Emrooz. (In Persian) Mils, S. (2003). Discourse. Translated by: F. Mohammadi. Zanjan: Third Millennium. (In Persian) Mirsepasi, A. (2005). Reflections on Iranian Modernity. Translated by: J. Tavaklian. Tehran: New Design. (In Persian) Nahid, A. (1989). Women in Constitutional Revolution. Tehran: Navid. (In Persian) Omidipour, Z. (2012). discourse analysis of women's resistance since Iranian Constitutional revolution) to the earlies of Pahlavi dynasty. Alzahra University, Department of social sciences and economic, Tehran. (In Persian) Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable Discourses, in: Applied Linguistics. Oxford University. Rafat-Jah, M. (2004). Women and the redefinition of social identity. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tehran: Department of Social Sciences. (In Persian) Rajabloo, A. (2017). Modernist Dictatorial Government in Iran. Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic History. (In Persian) Rostami, P., & Savagheb, J. (2019). The Socialization of women in the Pahlavi era, Possibility or refusal, Journal of History of Iran, 12(1), 17-47. https://doi.org/10.52547/irhj.12.1.17 (In Persian) Sadeghi, F. (2005). Gender, Nationalism and Modernity in Iran (Pahlavi Era). Tehran: Ghaside-Sara. (In Persian) Safiri, Kh., Jabarzade, S., & Hatami, A. (2015). A study of the amount of conflict between work and family roles among women (police and teacher) and factors affecting it. Quarterly Journal of Social and Development and Welfare Planning, 6(24), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2016.2000 (In Persian) Soltani, A. (2008). Power, Discourse and Language: Mechanism of Power in Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ney Publisher. (In Persian) Tajik, M. (2005). Other and Identity among Iranian, Tehran: Culture of Discourse. (In Persian) Tavakoli-Toroghi, M. (2002). Native modernism and rethinking history. Tehran: Pardis-e Danesh. Vahdat, F. (2004). Iran’s Intellectual Encounter with Modernity. Translated by: M. Haghighatkhah. Tehran: Qoqnoos. (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 367 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 270 |