سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,501
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,114,613
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,218,360
Ebrahimi, Mahdi, Kouroshi Zaer, Hossein, Daei Nabi, Milad. (1403). Innovation and Technology for Neutralizing Organizational Inertia: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach. , 58(1), 159-178. doi: 10.22059/aie.2024.370560.1884
Mahdi Ebrahimi; Hossein Kouroshi Zaer; Milad Daei Nabi. "Innovation and Technology for Neutralizing Organizational Inertia: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach". , 58, 1, 1403, 159-178. doi: 10.22059/aie.2024.370560.1884
Ebrahimi, Mahdi, Kouroshi Zaer, Hossein, Daei Nabi, Milad. (1403). 'Innovation and Technology for Neutralizing Organizational Inertia: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach', , 58(1), pp. 159-178. doi: 10.22059/aie.2024.370560.1884
Ebrahimi, Mahdi, Kouroshi Zaer, Hossein, Daei Nabi, Milad. Innovation and Technology for Neutralizing Organizational Inertia: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach. , 1403; 58(1): 159-178. doi: 10.22059/aie.2024.370560.1884

Innovation and Technology for Neutralizing Organizational Inertia: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach

Advances in Industrial Engineering
دوره 58، شماره 1، شهریور 2024، صفحه 159-178    اصل مقاله (550.01 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/aie.2024.370560.1884
نویسندگان
Mahdi Ebrahimi* 1؛ Hossein Kouroshi Zaer2؛ Milad Daei Nabi3
1Associate Professor, Business Management Department, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2M.Sc., Business Management, Business Management Department, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
3Ph.D. Candidate, Business Management, Business Management Department, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
In today's competitive business environment, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, survival hinges on the ability to innovate. Business Model Innovation (BMI) plays a pivotal role in driving competitiveness and enhancing performance. However, many organizations face organizational inertia, which can impede their ability to adapt to environmental changes, limiting their capacity to evolve. Organizational competencies and capabilities may play a crucial role in how businesses respond to these challenges. This study investigates the relationship between organizational inertia and BMI, focusing on the moderating effects of open innovation competencies and Information Technology (IT) ambidexterity. The research targets software companies in Tehran Province, Iran, within the ICT industry. The findings reveal that organizational inertia has a significant negative effect on BMI, highlighting the need to address inertia to foster business model innovation. Additionally, open innovation competencies serve as a key moderator in this relationship, suggesting the importance of developing these skills within organizations. Conversely, the moderating effect of IT ambidexterity was found to be insignificant.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Organizational Inertia؛ Business Model Innovation؛ Open Innovation Competencies؛ IT Ambidexterity
مراجع
  1. Remane, G., Hanelt, A., Tesch, J. F., & Kolbe, L. M. (2017). The business model pattern database—a tool for systematic business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(01), 1750004.
  2. Sun, J., Yao, M., Zhang, W., Chen, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016). Entrepreneurial environment, market-oriented strategy, and entrepreneurial performance: A study of Chinese automobile firms. Internet Research.
  3. Kim, S. K., & Min, S. (2015). Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business model benefit an incumbent? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 34-57.
  4. Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business strategy and the environment, 26(5), 597-608.
  5. Pan, L., Xu, Z., & Skare, M. (2023). Sustainable business model innovation literature: a bibliometrics analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 17(3), 757-785.
  6. Bachmann, N., & Jodlbauer, H. (2023). Iterative business model innovation: A conceptual process model and tools for incumbents. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114177.
  7. Godkin, L., & Allcorn, S. (2011). Organizational resistance to destructive narcissistic behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 559-570.
  8. Tsai, K. H., Hsieh, M. H., & Hultink, E. J. (2011). External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: The moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(3), 184-200.
  9. Haag, S. (2014). Organizational inertia as barrier to firms’ IT adoption–multidimensional scale development and validation.
  10. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003-a). Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  11. Obradović, T., Vlačić, B., & Dabić, M. (2021). Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda. Technovation, 102, 102221.
  12. Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537-562.
  13. Van de Wetering, R., & Versendaal, J. (2021). Information technology ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability, and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: Empirical study. JMIRx Med, 2(4), e32336
  14. Benitez, J., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Information & Management, 55(4), 508-523.
  15. Tai, J.C., Wang, E.T., & Yeh, H. (2019)." A study of IS assets, IS ambidexterity, and IS alignment: the dynamic managerial capability perspective". Inf. Manag., 56, 55-69.
  16. Peng, M. Y. P., Lin, K. H., Peng, D. L., & Chen, P. (2019). Linking organizational ambidexterity and performance: The drivers of sustainability in high-tech firms. Sustainability, 11(14), 3931.
  17. Mohamad yari, Z., Sepahvand, R., Vahdati, H., & moosavi, S. N. D. (2018). Evaluating the Maturity of Human Resource Management Processes Based on Philips Model. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 10(1), 51-76.
  18. Manteghi, M., & Sabeti Saeedi, F. (2013). Business models; principles, evaluation, innovation. Roshd-e-Fanavari, 3(35), 1.
  19. Pahlavan Ravi, M., & Naseri, B. (2021). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Inertia on Innovation with Respect to the Mediating Role of Job Security of Social Security Employees. Journal of Management and Sustainable Development Studies, 1(2), 95-119.
  20. Jui-Chan, H., Lu, C., Hao-Ming, W., Ching-Tang, H., & Hui-Wen, W. (2020). The Study of Organizational Inertia, Business Model Innovation and Organizational Performance in Taiwan Financial Institutions: Organizational Learning Perspective. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(5), 104.
  21. Latilla, V. M. M., Urbinati, A., Cavallo, A., Franzò, S., & Ghezzi, A. (2021). Organizational re-design for business model innovation while exploiting digital technologies: A single case study of an energy company. International journal of innovation and technology management, 18(02), 2040002.
  22. Liao, S., Fei, W.-C., & Liu, C.-T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183–195.
  23. Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763.
  24. Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012). Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS quarterly, 21-42.
  25. Shekhar Mishra, S., & Saji, K. B. (2013). Moderating roles of organizational inertia and project duration in the NPD process: an empirical investigation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(1), 52-64.
  26. Babazade, T., dostar, M., & moradi, M. (2019). The Impact of Learning on Innovation by Moderating Role of Organizational Inertia. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 9(2), 165-198.
  27. Mohammadi, J., Nadaf, M., & Safarian, S. (2017). Explaining the effect of organizational trust and organizational health on resistance to change in the government employees by considering the mediated role of organizational commitment (The case: Municipality of Ahvaz). Journal of Public Administration, 9(1), 85-106
  28. Teofilus T, Ardyan E, Sutrisno TFCW, Sabar S and Sutanto V (2022) Managing Organizational Inertia: Indonesian Family Business Perspective. Front. Psychol. 13:839266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.839266.
  29. Luu, T. T. (2021). Knowledge sharing in the hospitality context: The roles of leader humility, job crafting, and promotion focus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102848. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S027843192030400X
  30. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research 3, 147-158 in Godkin, L, & Allcorn, S. (2008). Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 8(1), 82.
  31. Hedberg, B. & Wolff, R. (2003). Organizing, learning, and strategizing: From construction to discovery. In Meinolf Dierkes, Ariane Berthoin Antal, John Child, & Ikujiro Nonaka. (Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge. (535-556). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Kierser, A., Beck, N. & Tainio, R. (2003). Rules and organizational learning: The behavioral theory approach. In Meinolf Dierkes, Ariane Berthoin Antal, John Child, & Ikujiro Nonaka. (Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge. (598-623). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Godkin, L., & Allcorn, S. (2008). Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 8(1), 82.
  34. Liao, S. (2002). Problem solving and knowledge inertia. Expert Systems with Applications, 22(1), 21–31.
  35. Baker, M., & Collins, M. (2010). English commercial banks and organizational inertia: the financing of SMEs, 1944–1960. Enterprise & Society, 11(1), 65-97.
  36. Kim, D. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review 35(1), 37-50 in Godkin, L, & Allcorn, S. (2008). Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 8(1), 82.
  37. Kim, L. (1998) Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science 9(4), 506-519 in Godkin, L, & Allcorn, S. (2008). Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 8(1), 82.
  38. Litvin, S. S. (2016). Types of psychological inertia. TRIZfest-2016, 401.
  39. Gao, K., Yang, Y., Sun, L., & Qu, X. (2020). Revealing psychological inertia in mode shift behavior and its quantitative influences on commuting trips. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 71, 272–287.
  40. Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R., & Krogstie, J. (2018). Big Data enabled organizational transformation: The effect of inertia in adoption and diffusion. In Business Information Systems: 21st International Conference, BIS 2018, Berlin, Germany, July 18-20, 2018, Proceedings 21 (pp. 135-147). Springer International Publishing.
  41. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American sociological review, 149-164.
  42. Wirtz, B. W., & Wirtz, B. W. (2020). Business Model Management: Design-Process-Instruments. Springer.
  43. Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3–8.
  44. Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2003). Internet business models and strategies. New York: McGrawHill.
  45. Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1997). Marktführerschaft: Wege zur Spitze. München: Heyne.
  46. Linder, J. C., & Cantrell, S. (2000). Changing business models: Surveying the landscape. Hamilton.
  47. Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  48. Wirtz, Bernd W.; Piehler, Robert; Daiser, Peter (2015): E-government portal characteristics and individual appeal: An examination of E-government and citizen acceptance in the context of local administration portals. In Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 27 (1), pp. 70–98. In Wirtz, B. W., & Wirtz, B. W..Business Model Management: Design-Process-Instruments. Springer.
  49. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. In 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, e-Reality: Constructing the e-Economy, Bled.
  50. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
  51. Wirtz, B. W., & Wirtz, B. W. (2020). Business Model Management: Design-Process-Instruments. Springer
  52. Bashir, M., Alfalih, A., & Pradhan, S. (2023). Managerial ties, business model innovation & SME performance: Moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100329.
  53. White, J. V., Markin, E., Marshall, D., & Gupta, V. K. (2022). Exploring the boundaries of business model innovation and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Long Range Planning, 55(5), 102242.
  54. Kajtazi, K., Rexhepi, G., Sharif, A., & Ozturk, I. (2023). Business model innovation and its impact on corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114082.
  55. Jiang, S. G. (2023). The Impact of Management Innovation, Organizational Inertia, and Organizational Learning on Organizational Performance: A Case Study of the Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China. International Journal of Science and Business, 23(1), 91-105.
  56. Lindgardt, Z., Reeves, M., Stalk, G., & Deimler, M. S. (2009). Business model innovation. New York: Boston Consulting Group
  57. Geissdoerfer, M., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., (2016). Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 1218-1232.
  58. Dong, B. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Organizational Inertia Literature and Future Outlook. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(2), 119-123.
  59. Cavalcante, S., Kesting, P. and Ulhøi, J. (2011), “Business model dynamics and innovation: (re) establishing the missing linkages”, Management Decision, Vol. 49 No. 8, pp. 1327-1342.
  60. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management, 37(4), 1019-1042.
  61. Moradi, E., Jafari, S. M., Doorbash, Z. M., & Mirzaei, A. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 171-179.
  62. Nijssen, E.J., Hillebrand, B., Vermeulen, P.A.M. and Kemp, R.G.M. (2006), “Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 241-25.
  63. Peter, T. D. (2023). The role of tie variety in successful circular business model innovation The moderating role of managerial tie variety on the relation between organizational inertia and circular business model innovation.
  64. Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we've been and where we're going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20-27.
  65. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  66. West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software. R&d Management, 36(3), 319-331.
  67. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003-b). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.
  68. Carrasco-Carvajal, O., Castillo-Vergara, M., & García-Pérez-de-Lema, D. (2023). Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research. Review of Managerial Science, 17(2), 397-442.
  69. Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2023). Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining. Technovation, 119, 102447.
  70. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes.
  71. West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of product innovation management, 31(4), 814-831.
  72. Hafkesbrink, J., & Schroll, M. (2010). Organizational Competences for open innovation in small and medium sized enterprises of the digital economy. Competence Management for Open Innovation: Tools and It Support to Unlock the Innovation Potential Beyond Company Boundaries, 30(2), 21.
  73. Bashir, M., & Verma, R. (2019). Internal factors & consequences of business model innovation. Management Decision, 57(1), 262-290.
  74. Tushman, Michael L. and O’Reilly, Charles A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38: 1-23.
  75. Raisch, S. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008), “Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators”, Journal of Management, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 375-381.
  76. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization science, 20(4), 685-695.
  77. Lee, O. K., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility?. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398-417.
  78. Heckmann, C. S., & Maedche, A. (2018). IT ambidexterity for business processes: the importance of balance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(4), 862-881.
  79. Heckmann, C. (2015), “The impact of business process IT ambidexterity on business process performance”, Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
  80. Zhang, Y., Wang, N., & Hu, H. (2023, May). Developing IT Ambidexterity: Insights from Knowledge Interaction Between CIO and TMT. In Wuhan International Conference on E-business (pp. 83-95). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  81. Kusanke, K., & Winkler, T. J. (2022). Structural Ambidexterity through Bimodal IT–A Literature Review and Research Agenda.
  82. Chen, Y., Liu, H., & Chen, M. (2020). Achieving Novelty and Efficiency in Business Model Design: Striking a Balance between IT Exploration and Exploitation. Information & Management, 103268.
  83. Cochran W. G. (1977) Sampling Techniques (3rd Edn). Wiley, New York.
  84. Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&d Management, 47(3), 385-403.
  85. Zhen, J., Cao, C., Qiu, H., & Xie, Z. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on organizational agility: the role of IT ambidexterity. Information Technology and Management, 22, 53-65.
  86. Levin, Richard I. Statistics for management. Pearson Education India, 2011.
  87. Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  88. Preacher, K. J. (2006). Testing complex correlational hypotheses with structural equation models. Structural equation modeling, 13(4), 520-543.
  89. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. (2018). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling.
  90. DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2(3), 292–307.
  91. Wang, P., Li, T., Wu, Z., Wang, X., Jing, J., Xin, J., ... & Dai, B. (2023). The development of career planning scale for junior high school students based on cognitive information processing theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1106624.
  92. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategies Managed Journal, 20(2), 195–204.
  93. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  94. Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. (2015). Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. MIS Quarterly. 39(2): 297-316.
  95. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328–388.
  96. Lu, L., Wang, L., Yang, X., & Feng, Q. (2009). Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview: development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 63(6), 730-734.
  97. Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 14.
  98. Di Bucchianico, A. (2008). Coefficient of Determination (R2). Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability.
  99. Chin W.W. (2010). How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses, In: Esposito Vinzi V., Chin W., Henseler J., Wang H. (eds). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 655-690.
  100. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
  101. Henseler, J., Fassott, G., Dijkstra, T. K., & Wilson, B. (2012). Analysing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 99-112.
  102. Doostar, M., Mombeini, Y., & Goodarzi, M. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Changes with an Emphasis on the Mediating Role of Political Intelligence. Public Organizations Management, 4(3), 85-104.
  103. Khashei, V., Mohammadi Nasab, A., & Mahdizadeh, E. (2016). An exploration of the relationship between organizational inertia with business model innovation and performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, from the perspective of open innovation. Organizational Culture Management, 14(4), 1111-1136.
  104. Jafari, Seyed Mohammadbagher., Mohammadi Doorbash, Zahra., Mirzaei, Ashraf (2019). The impact of organizational inertia on innovation and innovation on performance, Journal of Technology Development Management, 6(4), 153-175.
  105. Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, Contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: a comparative study of UK and C hinese high‐tech Firms. British Journal of management, 25(1), 58-76.
  106. Kasaeeian Naeeni, Mohammad. (2017). Impact of organizational ambidexterity on organizational agility with the mediating role of knowledge sharing (Case: Gaz Soozan Najafabad Co). Master’s Thesis. Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University.
  107. Smith WK. (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal 57: 1592-1623.
  108. Syed, T. A. (2018). IT ambidexterity: a competitive IT capability for high-tech SMEs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 342
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 95


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب